Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
engine deck height on 78 bus
Page: Previous  1, 2
Forum Index -> Bay Window Bus Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 21519
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:13 am    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

Agree with WT.....you can probably get away with a head gasket of .030". Then check with play-doh with the heads on and valves moving yo make sure you have no interference....and you shouldn't.

As for compression and tight deck...aslo agree with WT. A slight rise in compression will do the 2.0 just fine....especially if its done with a tight deck and not a small combustion chamber.

Vw set the compression at 7.3 back in the mid to late 70s. Fuel quality sucked.....tires were less efficient in rolling.....and part of that was done for reduced NOX emissions. If you are not somehwere where NOX emissions are critical....an extra 0.2 or even up to 0.4 compression increase will be just fine. Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Wildthings
Samba Member


Joined: March 13, 2005
Posts: 50350

Wildthings is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:16 am    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

raygreenwood wrote:
Agree with WT.....you can probably get away with a CYLINDER BASE SHIM of .030".


Fixed it for you Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 21519
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:18 am    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

Wildthings wrote:
raygreenwood wrote:
Agree with WT.....you can probably get away with a CYLINDER BASE SHIM of .030".


Fixed it for you Wink



Embarassed ...dang....thank you! I was behind on my coffee dosage when I typed that!
Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 41031
Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:51 am    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

Guys - Mike you lived at altitude, and Ray you have never owned a bus. Running 8:1 on a 2.0L bay with today's alcohol based fuels will cook it. especially with used heads. That is just how it is. Gene Berg was well respected in AC VW's. He suggested even lower for all air cooled VW engines except racing ones. The only issue with that is that bays are already under powered and there is just a trade off which 7.3:1 is barely acceptable due to the heat. At 7.3:1 my heads on a 2L are at 405 - 415 F at 65 mph. My 1971 1600 at 8.5:1 never approached that. 350 F was normal day and night around the clock with that engine. The cooling system on a 2L was designed for a 1700 engine. It can't handle the heat. You never hear of a 2L bus that died because it was too cold.

Quote:
Engine Recommendations » Here's What We Recommend


Stock, single carb engines: Not more than 6.6 for 87 octane to 6.9:1 for 91 octane. These recommendations are for the conventional head chamber. When the heads are properly semi-hemi cut you can increase these numbers by 0.3 points. Stock VW's originally had about 7.3:1 and this should be reduced to 6.6:1 when you intend to use 87 to 91 octane gas with the stock combustion chamber or 6.9:1 with the semi-hemi cut head.
Unleaded gas is no problem with any head combination that has the original factory stock heads of 1967 or later as they have the hard chrome stem valves required for unleaded fuel.

Dual carbs such as our GB 476-477A Kadrons with or without head work use 6.6:1 to 6.9:1 compression in correlation to the octane rating and chamber design. Dual Weber carbs such as our GB 479 and ported heads, use 6.9 to 7.1:1 compression.

Dual Weber carbs, welded big valve heads and large tube exhaust use 7.1 or 7.3:1 compression with the Semi-Hemi cut heads. All of the above recommendations are for sea level operation. Vehicles that ALWAYS run at high altitudes may run higher CR. See GB 801-HEADS, GB 801-CR or send a self-stamped envelope for high altitude formulas.

The duration of the cam has nothing to do with octane requirements. Just because you install a longer duration cam it will not allow you to run extra compression. Remember, conservative compression ratios 6.6:1 with normal combustion chamber and 6.9:1 (plus 0.3) if using semi-hemi heads, be sure to add 4 degrees more timing with the semi-Hemi cut heads to make the most power.

This will live longer and run cooler with better economy when 87 to 91 octane fuel is used.

Extreme high performance street cars driven regularly on the street with some race use, can also provide superior-to-stock VW life when the correct components are used. The gasoline octane rating must match the demands of the engine to achieve long life. For technical literature on CR vs. Octane, and formulas you can use to calculate your needs, order GB 801-CR.

Again, many people find our engine kits provide a package that works best for them or will use these as guide lines to create their own engine needs.

(from Gene Berg at https://www.geneberg.com/article.php?ArticleID=156 )
_________________
“Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 21519
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:38 pm    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

SGKent wrote:
Guys - Mike you lived at altitude, and Ray you have never owned a bus. Running 8:1 on a 2.0L bay with today's alcohol based fuels will cook it. especially with used heads. That is just how it is. Gene Berg was well respected in AC VW's. He suggested even lower for all air cooled VW engines except racing ones. The only issue with that is that bays are already under powered and there is just a trade off which 7.3:1 is barely acceptable due to the heat. At 7.3:1 my heads on a 2L are at 405 - 415 F at 65 mph. My 1971 1600 at 8.5:1 never approached that. 350 F was normal day and night around the clock with that engine. The cooling system on a 2L was designed for a 1700 engine. It can't handle the heat. You never hear of a 2L bus that died because it was too cold.

Quote:
Engine Recommendations » Here's What We Recommend


Stock, single carb engines: Not more than 6.6 for 87 octane to 6.9:1 for 91 octane. These recommendations are for the conventional head chamber. When the heads are properly semi-hemi cut you can increase these numbers by 0.3 points. Stock VW's originally had about 7.3:1 and this should be reduced to 6.6:1 when you intend to use 87 to 91 octane gas with the stock combustion chamber or 6.9:1 with the semi-hemi cut head.
Unleaded gas is no problem with any head combination that has the original factory stock heads of 1967 or later as they have the hard chrome stem valves required for unleaded fuel.

Dual carbs such as our GB 476-477A Kadrons with or without head work use 6.6:1 to 6.9:1 compression in correlation to the octane rating and chamber design. Dual Weber carbs such as our GB 479 and ported heads, use 6.9 to 7.1:1 compression.

Dual Weber carbs, welded big valve heads and large tube exhaust use 7.1 or 7.3:1 compression with the Semi-Hemi cut heads. All of the above recommendations are for sea level operation. Vehicles that ALWAYS run at high altitudes may run higher CR. See GB 801-HEADS, GB 801-CR or send a self-stamped envelope for high altitude formulas.

The duration of the cam has nothing to do with octane requirements. Just because you install a longer duration cam it will not allow you to run extra compression. Remember, conservative compression ratios 6.6:1 with normal combustion chamber and 6.9:1 (plus 0.3) if using semi-hemi heads, be sure to add 4 degrees more timing with the semi-Hemi cut heads to make the most power.

This will live longer and run cooler with better economy when 87 to 91 octane fuel is used.

Extreme high performance street cars driven regularly on the street with some race use, can also provide superior-to-stock VW life when the correct components are used. The gasoline octane rating must match the demands of the engine to achieve long life. For technical literature on CR vs. Octane, and formulas you can use to calculate your needs, order GB 801-CR.

Again, many people find our engine kits provide a package that works best for them or will use these as guide lines to create their own engine needs.

(from Gene Berg at https://www.geneberg.com/article.php?ArticleID=156 )


There you go again...making statements without having facts.

Actually I have owned a bus....and worked on many....and plenty of 2.0's...and in fact over the decades....I have worked on TUNING and drivability of 2.0's more than I have actually working on engine rebuilds for 2.0's. So...just starting out...you are incorrect.

And....who suggested 8.0:1 compression ratio? The stock 7.3:1...especially with the normally enormous deck the 2.0 runs...runs them hot in the first place.
Running a 2.0 at 7.5:1 or 7.7:1 will run just fine. Been there...done that.

In fact the first tier of improvement...would be keeping 7.3:1 but reducing the deck from the .055" to .065" that is common at the piston edge with many 2.0's. That alone will drop cylinder temps and keep heat rise down on the heads a noticeable amount.

The second tier of improvement is getting a "slight" bump in compression...which further boost efficiency. Then limit your total advance by about 3-4* (after the hoses are hooked back up)....because with better compression and more efficient burn...you do not need as much advance to make the same specific HP. It runs cooler.

And...FACTUALLY...the alcohol in the fuel...heat wise...has nothing to do with the equation whatsoever.

Much as I hate ethanol for all of its other drawbacks....one of its main benefits other than oxygenation...is a cooler flame temp which is part of its lure for NOX emission reduction.

Octane is octane as well. If ethanol fuel has the octane....its not an issue. Just run premium.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 41031
Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:21 pm    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

OP - consider not running a .030" shim. If you do your next post may be how do I cool my motor down and stop the piston scuffing.

in 1991 VW added a .030" shim to the base of their cylinders and removed the head gasket only because they were dealing with heads that were new and had stock combustion chambers. They also added notches to the rods and increased piston to cylinder clearances to stop scuffing and seizing. If you increase the C/R you only move back towards that seizing and scuffing. Your heads are fly cut and no longer have the stock combustion chambers. The .030" shim in the VW TSB is for stock heads that have not been fly cut. I am also guessing that your case has been cut a little too, or the cylinder area of the case has collapsed a little. You have to use whatever it takes to get the C/R down.

Here is that 1991 TSB retroactive on all 2L Bays and Vanagon engines.

https://kentcomputer.com/77VW/techbull.pdf

Quote:
There you go again...making statements without having facts.


Ray - Your knowledge of polymers is wonderful. Be assured that VW had to detune bus engines to stop them from over heating. That is why Gene Berg finally came to the conclusion that he couldn't follow water cooled thinking in a VW air cooled engine, even a bug. Some folks like Skills take it a step further and just move to water cooled engines (like VW did). Ray - your thinking is fine in a 2L water cooled engine but on an air cooled bay the lower C/R is more important than the squish area. My comment on you not having experience with bays on a personal basis over any kind of mileage is based on what you told me you drove and had experience with.
_________________
“Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Wildthings
Samba Member


Joined: March 13, 2005
Posts: 50350

Wildthings is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:06 pm    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

SGKent wrote:
OP - don't run a .030" shim. If you do your next post will be how do I cool my motor down and stop the piston scuffing.

in 1991 VW added a .030" shim to the base of their cylinders and removed the head gasket only because they were dealing with heads that were new and had stock combustion chambers. They also added notches to the rods and increased piston to cylinder clearances to stop scuffing and seizing. If you increase the C/R you only move back towards that seizing and scuffing. Your heads are fly cut and no longer have the stock combustion chambers. The .030" shim in the VW TSB is for stock heads that have not been fly cut. I am also guessing that your case has been cut a little too, or the cylinder area of the case has collapsed a little. You have to use whatever it takes to get the C/R down.

Here is that 1991 TSB retroactive on all 2L Bays and Vanagon engines.

https://kentcomputer.com/77VW/techbull.pdf

Quote:
There you go again...making statements without having facts.


Ray - Your knowledge of polymers is wonderful. Be assured that VW had to detune bus engines to stop them from over heating. That is why Gene Berg finally came to the conclusion that he couldn't follow water cooled thinking in a VW air cooled engine, even a bug. Some folks like Skills take it a step further and just move to water cooled engines (like VW did). Ray - your thinking is fine in a 2L water cooled engine but on an air cooled bay the lower C/R is more important than the squish area.


VW was trying to make a bad problem worse by removing the head sealing rings and adding a super thick cylinder base gasket. The original head sealing ring was something like 0.024" and the original base gasket was something like 0.006" or 0.030" total and VW in their infinite wisdom or just plain bad math decided to use a base gasket that was 0.040" on top of a deck height that was already in the 0.040 range without any shims. This all but guaranteed that the engines would run hot. Had they just removed the head sealing ring and cylinder base gasket they would have had an engine that ran cooler and put out a bit more HP.

Added compression without knock will make for a more efficient engine which turns more heat into mechanical engine and when combined with a tighter deck which requires less advance will make an engine run cooler as substantially less heat is being released to the heads. That 20% longer it takes your engine to ignite the fuel in the cylinder translates into more time for heat to pass into the heads and pistons. Not only is the cylinder exposed to heat longer, but more of the piston and head are exposed longer to the hot combustion gases, kind of a double whammy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 41031
Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:22 pm    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

Doesn't 100% of the heat that isn't used for mechanical work either go out the tailpipe or somewhere out via one kind of cooling or another, radiation etc.? Wouldn't you rather have the heat going out the top large iron cooling fin than into the aluminum head, and aluminum piston, or soaking the valve and guide on its way out the exhaust? I am trying to get max cooling cause the engineer screwed up there instead of making HP. If the engineers got the cooling right we'd be making 120 HP on these T4 engines from the factory. But then again they were designed as slow speed utility trucks and people carriers, not freeway fliers.
_________________
“Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
timvw7476
Samba Member


Joined: June 03, 2013
Posts: 2205
Location: seattle
timvw7476 is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:22 pm    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

^^^^^This goes hand in hand with catalytic converters from mid70s.
maybe VW had an emissions reason to pack more heat in their 2.0s.
didn't even consider us 21st century operators back then.
EDIT: VW needed more heat to keep the cat cooking & tuned the 2.0
to do just that, almost all the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 41031
Location: Citrus Heights CA (Near Sacramento)
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:51 pm    Post subject: Re: engine deck height on 78 bus Reply with quote

they added the afterburner loops and F-pipes - lengthening the exhaust to improve torque and burn CO / HC's. The leaner mixtures kept the heat up. By 1979 when they were forced to go to 14.7:1 on California cars they had to add flanges to the exhaust and move the heater boxes back near the heads to help cool the heads. At that time they told the public they were done with air cooled engines beyond the first year or two Vanagons. CARB and EPA made it too costly to continue. Water cooled engines can be produced and managed as to emissions much cheaper. They also last longer and it was clear that the Europeans were going to need more power to keep up with American cars and "vans." Anyone 60 yrs to 70 yrs old (like me) remembers the way the public just went head over heels for the big American vans with V8's. They could pull boats, climb mountain passes on freeways quickly - and they had more room. VW got the max they could get out of the air cooled motors with the Porsche 6's. They were the descendants of the fighter aircraft of WWii before they went water cooled or into the private plane market - Continental, Lycombing etc. Now we are left to argue why Herman, Otto, and Peter designed things like they did or chose the C/R that they did. And yes - they had no thoughts what so ever we might be doing in 2018, some 40 years later. They are mostly gone since they were probably in their late 40's and early 50's when they designed these buses. The guys my age were still sharpening pencils for them and making copies of their work for the factory to follow.
_________________
“Most people don’t know what they’re doing, and a lot of them are really good at it.” - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Bay Window Bus All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.