Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR.
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:05 pm    Post subject: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

I am building two engines side by side for similar purposes: off road buggy. I have two cranks:

~1980 SCAT forged counterweighted, STD mains and .020 on the rod journals. This was BEFORE the groove around the mains for oiling. Main oiling holes are scalloped similar to later beetle crank.

-A recent DPR welded counterweighted, .010 on mains and .010 on rods.

One will be my lower-tune spare/daily engine, a 1835cc with rebuilt rods and stockish heads fed by a single 40 IDF on a CB intake. WEB 119.

The other will be my 1915 with full FAT intake and better heads fed by a single 44IDF. Web 218/119, I-Beams with 3/8 ARPs, CB rocker with elephant feet.

Which crank goes in which engine? Reasons? I can't decide because I don't know if either has any benefit for a given situation.
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vwracerdave
Samba Member


Joined: November 11, 2004
Posts: 15307
Location: Deep in the 405
vwracerdave is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:13 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Flip a coin, it probably doesn't matter for either engine. If I hade to choose I'd put the DPR crank in the 1915.

What cases do you have and what align bore? bearing thickness might be a deciding factor.
_________________
2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK
Featured in Dec. 2001 HOT VW's Magazine page 63

Watch my racing video's http://www.youtube.com/user/okvwracer/videos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:24 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Ooh thanks and good question!

Both cases are at .020 over line bore and one has a light thrust cut. Of course my AK case that was so young it still has a tight stock thrust is going to be the basis for my 1915.
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
esde
Samba Member


Joined: October 20, 2007
Posts: 5969
Location: central rust belt
esde is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2019 7:12 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

let the rods decide; if one set fits one of the cranks better than the other, there you have it. Should not be a difference, but there often is, even if it's just side clearance.
If there is no difference, flip a coin.
_________________
modok wrote:
Bent cranks are silent but gather no moss. I mean, ah, something like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 10:37 am    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

I like it! That's one of those things I would have realized when I was putting them together but not now, so your advice gives me the chance to be smarter about rod bearing purchases.

I take it the old SCATs from the 80s are actually all-american? Of course their modern cast cranks are import and I'm assuming their mid-grade forgings are as well.
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
mark tucker
Samba Member


Joined: April 08, 2009
Posts: 23937
Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
mark tucker is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 10:45 am    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

i wood go with scat every time if the cost is the same. if a welded crank is half the price it may be worth taking a chance if thats what you want to do. Ive had 3 welded cranks in my shop...all 3 were not right from the maker.... runout on the crank gear journal,weld filled oil galley holes and taper on the thrust surface...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
nsracing
Samba Member


Joined: November 16, 2003
Posts: 9467
Location: NOVA
nsracing is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 10:55 am    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

The old Scat cranks were forged one-piece and were very good! I used several full flanged ones and they held up to full drags.

The DPR with welded CW is fine for what you want. But the Scat is special if it is early 80's. I have 2-3 forged strokers from Scat still in cosmoline from way back.

I will use the DPR and save the Scat. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 11:26 am    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Haha well, I'll probably put the SCAT in my "spicy engine" then Smile here is the SCAT. My DPR actually checks out great too.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
nsracing
Samba Member


Joined: November 16, 2003
Posts: 9467
Location: NOVA
nsracing is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 11:41 am    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Sorry to tell you... but that may be one of the Volkstroke cast cranks Scat came out before in their kits.

The Scat forged cranks were white almost in appearance. And they will 'ring' when you hit it just like any forged crank.

Also, Scat forged cranks had smaller counterweight profiles than what you got there.

That crank may be cast - someone correct me if I am mistaken.

By the way, Scat forged cranks were around $600 each back in the 80's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Dan Ruddock
Samba Member


Joined: October 25, 2012
Posts: 3594
Location: Sarasota, in my adopted state of Florida
Dan Ruddock is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:11 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Use the DPR.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:03 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

So, the above crank is the likely even worse 80's equivalent of this:

https://vwparts.aircooled.net/SCAT-Volkstroker-III-Counterweighted-Crankshaft-p/10692.htm

That kinda sucks.
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danwvw
Samba Member


Joined: July 31, 2012
Posts: 8892
Location: Oregon Coast
Danwvw is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:01 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

I have one of those early Scat cranks, It's a 74mm and after I got the engine all together I discovered the pulley moves up and down 20 thousandths every revolution it's been balanced and everything not sure I should keep it with the engine or not. Seems to run just fine and smooth and all.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
1960 Beetle And 1679cc DP W-100 & Dual Zeniths!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Facebook Twitter Gallery Classifieds Feedback
esde
Samba Member


Joined: October 20, 2007
Posts: 5969
Location: central rust belt
esde is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:06 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Danwvw wrote:
I have one of those early Scat cranks, It's a 74mm and after I got the engine all together I discovered the pulley moves up and down 20 thousandths every revolution it's been balanced and everything not sure I should keep it with the engine or not. Seems to run just fine and smooth and all.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


I would first investigate wether the end of the crank moves a corresponding amount, or maybe it's just a bad pulley. Even a bent crank can be fixed
_________________
modok wrote:
Bent cranks are silent but gather no moss. I mean, ah, something like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danwvw
Samba Member


Joined: July 31, 2012
Posts: 8892
Location: Oregon Coast
Danwvw is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:36 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

It's the crank!
_________________
1960 Beetle And 1679cc DP W-100 & Dual Zeniths!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Facebook Twitter Gallery Classifieds Feedback
nsracing
Samba Member


Joined: November 16, 2003
Posts: 9467
Location: NOVA
nsracing is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:03 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Or could be the pulley— are u sure the pulley snout is not bottomed out?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Danwvw
Samba Member


Joined: July 31, 2012
Posts: 8892
Location: Oregon Coast
Danwvw is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

It's the crank, as I tried several pulleys, I can see it. The end seems to rotate at a little bit of an angle almost like it was bent. Pretty sure the rest of the crank is fine just the end is wacky.
_________________
1960 Beetle And 1679cc DP W-100 & Dual Zeniths!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Facebook Twitter Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 10:17 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Egh. Bummer for both of us. If yours is forged mine definitely is not. Also I guess yours is trash, maybe straighten the end and then have it reground to true it up?
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vwracerdave
Samba Member


Joined: November 11, 2004
Posts: 15307
Location: Deep in the 405
vwracerdave is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 10:25 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Your SCAT cast crank will be fine for your 1835cc street engine. My 1835cc with a cast crank has over 600 1/4 mile passes and many years of street driving.
_________________
2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK
Featured in Dec. 2001 HOT VW's Magazine page 63

Watch my racing video's http://www.youtube.com/user/okvwracer/videos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:32 am    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Yeah buuuuutt... If something does happen then it's all over... I think I need to call Jose and get another DPR.
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1058
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:00 pm    Post subject: Re: 69mm crankshaft quality: old SCAT vs. DPR. Reply with quote

Here's some better pics. In good shape, checks out dimensionally, straight when indicated and spun on #1 and #3 bearings in a case half, but I believe it's cast.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.