Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
CA emissions fail
Page: 1, 2  Next
Forum Index -> Vanagon Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
llilibel03
Samba Member


Joined: February 03, 2008
Posts: 767
Location: Redondo Beach California
llilibel03 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:24 am    Post subject: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

HI. I've got a 85 with a tiico conversion done in 2003. The tiico has 30,000 miles.

I failed smog. 15mph NOx was high.

A couple suggestions i've gotten were to put denatured alcohol into the gas and to run the van on the highway for at least 20 minute to heat up the cat convertor.

My research however sayas the high NOx is due to a lean mixture which causes high temps which lead to NO. This is what was said on one site-

It (alcohol) should / will have minimal impact on NOx. NOx occurs from too lean an air/fuel mixture. When there’s too much oxygen. You can think of it as the alcohol makes the fuel burn hotter… and that’s the opposite of what you want when your NOx number is high.



Also if NOx is caused by high temps wouldn't running the car on the freeway to get the cat convertor hot increase engine temp and thus NO?

All I've done is cleaned my KN air filter and changed the spark plugs. Also plan to momentarily over inflate my tires for what that's worth.

Anything else I can do?
_________________
87 syncro tintop
90 gl tin top
85 westy 2.0 tiico automatic (present)


Last edited by llilibel03 on Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
termuehlen Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: May 02, 2012
Posts: 993
Location: Redwood City
termuehlen is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:43 am    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Check your exhaust system for any leaks between the engine and the Oxygen Sensor. This was the cause of my high NOx emissions failure a few years ago.
_________________
1988 Westfalia automatic Subaru OBD1
1986 syncro tintop wbx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
sjbartnik
Samba Member


Joined: September 01, 2011
Posts: 5993
Location: Brooklyn
sjbartnik is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:45 am    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Does that engine have EGR (exhaust gas recirculation)?

EGR's purpose is to cut emissions of NOx by recirculating a little exhaust gas into the intake under certain conditions.

If your engine does have such a system, ensure it's functioning correctly and doesn't have any leaks (bad gaskets, rusted out pipes etc) as that would admit excess air into the intake manifold causing a lean mix.
_________________
1965 Volkswagen 1500 Variant S
2000 Kawasaki W650
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
llilibel03
Samba Member


Joined: February 03, 2008
Posts: 767
Location: Redondo Beach California
llilibel03 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:11 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

No EGR.

Am I correct in assuming that running the car and getting it hot (the cat convertor) is not going to help reduce the NO levels?
_________________
87 syncro tintop
90 gl tin top
85 westy 2.0 tiico automatic (present)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
sjbartnik
Samba Member


Joined: September 01, 2011
Posts: 5993
Location: Brooklyn
sjbartnik is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:38 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Getting it nice and hot would tend to lower HC levels but not necessarily NOx levels. The catalytic converter is mostly there to reduce emission of unburned hydrocarbons, not NOx.

Check for vacuum leaks
_________________
1965 Volkswagen 1500 Variant S
2000 Kawasaki W650
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
davevickery
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2005
Posts: 2887
Location: Fort Collins, CO
davevickery is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:04 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

I think he just needs a new CAT unless his engine has an EGR valve and it is stuck.

Adding alcohol to the gas could help a little with NOX because it burns cooler than gas. If you were close to passing, you could try that, but it won't make a huge difference by itself. Higher octane fuel helps too, but not that much. You probably just need a cat or o2 sensor. If you have a way to test your o2 sensor and see it cycling properly, then I think you will probably just have to replace your cat.

Here is my thread from when I had high NOX. https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=663025

Cliff Notes version: I put in a Cali CAT and NOX dropped from 5.8 NO to 0.30. My recent 2 year later retest wasn't as impressive but I still passed easily.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
llilibel03
Samba Member


Joined: February 03, 2008
Posts: 767
Location: Redondo Beach California
llilibel03 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 4:25 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

davevickery wrote:
I think he just needs a new CAT unless his engine has an EGR valve and it is stuck.

Adding alcohol to the gas could help a little with NOX because it burns cooler than gas. If you were close to passing, you could try that, but it won't make a huge difference by itself. Higher octane fuel helps too, but not that much. You probably just need a cat or o2 sensor. If you have a way to test your o2 sensor and see it cycling properly, then I think you will probably just have to replace your cat.

Here is my thread from when I had high NOX. https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=663025

Cliff Notes version: I put in a Cali CAT and NOX dropped from 5.8 NO to 0.30. My recent 2 year later retest wasn't as impressive but I still passed easily.


Hi Dave, my reading is that alcohol makes it run leaner and hotter, which is bad for the NO. Same for higher octane gas.

Also on the tiico yahoo group someone said the tiico does not have EGR.

Might have to get a new cat convertor.
_________________
87 syncro tintop
90 gl tin top
85 westy 2.0 tiico automatic (present)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
davevickery
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2005
Posts: 2887
Location: Fort Collins, CO
davevickery is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:17 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

llilibel03 wrote:

Hi Dave, my reading is that alcohol makes it run leaner and hotter, which is bad for the NO. Same for higher octane gas.

Thanks, I might have gotten that wrong. Seems like it isn't a simple answer though. The energy density of the alcohol is less so all things being equal it would lean it out. But the o2 sensor is compensating and alcohol has a higher octane than gas so it burns slower. But I do see that the internet consensus says that adding alcohol to your gas will lean it out.

I still think higher octane gas would run cooler. The fuel density isn't lower and the octane retards the burning. Just spit balling here. I'm always happy to be corrected and learn something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jberger
Samba Member


Joined: November 17, 2003
Posts: 2476

jberger is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:45 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Check your o2 voltage while running.. it should bounce constantly between 0 and 1 volt. If it’s hovering around a narrow band... that’s your issue. Just went through this with my mk2 8v

J
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Abscate
Samba Member


Joined: October 05, 2014
Posts: 22631
Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
Abscate is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 9:20 am    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

You want the cat as hot as possible , which helps conversion of CO, HC, and NOx. The combustion temperature at the 15 mph test won’t be impacted by a good hot run cycle before.

Try a hot run to a pretest place and see how it tests out.

Thanks for not killing children with a dirty car. It matters
_________________
.ssS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
912 outlaw
Samba Member


Joined: June 04, 2012
Posts: 30
Location: sonoma
912 outlaw is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 5:28 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Put some good chevron 91 octane in her and run her some hills to burn her out and get that cat hot. High octane gas will help with her running a little cooler.full tune wouldon't be bad with oil change too
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
llilibel03
Samba Member


Joined: February 03, 2008
Posts: 767
Location: Redondo Beach California
llilibel03 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 6:32 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Failed the retest. Evil or Very Mad

Here's what I did- changed plugs, cleaned KN air filter, overinflated tires, ran the last 1/4 tank of gas with a double dose of sea foam, filled it up, ran it for another hour on the freeway and then took it in. Same result- failed 15mph NOx. A little better but still failed.

I looked at the PO's smog results. One thing I noticed is there was an "iginition. timing" number- 5 BTDC. My tests said "not applicable." Is the PO's number a retarded value? Could that be my winning ticket? Temporarily retarding the timing? Could that throw the other values off?

Since the other numbers are passing I'm kind of doubting the catalytic is the problem.

Also, while googling the issue it was said I could tell if it was running lean by looking at the O2 numbers. Mine was 0.0. PO's was 0.2


Finally, I was told on the tiico yahoo page that there is no EGR.
_________________
87 syncro tintop
90 gl tin top
85 westy 2.0 tiico automatic (present)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
82westyrabbit
Samba Member


Joined: March 02, 2015
Posts: 967
Location: Ma
82westyrabbit is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 6:43 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Hi. We all keep guessing at why it is not passing the smog test. Of course cking the tune up is always first on the list. When you look at the spark plugs ck to see if they all look the same color. If one is a darker color then you might have a bad injector (which I doubt). If everything looks good there I would find someone that can hook it up to a computer (probably Ross tec) or a V.A.G. tool. At which point you will know that the various sensors work particularly the 02 sensor (probably the problem). If you get through to this point and have not found the problem then it’s probably the cat. Just replacing the cat may take care of the problem by covering up the real issue. Any way that’s how I would approach this problem. John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
davevickery
Samba Member


Joined: July 16, 2005
Posts: 2887
Location: Fort Collins, CO
davevickery is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 7:51 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

llilibel03 wrote:
Failed the retest. Evil or Very Mad


I think the CAT would fix you up. But if you have a distributor, I would retard the timing a little bit and retest.

My situation was a little different. My engine doesn't have a way to adjust timing as it all electronic. And all my numbers were not that great. If the engine was still in the subaru I would have failed HC and NO and been close to failing on CO. But the CAT cleaned them all up. Yours could just be advanced timing.

HC went from 1.48 to 0.09 gpm 2000+ cars limit 1.2 '89 Vanagon 3.0
CO went from 12.02 to 1.16 gpm 2000+ cars limit 15.0 '89 Vanagon 25.0
NO went from 5.87 to 0.30 gpm 2000+ cars limit 1.5 '89 Vanagon 5.0
CO2 was 536
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Abscate
Samba Member


Joined: October 05, 2014
Posts: 22631
Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
Abscate is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 4:42 am    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Post up the test report, let’s look at all the data.

Cover up name and address for pricacy of course,
_________________
.ssS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
ckissick
Samba Member


Joined: August 22, 2006
Posts: 498
Location: Bay Area
ckissick is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 9:31 am    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Every time I've failed I've replaced the cat and passed. Simple.
_________________
Charlie
1950 Beetle
1983 Westfalia
1989 syncro Tristar
1966 Porsche 912
1989 Beck Spyder
2007 GTI Fahrenheit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
llilibel03
Samba Member


Joined: February 03, 2008
Posts: 767
Location: Redondo Beach California
llilibel03 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 2:48 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

Passed.

I went to my old Audi guy. He retarded the timing 5 degrees and also put in different spark plugs that he said were "cooler" - Bosch W5DC.

He also told me he knows folks who put in the expensive California cat converter for the test and then swap it out for the 49 states one and only use the expensive one for the test. He said is some new Audis with two cats the cost of the CA ones can be $800.

He also mentioned that on the tiico there were no timing marks anywhere so he just made his own mark o the distributor.
_________________
87 syncro tintop
90 gl tin top
85 westy 2.0 tiico automatic (present)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
tjet Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: June 10, 2014
Posts: 3533
Location: CA & NM
tjet is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:29 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

llilibel03 wrote:
Passed.

I went to my old Audi guy. He retarded the timing 5 degrees and also put in different spark plugs that he said were "cooler" - Bosch W5DC.

He also told me he knows folks who put in the expensive California cat converter for the test and then swap it out for the 49 states one and only use the expensive one for the test. He said is some new Audis with two cats the cost of the CA ones can be $800.

He also mentioned that on the tiico there were no timing marks anywhere so he just made his own mark o the distributor.


Nice, Good info for the next guy. VW Logo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
82westyrabbit
Samba Member


Joined: March 02, 2015
Posts: 967
Location: Ma
82westyrabbit is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 5:10 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

I glad you got through the smog test. The timing marks are on the crank pully on the timing belt end of the engine. To set the timing properly needs to be connected to a computer/scan tool. Now that you have passed smog test you probably want him to set the timing back where it was and the old heat range plugs in back in. It probably would be a good idea to scan the system every so often anyway. Happy driving. John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
llilibel03
Samba Member


Joined: February 03, 2008
Posts: 767
Location: Redondo Beach California
llilibel03 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 10:03 pm    Post subject: Re: CA emissions fail Reply with quote

82westyrabbit wrote:
I glad you got through the smog test. The timing marks are on the crank pully on the timing belt end of the engine. To set the timing properly needs to be connected to a computer/scan tool. Now that you have passed smog test you probably want him to set the timing back where it was and the old heat range plugs in back in. It probably would be a good idea to scan the system every so often anyway. Happy driving. John


I didn't notice much difference in driveability, maybe a little rougher at idle but that's it. I was expecting a noticeable power loss, but couldn't notice any. I'm waiting to see if the timing change has an effect on my MPG before I set it back. Are there other reasons I should set the timing back to it's original setting?
_________________
87 syncro tintop
90 gl tin top
85 westy 2.0 tiico automatic (present)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Vanagon All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2023, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.