Author |
Message |
Schepp Samba Member

Joined: March 22, 2020 Posts: 326 Location: NorCal
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:23 am Post subject: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Hey guys,
I was hoping you wizards would help an average guy out with determining which or if I should put a mild cam in my engine?
I started the research process but it’s pretty confusing. Especially when looking at CB’s website Since they don’t have an application chart or anything.
I’ve got it all apart and I’m wondering if I should put a mild cam in it now while it’s apart? I have no clue what all the terminology means or what the numbers mean.
This engine is going into a Baja. It’s going to be driven on the freeway to work a few days during the week and on slow mountain fire roads on the weekends. It’s not my daily driver.
Most usable power for me would be on in the mid rpm range.
The engine was tired and needed an overhaul.
Here’s what I’ve got:
1600 DP
Mofoco 041 polished heads
Stock rockers
Stock size pistons
Stock crankshaft
Stock rods
Single Weber 40IDF
Pertronix SVDA distributor
Cb in/out oil pump
Remote oil cooler with fan
Remote oil filter
Tri-Mil Bobcat exhaust system
Stock trans
215/75-r15 tires
I’m leaving it up to you to pick out a cam for me if you think it’s worth it for performance?
Thanks a ton!
Schepp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1885 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:35 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
In a Baja I would stick with the stock cam.
And with a single IDF it will be a lot easier to tune with the stock cam
Is your old cam and lifter still in good shape? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Next_Racer Samba Member
Joined: September 09, 2007 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:42 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
If you want a bit more go for a engle W100. _________________ Ovaal '54 --> Gekeurd
1300 '69 -->RESTO
1303S '73 --> Gekeurd
http://vwovaal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pruneman99 Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2012 Posts: 5013 Location: Oceanside
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 10:46 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
What do the chambers measure on the heads? You might be making a dog of an engine if the chambers are large, and your compression ratio ends up low. Add a larger cam with overlap, and it's a real slug. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schepp Samba Member

Joined: March 22, 2020 Posts: 326 Location: NorCal
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:09 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Thanks for the reply’s!
The chambers are 55cc
The compression ratio is 7.5:1
I keep reading that ideally a performance cam needs a higher compression ratio.
Which mine is not.
I’m not sending anything out for machine work cuz the turnaround times right now up here are ridiculously long and I want to be on the road/trails this summer instead of waiting around.
The stock cam is in ok shape but the stock lifters are pitted and are being replaced.
I definitely don’t want to make it a dog. It may not be the power plant I want it to be now but it could be worse.
I’ll eventually be building a bigger engine. But this one needs to work for now for the time being.
If it’s not realistic to put a different cam in it now then I’ll put a new stock cam in with new lifters. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent  Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 41866 Location: at the beach
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 12:15 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
you can get what used to be called an RV cam, It has plenty of torque on the low end like stock and will raise the top RPM just a tad. Engle W90 is only 265 degrees total duration so it will not hurt the low end, and it will give a little pickup. They name it as the Cheater Cam. Will work well to 5000 RPM without sacrificing the low end. Make sure you know if you need a dished or flat cam for the oil pump. _________________ "Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7752 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce Amacker Samba Member

Joined: December 26, 2007 Posts: 1789 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
croSSeduP Samba Member

Joined: June 13, 2004 Posts: 1150 Location: Western Washington State
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Just in case you didn't know...
If you change to any kind of cam that gives "more", you'll also have to change a bunch else. You will have to address your whole valve train:
Rocker arm shafts
Push rod length and strength
Valve spring tension increase...
That only gets you started. My point is you can't just drop in a cam and run it. Without other upgrades those other things will (probably) break. _________________ Please check my '67 sedan project progress!
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=502253&highlight= |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schepp Samba Member

Joined: March 22, 2020 Posts: 326 Location: NorCal
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
I’m not sure how a mild cam would break stock rocker arms or pushrods especially on a low horsepower engine but ok.
I’ve already got heavier springs with stainless steel valves in my heads.
I was thinking that a mild cam would complement the heads, carb and exhaust I already have.
I keep reading about that CB Cheater cam. Would that be ok to run on a low compression engine?
I like and don’t like reaching out to performance shops because they always say their own product is the best. But the more I read the more I hear the Engle W100, W90 or the CB 2280 “cheaters” for applications similar to mine.
From what I’ve read both Engle W90 and CB’s Eagle 2280 are considered “cheater” cams. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce Amacker Samba Member

Joined: December 26, 2007 Posts: 1789 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:45 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Schepp wrote: |
I’m not sure how a mild cam would break stock rocker arms or pushrods especially on a low horsepower engine but ok.
I’ve already got heavier springs with stainless steel valves in my heads.
I was thinking that a mild cam would complement the heads, carb and exhaust I already have.
I keep reading about that CB Cheater cam. Would that be ok to run on a low compression engine?
I like and don’t like reaching out to performance shops because they always say their own product is the best. But the more I read the more I hear the Engle W100, W90 or the CB 2280 “cheaters” for applications similar to mine.
From what I’ve read both Engle W90 and CB’s Eagle 2280 are considered “cheater” cams. |
After using several of the 2280s, I wouldn't build an engine with a stock cam anymore, even a bone stock engine. In your usage you need to decide how much of your driving will be done on "slow mountain roads". There is no camshaft that gives great power at all RPM ranges- low/mid/high, you need to decide where you want the power the most. If you want the engine to be happy down low use the 2280. If you're looking for more spirited mid or upper-mid rpm use on the street, go with the 100 or 110 but expect a trade-off down low. I honestly wouldn't use an Engle 90 cam in anything if the 2280 was available (it was on backorder for a year during covid).
I currently have 4 PN2280 cams in my engines from 1600 to 2180cc. I've bolted that cam into stock engines without any changes at all and had great success over many miles. (I'm in my 60's and don't wind any engine over 4500-5000rpm) Look at the specs I posted above- a "cheater" is the nickname for a cam that increases lift and not duration. This increases power without the soggy bottom end associated with a higher duration cam.
Asking what cam to use on this forum brings out a lot of opinions, these are my experiences with that exact cam. I had a 2180cc/W110 in my Ghia and loved it but it was not a bottom end torquer, it came on like gangbusters in the midrange. I put that engine in one of my busses but swapped the 2280 cam into it first. The 2280 is a really mild cam for a big 2180cc engine but it works really well in a bus. Your application (Baja/slow dirt roads) is similar- you'll want bottom end torque and lots of it. You may want to lighten up your stiff springs if you're not looking for high RPM use, most of mine are running stock springs.
If you have a few bucks to spare I suggest a counterweighted crank in any engine also, it makes the engine noticeably smoother and revs better. They come as 8 dowel, have the machine shop drill/match your flywheel to it.
I'm sure others will chime in with conflicting opinions, good luck with whatever you choose. _________________ '66 Deluxe Bus
'65 Standard Bus
Build threads:
'66- http://www.leakoil.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2888&sid=54d8dedfb3822f99c7f2ea430cb4e856
'65- http://leakoil.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=4263 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
croSSeduP Samba Member

Joined: June 13, 2004 Posts: 1150 Location: Western Washington State
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:38 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Schepp wrote: |
I’m not sure how a mild cam would break stock rocker arms or pushrods especially on a low horsepower engine but ok.
I’ve already got heavier springs with stainless steel valves in my heads.
I was thinking that a mild cam would complement the heads, carb and exhaust I already have.
I keep reading about that CB Cheater cam. Would that be ok to run on a low compression engine?
I like and don’t like reaching out to performance shops because they always say their own product is the best. But the more I read the more I hear the Engle W100, W90 or the CB 2280 “cheaters” for applications similar to mine.
From what I’ve read both Engle W90 and CB’s Eagle 2280 are considered “cheater” cams. |
Okay, so you've already done some things; cool. If you were going to run an Engle W100 the next step I'd recommend is getting the solid rock shim set-up, instead of the clips. I think you should be okay after that. I think the weak point then would be the stock push rods. _________________ Please check my '67 sedan project progress!
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=502253&highlight= |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisflstf Samba Member

Joined: February 10, 2004 Posts: 3953 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:57 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
CB 2232 is very similiar to W 100. Has 236 duration at .050 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schepp Samba Member

Joined: March 22, 2020 Posts: 326 Location: NorCal
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 2:06 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Thank you Bruce.
That’s the kind of real experience that I was looking for. I want all the low to mid torque I can get. There’s no desert up here in NorCal but a lot of steep slow mountain roads.
I’ve reached out to Roy at Mofoco for his advice as well. Waiting to hear what he says. My guess is that it’ll be on par with what you’ve said.
Racer,
I would like to ditch those stock rockers for the CB kit. I think it just makes sense to get rid of those 50yr old worn out parts.
Thanks for your guys advice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dusty1 Samba Member
Joined: April 16, 2004 Posts: 1995
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 2:14 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
It might come down to availability. I literally just called CB because they still have a disclaimer on their site that it might take a while to get a 2280. The helpful dude on the other end of the phone said,
"The 2280 is in stock."
"The 2232 is backordered."
So the Engle W100 and the Eagle 2280 are available.
I prefer the 2280.
The 2280 will work with single "hi rev" springs and aluminum pushrods. Be aware that extra weight in the valvetrain (steel pushrods) requires extra spring pressure (dual springs) to adequately control it.
So: I would go with the 2280, "hi rev" single springs and aluminum pushrods. Heavy duty rocker assemblies won't hurt anything.
You may find one of those new fangled "big stock" bootleg Solex carbs pulls better and is easier to tune than a single 40IDF.
.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lingwendil Samba Member

Joined: February 25, 2009 Posts: 3999 Location: Antioch, California, a block from the hood
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent  Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 41866 Location: at the beach
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 12:37 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
W90 then. You aren't looking for outrageous RPM, you are looking for a little more than stock, but a smooth performer. _________________ "Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 3858 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:35 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
For the super mild "cheater cams", I would run the CB2280 long before the w90.
The 2280 has .070" more lift, far better grind quality, it will actually match the cam card, CB has them in stock now, and best of all, you can use the really good cb1512 $32 lifters instead of the expensive, heavy, and thick head Engle lifters. All wins.
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
madmike Samba Member
Joined: July 11, 2005 Posts: 5298 Location: Atlanta,Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 1:28 pm Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
I'd try and find a machine shop that can cut the step out of them heads at the very least  _________________ 'Black Ice'Drag Buggy 'Turbo'
Rail Buggy 1915 turbo
76 Drag/Street bug 2180cc 'Turbo' 11:85 @113 mph"If I go any faster I'll burn up the Hamster" ,gets 28 mpg. also 10/09/22 11.90 @115 mph
"If I'm ever on Life Support,UNPLUG Me, Then Plug me back In see if that Works" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schepp Samba Member

Joined: March 22, 2020 Posts: 326 Location: NorCal
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:24 am Post subject: Re: Cam recommendations |
|
|
Thanks for all the advice guys. It’s nice reading you opinions without the drama that often occurs on a touchy subject like camshafts.
Roy @ Mofoco recommends the Engle w100.
Mike @ CB recommends the 2280.
Mike stated that since the compression ratio is stock, a grind with a shorter duration will result in a smoother idle a better low to mid range. They won’t have the higher revs most people want but will have that practical useable power down low for an application like this.
Madmike:
Mofoco heads have no step in them.
I feel like I now have the information I need and have a good understanding of what I need for my application.
I’ve compiled a list of camshafts that would work for a stock comp ratio. If anyone is interested I’ll post it.
Thanks again.
- Schepp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|