| Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics, with or without covers and canopies |
| Without Canopy |
|
50% |
[ 5 ] |
| With Tonneau Cover (canvas or fibreglass) |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
| With Cab Height Canopy (canvas or fibreglass) |
|
30% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
| Author |
Message |
SyncroGhia Samba Member

Joined: August 21, 2009 Posts: 2458 Location: Highnam, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:47 am Post subject: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
I'm currently driving a Tristar 2WD daily and a question within my blog thread has prompted a question...
With a T3 (Vanagon) Doka and Sinka, what does everyone think would be the most aerodynamic?
Without a Canopy?
With a Tonneau Cover?
With a Cab height Canopy?
I've tried to add another poll option for the extra height canopy but it won't let me.
I've always thought that the Crew Cab/Single Cab performed less well without a canopy as the tailgate acts as a windbreak but I've no proof of this.
Anyone got any hard and fast info on this?
Cheers
MG _________________ T3 Syncro 16 S6 Westfalia Limey SOLD
T3 Syncro 6x6 SOLD
T3 RS6 Bluestar
T3 Tristar Syncro 16 SOLD
T3 Tristar Syncro RHD SOLD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leipo Samba Member
Joined: April 11, 2012 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
mythbusters tested this and the verdict was: empty/open boot with tailgate in the up position gave the best fuelefficient results!
the tailgate creates a bubble of air that stands still and directs the flowing air over the tailgate with less drag then you would think
the canopy would not have this air bubble and will have more drag all by itself and would be the least fuelefficient option |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SyncroGhia Samba Member

Joined: August 21, 2009 Posts: 2458 Location: Highnam, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Leipo wrote: |
mythbusters tested this and the verdict was: empty/open boot with tailgate in the up position gave the best fuelefficient results!
the tailgate creates a bubble of air that stands still and directs the flowing air over the tailgate with less drag then you would think
the canopy would not have this air bubble and will have more drag all by itself and would be the least fuelefficient option |
Interesting, I'll have to look that episode up. Obviously it won't have been on a T3 but I'd imagine that the theory would be the same for most pickups.
MG _________________ T3 Syncro 16 S6 Westfalia Limey SOLD
T3 Syncro 6x6 SOLD
T3 RS6 Bluestar
T3 Tristar Syncro 16 SOLD
T3 Tristar Syncro RHD SOLD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leipo Samba Member
Joined: April 11, 2012 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
episode 43 and re-visited in episode 64  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boltze Samba Member

Joined: January 21, 2008 Posts: 60 Location: Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SyncroGhia Samba Member

Joined: August 21, 2009 Posts: 2458 Location: Highnam, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
balzac Samba Member

Joined: May 11, 2011 Posts: 79 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Leipo wrote: |
mythbusters tested this and the verdict was: empty/open boot with tailgate in the up position gave the best fuelefficient results!
the tailgate creates a bubble of air that stands still and directs the flowing air over the tailgate with less drag then you would think  |
Dang. I installed a couple cables to hold my tailgate horizontal for highway driving. I thought I was being clever! _________________ 1986 Transporter single cab Syncro |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MsTaboo  Samba Member

Joined: June 02, 2006 Posts: 4609 Location: East Kootenay, British Columbia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
There was a big difference in airflow between using the tilt and bareback on my Syncro Doka.
Just removing the canvas made a noticeable difference.
But I really like the covered storage, so maybe if I keep it I'll think about cutting down the legs so it's cabin height. _________________ Currently:
'90 Syncro Westy 3 knob w/Zetec
The information age has morphed into the age of disinformation and willful ignorance. Agnotology!
When you stir up shit you're bound to get some on yourself.
Resist Kleptocratic Oligarchy (and Idiocracy)! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Central Syncronizer Samba Member
Joined: November 19, 2008 Posts: 302 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its my understanding that most drag is generated at the rear of the vehicle. The tonneau cover comes closer to "tapering" the truck towards the back. It also reduces the interference drag created by the tailgate.
I think the greatest drag is generated by a vertical profile at the rear (which is at its greatest with an oem canopy) _________________ Ongoing restoration/maintenance of my syncro double cab (and soon Westy):
http://88syncrodoka.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sub-hatchtim Samba Member
Joined: September 19, 2006 Posts: 2687 Location: Phoenix AZ
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I loose a few mpg with the canopy installed but I really like having it on there it is very useful, I also notice that handling is adversely affected with stock spring's _________________ 58' pg/sg silo fridge westy
58 Dove blue singlecab
76 911S |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SyncroGhia Samba Member

Joined: August 21, 2009 Posts: 2458 Location: Highnam, UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been monitoring my MPG and have been driving with and without the canopy.
I never drive over 60mph for longer than 30 seconds or so as it's revving the nads off the engine and it'll only do that going downhill
General top speed is 55-60mph.
A 160 mile journey with the canopy on gave 35.6mpg and the same journey without the canopy gave 35.5mpg. The van was loaded in the same way and the weather was similar although this is hardly scientific.
I've been driving around without the canopy on over last two weeks to try to stop it being blown around so much as we've had fairly gusty winds. This has certainly made a difference but again, mpg is hardly changed.
My daily drive to work is 25 miles cross country, overtaking, speeds from 25-55mph is giving me around 33mpg and the canopy isn't making that much difference.
I'll be doing the same 160 mile journey again tomorrow and will have the canopy on for practical reasons on keeping stuff dry.
I know that Myth Busters did the experiment but that was on a more traditional shaped vehicle with a bonnet... I'm not sure if the aerodynamics make our vans a different kettle of fish?
MG _________________ T3 Syncro 16 S6 Westfalia Limey SOLD
T3 Syncro 6x6 SOLD
T3 RS6 Bluestar
T3 Tristar Syncro 16 SOLD
T3 Tristar Syncro RHD SOLD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MsTaboo  Samba Member

Joined: June 02, 2006 Posts: 4609 Location: East Kootenay, British Columbia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:24 pm Post subject: Re: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
I missed this thread back in the day, but for the archive I voted in the tonneau cover category.
Had a Syncro Tristar that the PO had installed a tonneau cover that just snapped onto the gates and had a slotted piece behind cab to hold tight.
I added some support rods across the bed to keep water from pooling on the cover and increase it's tautness.
There was a noticeable difference with the cover vs without in both noise and buffeting. Also was nice to keep stuff dry.
_________________ Currently:
'90 Syncro Westy 3 knob w/Zetec
The information age has morphed into the age of disinformation and willful ignorance. Agnotology!
When you stir up shit you're bound to get some on yourself.
Resist Kleptocratic Oligarchy (and Idiocracy)! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
16CVs Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2004 Posts: 4273 Location: Redwood City, California
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 1:18 am Post subject: Re: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
Rarely have I seen a Tristar with Tinted glass.
Stacy _________________ 1987 Syncro Westfalia Triple knob (bastard)
1989 Syncro Tristar Triple knob "Swedish"
2013 Jetta Hybrid a true "Zwitter"
Samba member # 14980
Call anytime number 650 722 4914 .
Keep Your van running and upkept tastefully for the love of the hobby.
Don't let your van end up in an "abortions" thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52636
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 2:49 am Post subject: Re: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
| A Kamm Back designed topper might do you the best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MsTaboo  Samba Member

Joined: June 02, 2006 Posts: 4609 Location: East Kootenay, British Columbia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 11:34 am Post subject: Re: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
| 16CVs wrote: |
| Rarely have I seen a Tristar with Tinted glass. Stacy |
Factory glass - no aftermarket tint. I looked at the "birth certificate" to check the M-Codes for green glass but no luck.
Not too surprising, they missed other things also. _________________ Currently:
'90 Syncro Westy 3 knob w/Zetec
The information age has morphed into the age of disinformation and willful ignorance. Agnotology!
When you stir up shit you're bound to get some on yourself.
Resist Kleptocratic Oligarchy (and Idiocracy)! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crankey Samba Member

Joined: July 11, 2004 Posts: 2672
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 12:34 pm Post subject: Re: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
SyncroGhia, that is a bitchen' ride.
I vote custom built canopy frame at cab height and full custom covered wagon canvass.
But I did see that Mythbusters episode and remember it was logical and interesting episode. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
syncrodoka Samba Member

Joined: December 27, 2005 Posts: 12397 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 1:29 pm Post subject: Re: Doka and Sinka Aerodynamics with and without canopies. |
|
|
| IIRC syncroghia has sold that truck years ago. Post is from 2013. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|