TheSamba.com Forums
 
  View original topic: what cc's would a 2.0 be?
zackpunx Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:46 pm

can sumone help me out with that

krusher Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:58 pm

2000cc

Google is your friend http://www.unitconversion.org/volume/liters-to-cubic-centimeters-conversion.html

ddwbeagles Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:08 am

I doubt you need to use the conversion link. Just think of 1600 as a 1.6 liter, a 2.0 liter engine as a 2000cc, a 1700 as a 1.7 liter engine and so forth. Damn Americans, why can't we convert to the metric system :shock: (joking there). So the next time that american muscle 5.0 Mustang rolls past you.....well know that he has a 5000cc motor. Helps keep things in perspective.

fred69vert Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:53 am

Another thing to remember is that a cubic centimeter (cc) equals a milliliter (ml). 1000ml = 1l (liter). Therefore 2.0 liters = 2000 ml = 2000 cc.

vincent9993 Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:02 am

Correct me if I'm wrong but there's some rounding being done in some cases.

A 1.9 may be a 1915cc and a 2054cc may be a 2.0 or 2.1 for example.

gonebuggy Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:57 am

When did basic math become "high performance/engines/racing"? :?

Alex

Tbirdusa Wed Aug 05, 2009 7:21 am

ddwbeagles wrote: why can't we convert to the metric system :shock: (joking there). .

And why is my header a 1 5/8" when the rest of my engine is metric?

Glenn Wed Aug 05, 2009 7:25 am

Tbirdusa wrote: ddwbeagles wrote: why can't we convert to the metric system :shock: (joking there). .

And why is my header a 1 5/8" when the rest of my engine is metric?
Because it's easier to get SAE fractional tubing than metric tubing.

Why are your rims 15x5.5 ???

Why to people use 1/4" fuel hose when it should be 5.5mm?

juki48 Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:19 am

why is the US still using the english system????????

krusher Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:20 am

vincent9993 wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but there's some rounding being done in some cases.

A 1.9 may be a 1915cc and a 2054cc may be a 2.0 or 2.1 for example.

Well the place you will find this is stock vw engines, non are the exact cc, for example a 1600 is a 1584 etc.

The reason move vw people talk in exact cc is to the well trained a way of knowing what stroke and bore you have.

For example if i said I had a 2L, that could be many engine combos, but if I had said a 2007cc most would know its a 78x90.5 etc

sactojesse Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:04 am

If your question is referring to the 2 liter Type IV engine used in late model bay window buses or in the 914 2.0, that displacement was 1971 cc (94mm bore x 71 mm stroke).



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group