| BFB |
Mon Jul 21, 2025 6:54 pm |
|
i just got this, i really like odd vintage car shit , saw this on eBay and made an offer for it. No i dont plan to use it , not sure even I’d want to risk any of this thing making it down an intake and into a head or cylinder.
Im also not going to say anything to point things out , just gunna let ya’ll look at it and have fun.
Any questions, just let me know and I’ll let you know what i see.
God i hope one of ya’ll ran or knew someone that ran one of these things…
|
|
| FarmerBill |
Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:09 pm |
|
Love the gas gimmick products. I didn't realize the business was so old.
So this thing is what looks to be a calibrated vacuum leak with a pair of brass spinners.
But save up to $75 a year! In late 1940s dollars that's like $1000 today.
My Uncle sold a water injection gas saver system in the 70s. I wish I still had one around today but the last one went when we cleaned out the barn years ago.
Cool find. |
|
| Glenn |
Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:10 pm |
|
Will it be better than this?
|
|
| BFB |
Mon Jul 21, 2025 8:18 pm |
|
Glenn, that was proved to produce more hp gains on a stock 1600 than most other off the shelf bolt on performance products... sorry man, they ruined that one for ya.
although im not sure that it needs a blow off valve |
|
| busdaddy |
Mon Jul 21, 2025 8:25 pm |
|
| Now you've done it, JC Whitney is going to spam your mailbox with catalogs and flyers, your mail carrier will hate you. |
|
| Rob Combs |
Mon Jul 21, 2025 9:03 pm |
|
The BOV is probably a little optimistic.
As to the original post pics, I remember my dad playing around with something similar back in the late 70's/early 80s. The only difference he got, with an old Monte Carlo with either a 305 or a 307 (I don't remember which) was a little better fuel mileage. May have been from better atomization from the blades spinning in the fuel/air mix under the carb.
I don't remember a vent on the vacuum side of the carb on dad's contraption, but if it had one, that would explain the fuel mileage increase - at the expense of shortened engine life by running too lean.
Plus how's that not a fire hazard in the event of backfire?! Is the screen a flame trap? |
|
| NJ John |
Tue Jul 22, 2025 9:47 am |
|
| Perfect for under your bug spray! I would hate to swallow an “e” clip. |
|
| oprn |
Wed Jul 23, 2025 3:29 am |
|
Glenn wrote: Will it be better than this?
No. I would step out on a limb and guess yours is the clear winner. |
|
| FarmerBill |
Wed Jul 23, 2025 4:58 am |
|
Rob Combs wrote:
I don't remember a vent on the vacuum side of the carb on dad's contraption, but if it had one, that would explain the fuel mileage increase - at the expense of shortened engine life by running too lean.
Plus how's that not a fire hazard in the event of backfire?! Is the screen a flame trap?
I'm guessing that the pinhole vacuum vent hole got plugged up pretty quick having no real air filtration. Probably worked just long enough for folks to notice a slight increase in mileage and then lost effectiveness around the time you stopped counting miles to gallons. |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|