Author |
Message |
Manx1173 Samba Member

Joined: July 19, 2005 Posts: 149 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 10:44 am Post subject: Corvair Conversion |
|
|
I have always wanted to do a Corvair conversion in my Manx 1. I haven't yet because in my opinion they look funny (too long and short). However, I ran across this conversion and think it is awesome and thought I would share. It may have brought the Corvair conversion back to the table.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sturgeongeneral Samba Member
Joined: June 23, 2005 Posts: 2460 Location: Sacramento, California
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
That looks pretty solid. Does your buggy have room for the corvair motor? Some buggies it is a tight fit with the box rear end, but will go with a little fiberglass modification. It would make a buggy go pretty nicely too! _________________ Street legal fiberglass rocket ship
2005 Lotus Elise supercharged
1974 Chevy Corvette
My fiberglass car collection!
In honor of bowtie56jw:Another victim of the nasty "C" Praying for ya Jeff!
My exwife said if I towed home one more bug she would leave me. You know, every once in a while I miss her |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rayjay Samba Member
Joined: March 26, 2008 Posts: 1590 Location: Buford GA
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have seen a site on the web where the guy was using big bore VW cylinders on Corvairs for airplane use [ iirc ]. Lots of useful info.
Personally I would go with a modern watercooled motor instead of something that hasn't been made since 1969. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manx1173 Samba Member

Joined: July 19, 2005 Posts: 149 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my opinion watercooled engines belong in the front. The main issue I have with them is radiator placement (should I say how to hide it). However, some of the Manxsters I have seen with the radiators in the side pods are pretty sweet and the new Kickout SS side pods may help bring that option to the original Manx 1s.
I am not sure on fitment, however, I know several people have done the conversion on Manx 1s successfully. Here is another engine without the Webers.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hcallaway Samba Member
Joined: September 06, 2008 Posts: 333 Location: Richmond VA
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="geoman"]In my opinion water-cooled engines belong in the front. The main issue I have with them is radiator placement (should I say how to hide it).
You are not saying the Corvair motor that you have posted is water-cooled? I had one in a Drag VW. You have to run a reverse rotation cam shaft and distributor gear to make it use the VW transaxle without flipping it. You also have to have a motor adapter but I think that is about it. The cover on the motors you show must be aftermarket. Mine was stock and sat flat on the motor. I am not a Corvair expert so others may have a better idea of what I am talking about. Nice motors with an easy 140 HP. _________________ Share site with additional pictures.
http://berriennostalgiadunebuggy.shutterfly.com/
http://s83.photobucket.com/albums/j289/hcallaway/berrien%20dune%20buggy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
manxbuggy Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 131 Location: Seattle, Wa
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Weber version might fit, I think the 4BRL setup would require some fiberglass cutouts.
Here is my Corvair powered Manx with stock carbs and low profile filters:
The stock Corvair fan belt changes direction (around the alternater and an idler pulley) to rotate the top mounted fan from the rear pulley. I think the Porsche style fan would solve the problem some Corvair engines have with fan belts not staying on their pulleys as intended. Plus it looks great!
I'll take the triple weber version please.
Rob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is actually a 914 engine that was raced very sucessfully by Tangerine Racing. They call it "the best cooling system
for a racing 914-4". They say they intend to sell the system as a kit. There's nothing wrong with a later model Corvair cooling system that the right fan belt, and a tensioner won't fix.
http://www.tangerineracing.com/Engine.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manx1173 Samba Member

Joined: July 19, 2005 Posts: 149 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hcallaway wrote: |
You are not saying the Corvair motor that you have posted is water-cooled? ...The cover on the motors you show must be aftermarket. Mine was stock and sat flat on the motor. |
Sorry I think I confused you. No, the Corvair engine is definitely aircooled. I was replying to a previous post that they preferred watercooled over an engine not made since 1969. Yes the fiberglass cover is aftermarket and is a conversion item.
BL3Manx: I am by no means knocking the stock cooling system (at least the later version), I just don't think they look the best hanging out the back of a buggy (no offense Manxbuggy, I'd take yours in a second). In addition, I think there is a company in Europe that makes a Corvair cooling conversion for the Type 1 engine.
Manxbuggy: Is your buggy standard rotation with a flipped ring gear or reverse rotation?
The conversion shroud was designed and manufactured by Starr Cooke in California (he is a well known and respected Corvair engine builder). This is what Starr says about his system:
"The Porsche fan takes 12 hp at 6,000rpm whereas the stock Corvair fan uses 26hp at 6,000rpm and you cannot keep a belt on it if it revs quickly. You will not throw a belt with a Porsche fan. The Porsche fan conversion which I manufacture I sell for $1,500.""
Last edited by Manx1173 on Wed May 27, 2009 8:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree the 911 cooling system looks great, however if you read Jake Raby's website, when he tested the effectiveness of the 911 style system on Type 1's and Type 4's, he said, "the famed Porsche 911 systems didn’t work worth a DAMN in our testing". Basically they didn't get the air to turn 180 degrees and cool the aft cylinders. Plus the 911 engine had better inherent heat shedding capability than the Type 4.
http://www.aircooledtechnology.com/type1/dtm/index.htm#results
This looks pretty good too.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manx1173 Samba Member

Joined: July 19, 2005 Posts: 149 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BL3Manx wrote: |
I agree the 911 cooling system looks great, however if you read Jake Raby's website, when he tested the effectiveness of the 911 style system on Type 1's and Type 4's, he said, "the “famed” Porsche 911 systems didn’t work worth a DAMN in our testing". Basically they didn't get the air to turn 180 degrees and cool the aft cylinders. Plus the 911 engine had better cooling capability than the Type 4.
http://www.aircooledtechnology.com/type1/dtm/index.htm#results |
I am very familiar with Jake's work (I own a Type 4 DTM and will have an upright T4 in my Manx 1, I chose it over the Corvair before I found this conversion). I also respect Jake and his research/testing. The 911 fan was designed to cool a 6 cylinder engine. Assuming this system is designed properly it should cool a 6 cylinder Corvair engine as efficiently as a 6 cylinder Porsche engine. I have not seen one of these shrouds and I don't know if it has the cooling vanes like the original Porsche.
Starr Cooke is the leading Corvair engine builder for performance engines. However, I don't know if he has any test data comparing his system and the stock system. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VOLKSWAGNUT Fastest VW Belt Changer

Joined: October 14, 2007 Posts: 11152 Location: Flippin' a Belt........ .... Off-n-On ... NC USA
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I aquired a reverse rotation 1965 Corsa 4 carb engine when I bought my buggy. Didn't use it the buggy build, but had planned to build a fast Volksrod.
Does anyone know if horespower is lost/gained when the engine is reverse rotated? It sures sounds like a beast on a stand. Sounds like it has a nice lumpy camshaft. I cant wait until I get it in a light weight VW. ZOOOOM  _________________ aka Ken {o\!/o}
Its your vehicle- stop askin' for approval-do what YOU like for cryin' out loud
Better to roll em' how you want and wear em' out-than lettin' em' rot out
Its about the going not the showing
Rebuilt to drive not decorate
WANTED: Local Eatin' Joints, Triple D for TheSamba contributions here http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=570510
Search "VOLKSWAGNUT" on YouTube since you cant watch a "certain" BELT change video round here
Usually and often edited |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Letterman7 Samba Member

Joined: March 14, 2004 Posts: 3230 Location: Downingtown, PA
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to my local 'Vair gurus, reversing the rotation, if the pistons were flipped upside down as well (something to do with keeping the right "arc". Apparently it does make a difference.) the engine will actually increase horsepower somewhat. Something like 5% or so, depending on how it's outfitted. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SteveManx2 Samba Member
Joined: January 15, 2009 Posts: 43 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:02 am Post subject: Corvair motor |
|
|
I have a Corvair motor in my Manx 2 buggy. Though instead of reverse rotation and such, my set-up actually uses the Corvair transaxle also. Mine has the TransVair kit which allows the entire Corvair drivetrain to fit into VW suspension/pan. The motor is a 1963 with 140hp heads running a center mount Holley 4brl.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
It looks like you have 5 lug wheels. The Transvair used the 60-64 Corvair swingaxle trans which used 4 lug hubs. Do you have adapters or were the hubs redrilled? The Transvairs they used in buses used the later IRS transaxle.
Are you sure your bottom end is 63? They had a shorter stroke than later engines. It looks like you have an alternator. What about your cooling fan, is it the later non-directional? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SteveManx2 Samba Member
Joined: January 15, 2009 Posts: 43 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the rear hubs have been drilled....EM Corvairs had 4 on 4.5, these are now 5 on 4.5". The front VW hubs have adapters. The brakes date it to 1962-1963. The motor is a bit of a mystery...the code on the block (T0820YN) indicates 1960-1963 145cid....but it does have 1965 140 heads. The upper shroud is an EM with no provision for PCV but has been modified to fit the 140HP heads. It has a draft tube rather then PCV and yes has an alt. The flywheel, differential, and transmission are all 1962-1963. So, I'm not 100% positive what all is here The instrument panel and gauges are from 1962-1964 Spyder. The fins on the fan are straight...does that indicate LM?
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
The fan with the straight blades is 64-69. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GS guy Samba Member

Joined: December 03, 2007 Posts: 988 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a real shame either GM didn't continue development on the Corvair engine to a 3rd generation, or someone hasn't worked on tooling up their own version. An air cooled push-rod 6 is just plain cool!
Unfortunately, by the time you have one outfitted like the pic at the beginning of this post, you'll likely have as much $$$ into it as a real Porsche engine! Factor in the 94mm cylinders, full rebuild, cut heads for the Weber manifolds and revised valvetrain, the Webers or PMO's, Porsche shroud and fan/alt., roller reverse cam.... That all turns into a BiG TICKET motor, likely only pushing about 250 HP or so.. maaaaaybe 300? Then it becomes too hard to keep it cooled while making that kind of power.
A modern engineered and machined bottom end would be the real ticket, with the same modern engineering head design to go with it! Just dreaming though... only mass production would ever make such an engine even remotely affordable.
When I found what it was going to take to make a reliable 200+hp N/A Corvair, I quickly switched gears to a modern "boxer" 4-cylinder engine, factory turbocharged easily able to crank out 250hp - stock. It does come with its own fitment issues though!
Still, I think that pushrod 6 Porsche look-alike is downright cool!
Jeff |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BL3Manx Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2006 Posts: 6768 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GS guy wrote: |
When I found what it was going to take to make a reliable 200+hp N/A Corvair, I quickly switched gears to a modern "boxer" 4-cylinder engine, factory turbocharged easily able to crank out 250hp - stock. It does come with its own fitment issues though!
Jeff |
How about take a stock 180hp, then reverse rotation, use a modern turbo with a set of Keith Black forged pistons and a set of the Chinese nikasil cylinders to keep it cool? I think that would give you 200hp+ with better reliability than the stock engine and probably not be all that much more expensive than a 150hp Type 1. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|