Author |
Message |
mrbigmax Samba Member
Joined: September 10, 2011 Posts: 1289 Location: Modesto, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's pretty good out of a small motor. 0 to 60 was about 7 seconds, to 80 in about 14 seconds. And he's shifting it at about 4,000 RPM. That combo ought to pull well to 5,000 RPM. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
theastronaut Samba Member
Joined: November 19, 2007 Posts: 1631 Location: Anderson, SC
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Link
1964 VW Bug, full weight.
1679cc
DPR counterweighted crank 69mm
Thick wall 88mm cylinders.
FK-41 cam on 112LC
.035 deck
9.6:1 CR
Dual 36mm Dellorto DRLA carbs, 30mm vents.
041 heads- no port work, single springs.
1.4 rockers.
Stock trans with 4.37 R&P
205/70-15 tires.
90 hp 115 tq
Any issues with reliability is from poor workmanship and cheap/inferior parts. Buy the best and put it together the RIGHT way (no guessing) and it'll live a long happy life. Dual carbs aren't a pain either, I've put over 50k miles on mine with dual 36 dells and it hasn't given me the first bit of trouble. They don't need re-syncing all the time unless you buy crap linkage or can't properly assemble and adjust good linkage.
_________________ Strive for perfection in everything. Take the best that exist and make it better. If it doesn't exist, create it. Accept nothing nearly right or good enough."
-Sir Henry Royce, co-founder of Rolls-Royce
'64 Beetle Sunroof OG Bahama Blue
'63 Beetle Vert
'66 Beetle
'88 Festiva L
'89 Festiva L
'64 Chevy C10
'66 Chevy C10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
drockhead Samba Member
Joined: February 21, 2011 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:47 pm Post subject: In regards to machining a larger VW engine |
|
|
The big expense in performance isn't necessarily in the machining, in fact, that price is rather static no matter how large of a bore you go too.
The majority cost of a high performance VW engine is (and will always be) in the intake and exhaust.
You can spend more in a good quality intake (heads and carburator) than the rest of the motor and it would not be a wasted expense. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CaliTransVair818 Samba Member
Joined: February 26, 2011 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
talked to my local parts dealer and we figured for what i want is a 1903 he also said to talk to low budget, chico, or brothers. im going to pretty much put the set up i have now on a 1903 block which is dual 40 kads which i might rebuild to 44. should i get a bigger headers is a 1903 bigger valves then 1641? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
66brm Samba Member
Joined: January 25, 2010 Posts: 3676 Location: Perth Western Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can go big and be reliable, its just a matter of being conservative with certain aspects of your engine build. If you want it to last, stay fairly conservative on heads, cam, and compression ratio. Pay for good quality parts (yes they come at a premium sometimes) drive it like you want it to last, take care of the investment with regular servicing etc. and it will last, if you don't trust your mechanical skills then have a reputable shop build the engine for you, tell them what you are after, you driving style etc and they should be able to put a package together that will achieve your aim. _________________ Aust. RHD 66 Type 1
Aust. RHD 57 Type 1 Oval
modok wrote: |
I am an expert at fitting things in holes, been doing it a long time |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CaliTransVair818 Samba Member
Joined: February 26, 2011 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have a 1641 with dual kads and i want to go bigger but i deliver pizza so i have to have it reliable i was thinking 1914 but i see a lot of negative emotions about em.....whats wrong with them and what about a 2024? i believe that would be the next bump up besides the 1904 and what about the 1904 better than 1914?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnnypan Samba Member
Joined: October 24, 2007 Posts: 7431 Location: sackamenna
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Got an ancient 1835 in a package deal,long block...the case cracked at #3..the heads are almost new and a like new w110 was in the case.Have an AS41 case that linebored at .040 over and the old boy who did the machining does fly cutting as well,so he's cutting it for 92mm. figure some A&A cheapo jugs and slugs, counterbalanced crank and I'll lash on a pair of old school italian weber ICT's I scored...some polyester pants and a mullet,mullholland the 67 and Im good to go...figure Im ahead of the curve...36/40hp speed is the big thing now,wont be long before old school 1600 speed is hot,and when it is, Ill be ready. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dcdubs Samba Member
Joined: January 29, 2003 Posts: 860 Location: the Great Northwest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
think of it in terms of building an efficient air pump. horse power and torque being a byproduct. carberation, heads, and exhaust wil be a huge factor in this adventure... do you want heaterboxes?
rough hp speculation without refering to technical data
1600 dp 53-60 hp
1776 dp 75-100ish hp
1835 dp 75-110ish hp
1915 dp 80-130ish hp
stroker- (larger than 69mm crank) 100hp on up (dual carbs/F.I.)
pick two...fast reliable or cheap
depends on your goals expectations and budget
i say if you have the cash to build a proper 1776 then might as well go 1915 little extra oomph and have your machinest turn down the barrels to fit a case cut for "1776" so you can run the bigger piston/barrels with less fear of #3 case damage from overboring dont set the compresiion too high so you can run the shit for fuel our government is providing us and rock out! _________________ dcdubs/glcustoms
AllRightGarageDoorsNW.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rustfree1967bug Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2006 Posts: 3436 Location: minnesota
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You mean 90.5 mm pistons right? _________________ '70 ghia
'69 ghia
'65 singlecab
'66 sunroof beetle
'74 bus
'67 so-42
IDA's...well... they talk dirty -MURZI |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bugninva Samba Member
Joined: December 14, 2004 Posts: 8858 Location: sound it out.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if you can't afford to build the engine, then leave it alone.... _________________
[email protected] wrote: |
With a show of hands, who has built over 1000 engines in the last 25 years? Anyone? |
GEX has. Just sayin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
justing1234 Samba Member
Joined: July 16, 2010 Posts: 1 Location: cumberland ri
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i want to build a 1776 for my 1972, but the cheapest kit i could find is $730.
after reading the thread, i noticed some people said that you only need a 110 cam, and larger pistons&cylinders.. is this true? if so, i'll just get those, and recondition everything else... so pretty much i'd have
dual kadron 40's
110 cam
92mm cylinders and pistons
and everything else stock.... besides tuned heads
would this work? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bill may Samba Member
Joined: August 27, 2003 Posts: 14160 Location: san diego,ca
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
veedubfreak59 wrote: |
What's the biggest displacement/horsepower you can get out of a single progressive carb? |
the ford pinto carb will get about 30 hp from a 40 hp volkswagen engine. your hair may turn gray before you get it dialed in perfect. you can use a stock solex single barrel carb on a 2 liter engine. _________________ Admin note: Bill Passed away - July, 2017
1965 panel bus-Kermit
"Camping is cheaper than therapy"
www.sv2s.com
www.steeringboxscrapers.net
SBS #100
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=453617 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pantone149 Samba Member
Joined: August 19, 2004 Posts: 1018 Location: Mt. Shasta
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you've got a stock 1600 and bump its displacement to 1776 or 1835 there will be little horsepower increase, if any at all. The reason is that the stock carburetor and exhaust are too small to feed the extra displacement. To get real power out of the bigger motor you need more air and fuel going in and more stinky stuff going out. You'd need dual carbs plus headers to make it compete with a Honda (plus about 70 years of technical innovation). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rubyparts Samba Member
Joined: December 30, 2006 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 12:26 pm Post subject: case machining |
|
|
stiltwalker39 said that the work shop didn`t machine the case because of the bigger case savers "what dose it mean???"
because i want to machine my case next week , my work shop is doing this job for the first time "that`s my country" he bored cases for me to a 90.5`s about 4 engines last year and they are all 1776 also the are the only ones that wear built in my country .
so i don`t want to miss my case "help me " with any information !!
Thank`s |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zundfolge1432 Samba Member
Joined: June 13, 2004 Posts: 12468
|
Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldmanmark Samba Member
Joined: July 08, 2006 Posts: 842 Location: n.w. indiana,chicagoland
|
Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
whatever size you build put the money in the heads,get a dpr crank and get all the major rotateing parts balanced includeing rods and pistons. the search function is your source. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bertha64 Samba Member
Joined: May 09, 2010 Posts: 32 Location: tampa florida
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stiltwalker39 wrote: |
All the machine work is done and I will be picking up the block and all the other parts early this week coming. I thought about finding another case and having the machine work done and sell the case I have in the shop for what I can get out of it. That would be the cheapest way out. So for now I will just stew on it.
I have the body off the chasse and the chasse is complete and ready to go. I will bring the body in this weekend and start disassembling it and I will start restoring it. The motor is just one of the costs of this project. I still have bodywork, interior and paint to go along with tires. I may be stock with the 1776 since I would need to come up with about $400 to $600 for a used bock with the machine work done. It’s all about the money.
Yes, You are right, I will not be happy until I get the 1915. That’s for sure!!!!
Carl |
Quote: |
i fell your pain with all that work im doing the same thing to my 64.but if you want to get on the road faster go with the 1776 done right you will be happy and want notice to much difference.i had a 1915 in my 72 before it got totaled and had a little more top end but my 4year old 1776 in my 64 has more off the line and seems to run out smoother.its all it the way its built and the tranny i guess.and you can always build anoter latter wile your on the road having fun. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
veedubfreak59 Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2010 Posts: 228 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What would you folks suggest for a weekend warrior 59 ragtop that will by no means be a daily driver. I want something fast that wont blow up on me when it gets beat on during the weekend. Seeing as the car is a field find, the original motor/transmission are going into a corner never to be touched. My dad keeps telling me to just go with a cammed 1641 and a progressive carb, but i want more. Money isn't really an issue as i plan to spend whatever is needed to get the car where i want it.
What's the biggest displacement/horsepower you can get out of a single progressive carb? I really don't want to deal with the hassle that comes with dual carbs, unless its easier to set up than it was 15 years ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cusser Samba Member
Joined: October 02, 2006 Posts: 31385 Location: Hot Arizona
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just consulted with the mechanic who built my 1835 engine. Yes, that was me. I've run 1835cc since 1976, in Arizona, no overheating issues, no cracked cylinder heads, etc. I have plenty of added power, daily driver type use. I've made numerous trips across the desert
Mine has stock crankshaft, not counterweighted, and stock cam. Cylinder heads are dual-port, bored for the 92s, but overwise stock rebuilds. Carb is single Weber 40DCNF (hey, I said from the 1970s) on matching manifold from Claude's Buggies (now CB), quiet exhaust, 009 distributor (1976 version), stock rockers. I use oil pump 26mm with built-in filter, Maxi-2 from CB, and an external oil cooler forward of the shroud, because the engine I used to build it was originally a 1970 single port without doghouse, and I wanted to get rid of the stock oil cooler that was blocking cooling from #3 and #4 (that's what was done in the 1970s). Transmission is stock, never out or rebuilt (1971), the clutch pressure plate and disc are also stock.
_________________ 1970 VW (owned since 1972) and 1971 VW Convertible (owned since 1976), second owner of each. The '71 now has the 1835 engine, swapped from the '70. Second owner of each. 1988 Mazda B2200 truck, 1998 Frontier, 2014 Yukon, 2004 Frontier King Cab. All manual transmission except for the Yukon. http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=335294 http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=335297 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vincesco Samba Member
Joined: January 06, 2010 Posts: 34 Location: Orlando
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Travis wrote: |
Kafer Wolf wrote: |
i've read that all you have to do to convert a 1600 to 1776 is replace the stock cylinders with larger ones. the stock crankshaft will still work.
but can you still use your stock pistons? or should you use larger piston rings? |
You need larger pistons and cylinders and you need to bore the case and heads. |
Do you have to bore in order to fit the 1776 pistons? (90.5mm) _________________ 74 Bay w/ 1641 DP |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|