Author |
Message |
Richard D Samba Member
Joined: October 27, 2011 Posts: 94 Location: Texas City, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:16 am Post subject: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
What are the visible differences from outside the car? I realize there are some differences inside, especially behind the door panel. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
type4split Samba Member
Joined: May 23, 2007 Posts: 718 Location: Hamilton, Indiana
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:50 pm Post subject: Re: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
Short answer is the skin of 64 and earlier doors are basically the same other than some details around outside handles. Maybe add some addition context around your question and people will chime in.. _________________ '67 deluxe bus w/the little windows
'52 beetle
'55 convertible
'50-something convertible (*need ribbed 'vert quarter panel )
'63 "milo" beetle
Part, parts and more parts |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard D Samba Member
Joined: October 27, 2011 Posts: 94 Location: Texas City, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:29 am Post subject: Re: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
That’s just my question, thank you very much! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VW_Jimbo Samba Member
Joined: May 22, 2016 Posts: 10631 Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:17 am Post subject: Re: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
type4split wrote: |
Short answer is the skin of 64 and earlier doors are basically the same other than some details around outside handles. Maybe add some addition context around your question and people will chime in.. |
And the interior detail at the door panel inset, the attachment of the window and inner workings, the vent wing and interior handle attachment, door latch to pillar has been changed as well.
That off of the hip with regards to what I have noticed. I am certain there are several more. Like the door wedges, striker clearance indent, the door lock pop up (not sure when those were introduced), the door pull handle at the interior interaction point, vent wing pivot. _________________ Jimbo
There is never enough time to do it right the first time, but all the time necessary the second time!
TDCTDI wrote: |
Basically, a whole bunch of fuckery to achieve a look. |
67rustavenger wrote: |
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard D Samba Member
Joined: October 27, 2011 Posts: 94 Location: Texas City, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:09 am Post subject: Re: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
I knew there were a lot of differences on the inside. I was just talking about outward appearance besides the door handles. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
smitty24 Samba Member
Joined: April 28, 2008 Posts: 2727 Location: Salem, Oregon
|
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 9:43 am Post subject: Re: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
This is a vague question. There are many differences...say mid ‘55 and earlier. Late ‘55-to early 60s (non ice pick / push button door to early ‘64). People say they are mostly the same. I have noticed there is a difference at the outer handle indentation around the ice pick. OG ice pick doors have a slightly different shape here.
My OG 11/55 doors were MIA when I bought the car. I didn’t care to spend stupid money on some battered northwest doors back then. My car came with ‘62 or ‘63 doors. I tore them apart and converted them to ice pick. There was substantial drama changing the strikers on the body to work with the later doors, getting spacing around doors correct by adjusting hinges and brackets...then discovering the differences between Brazilian and German door seals and making further changes. But they work nice now. If I did it again, I’d probably source more correct doors. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard D Samba Member
Joined: October 27, 2011 Posts: 94 Location: Texas City, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:36 am Post subject: Re: Split/Oval vs. Later Doors |
|
|
Good to know. I am not doing a restoration. I just want the ice pick doors on my custom Beetle. A purist will know they’re not correct but the average Joe will not. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|