Author |
Message |
dublife13 Samba Member
Joined: March 08, 2021 Posts: 124 Location: washington
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:51 pm Post subject: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
There is a new bill proposed that would eliminate smog compliance for vehicles 35 years and older if register as collector vehicles.
https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB712/2025
Not sure what the requirements are for collectors plates or what that insurance is in California, but it’s an improvement if passed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fxr Samba Member

Joined: December 07, 2014 Posts: 2638 Location: Bay area CA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 5:27 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
That could be very helpful! _________________ Jim Crowther
1984 1.9l EJ22 Westy Wolfsburg Edition
Vespa GTS 300 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52299
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 5:38 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
If the bill allows old smoky engines to be on the road, then when the pendulum swings the other way all older vehicles may be outlawed. One should be careful what they wish for.
I personally believe that they should make older vehicles meet reasonably attainable standards, I know that back circa 1981 I was able to get my 1972 VW Thing with an aftermarket carb to pass the pollution standards that would be applied come the 1986 model year IIRC. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hdenter Samba Member
Joined: October 14, 2008 Posts: 2938 Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 6:00 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
It varies from county to county. In LA and Bay Area my wife's '79 vert requires an "enhanced" smog with a dyno. Here it is just a regular... Go figure. At some point there will be too small a percentage of cars older than the beginning of OBDII for it to be worth it to maintain the smog station bureaucracy. Even now, some smog stations don't have the equipment to smog late '70s early '80s cars. If the "collector" plate has a mileage limit, I'm out.
Hans _________________ '79 triple white convertible bug
'84 sunroof vanagon
'85 weekender |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
metahacker Samba Member

Joined: May 26, 2010 Posts: 890 Location: san.diego
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 6:08 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
California used to have a rolling year exception
e.g. if it was X number of years old, it was historic and exempted
then when the Terminator (Arnold S.) was in office they suddenly froze it and it got stuck at 1975
putting it back like it was would be ideal...and totally reasonable |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GoEverywhere Samba Member

Joined: December 13, 2020 Posts: 891 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 6:19 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
hdenter wrote: |
It varies from county to county. In LA and Bay Area my wife's '79 vert requires an "enhanced" smog with a dyno. Here it is just a regular... Go figure. At some point there will be too small a percentage of cars older than the beginning of OBDII for it to be worth it to maintain the smog station bureaucracy. Even now, some smog stations don't have the equipment to smog late '70s early '80s cars. If the "collector" plate has a mileage limit, I'm out.
Hans |
Thats already happening. Washington no longer smogs vehicles, and Oregon is talking about doing the same. They both cite not enough old vehicles on the road to bother. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
syncrodoka Samba Member

Joined: December 27, 2005 Posts: 12291 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:45 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
Collector(historic) motor vehicle registration has usage limits and annual mileage limits. They aren't for a daily or a car you are taking camping. This wouldn't be of much use for most of us, unfortunately. I would love to hear otherwise though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dublife13 Samba Member
Joined: March 08, 2021 Posts: 124 Location: washington
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
Washington has mileage limits for their collector plates but doesn't check or enforce them in any manner. One time purchase, no year tab renewal or any fees for the life of the vehicle. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zerotofifty Samba Member
Joined: December 27, 2003 Posts: 3748
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:22 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
metahacker wrote: |
California used to have a rolling year exception
e.g. if it was X number of years old, it was historic and exempted
then when the Terminator (Arnold S.) was in office they suddenly froze it and it got stuck at 1975
putting it back like it was would be ideal...and totally reasonable |
Sally Lieber was the state legislator that wrote that horrible smog law, she was from Mt. View Calif. Arnold signed it into law. I campaigned to stop this evil bill. To this day, I cant stand his stupid terminator movies thanks to what he did. F him and Lieber.
Nothing but more expense and hassle for me |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MsTaboo  Samba Member

Joined: June 02, 2006 Posts: 4548 Location: East Kootenay, British Columbia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
I think if they're gonna still smog check (and I understand why in certain areas) they should require the vehicle to meet the numbers when it was made, regardless of what kind of engine it currently has.
Makes no sense at all to penalize a 1990 VW for having a 2003 engine if it's putting out the same (or better) emissions just because it's an engine conversion.That newer engine is most likely getting better milage and not dripping oil all over (or stuck on the side of the road broke down).
On the other hand it's crazy that you can have 1964 Mustang with a 800 hp engine with no emission equipment and be exempt from any smog check just because it's older. Or those off-road only vehicles doing the same thing; just because it's off-road doesn't mean it's not polluting!
edit: added the bold type _________________ Currently:
'90 Syncro Westy 3 knob w/Zetec
The information age has morphed into the age of disinformation and willful ignorance. Agnotology!
All that's needed for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.
Resist Kleptocratic Oligarchy (and Idiocracy)!
Last edited by MsTaboo on Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GoEverywhere Samba Member

Joined: December 13, 2020 Posts: 891 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:43 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
MsTaboo wrote: |
I think if they're gonna still smog check (and I understand why in certain areas) they should require the vehicle to meet the numbers when it was made, regardless of what kind of engine it currently has.
Makes no sense at all to penalize a 1990 VW for having a 2003 engine if it's putting out the same (or better) emissions just because it's an engine conversion.That newer engine is most likely getting better milage and not dripping oil all over (or stuck on the side of the road broke down).
On the other hand it's crazy that you can have 1964 Mustang with a 800 hp engine with no emission equipment and be exempt from any smog check just because it's older. Or those off-road only vehicles doing the same thing; just because it's off-road doesn't mean it's not polluting! |
On the flip side, that 800HP Mustang meets the emissions standards of when it was built, just like you're advocating for above... I get where you're going, but the fact is there are so few 64 Mustangs on the road even if they were belching black clouds of hydrocarbons for miles they're not likely to make enough of an impact to be measurable in any way.
Don't get me wrong, emissions rules are vital. But letting offroaders and hotrods put a few miles on a year isn't worth squashing in my mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markswagen Samba Member
Joined: January 28, 2018 Posts: 1555 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:45 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
l'm not interested, we do far more miles in a year that having the vans insured and historic or what ever would allow.
our school run alone is over 200 miles a week. _________________ markswagen {mobile mechanic} san diego area all early VW's cared for.
619 201 0310 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate  Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 23791 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:42 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
MsTaboo wrote: |
I think if they're gonna still smog check (and I understand why in certain areas) they should require the vehicle to meet the numbers when it was made, regardless of what kind of engine it currently has.
Makes no sense at all to penalize a 1990 VW for having a 2003 engine if it's putting out the same (or better) emissions just because it's an engine conversion.That newer engine is most likely getting better milage and not dripping oil all over (or stuck on the side of the road broke down).
On the other hand it's crazy that you can have 1964 Mustang with a 800 hp engine with no emission equipment and be exempt from any smog check just because it's older. Or those off-road only vehicles doing the same thing; just because it's off-road doesn't mean it's not polluting! |
It’s antisensical as being able to re-engine an old car is the greenest thing on the planet. Getting another decade out of a large manufactured item is a huge reduction in footprint from a new car, either ICE or EV _________________ 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🍊 🍊 🍊 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52299
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:57 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
I have Oregon historic tags on 5 vehicles and only my 91 Multivan is titled as a regular vehicle. Two of the vehicles with historic tags reside full time in Arizona any more so Oregon doesn't know or care how many miles they get a year and the other three with reside in Oregon get only about 5000 miles combined in a year much of which is in Washington so I figure I meet the limited use requirement of the historic tags pretty well.
As of yet my only problem with the historic tags was in a two incident-two state occurrence. I parked my historic Toyota pickup in a perfectly legal spot in paved pull off in California that was well outside of a marked wilderness area to go hiking. While I was out hiking a National Park Service LEO saw the rig and ran the tags which because they are good forever don't have an expiration date or even places for the date stickers to go. I got a warning about having an expired tag and to not drive into the wilderness area which I had not done. A week later in Arizona I am going hiking in another wilderness area, so am driving a jeep road that goes right along the wilderness boundary several miles. This is a numbered BLM road that actually goes to an officially developed but long forgotten parking lot and is perfectly legal to use. As luck would have it the very same NPS officer that gave me the previous warning saw me turn up the unmarked Jeep trail that skirts the wilderness and he followed me up the trail and pulled me over figuring he could cite me for both having expired tags and for driving in the wilderness. I had ended up stopping right next to a boundary sign for the wilderness and pointed out to him that it was perfectly legal for me to drive on the north side of the boundary and offered to show him my BLM map and then when he went on to the expired tag issue I showed him the registration which was marked "permanent" which he too accepted. He seemed intrigued at the idea of the permanent historic tag.
Sadly almost no one goes hiking or hunting on foot in this area anymore and LEOs just assumes if you are parked close to a wilderness area you are there for nefarious purposes, so I have gotten a lot of warming tags left under my wipers for doing something that is 100% legal.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 18717 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:59 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
After cash for clunkers, FL did away with emissions testing. They were done at state facilities. Florida has historic plates, but you renew them every year. Not sure what the advantages are. They are blue and match the paint better. There are restrictions, but ours is not a daily driver. It’s more for car shows, parades etc, but I don’t think it’s enforced much. I see classic pickups with landscape equipment with antique tags. Vehicle needs to be 30 years. I think it’s a step in the right direction.
Terminator seemed pretty far fetched at the time. With AI and advances in robotics, it does get a bit concerning. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GoEverywhere Samba Member

Joined: December 13, 2020 Posts: 891 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:31 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
MarkWard wrote: |
After cash for clunkers, FL did away with emissions testing. They were done at state facilities. Florida has historic plates, but you renew them every year. Not sure what the advantages are. They are blue and match the paint better. There are restrictions, but ours is not a daily driver. It’s more for car shows, parades etc, but I don’t think it’s enforced much. I see classic pickups with landscape equipment with antique tags. Vehicle needs to be 30 years. I think it’s a step in the right direction.
Terminator seemed pretty far fetched at the time. With AI and advances in robotics, it does get a bit concerning. |
Oregon's have some restrictions too, basically it comes down to the phrase "Maintain the vehicle of special interest as a collectors’ item and use the vehicle only for exhibitions, parades, club activities and similar uses but not use the vehicle primarily for the transportation of persons or property;"
More or less that's mostly interpreted as 'not your daily driver' around here. I've got historic plates on my classics and even when I HAVE been pulled over(I got a speeding ticket in my Vanagon once) the officers don't even look twice at the historic plates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52299
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:41 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
GoEverywhere wrote: |
MarkWard wrote: |
After cash for clunkers, FL did away with emissions testing. They were done at state facilities. Florida has historic plates, but you renew them every year. Not sure what the advantages are. They are blue and match the paint better. There are restrictions, but ours is not a daily driver. It’s more for car shows, parades etc, but I don’t think it’s enforced much. I see classic pickups with landscape equipment with antique tags. Vehicle needs to be 30 years. I think it’s a step in the right direction.
Terminator seemed pretty far fetched at the time. With AI and advances in robotics, it does get a bit concerning. |
Oregon's have some restrictions too, basically it comes down to the phrase "Maintain the vehicle of special interest as a collectors’ item and use the vehicle only for exhibitions, parades, club activities and similar uses but not use the vehicle primarily for the transportation of persons or property;"
More or less that's mostly interpreted as 'not your daily driver' around here. I've got historic plates on my classics and even when I HAVE been pulled over(I got a speeding ticket in my Vanagon once) the officers don't even look twice at the historic plates. |
I saw a Unimog setup like it was prepped for world travel with Oregon Special Use plates on it. No idea what it was actually being used for, but as a guess I would say someone was living in it at least part time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dailymoto Samba Member
Joined: August 06, 2020 Posts: 21 Location: So cal desert
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:15 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
Abscate wrote: |
MsTaboo wrote: |
I think if they're gonna still smog check (and I understand why in certain areas) they should require the vehicle to meet the numbers when it was made, regardless of what kind of engine it currently has.
Makes no sense at all to penalize a 1990 VW for having a 2003 engine if it's putting out the same (or better) emissions just because it's an engine conversion.That newer engine is most likely getting better milage and not dripping oil all over (or stuck on the side of the road broke down).
On the other hand it's crazy that you can have 1964 Mustang with a 800 hp engine with no emission equipment and be exempt from any smog check just because it's older. Or those off-road only vehicles doing the same thing; just because it's off-road doesn't mean it's not polluting! |
It’s antisensical as being able to re-engine an old car is the greenest thing on the planet. Getting another decade out of a large manufactured item is a huge reduction in footprint from a new car, either ICE or EV |
I used to think this was the case as well with EVs, but after reading from the EPA, Department of Energy, MIT, etc, the evidence consistently shows that the lifetime carbon emissions of an average EV is significantly less than an average ICE vehicle even when taking manufacturing into account.
I definitely agree about the old ice for new ice swap. Here in Cali, I would have loved a different newer motor than what’s offered out here.
The dream would be an EV conversion, but after crunching the weight, range, and charging speed capabilities, not sure if that’ll ever happen for our household. Maybe 10-15yr if ever? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BuddyTheWolf Samba Member
Joined: September 26, 2024 Posts: 17 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:22 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
It's silly to ban a "modified" car, say with a modern EFI system and high flo cats but it's allowed if the anemic and inefficient 40 year old emissions equipment is left untouched. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
E1 Samba Member
Joined: January 21, 2013 Posts: 8245 Location: Westfalia, Earth
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:36 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
For what it’s worth, Colorado has an annual mileage limit of 4,500 on their Collector plate, so we did a standard plate for eight years.
We almost did that again last time… until the clerk asked why we don’t do the 5-year collector plate.
I mentioned the mileage limit, and she said “Oh, we don’t care about that.”
So neither do we. _________________ 1984 Westfailure/2.1 Digijet/5.43 Ring & Pinion/Peloquin/D-rated BFG KO2s
AI has spoken to further illiteracy, to steal, to cheat, and to replace humans
"Adding power makes you faster on the straights.
Subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere." — Colin Chapman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|