Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Forum Index -> Bay Window Bus Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 5:44 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

The tank opening is 7/16”. The copper return pipe is 5/16” od and 1/4” id. If you figure the area of the cross section of the tank opening(.1503in^2) and subtract the area of the cross section of return pipe(.0767in^2) including the wall (5/16”), you get the feed around the return pipe. If you then figure the area of the cross section of the return pipe (1/4”)id. (.0491in^2), you have a cross section that will yield a greater potential feed volume than return volume.

.1503-.0767=0.0736in^2 feed
0.0491in^2 return

And, I’ve been driving it around trying to make it fail. It’s still early, but so far it is very promising. Ultimately, if it becomes necessary to replace the tank with an FI tank, I will. First, however, I’m going to exhaust my mind with finding a VIABLE workaround or not. It’s an interesting project.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 42044
Location: at the beach
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 6:01 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

while an FI tank would be best if you come across a clean on within pickup distance, you can always put the issue on your to do list and braze in a return line some time when you have the engine out and can pull the tank. There are ways to work on a gas tank safely. In the meantime, if what you are doing works, go for it. The FI tanks have no filter in them like the carb tanks. The filter is before the pump.
_________________
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 6:08 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

I left the sock out and have the square FI filter between the tank and pump.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 42044
Location: at the beach
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 11:06 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

I understand what you did now. The small copper return goes thru the body and into the tank.

As to the return, that will work just fine I think. But, I have only one caveat. We were racing at Riverside, Sears Point, Laguna Seca, and Willow Springs on road courses in FP. We had a small oil sender screwed into the block that had an idiot sender on it and an adapter to a nylon oil pressure line. The weight of that sender was less than the CB adapter you have. We were at Willow Springs and the vibrations snapped the sender off the block. We lost oil pressure but caught it just before the engine grenaded. The #2 rod was bent about 50 degrees and the engine was about to chuck it. There is a lot more force on things that hang than people realize. We did not realize it but when I told my mentor, Bill, who was known for the Cosworth F1 and Indy engines he built, about the incident, he said he had seen that before.

If you can think of a way to make that work with the block held on tightly to something so bumps and potholes cannot vibrate it, consider doing that. Most important, get as much weight off it as you can that might flex it from side to side.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin


Last edited by SGKent on Thu Apr 24, 2025 2:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 5:27 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

It is remarkably light, but I take your point. I had the same thought and relieved it as much as possible with cable ties situated to take some weight off and lessen the likelihood of it vibrating loose and leaking. The t is sealed with an o-ring, and I worried it might work its way loose. I’ll definitely be keeping an eye on it.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 23003
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is online now 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 8:18 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

SGKent wrote:
Ray - no actually I had a perfect score on my ACT and SAT in that area. Take your space suit off next time you are up on a space walk and see what happens to your blood. at 24" of vacuum water will boil at 140F. At sea level, gasoline mixtures will begin outgas at 95F. To boil the whole mass one needs about 20F less than water. One reason a carb changes fuel to vapor is that the pressure is lower in the manifold.


to the OP. Not quite sure how you have a return in the feed line because it is so small but the baffle is for when the fuel gets down to quarter tank or so. The pump can suck air on turns or hard braking. If you are returning the fuel to the tank, then the air will go back there, and so will the heat. The whole tank becomes the heat sink.


Yes....water will boil....in a vacuum.
However, your assertion that there is significant negative pressure at the inlet of any of these fuel injection pumps is 100% incorrect. These are not high volume positive displacement pumps. And there is no "vacuum"....or negative pressure.... in liquid. Only positive flow toward a source of suction.

Bluntly put.....negative pressure in a fluid is not the same as negative pressure in a gas. You cannot create negative pressure in a fluid because of the surface tension holding it together as a fluid. You might want to look it up before you keep answering here in public. Wink

Likewise....cavitation is not caused by creating negative pressure or suction. It's caused by shear. There is no shear in the inlet nipple of the pump. There could be.....maybe if you increased throughput by about 1000% and we're trying to pull 60 liters per minute through a tiny 7mm orifice....sure....the shear rate would create bubbles.

Yes....the entire tank is heat sink. So is the outer body of the pump and any metal and rubber lines. Been saying that for years in these conversations and you yahoo keep swearing (without any measured data) that the energy of the pump just keeps heating the fuel up without any regard to the heat shedding properties of the tank and lines.

The other problem you ignore that ai mentioned in my last post (and time and time again in these same conversations)....is that the fuel tank is also a large black painted sheet metal vessel pointing down toward the pavement. Pavement in hot urban areas in anything over 90° ambient is well over 110-120°....and even hotter in temps over 105°. That radiates upward to create air over the pavement pushing 150° F.

Sit in some stop and go traffic for an hour or so....and you tank will be HOT. Your fuel will be HOT.
Yes....lots of evaporation! That factor is why I started measuring temps back in 1998-99 living Dallas. That's when I found....and I posted extensively on this years ago here in the forums in conversations about the charcoal canister.....that it's common on a hot day with open tank vents to lose over 1 gallon through evaporation alone.

The other nice thing though, is yes....the tank is a huge piece of sheet metal heat sink once the fuel starts sloshing around and you start moving at constant speed with air flowing around it. 10-15 minutes after getting out of traffic and onto the highway......fuel temps drop back to ambient plus just a few degrees from radiant heat coming off the highway.

Sure, you get vapor bubbles in the tank and can get foam from sloshing (which is actually quite rare because of the antifoam additives in gasoline).....but this is why you pull fuel from the bottom of the tank.

Yes.....in static fuel in lines that is not pressurized, hot fuel can break down into bubbles of gas from low vapor pressure additives. But when the fuel gets hot in the summer....that is not instantaneous. It's rare for it to be a fuel inlet problem for the pump.

As I stated....fuel in the tank in summer in hot urban areas can get very hot. I have measured peaks of 140° F in the center volume of the tank. That does not mean its like that everywhere and all the time. 120° is very common and it cools off quick in the lines.

As you note....and this is a problem everyone can have in many cars of our era.....getting air bubbles into the pump inlet is a problem from sloshing when the tank is low. The pre 80s BMW and Porsche guys spend big money out at the track for slosh tanks and mats to get rid of the issue.....but they are a different order of magnitude of the problem.

So the two biggest things that propagate cavitation (where it otherwise is not already happening) are air bubbles from sloshing and air bubbles immediately sucked in coming from the return line.
Air bubbles sucked into the pump....cannot be compressed. They instantly free the ollers and therefore the rotor moving the rollers....from compressive load. It then overspeed from its 4500-ish rpm constant to even higher max of around 5000 rpm.....causing cavitation....creating more bubbles.

The other items is restriction. If you have poor entry angles of return lines or inlet lines that slow the fuel flow at the inlet.....the rollers starve....and it causes classic cavitation.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
zerotofifty
Samba Member


Joined: December 27, 2003
Posts: 3505

zerotofifty is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:00 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Wildthings wrote:
If you are worried about the size of the plenum, 1974 T4 cars came with an 1800 with L-jet while earlier ones had a 1700 with D-jet. 1975 California model buses also had an 1800 with L-jet. Not sure what the various 1700 & 1800 Porsches had for fuel injection systems but there would be potential there as well.


The 1.7 914 and 2.0 914 used D jet at least thru 1974. all the 1.8 914s used L jet this be for American market 914s, some ran carbs for other markets.
Been doing 914s for a long time, many prefer the D jet, less finicky than the L jet. no delicate air meter

The injected 914s use a different cam than the carb versions

So assure your Bus engine has an injection cam for best results
_________________
Sorry About That Chief.

Give Peace a Chance.

Words to live by.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
zerotofifty
Samba Member


Joined: December 27, 2003
Posts: 3505

zerotofifty is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:06 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

SGKent wrote:
I understand what you did now. The small copper return goes thru the body and into the tank.

As to the return, that will work just fine I think. But, I have only one caveat. We were racing at Riverside, Sears Point, Laguna Seca, and Willow Springs on road courses in FP. We had a small oil sender screwed into the block that had an idiot sender on it and an adapter to a nylon oil pressure line. The weight of that sender was less than the CB adapter you have. We were at Willow Springs and the vibrations snapped the sender off the block. We lost oil pressure but caught it just before the engine grenaded. The #2 rod was bent about 50 degrees and the engine was about to chuck it. There is a lot more force on things that hang than people realize. We did not realize it but when I told my mentor, Bill, who was known for the Cosworth FI engines he built, about the incident, he said he had seen that before.

If you can think of a way to make that work with the block held on tightly to something so bumps and potholes cannot vibrate it, consider doing that. Most important, get as much weight off it as you can that might flex it from side to side.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


use care with copper pipes, vibration can work harden them, then they can crack and fail big time. Steel is less prone to this. I had a pressure sender for oil on a copper pile, extend several inches and vibration cracked it off. So use extreme car, specially with copper pipes. few manufactures use copper for things that can vibrate, although copper plated steel is oft used for pretty show cars. be aware of vibrations causing fatigue.
_________________
Sorry About That Chief.

Give Peace a Chance.

Words to live by.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 12:15 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

I had soft copper and compression fittings on the boat; so, the copper is for proof of concept and testing. I don’t really like mixing copper and aluminum anyway. If I still feel that the system is working after a few hundred miles, I’ll swap the copper for stainless. Thanks; that’s an excellent point which I should have mentioned.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Update
I have driven several hours now really looking for problems. The bus is running well, incredibly smooth. So far the fuel return has worked as hoped. I have noticed that a few bubbles still end up in the filter but are not sufficient to cause problems; the pump is cool and having no trouble maintaining volume and pressure. As it is set up now, the return is about 1-1/4” above the bottom of the tank, slightly slanted but basically straight up. Clearly, there is some “aeration” of the returning fuel. I’m wondering if a bend and a few inches of additional pipe to move the returning fuel further from the pickup would have a real impact and limit the bubbles even more. Thoughts?
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 42044
Location: at the beach
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:08 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Bnanwel wrote:
Update
I have driven several hours now really looking for problems. The bus is running well, incredibly smooth. So far the fuel return has worked as hoped. I have noticed that a few bubbles still end up in the filter but are not sufficient to cause problems; the pump is cool and having no trouble maintaining volume and pressure. As it is set up now, the return is about 1-1/4” above the bottom of the tank, slightly slanted but basically straight up. Clearly, there is some “aeration” of the returning fuel. I’m wondering if a bend and a few inches of additional pipe to move the returning fuel further from the pickup would have a real impact and limit the bubbles even more. Thoughts?
What you need to come up with is a fitting that is smaller and lighter than the one you have now, move your on off away from the tank and to the frame. Then change your return to a different metal than copper. I would say yes, keeping it away from the intake would be beneficial but I would angle it closer to 45 - 90 degrees and 2" way from the intake. Weight is the enemy now.
_________________
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 2:05 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

That all makes sense. I’ll change the return tube to aluminum and extend it further into the tank. I’m going to get it as close to 90* as will thread into the tank so that it stays fully immersed as much as possible, less agitation. Moving the ball valve off of the fitting is simple enough. Thanks for the input.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:18 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Update:
I lengthened the return pipe to move it away from the outlet of the tank. At the same time, I changed the return to aluminum tubing and reduced it to 1/4” to allow more feed volume. This iteration works quite well, no bubbles sucked to the filter even with prolonged run times. I think this is the way to make the cb performance T perform properly in a fuel injection system, a return without changing the tank or robbing a vent.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 42044
Location: at the beach
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:24 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Good job. the only thing left is I would remove the heavy shut off valve. If you need one mount it to something solid. They can also leak. I use small fuel line clamps when shutting off the fuel.
_________________
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:20 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

That pic was during mock up, prior to removing the shutoff. The T/return is now light and fully functional. It really is a joy to drive! Thanks so much for your input.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
SGKent Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2007
Posts: 42044
Location: at the beach
SGKent is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 2:10 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Bnanwel wrote:
That pic was during mock up, prior to removing the shutoff. The T/return is now light and fully functional. It really is a joy to drive! Thanks so much for your input.


It should work, because it is using the tank as the heat sink and to release any trapped air. I hope others who have the similar issue find your fix. I would try to keep my tank at least 1/3 full as much as possible. If the top of the return exit clears the fuel level, it will cause aeration as the fuel splashes. But if you keep a good amount of fuel in the tank there is no reason to do anything else.

You could flare / bell the end a little bit as that might slow the exit velocity a little. Or make some kind of a diffuser that would stay on the end and not come off or plug up.
_________________
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
telford dorr
Samba Member


Joined: March 11, 2009
Posts: 3623
Location: San Diego (Encinitas)
telford dorr is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2025 12:10 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

There is one more detail about FI tanks that you should be aware of. FI tanks have a small bowl structure in them that's a couple inches wide and high. The fuel feed to the pump comes from the center of the bowl. The return fuel line squirts into the bottom of the bowl from the outside through a simple venturi structure. This return fuel drags fuel from the tank into the bowl, causing it to fill up and overflow. The purpose of all of this is to guarantee a supply of fuel to the pump even when the fuel level in the tank is low. Without it, with a low fuel level in the tank, it is possible on hard cornering to temporarily uncover the tank port to the fuel pump, allowing the pump to suck air. While no big deal when feeding a carb, with FI this will cause a temporary loss of fuel pressure, and thus a loss of engine power. Therefore, when using a non-FI tank, it's best to keep a half of a tank of fuel minimum to avoid this problem or, if below a half a tank, to take corners very gently. FWIW
_________________
'71 panel, now with FI
'Experience' is the ability to recognize a mistake when you're making it again - Franklin P. Jones
In theory, theory works in practice; in practice, it doesn't - William T. Harbaugh
When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. The pain is only felt by others.
Same thing happens when you're stupid. - Philippe Geluck
More VW electrical at http://telforddorr.com/ (available 9am to 9pm PST)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 23003
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is online now 

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2025 12:56 pm    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

telford dorr wrote:
There is one more detail about FI tanks that you should be aware of. FI tanks have a small bowl structure in them that's a couple inches wide and high. The fuel feed to the pump comes from the center of the bowl. The return fuel line squirts into the bottom of the bowl from the outside through a simple venturi structure. This return fuel drags fuel from the tank into the bowl, causing it to fill up and overflow. The purpose of all of this is to guarantee a supply of fuel to the pump even when the fuel level in the tank is low. Without it, with a low fuel level in the tank, it is possible on hard cornering to temporarily uncover the tank port to the fuel pump, allowing the pump to suck air. While no big deal when feeding a carb, with FI this will cause a temporary loss of fuel pressure, and thus a loss of engine power. Therefore, when using a non-FI tank, it's best to keep a half of a tank of fuel minimum to avoid this problem or, if below a half a tank, to take corners very gently. FWIW


Yep. There are some alternate methods of "anti-slosh" devices out there as well that are like flat filtration bags that are micropore material that lay flat on the bottom of the tank and separate air from fuel. These do a lot of the same thing in the long run. Some are common with the road racing guys. I will see if I can find some and post a couple links. Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Bnanwel
Samba Member


Joined: November 10, 2022
Posts: 246
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Bnanwel is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2025 6:42 am    Post subject: Re: 1972 Bus Type4 EA 1.7 to Ljet? Reply with quote

Thanks guys. I’m aware of the potential “slosh” problem. I’ve only been doing local, city driving, but I have had it as low 1-1/2 gallons. At that low level, it obviously sloshed and sucked air one time on a speed bump. The pump whined for 20 seconds and cleared. I consider 1 gallon empty anyway. If it gets to the pisses-me-off point, I’ll create a slosh pot or swap the tank. Any ideas for controlling slosh short of changing the tank are very welcome. Engineering a work-around seems to me to be a beneficial project given how many people find themselves in a similar position. Thanks for all the constructive feedback.
_________________
‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback 
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Bay Window Bus All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2024, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.