Endcastings flow?

[BFB]

ive seen a few threads here and there on the stock DP end castings and a lot of differing opinions. So i was wondering if anyone ever ran any flow test on them and came to any definitive conclusions?
And if so stock compared to ported, or to the aftermarket larger endcastings ?
_________________
"how am i supposed to torque the rear wheel nut to 250 ft lbs??? " - clonebug
An interesting thing happens in forums where everyone starts parroting the same thing and "common knowledge" takes over.
Most experts aren't.

[Rob Combs]

Consensus seems to be that bone stock end castings max out around 88-90 HP.

Consensus is that the aftermarket “high flow “ castings are too big for anything but truly large engines or turbo applications.

There are a few people in the world who know exactly how to get more out of the stock units, or cast units that work in mid-size engines. I’ll stand aside and let them speak for themselves if they so choose.

I’ve tinkered with one by cutting one in two and altering the split but never got around to testing to see if i’m on the right track. Maybe on the next engine.

Or I’ll just go to someone who knows what to do to build out a set, whatever it costs and however many NDAs I have to sign, and call it a day.

But I am interested, and next time around will be building a smaller displacement engine with a modified PICT-3 and as much cam as it will handle.

[SGKent]

I was getting about 105 HP in a 1971 bus with stock 1600 dual port castings. I ported the heads, backcut the valves, and made sure that all turns were radiused properly. I also made sure that any areas in the 34 pict 3 that had rough castings, uneven mold seams, protrusions etc,. were flowed so that everything from the air cleaner to the cylinder was a smooth path - meaning no sharp edges. The surfaces were generally kept with a light roughness to stop any laminar flows. Used an extractor type exhaust for minimal backpressure. They used to call the cam a RV cam but I think it was the equal of what is the Engle 100 today. The only issue is that the engines were not originally made to handle the stress and heat created in a VW bus so the longevity of the engine is less than stock. With a stock exhaust the HP fell way back to slightly faster than walking but the life span of the engines was greatly increased. There comes a point where it is no fun working on a car when there are other things one would rather be doing.
_________________
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin

[modok]

I tested about 6 sets, was finding 115-130 cfm at 25" on a head that flowed 150
ID about 31mm-31.5
Suits 35.5-37.5 intake valves
The end castings are best designed part of the stock intake, IMO
as VW built them.....the heads are meh, center section is crude, carb is crude, but the end casting just need a little clean up, tho IMO they don't need to be made of aluminum, (steel ones heat soak less)

"The problem" is more to do with the qualities of the whole intake manifold itself, what it just naturally does. It is what it is.


Best use of the the stock end castings IMO, is to put a turbo it.

Guido Wensing (sp?) has made larger stock type aluminum end castings, which is neat, but I have yet to see them used in an application where they could truly shine.

[oprn]

I am not convinced that there would be enough advantage to warrant the cost of bigger ported end castings on a boosted engine. If running a single carb, the turbo will more than take care of any low flow short fall. I see guys running them here and making anywhere from 140 to 200+ HP on stock-ish engines.

If you are going for HP higher than that you will be going large displacement, blow through with dual Webers or 4 throttle bodies and EFI so you won't be using end castings anyway.

Modoc, I was not aware that the end castings have a heat soak problem. How does that manifest itself? Deterioration of the intake boots possibly?
_________________
Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old!

[modok]

With steel manifolds you will notice the difference, less HP loss when hot.
It's just that very rare to see, few steel end castings are ever paired with a center section that actually works well.

[Brian_e]

I looked in my notes, and my results are about the same as Modok.

I tested them on a Mofoco 40x35 head. I test at 28”. I did a stock end casting, a German Winsing larger end casting, and an IDF manifold for comparison.

Here are the .500” lift numbers.

Stock end casting
113cfm

Winsing
131.2

Untouched CB offset IDF manifold
137.9

Brian
_________________
So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok


www.type-emotorsports.com

Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts

[modok]

Seems about right.
I had a higher flowing head and a bellmouth velocity stack on the manifold.
Some flowed more one side or the other, some just flat out flowed more than others.
Testing a pile of them and choosing the best pair was a very fast way to gain 10CFM or better, with no real work.

[Alstrup]

I/we measure a little less, but that can be the calibration, or that the ones we tested were less efficient
If you want a stock like idle there is a definitive upper limit on overlap. So unless you go radical, yes 88-90 hp through stock castings. If you accept a choppy idle at 1000-1100 rpm the hp can easily increase about 10

Wensing castings can, with a little detailing, support 140 hp through a modified Solex carb
_________________
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993

[oprn]

[BFB]

Sounding a little ignorant here, but I assume ya’lls numbers are for one end casting ?

Alstrup, I assume you’re referring to removing or at least shortening the divider?

I can definitely see the heat soak thing too, those end castings have been hotter than I expected a few times I touched them. Some carbon fiber ones would be pretty cool but not sure how well they’d hold up. I’d considered 3d printing some back when I started messing with printing but from my experience there’s nothing available (yet ) that will hold up to the heat and fuel both.
_________________
"how am i supposed to torque the rear wheel nut to 250 ft lbs??? " - clonebug
An interesting thing happens in forums where everyone starts parroting the same thing and "common knowledge" takes over.
Most experts aren't.

[NJ John]

These end castings are ported. I didn’t use them on this version of my turbo. But, plan too. See the pipe welded to the inlet? Sorry, only pic of them. I can dig them out if needed.

_________________
1973 standard, yellow, lowered, 3” narrowed front, 1600 blo-thru turbo w/single dell 15.4@86, so far
11.41 et buggy. Long gone
Let’s go O’s! Let’s go O’s!
https://www.youtube.com/@AirSpooledGarage

[Brian_e]

[Brian_e]

[modok]

One sided of one end casting at a time.

[DerrickfromNC1]

Would a setup like this on a 2332 benefit from highflow end castings?

[BFB]

[Wreck]

[chrisflstf]

I asked this question before about increasing flow and was told to check out the Formula Vee forums, but couldnt find anything helpful

I have run a flex ball hone thru them but cant measure any results. They look better but the flow bench is the only way to know. I do think 10 to 15% increase is reasonably possible

[BFB]