Author |
Message |
Bub Samba Member

Joined: June 10, 2004 Posts: 1290 Location: Central Washington
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 10:40 am Post subject: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
Hey guys--
Just spent some time rebuilding a 63' (ground up rusty restore project). I'm not new to the VW stuff, so assume I know the basics and some details.
A couple questions I'm running through my head about rear suspension. I have adjustable spring plates on this car, lowered all around roughly 2" or so.
During assembly in the rear I measured and drilled/ threaded a hole in each spring plate so I could lock them in place and initially set up as stock would be, then adjust from there. Car was level and stock prior to all this.
After assembly rear height wasn't equal side to side, so I have adjusted it to level- but the adjustment on each side isn't equal. Does it matter?
Had it @ alignment shop last week, Camber is very close side to side.
rear Passenger side needs a couple more degrees of toe- do you just slot the mounting spring plate holes a tiny bit more?
Alignment specs weren't terrible, up front is all decent except odd bit of caster on passenger side- but it's still fairly dodgy on uneven highway roads.
Also-- speaking of rear camber; this particular car does an odd thing. I've owned 50 or so vintage VW's, none of them have done this the way this car does:
If you roll it backwards even a foot the rear camber goes way off, like you're jacking it up. I know reversing under power can have that effect. But when not in gear, not running if I roll it back a single foot the rear jacks WAY up, roll forward and it goes back to even. I'm trying to understand the physics of that. If I park facing up hill, and let it roll back a foot rear wheels tuck up, nothing dragging fwd or rear...shocks are good.
_________________
hitest wrote: |
Had a girlfriend once who shall we say, nearly arrived at the mere sight of a semaphore in action- easy to please she was... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisflstf Samba Member

Joined: February 10, 2004 Posts: 4017 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:20 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
My guess is the pan is under some kinda stress or tension. Maybe twisted when new pan halves were welded?
Rear toe can be adjusted by springplate holes or trans position, fore and aft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bub Samba Member

Joined: June 10, 2004 Posts: 1290 Location: Central Washington
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:28 pm Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
chrisflstf wrote: |
My guess is the pan is under some kinda stress or tension. Maybe twisted when new pan halves were welded?
Rear toe can be adjusted by springplate holes or trans position, fore and aft |
What is the trans-position adjustment you're referring to? Seems like the trans installs in one spot front and rear, no adjustment that I have ever seen.
And I mentioned the spring plate adjustment- anyone ever felt like adding a bit of room to the holes for a tiny bit extra toe? _________________
hitest wrote: |
Had a girlfriend once who shall we say, nearly arrived at the mere sight of a semaphore in action- easy to please she was... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisflstf Samba Member

Joined: February 10, 2004 Posts: 4017 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 1:41 pm Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
If your toe in is out only on 1 side I would look at slotting the spring plate holes. But I would put new bushings in the springplate first at the torsion bar end, as worn bushings will affect the springplate location. Ive seen springplate covers also with worn, elongated holes which also change the original location.
Moving the trans would not be my first choice. Relocating it backward, which would increase toe, could be done with shims. But it will move both axles also.
Hope that helps |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 35808 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Today 8:38 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
chrisflstf wrote: |
If your toe in is out only on 1 side I would look at slotting the spring plate holes. But I would put new bushings in the springplate first at the torsion bar end, as worn bushings will affect the springplate location. Ive seen springplate covers also with worn, elongated holes which also change the original location.
Moving the trans would not be my first choice. Relocating it backward, which would increase toe, could be done with shims. But it will move both axles also.
Hope that helps |
X2 on replacing the bushings and checking the covers first. Lube with talcum powder.
I haven't seen it, but backing up an unloaded VW often pushes them to negative camber in a roll or two. So I would guess it's normal? _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bub Samba Member

Joined: June 10, 2004 Posts: 1290 Location: Central Washington
|
Posted: Today 8:41 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
KTPhil wrote: |
X2 on replacing the bushings and checking the covers first. Lube with talcum powder.
I haven't seen it, but backing up an unloaded VW often pushes them to negative camber in a roll or two. So I would guess it's normal? |
I put all new bushings back there during assembly, I mean...it was totally torn down, I couldn't just skip that stuff. More or less every 'wear-item' I replaced.
For that rear toe I wonder if the spring plates just aren't exact, I mean they're not original...good chance one just doesn't measure *exactly* as the originals.
Nah....that never happens. _________________
hitest wrote: |
Had a girlfriend once who shall we say, nearly arrived at the mere sight of a semaphore in action- easy to please she was... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 35808 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Today 8:52 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
If you marked "level" before disassembly, and then later replaced the bushings, I would not be surprised if the alignment changed and your marks are now "off." _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bub Samba Member

Joined: June 10, 2004 Posts: 1290 Location: Central Washington
|
Posted: Today 9:00 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
KTPhil wrote: |
If you marked "level" before disassembly, and then later replaced the bushings, I would not be surprised if the alignment changed and your marks are now "off." |
Well....I didn't mark any stuff before removal. Since I was tearing it down so far, and so many new parts going on I assumed the marks wouldn't relate to very much.
I did make the rear spring plates 'solid' (they're adjustable) and the same on both sides, and matched to the originals. Then assembled as usually do on a rear swing axle setup. And assembly was normal..honestly In the past I haven't generally worried about the rear toe/ alignment- they just seem to go together and be fine. But on this one it was driving pretty dodgy.
For the toe, I'm just going to unbolt the axle and slot the holes just a tiny bit. Initially it was BAD- and simply loosening the axle/ springplate and tapping it to its most fwd position made 100% difference. So another 1/8" might do it. _________________
hitest wrote: |
Had a girlfriend once who shall we say, nearly arrived at the mere sight of a semaphore in action- easy to please she was... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 35808 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Today 9:14 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
Not everyone agrees with me, but I like a slight toe-out at the rear for swing axle cars. It makes handling over undulating curves a little more stable (most noticeable on a sweeping freeway interchange that has a little roller coaster action in it; this loads and unloads each side of the rear). It is a slight form of self-correcting as pitch and roll makes the car favor the inner or the outer wheel. Not to be overdone, but it helped my car seem a little more stable on those roads, and also in reaction to sidewinds, too. _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bub Samba Member

Joined: June 10, 2004 Posts: 1290 Location: Central Washington
|
Posted: Today 9:24 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
KTPhil wrote: |
Not everyone agrees with me, but I like a slight toe-out at the rear for swing axle cars. It makes handling over undulating curves a little more stable (most noticeable on a sweeping freeway interchange that has a little roller coaster action in it; this loads and unloads each side of the rear). It is a slight form of self-correcting as pitch and roll makes the car favor the inner or the outer wheel. Not to be overdone, but it helped my car seem a little more stable on those roads, and also in reaction to sidewinds, too. |
OK, now we're getting somewhere. Because that's what my brain tells me would work best. I have to look at the spec sheet- but I think I was roughly 0*-1* toe in on drivers side, and almost 'out' 2* on passenger side.
Handling itself and track fantastic around town, and is really good on nice even roads at highway speeds. But hit about 60mph on the highway and it starts getting interesting if the road isn't super nice. It's tracking ruts and feels a bit wiggly at almost every bump. New shocks, sway bar bushings, new steering stabilizer, steering box is GREAT, ties rods and ends all new.
Everything is tight everytwhere.. it's not a major problem, but must be fixable. I think I have to just get both sides to basically 0* and it'll be ok. _________________
hitest wrote: |
Had a girlfriend once who shall we say, nearly arrived at the mere sight of a semaphore in action- easy to please she was... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aquifer  Samba Member
Joined: August 30, 2021 Posts: 320 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Today 9:35 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
Your comment about the wheels tucking when you roll it backwards is interesting. My thought is that it would take serious toe-out for that to happen. So when you roll it backwards, the back wheels would want to roll toward each other, thus causing the back end to jack up. If you have toe-out, the "front" of the wheels are toe'd out, but the back of the wheels would toe in, and therefore might want to tuck when you roll it backwards. I don't know if that's true or not, but I can't think why else it would do that.
I've always heard that you want a little toe-out at the rear wheels as ktphil mentioned, but I've never had it raise the car when rolled backwards as you described. Not sure where I'm going with this, but I think I would solve that riddle before I got too excited about anything else.
Edited to add: oops looks like you replied before I realized it. Sounds like you're making some progress. _________________ Parts needed:
Front & rear NOS or used OEM door panels for a '67 in the original Gazelle color (dark tan/light brown).
Also looking for used white headliner pieces, both perforated and non-perforated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 35808 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Today 10:01 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
On swing axle cars, the rear toe changes as the suspension is loaded and unloaded. So measuring the chassis only can be misleading. Figure on one or two iterations after all is assembled. _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback
Last edited by KTPhil on Today 11:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisflstf Samba Member

Joined: February 10, 2004 Posts: 4017 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Today 10:58 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension toe / camber |
|
|
Yes, toe changes with camber changes. So, change one, need to check the other |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|