| Author |
Message |
rblake3 Samba Member

Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 154 Location: Whidbey Island, WA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a lot of great info here. You ultimately have to make your own decision based on how much money, time or effort you are willing to spend.
If I personally was in a crunch for camping season and had a dead Vanagon sitting in the driveway (like I did three months ago), I would probably be looking for another vehicle. The buy in for a reliable Vanagon is at least 5K not including transmission, axles, shocks, tires, bearings, brakes. If I did it again I would not put a WBX motor in my van either. I have a rebuild, it works now but only after I replaced the head seals after only 3k miles of "newish" motor fun. Sounds like you are in a similar situation with a motor that has been freshened up once already. Not worth the wasted money.
For an emergency camp right now vehicle you can find decent newer Subaru outbacks or legacys all over the internet for less than 8k. Put a rack and pod up there and you are set for serious camp action. Not the same coolness and convienience factors as the Vanagon but you won't have to worry about the engine too much. They haul butt over mountain passes and can actually overtake other cars at highway speeds. I used to have a Suby wagon and it was awesome. My next "general purpose" car will be a Suby wagon hands down. _________________ 90 Vanagon Carat Wander Wagon
88 16v GTi
01 1.8T Beetle
94 Miata
Vanagon H4 E-Code Lighting Upgrade page |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jyl Samba Member
Joined: February 13, 2007 Posts: 257
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey guys. Thanks for all the responses. I have Internet access for five min while waiting for ferry. Will read your advice in more detail later. I am slightly leaning toward zetec/bostig option for ease of doing, long term reliability, power, etc. Ready to give up on the CA smog, wife points out we are not likely to move back there. Anyway I'll check in when get back home in a day. Thanks again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PDXWesty Samba Member

Joined: April 11, 2006 Posts: 6344 Location: Portland OR
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it were me and coming from a viepoint of limited funds, I would make a decision after I had the mechanic pull the heads. If they were re-usable and everything else on the engine looked good, I would install new gaskets and be done with it. Might be a $1000 dollar job or less. You might get another 50k trouble free miles that way and you'd be on the road again this summer at minimal time and cost.
If you did need new heads I would probably still get it done, but I would shop it around a little. I don't know where you took your van, but there are lots of qualified mechanics in Portland. You'd still probably get another 50k miles out of it. I don't know how many miles a year you put on your van, but I only do 5-6K a year.
A couple year extension on this engine would give you time to save and plan another engine or conversion. 138k miles is not that high for the bottom end. _________________ 89 Westy 2.1 Auto |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
j_dirge Samba Member

Joined: August 08, 2007 Posts: 4641 Location: Twain Harte, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PDXWesty wrote: |
A couple year extension on this engine would give you time to save and plan another engine or conversion. 138k miles is not that high for the bottom end. |
I agree.
I bought my 89 GL Westy with 138k miles on it.. Am at 170 now. After what? 7 yrs?
Didn't make my mind up on which swap until 2 months ago.
No need to rush into replacing the engine if there's miles left in it. _________________ -89 GL Westy, SVX.. finally.
-57 pan f/g buggy with a 67 pancake Type 3 "S"
"Jimi Hendrix owned one. Richard Nixon did not"
-Grand Tour, Season 1, episodes 4 and 5
| danfromsyr wrote: |
those are straight line runs with light weight race cars for only 1/4mile at a time..
not pushing a loaded brick up a mountain pass with a family of 4+ inside expecting to have an event free vacation..
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ytsew Samba Member
Joined: June 09, 2008 Posts: 57 Location: OR
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I put a used Subaru EJ22 into my 84 westy a year and a half ago. I am handy with tools and have no problem with electronics so labour was cheap. Took about 100 hours of work. I love it. Works VERY well.
My neighbour did it too - he got the mechanic at the autoclub to help out as my neighbour is not too mechanically inclined.
If you can do it yourself, or with a buddy - the EJ22 is a great engine, lots of power and works well.
Unfortunately there is no one place for information, as no one has published a step by step how to. And there are lots of options every step of the way. The yahoo group is very supportive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ytsew Samba Member
Joined: June 09, 2008 Posts: 57 Location: OR
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW the EJ22 did not have a head gasket problem. It was the twin cam EJ25 turbo that did. Check on the yahoo groups forum, they can tell you exactly what model engines had the problem and how it was corrected.
The EJ22 is the engine that is so reliable is used for small airplane engines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Williamtaylor33 Samba Member

Joined: September 07, 2007 Posts: 1545 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ytsew wrote: |
The EJ22 is the engine that is so reliable is used for small airplane engines. |
They are reliable engines. And what you say is true. But aint they used in airplanes because of the flat orientation of the engine? _________________ 89 Bostig powered syncro westy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sodo Samba Member

Joined: July 06, 2007 Posts: 10779 Location: Western WA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Williamtaylor33 wrote: |
| ytsew wrote: |
The EJ22 is the engine that is so reliable is used for small airplane engines. |
They are reliable engines. And what you say is true. But aint they used in airplanes because of the flat orientation of the engine? |
Ha you are trying to trick us! No,,,,,, you won't see kits to put a WBX in an airplane anytime soon! _________________
'90 Westy EJ25, NEW oil rings (!) 2Peloquins, 3knobs, SyncroShop pressure-oiled pinion-bearing & GT mainshaft, filtered, cooled gearbox.
'87 Tintop w 47k 53k, '12 SmallCar EJ25, cooled filtered original gearbox
....KTMs, GasGas, SPOT mtb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bostig Samba Member
Joined: February 01, 2006 Posts: 236
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:02 pm Post subject: Re: Oops, Add Zetec/Bostiq To The Mix |
|
|
| jyl wrote: |
The Bostig is interesting. I should have added that to my options.
I guess the advantage of going Bostiq over Subaru is that you get all the parts, instructions, support from a single vendor? And that low-mileage Ford motors can be cheaper than an equivalent mileage Subaru motor?
What would be the disadvantages? Maybe timing - I see the 8th group closes for deposits on July 10, which was yesterday, and the kits won't complete shipping until September - even if I can still get into the group after I get home next week, that doesn't give me a ton of time to decide.
If I miss the 8th group, not sure when the next group starts. |
We have 5 Reserve kits going up for sale in a week or so. The reserve kits cost $500 more, but you buy today they ship tomorrow. Going the group route will save you money for sure, but if you're in a real pinch it is an option.
I should also mention we now have brand new zero mile zetec engines available for $1300(if you pickup in Boston or Seattle, or $150-$250 more to ship them) but it's still a sick deal on a factory sealed complete engine, there's nothing else you can buy for the same money. There are about 300 available, and we're not sure how many we're going to be able to get for customers but it's a great deal.
The 9th install group may end up opening early, and close out as soon as we get another 10-12 folks or by mid-late august. If the demand is there we can bump the schedule and start overlapping the groups as long as engineering can maintain pace with having the right revisions ready in time as well, I also can't rob too much time from the other dev projects, it's a balancing act that we're steadily improving at.
Jim Akiba |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jyl Samba Member
Joined: February 13, 2007 Posts: 257
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. The zero-time engine is pretty tempting. I live in Portland but would have to rent a pickup truck and drive to Seattle, so self-pickup vs delivery would probably be a wash.
I have to think about the reserve kit vs 9th group. I'm not really clear why you are batching installs into "groups", though I know there must be a reason, what is the difference to the user other than the $500?
There was mention of a warranty on the Bostig site but I couldn't find details. Is there really such a thing?
How easy is it to retain A/C with the Zetec? Do you re-use the Vanagon compressor, how does the bracket adapt, etc.
As the Zetec is vertical, is there a ground clearance issue? I only have a 2WD and never stray beyond a gravel road, so this probably isn't important, but just wondering.
I am pretty sure I have all tools needed except an engine hoist. For the 911 I put a jack under the engine, there isn't really room for an overhead hoist. But for the Vanagon I'd want a hoist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bostig Samba Member
Joined: February 01, 2006 Posts: 236
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Group vs Reserve:
Groups prepay, and have to wait 4-6 weeks. In exchange we discount.
Reserve kits are purchased by our cash up front(which we have little of typically, since cash flow can be problematic in the little micro-enterprise), so we charge regular kit price + cost of credit to buy that inventory + risk of having inventory over time = roughly $500 more per kit makes it worth our while. Value to customer for paying $500 more, buy today ship tomorrow. It's cheaper to be patient and plan ahead, but it doesn't always work out that way esp with vanagons.
The purpose of groups is to obtain the scale needed to both manufacture the kits, and to evaluate documentation, procedures, and small revisions on a continual basis, with a large enough sample to distinguish systemic vs. isolated issues. Groups may eventually stop as we get closer to the retail version/development freeze in preparation for a massive build group which we'll hold in inventory. The retail price will reflect the reserve price, but the structure will be different in that we are going to option virtually everything including phone support to provide a basic kit for lower cost entry for folks looking to gain entry but willing to give up value in areas where they might not deem it important/vital. We are hoping to freeze dev on the v2.0 within another 2-3 groups, but of course originally we were shooting for group 6 to be the last one needed... but that's grudgingly typical for the aftermarket, least we're doing better than GM.
Keeping A/C is pretty easy, Ford compressor, $35 adapter block from doc's blocks, the trickiest part is having a hydraulic place or AC shop extend/fit lines to attach to the A/C block fittings.. but even that is pretty straight forward. The ford compressor is the same displacement as the Sandens in the later vanagons, just with 10 cylinders instead of 7, works quite well.
I just posted pics to another thread about ground clearance, have a look there.
Jim Akiba
Last edited by bostig on Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Williamtaylor33 Samba Member

Joined: September 07, 2007 Posts: 1545 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jyl wrote: |
Thanks. The zero-time engine is pretty tempting. I live in Portland but would have to rent a pickup truck and drive to Seattle, so self-pickup vs delivery would probably be a wash.
I have to think about the reserve kit vs 9th group. I'm not really clear why you are batching installs into "groups", though I know there must be a reason, what is the difference to the user other than the $500?
There was mention of a warranty on the Bostig site but I couldn't find details. Is there really such a thing?
How easy is it to retain A/C with the Zetec? Do you re-use the Vanagon compressor, how does the bracket adapt, etc.
As the Zetec is vertical, is there a ground clearance issue? I only have a 2WD and never stray beyond a gravel road, so this probably isn't important, but just wondering.
I am pretty sure I have all tools needed except an engine hoist. For the 911 I put a jack under the engine, there isn't really room for an overhead hoist. But for the Vanagon I'd want a hoist. |
As far as A/C goes. I just installed A/C in my vanagon last week. And i've put around 3000 miles on my van in the past week. As i type i'm riding in the passenger seat of my westy in south texas and the A/C is keeping it chilly in here.
You use a ford focus compressor. I got a new one for 189.00. (after tax and shipping) All i did was flush the system real good. Install a new dryer. And run lines from the new compressor to the old lines and splice them together. It wasnt difficult. Took about 5 hours from start to finish.
The bostig google group has a link to Docs Blocks that you can buy the A/C block from. That simplifys the install. _________________ 89 Bostig powered syncro westy
Last edited by Williamtaylor33 on Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bostig Samba Member
Joined: February 01, 2006 Posts: 236
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We are a couple weeks from shipping the first set of parts to a gutsy customer in CA. The problem is, the BAR ref sticker procedure is the only chance right now, and technically, if they don't like you for instance or for any reason they can simply state that because it is OBDII and does not carry with it the trans from the donor vehicle, they will not sticker it.
So here's the value prop to our customers:
- $1500 more in parts that do virtually nothing for you(lower evap emissions, lower NOx at idle alone)
- More complexity in wiring, hoses, exhaust, and general routing
- The only problematic part of the zetec powertrain was the EGR system which is known to need replacement early and can cause annoying drivability issues.. which we'd be adding back in(and it does nothing for you, not better mpg, you don't need it to pass the actual CA emissions etc)
- After all that, it's still only a maybe that you'll get a sticker.
Sound less than rosy? Does to me... but at least we might set a precedent with this first go around, still no guarantee.
The conversion can pass the emissions tests, but it isn't about that. And we cannot obtain an EO, they will not issue them for OBDII engine swaps.
Jim Akiba |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelhead Samba Member

Joined: February 25, 2007 Posts: 1791 Location: Kentfield, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bostig wrote: |
| ..... $1500 more in parts that do virtually nothing for you.... |
$1500 would go a heckuv a long way to getting through a test-only smog shop. That's a lot of grease! Even spread out over 6 years ($500 per two-year period) would probably do the trick just fine.
While standards have certainly tightened up in CA, I'm pretty sure there are plenty of shops in the more urban environments that would simply stick the sniffer in your exhaust pipe and pass you based on the emmissions output. Or am I missing something? I mean, if the smog tester treats it as a stock engine, won't it pass? Many shops seem to be willing to do a test run w/o registering the vehicle in the system (there's a work-around to trick the system..can't remember what exactly), at which point they could let you know if there are any red flags.
As far as the visual inspection goes...I have an old Jeep with shiny, non-compliant edelbrock stuff all over its engine and I would just take it to the smog shop in downtown SF...the visual inspection was cursory at best.
I think if I were to go the Bostig route I'd just spend some time finding an acommodating/lax shop. After that, how big a risk is it?
Flamesuit on. _________________ '77 Bay Window / '89 Caratsburg (aka. the Stormtrooper) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
j_dirge Samba Member

Joined: August 08, 2007 Posts: 4641 Location: Twain Harte, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steelhead wrote: |
I think if I were to go the Bostig route I'd just spend some time finding an acommodating/lax shop. After that, how big a risk is it?
Flamesuit on. |
Shops that flaunt the rules face big fines and possible loss of the license to do smog test.
See Bostig's earlier link where you can alos find a list of shops that have been fined or licenses yanked.
Add to this that Vanagons are HEPers (High Emitting Profile) and they ususally have to go to Smog Test Only stations.
These outfits make much of thier total income on smog checks.
Also.. hurts resale.
I'd not be likely to buy a Vanagon unless I KNEW it could pass smog legitimately.
If I recall correctly, there was an SVX Vanagon for sale up near Vacaville somwhere about a yr ago. Owner couldn't get it thru smog.
Worth nearly zero dollars in CA. I guess you could plan to sell out of state if you ever got busted?
Dunno.. Not a risk I'm willing to take if there are other proven alternatives. _________________ -89 GL Westy, SVX.. finally.
-57 pan f/g buggy with a 67 pancake Type 3 "S"
"Jimi Hendrix owned one. Richard Nixon did not"
-Grand Tour, Season 1, episodes 4 and 5
| danfromsyr wrote: |
those are straight line runs with light weight race cars for only 1/4mile at a time..
not pushing a loaded brick up a mountain pass with a family of 4+ inside expecting to have an event free vacation..
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tomudell Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2009 Posts: 16 Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Just a reply and my vote. I have also faced the pro's and cons cause I live in CA. I had my heart set on a 2.5 sub conversion but it is not approved in CA, only the 2.2. I was going to go that route until I found out it was going to have to be an OBDI version engine. I talked to my aunts ex boyfriend who owns a shop and worked on sub for the past 30 years and he said he would not touch the 2.5 wither way in his opinion those are all crap. FYI the years the 2.5 were the worst is any DOHC most likely 98 and earlier. Legacy 2000 - 2002, Impreza 99- 2002 and Forester 99-2002. If you stay away from those years and do a 2003 or newer you should be ok, but no guarantee or stick with a 2.2. If I were out of CA I would do the 2.5 with a newer 2.5 or better yet do the 2.0 turbo. Pro's and cons are also if you want to keep your A/C you have to get new a/c hoses made and for ground clearance would need to get the oil pan reduced. After much debate with my self I decided to go with a rebuilt engine from JLP www.jlpengines.com which will be a 2.3 115hp, with over 148 lb ft of torque. Jake there was a pleasure to talk with they have done much to their rebuilds to make them a much better engine at a good price. I for 1 wish that CA was not such a chicken shit or I would have done the subie conversion with a newer 2.5 or 2.0 turbo. Word to the wise, if you do stay there is anyone that does stay with the vw engine you might consider buying the subaru coolant conditioner as they call it (i think it is just a fancy stop leak but anyway) that is what they use in there 2.5's, I tried it in my 2.1 when I first got the leaky head gasket and it helped seal it, matter a fact I have not seen a leak since I added it. I know the problem is there so now was the time for me to make my decision to do the swap or rebuilt. Any thoughts on this conditioner, what could be the pro's and con's of using it the way subaru does in my new engine? or am y asking for problems cause it could cause my cooling system to get clogged up? any thoughts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
morymob Samba Member
Joined: November 09, 2007 Posts: 4683 Location: east-tn
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| levi wrote: |
| 240Gordy wrote: |
| buckturgidson wrote: |
Ok it's been a late night for me but I'll toss out a couple things.
Levi , why would you feel safer spending on a re-build of a 1.9 instead of a 2.1 ? |
cuz maybe the rods won't break and punch a hole in the case? |
Yeah. The 2.1 are known for that with just a little more miles on them than what you've already got. Not so with the 1.9, in fact my last 1.9 had about 250,000 on the original engine and was still running strong. Man I hated getting rid of that one. |
The 2.1 with 1.9 rods or updated to newer 3/8 bolts won't break rods,it's the crappy stretch bolts vw started using that causes the problems. After making some changes to the wbx engine, i've been running wbx's since '93, many miles and with a much better reliability record than the brand x's i also have owned,current CRV wouldn't start in the 7-degree weather a few days ago but the syncro fired right up. Learned on my 1st wbx that u do it right or do it over until it is right. How can you improve if u don't have problems, not counting regular wear items=belts shoes,pads etc which u replace on all?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
randywebb Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2005 Posts: 3815 Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Orygun
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:42 pm Post subject: Re: No Votes For Fixing The Wasserboxer? |
|
|
| jyl wrote: |
| Hmm, I notice I'm not seeing any votes or arguments for fixing my existing wasserboxer. |
isn't that the clear inexpensive choice?
if it breaks down somewhere, who can fix a conversion?
- who will be willing to try and fix one??
which conversions do not reduce the ground clearance or ramp angle in the rear?
- gravel roads have low clearance sometimes too...
which conversions do not require a bump in the luggage compartment for clearance?
I do not know the answers to the above, but I would sure find out beforehand.
I would also think about how long it will be before you can put some sort of electric/hybrid drive into the vehicle. If you drive 5k or 10k a year, you will have a pretty nice cushion to wait for such modifications to mature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ftp2leta Samba Member

Joined: October 11, 2004 Posts: 3271 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:41 pm Post subject: Re: No Votes For Fixing The Wasserboxer? |
|
|
| Quote: |
if it breaks down somewhere, who can fix a conversion?
- who will be willing to try and fix one?? |
Who will fix the stock engine? Modern engine have OBD2, easy to find any problem.
| Quote: |
| which conversions do not reduce the ground clearance or ramp angle in the rear?- gravel roads have low clearance sometimes too... |
You loose 1 in on mine. Ramp angle?
| Quote: |
| which conversions do not require a bump in the luggage compartment for clearance? |
Mine again. _________________ Working with rust, grease, dirt and dust is a sad truth.
------------------------------------------------------
FI part for sale: http://www.benplace.com/parts_sale1.htm
My site: http://www.benplace.com/vw2.htm
Subi conversion: http://www.benplace.com/vanaru_eng.htm
Youtube http://www.youtube.com/user/ftp2leta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccisco Samba Member
Joined: August 28, 2008 Posts: 212 Location: eugene
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:29 pm Post subject: conversion |
|
|
I'm glad that this thread has re-started, because I'm considering doing a conversion on my Westy. I've been checking prices, and it seems to me, even with shipping the wiring harness to Canada to get it done, the Subie conversion is a lot cheaper. I've my math is correct, buying the essential items from KEP runs about 1200 dollars, then the harness is about 600 to have done. That's $1900, and there's just a ton of 1990-95 (the non-interference engines) Legacys for 500-900 to get the engine, harness, computer etc. Which would bring the total price to about 2500-2800. Does that sound about right to those who have done this, or am I totally off? If so, that puts it in the range of a cheap rebuild on a Waterboxer...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|