| Author |
Message |
tarandusVDub Samba Member

Joined: August 27, 2010 Posts: 1683 Location: Between Here and There
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO the fox shocks are mucho overkill for a 2wd. We did the GW 1.5 springs, bilstien HD shocks, 16" GW rims and Yoko Geolandars for tires. If I did it again I'd go Reins 15". Also added a peloquin during Trans rebuild. Fantastic 2wd setup haven't been stuck yet! _________________ 1990 Syncro 16" DoppleKabine 2.1 DJ 112i
________________________
Sold: 1972 Bay Campmobile; 1984 Westy, base model, 2WD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hans j Samba Member

Joined: May 06, 2006 Posts: 2746 Location: Salt Lake City UT
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Find some vans local to you to ride in and decide after that. Personally: I feel the gowesty springs are too stiff. Shocks will help a ton with dive and roll, maybe bilstein HD or sport (I prefer something from their off road catalog). I've driven on some pretty sharp rocks with my BFG AT and love them, 25k miles on them so far. But tires are an emotional purchase, so go with your gut on that one. And definitely do bushings before spending money on other stuff! _________________ 1986 Canadian Syncro Westy TDI - 1989 Syncro Single Cab - 2001 Audi S4 - 1981 VW Caddy ABA - 1980 VW Caddy EV - 1973 VW T-181 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kbeefy Samba Member

Joined: March 10, 2006 Posts: 600 Location: Central Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Compared to springs, shocks have a pretty small effect on roll. Unless compared to a failing shock. Shock Damper rates are usually in the 50-150# range, the wheel rate of springs can be much much higher.
In a perfect world, springs control roll (they do tons more than that, but for this comment I'm focusing on body roll since thats what has been brought up). Shocks dampen springs, they are matched to the spring more than the vehicle. The dampening value can be changed to affect other handling aspects, but ultimately shocks are meant to control springs.
When that doesn't work perfect (as it almost never does) things are tweaked to compensate for shortcomings. Enter the Sway/Anti-roll bar. Enemy of shock tuners everywhere.
Anyways.... Identify and correct the problem, don't put a bandaid on it and ignore it. _________________ 86 syncro CHC, NorthWesty subbie 2.5, decoupler, locker, custom interior, 225/75r16 Duratrack's on CLK's, Toyo cabin heater, ARB fridge, 300w Zamp Solar, Gowesty bumpers/skid/rails, Fiama awning
'86 Syncro Westy. Stock for now.
2000 F350 7.3 CC LB 11' Northland Cabover
2006 Subbie OBXT
2002 Tacoma DoubleCab 4x4
1969 Mustang Basket Case 351c/FMX/9
http://kbeefy.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hans j Samba Member

Joined: May 06, 2006 Posts: 2746 Location: Salt Lake City UT
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Springs hold up the vehicle, shocks control the spring. I'm running softer than stock springs and stiffer than stock shocks. Minimal body roll and dive  _________________ 1986 Canadian Syncro Westy TDI - 1989 Syncro Single Cab - 2001 Audi S4 - 1981 VW Caddy ABA - 1980 VW Caddy EV - 1973 VW T-181 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
levi Samba Member
Joined: February 11, 2005 Posts: 5522 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's my opinion on part of your intended setup.
This is with an 85 hightop, about the same weight as your van.
Never tried syncro.org springs, but I have the gowesty 1-1/2" all around.
In the rear, a very noticeable difference in feel, and after a year, no appreciable sag, still about 1-1/2" lift.
I am really glad about the results there and have no problem recommending it.
For the front I thought it was much too soft, different shocks could have helped, but then they sagged about 1-1/2".
Too their credit gowesty does replace them if they sag, but you still have to pay shipping both ways of course, including shipping the old springs back to them.
I admit I am wondering if the new set will sag like the others...time will tell there.
Previous to this, I had a set of moog 5660 on the front.
Those, I really liked.
The van handled very well with those, they were much stiffer than the gowesty 1-1/2, and they were only 50$ for the pair from the local flaps.
Even if the new set of gowesty springs don't sag I may very well go back to them. _________________ One of these days I'm gonna settle down,
but till I do I won't be hangin round.
Going down that long lonesome highway,
gonna see life my way
https://youtu.be/cSrL0BXsO40 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
madspaniard Samba Member

Joined: August 18, 2008 Posts: 3795 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have the latest gen of syncro.org springs, sold by VanCafe, and Koni shocks. Poly bushings, Nokian tires, Burley tubular arms and front anti sway bar. Really happy with this set up, it took me a while to find the correct combination of parts, a lot of trial and error when you deviate from OEM. I recommend you install the anti sway bar, T3 Technique offers a new one.
I also have tried Moogs 5660 in the front but ended up sticking with syncro.org springs. My low-miles Moog 5660 are for sale in the classifieds for cheap. _________________ 1991 Westy auto w/ Peloquin TBD
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad” - Salvador Dali |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake de Villiers Samba Member

Joined: October 24, 2007 Posts: 5938 Location: Tsawwassen, BC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
madspaniard Samba Member

Joined: August 18, 2008 Posts: 3795 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jake de Villiers wrote: |
Levi and Mad: do either of you have a ride height number for the Moog springs?
Thanks! |
Ranging from 17 to 17.5" _________________ 1991 Westy auto w/ Peloquin TBD
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad” - Salvador Dali |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake de Villiers Samba Member

Joined: October 24, 2007 Posts: 5938 Location: Tsawwassen, BC
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| madspaniard wrote: |
| Jake de Villiers wrote: |
Levi and Mad: do either of you have a ride height number for the Moog springs?
Thanks! |
Ranging from 17 to 17.5" |
I see. So your ride height went up then? _________________ '84 Vanagon GL 1.9 WBX
'86 Westy Weekender Poptop/2.5 Subaru/5 Speed Posi/Audi Front Brakes/16 x 7.5 Mercedes Wheels - answers to 'Dixie'
@jakedevilliersmusic1
http://sites.google.com/site/subyjake/mydixiedarlin%27
www.crescentbeachguitar.com
www.thebassspa.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Merian Samba Member

Joined: January 04, 2014 Posts: 5212 Location: Orygun
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just don't understand what magic the fox shocks would bring if don't race off-road. Remote reservoirs exist to limit heat problems which should not be a big issue in normal use.
what you want: digressive, magnetorheological
what you want to understand what shocks do: your Soph. physics course covered this - just write out the equations of motion for the wheel displacement for a bump, and differentiate it - you're there! right there in DHO heaven! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
insyncro Banned

Joined: March 07, 2002 Posts: 15086 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Merian wrote: |
I just don't understand what magic the fox shocks would bring if don't race off-road. Remote reservoirs exist to limit heat problems which should not be a big issue in normal use.
what you want: digressive, magnetorheological
what you want to understand what shocks do: your Soph. physics course covered this - just write out the equations of motion for the wheel displacement for a bump, and differentiate it - you're there! right there in DHO heaven! |
The beauty of the Fox and other coil over type shocks is adjustability.
Not only ride height, but compression and rebound.
Read a few threads where owners just kick down for new shocks, only to not like the feel they provide...not a problem when adjustable.
Pair a too soft or too hard spring with an adjustable shock and with a bit of experimentation, you have a comfortable ride.
I have always leveled a van from rear to the front and use the adjustability of these types of shocks to achieve the percise height I desire.
Not hacking up cutting boards and stuffing them above the springs.
Add in progressive rate springs and stacking will create coil binding.
Not with coilover type shocks.
Worth every penny in my opinion and more than Fox are available, but they are where the price point starts, so if they seem high to you, move on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
davevickery Samba Member
Joined: July 16, 2005 Posts: 2887 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Regarding the Moog 5660. I recommend the 5658 which has a lower spring rate, but still pretty stiff (maybe more than I like but the handling is worth it). The 5660 fit fine, but the 5658 fit PERFECTLY. I'd say the the ride height is only 3/8" less than the 5660. So if ride height is your priority, maybe the 5658 aren't better. But I have used the 5660 and the 5658 and I would recommend the latter. 16.75" ride height on a Westy (just measured it again after a year-no sag). Matched to GW zero lifts in the back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
levi Samba Member
Joined: February 11, 2005 Posts: 5522 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jake de Villiers wrote: |
Levi and Mad: do either of you have a ride height number for the Moog springs?
Thanks! |
I was at 17" in the front with the moog 5660 when I pulled them.
I know they lifted the front when I installed them, compared to the original 85 springs, but I'd have to check just how much.
I think it was in the 1/2" to 3/4" range. _________________ One of these days I'm gonna settle down,
but till I do I won't be hangin round.
Going down that long lonesome highway,
gonna see life my way
https://youtu.be/cSrL0BXsO40 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hans j Samba Member

Joined: May 06, 2006 Posts: 2746 Location: Salt Lake City UT
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my experience, only the rears need to be external reservoir for off road use. My front shocks are ice cold after very rough roads.
I believe the Fox are only rebound adjustable, and it just changes the size of the oil bleed off orifice. I feel the Bilstein digressive valving is the best overall.
It's all personal preference though. Ride in a couple before you spend the money! _________________ 1986 Canadian Syncro Westy TDI - 1989 Syncro Single Cab - 2001 Audi S4 - 1981 VW Caddy ABA - 1980 VW Caddy EV - 1973 VW T-181 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
levi Samba Member
Joined: February 11, 2005 Posts: 5522 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So in looking back at my records the 5660 initially added about 1-1/2".
Keep in mind though that this was a heavy van at the time, several hundred pounds from the high top, several hundred more with the tube bumpers, and at least another 1,000 pounds of tools and crap inside. _________________ One of these days I'm gonna settle down,
but till I do I won't be hangin round.
Going down that long lonesome highway,
gonna see life my way
https://youtu.be/cSrL0BXsO40 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Merian Samba Member

Joined: January 04, 2014 Posts: 5212 Location: Orygun
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sounds like somebody needs to manf. an adjustable shock w/o a remote res.
hard to believe no one has taken the shocks off of a late-model caddy and adapted them to a Van - I know you guys will try anything... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Merian Samba Member

Joined: January 04, 2014 Posts: 5212 Location: Orygun
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hans j wrote: |
I feel the Bilstein digressive valving is the best overall.
|
sports car guys are all over those - are they available for the Vanagon? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake de Villiers Samba Member

Joined: October 24, 2007 Posts: 5938 Location: Tsawwassen, BC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DAV!D Samba Member

Joined: September 10, 2013 Posts: 980 Location: EL CAMINO
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeff's Old Volks Home wrote: |
| luVWagn wrote: |
| Also note that BFG AT tires are not that great according to this tire review from Expedition Portal. I'm likely to take their lead and do Cooper Discoverer AT3 for my set of 16" tires. |
Expedition Portal just reviewed the latest BFG. It wasn't available for the first test...it looks much better, not as good as the Cooper, but still better than the old BFG. |
Older BFGs were not that great either, I went through two sets on my former Tacoma and both sets were dry rotting long before the tread life came to an end. _________________ 86 Syncro Build - Ecotec Motor Swap - Pop Top Conversion - Camper Build & Syncro Conversion |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hans j Samba Member

Joined: May 06, 2006 Posts: 2746 Location: Salt Lake City UT
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Merian wrote: |
sports car guys are all over those - are they available for the Vanagon? |
I have some I'm about so send another set to someone else for testing too. I'm months of work into them so far and just about have all the pieces I need. I haven't tested on my 2wd yet since the engine and trans are not installed, but I'll be installing them too. Height adjustable too of course.
As far as the ExPo tire test, I think they only tested two tires that even get close to my size (215/75-15). I wouldn't mind trying something else, but they aren't broken. Just rotate often. _________________ 1986 Canadian Syncro Westy TDI - 1989 Syncro Single Cab - 2001 Audi S4 - 1981 VW Caddy ABA - 1980 VW Caddy EV - 1973 VW T-181 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|