Author |
Message |
mitch5 Samba Member
Joined: October 17, 2019 Posts: 147 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 8:39 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
So update, for all those considering doing a swap with booster. Now that I have driven the van I will say it’s not as soft as it was Initially, it stops and has the feel similar to an early 2000’s Subaru. I had some air trapped in the master that the power bleed didn’t get. Cracking open the line then depressing the pedal finally got that.
I will suggest that if you planning to update/convert to discs then I would swap the brakes first without ditching the stock booster. If you like the pedal feel with that then I would keep it. The bmw booster will just decrease the overall force needed but also will change how/when the force is applied. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dkoesyncro Samba Member
Joined: December 10, 2006 Posts: 999
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
I have had the girling 60 front brakes and BMW booster for apx. 13 yrs. This has been a great feel. This last MogFest I produced some carnage that gave me an opportunity to do a rear disc conversion. I made my own using the Eurovan.
I had a hell of a time bleeding the system so I thought! Soft pedal after soft pedal and nearly 3 qts. of fluid. I convinced myself that my son had over extended the MC and the seals rolled while bleeding . I took apart the MC, cleaned it up and ensured that the seals will ride right. Bench Bled the MC and repeated the whole thing again with a pressure bleeder.
I cracked everything, even the rumored air trapped proportioning valve, joints and junctions. Viola, absolutely sure I’m air free. However, I will report that the pedal feel is softer than it was with rear drums. The e-brake is great though.
As for the MC, years ago and maybe it was even Siekel the Audi 4000 MC was an option. Although fluid dynamics is not my specialty and I believe that larger lines were also needed for those who were going to benefit from this conversion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sodo Samba Member

Joined: July 06, 2007 Posts: 10639 Location: Western WA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:26 pm Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
Interesting re: charged particles sticking….. but how much heat can a tiny particle retain as it passes through the air enroute to your shiny bits?
I wonder if there is an acid etch or something.
It seems to me that it wipes off easily, if you clean it soon, more difficult if you wait.
Wouldn’t the amount of dust depend upon how you use your “increased pedal assistance”?
Braking harder will logically produce more brake dust.
Some might brake the same as before, just pushing less hard on the pedal, and get “same dust. _________________
'90 Westy EJ25, NEW oil rings (!) 2Peloquins, 3knobs, SyncroShop pressure-oiled pinion-bearing & GT mainshaft, filtered, cooled gearbox.
'87 Tintop w 47k 53k, '12 SmallCar EJ25, cooled filtered original gearbox
....KTMs, GasGas, SPOT mtb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gnarlodious Samba Member

Joined: September 28, 2013 Posts: 2404 Location: Bonners Ferry Idaho
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 9:32 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
I guess I would also warn that with this upgrade you are going to see more black dust on your front wheels. Like, a LOT of black dust, I am constantly cleaning it off because I have shiny parts. The dust comes off the brakes hot and electrically charged, so it sticks mightily and on some surfaces actually burns itself into the coating. reporst are that ceramic brake pads being a lighter color make less visible dust particles. Also that a "ceramic wax" on your wheels will prevent such severe sticking. I don't know for real but researched it because of such a lot of black dust on my wheels. _________________ Vanagon ’83 diesel AAZ w/Giles injection, 5spd 4.57R&P+TBD and a '78 diesel Rabbit |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sodo Samba Member

Joined: July 06, 2007 Posts: 10639 Location: Western WA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:31 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
Christopher Schimke wrote: |
Sodo wrote: |
I have two vans:
'90 Westy Syncro, appx 5,200 lbs, 10% bigger wheels, with big brakes, rear discs, garden-variety brake pad materials and age
'87 TinTop Syncro, appx 4300 lbs, 10% bigger wheels, 100% original 54k mile factory brakes - original pads, original shoes
The '87 tintop 100% stock brakes feel MUCH better, less pedal pressure.
There are a lot of details to balance when making brake improvements.
Especially if changing multiple parameters at once. |
Do you mind divulging what front/rear brake kits you have on the '90 Syncro?
Also, I assume you mean that the stock brakes on the '87 take less pedal pressure to achieve similar braking performance/stopping distances compared to your '90? Hard to quantify, I know. I'm just trying to figure out if it's just he feel of the pedal that you like better or the combination of the pedal feel plus the brake performance. |
OG brake boosters in both vans.
'87 has higher stopping power under less pedal pressure.
I don't know how to quantify it except when I jump from one van to the next, anecdotally it feels like "double".
Instrumentation would probably not show "double".
But the foot says "significant".
'90: SmallCar brake kits front & rear from 2009.
Brake pads from the FLAPS.
Rotors not re-surfaced, just replaced brake pads, I don't know how long ago (years).
AFAIK the pads are wearing evenly, but I have not looked at it 'critically'.
I just glance at the thickness and it looks 'OK'.
Brake booster pulls the pedal down when the engine is started.
And it's a camper so has 'stuff, on shelves, perched etc' consequently I never do any "panic stop" tests (yard sale).
In the old days I used to "panic-stop-test" my vehicles,
often enough that I knew what was gonna happen.
Performance will be revealed (as with everyone else) during the actual emergency.
Isn't that kinda dumb?
After which I will kick myself, because it is an easy test, easy knowledge, easy performance confirmation.
All it takes is an empty road and a little foresight.
I'm no Samba historian, but can't recall anyone ever discussing/demonstrating this on theSamba over the years.
But that's for a different thread perhaps specifically named like "Tested panic stop distance?" _________________
'90 Westy EJ25, NEW oil rings (!) 2Peloquins, 3knobs, SyncroShop pressure-oiled pinion-bearing & GT mainshaft, filtered, cooled gearbox.
'87 Tintop w 47k 53k, '12 SmallCar EJ25, cooled filtered original gearbox
....KTMs, GasGas, SPOT mtb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ALIKA T3 Samba Member

Joined: July 30, 2009 Posts: 7208 Location: Honolulu,Hawaii and France
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:35 pm Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
MarkWard wrote: |
I’ve not been impressed with the vans that I’ve worked on with the bmw booster. Only a few. My impression is the soft pedal is the additional assist you’d expect from a larger booster.
I’ve upgraded two of these vans with the BMW Master Cylinder. The larger diameter should increase pedal effort. But all in all the stock booster and master work fine for me.
A larger booster alone is not going to make the brake hydraulics stronger. It can only reduce pedal effort. Also make sure the master is returning fully. There is a member selling new adapted stock size boosters in the classifieds. That would be my choice. |
That's me selling the boosters.
I started it to actually remove the BMW booster and go back to stock size booster, and needed a brand new stock size booster that didn't exist.
You won't catch me dead installing the new JP Group repros  _________________ Silicone Steering Boots and 930 Cv boots for sale in the classifieds.
Syncro transmission upgrade parts in the Classifieds.
Subaru EJ22+UN1 5 speed transmission
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=416343
Syncro http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4...num+gadget |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 18768 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:59 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
MarkWard wrote: |
As crazy as this sounds, I would drive the van. While the pedal has a different feel, it may stop fine in use and you will adapt to the new pedal feel assuming properly bled. |
This is why I suggested driving the van in question. Certainly feel is subjective and braking distance is likely a measure of improvement. Don’t see where anyone has measured braking distance, pedal effort before and after. There is also that it’s rare to fix brakes that are working satisfactory. So fixing poor braking with new parts is going to feel better. There is likely a placebo affect going on. “ I just spent $2000 upgrading my brakes” of course they feel better.
Something similar happens with bolt on power. The bragging is a result of the driver’s butt Dyno. We have a chassis Dyno that can actually measure power reliably before and after. We’ve had owners come in with their 10% increase in power and want to compare their butt Dyno and the hype of the bolt on power added only to be disappointed with real measurements.
Driving style should be a consideration too. I rarely use the brakes in our 82 2 piston caliper stock setup. In city driving I coast a lot looking ahead. On highway s I coast up the exit ramps. Every now and then an idiot forces me to actually threshold brake to avoid a collision and the van has always stopped in time. Someone living on a mountain is going to have different requirements from me. It’s all subjective. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Schimke Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2005 Posts: 5527 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:19 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
Sodo wrote: |
I have two vans:
'90 Westy Syncro, appx 5,200 lbs, 10% bigger wheels, with big brakes, rear discs, garden-variety brake pad materials and age
'87 TinTop Syncro, appx 4300 lbs, 10% bigger wheels, 100% original 54k mile factory brakes - original pads, original shoes
The '87 tintop 100% stock brakes feel MUCH better, less pedal pressure.
There are a lot of details to balance when making brake improvements.
Especially if changing multiple parameters at once. |
Do you mind divulging what front/rear brake kits you have on the '90 Syncro?
Also, I assume you mean that the stock brakes on the '87 take less pedal pressure to achieve similar braking performance/stopping distances compared to your '90? Hard to quantify, I know. I'm just trying to figure out if it's just he feel of the pedal that you like better or the combination of the pedal feel plus the brake performance. _________________ "Sometimes you have to build a box to think outside of." - Bruce (not Springsteen)
*Custom wheel hardware for Audi/VW, Porsche and Mercedes wheels - Urethane Suspension Bushings*
T3Technique.com or contact me at [email protected] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
82westyrabbit Samba Member
Joined: March 02, 2015 Posts: 1013 Location: Ma
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:06 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
I installed a BMW brake booster with stock early brakes about four years ago. Just to make it clear, I installed the brake booster because it was cheap and available not because I was looking for a performance upgrade. At first I felt like I had a soft pedal. I had to rebleed the brakes, and I adjusted the rear brakes to get the pedal to feel right. It takes less pedal pressure to stop the van but the pedal is at the same hight as it was before the BMW booster. If the rest of the brake system is not in great shape the new booster will amplify the problem. The speedometer cable is a problem. I get a slight clicking sound from the cable. I am happy with the upgrade if you want to call it that. I have recently installed a big brake kit but have not driven the van since. it will be interesting to see how I feel about the brakes now after I drive it. John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sodo Samba Member

Joined: July 06, 2007 Posts: 10639 Location: Western WA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:00 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
I have two vans:
'90 Westy Syncro, appx 5,200 lbs, 10% bigger wheels, with big brakes, rear discs, garden-variety brake pad materials and age
'87 TinTop Syncro, appx 4300 lbs, 10% bigger wheels, 100% original 54k mile factory brakes - original pads, original shoes
The '87 tintop 100% stock brakes feel MUCH better, less pedal pressure.
There are a lot of details to balance when making brake improvements.
Especially if changing multiple parameters at once. _________________
'90 Westy EJ25, NEW oil rings (!) 2Peloquins, 3knobs, SyncroShop pressure-oiled pinion-bearing & GT mainshaft, filtered, cooled gearbox.
'87 Tintop w 47k 53k, '12 SmallCar EJ25, cooled filtered original gearbox
....KTMs, GasGas, SPOT mtb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Schimke Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2005 Posts: 5527 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 9:04 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
skills@eurocarsplus wrote: |
Christopher Schimke wrote: |
You know, there's one recurring theme in all of this, be it for or against, and that is people using the word "feel" to describe their braking system. Feel is such a subjective word. What feels good to me might feel like garbage to another.
|
but 9 out of 10 times the pedal is soft, almost to the floor and the braking sucks
|
I totally agree. And for those that may not have had this experience, think about this.
Everything below relates to how the brake pedal feels, not how the van stops. For the sake of simplicity, we are going to ignore the different rear brakes of the 16" Syncro and go with the fact that all Vanagons used basically the same booster, the same master cylinder piston size, and the same rear drums.
The early Vanagons have calipers with smaller pistons, but the caliper bodies themselves are pretty stiff. This equates to a relatively "hard" pedal feel with the travel range of the pedal being fairly short.
For the later Vanagons, VW changed to a caliper that has a larger piston diameter and the late caliper body is a bit more flexible than the early calipers. The larger piston diameter and flexible caliper body combined make the pedal feel softer and have a longer travel range to get full stopping power out of the brakes.
So...
Early Vanagon = a harder pedal feel and a shorter pedal travel range (pedal is higher off the floor) at full braking.
Late Vanagon = a softer pedal feel and longer pedal travel (pedal closer to the floor compared to the early models) at full braking.
The pedal feel and travel distance of the early vans feel nice to me, but many people feel that the pedal is too hard to push to get full stopping power. From what I gather, most people are happy with the feel of the stock late model braking system.
Now think of this - What if you go even bigger with the piston size in the front calipers. If the new calipers have the exact same stiffness as the late model Vanagon calipers, the pedal travel will increase a bit, but once the travel distance is taken up, the pedal feel can be okay. However, if the new calipers have both a larger piston diameter AND the caliper body is more flexible than the stock late model Vanagon calipers, not only will the pedal travel be even longer, but the pedal can feel soft/spongy due to the flex in the calipers themselves.
Now toss in a bigger booster along with the brake calipers that have a larger piston diameter, as well as being more flexible, and it's easy to see how things get out of control quickly in terms of pedal travel and pedal feel.
I completely agree that it's a combination of feel/stopping power. The way to achieve this is through the use of components that work well together, not just haphazard parts that are tossed together without thought toward how the entire system works together. _________________ "Sometimes you have to build a box to think outside of." - Bruce (not Springsteen)
*Custom wheel hardware for Audi/VW, Porsche and Mercedes wheels - Urethane Suspension Bushings*
T3Technique.com or contact me at [email protected] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mitch5 Samba Member
Joined: October 17, 2019 Posts: 147 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:11 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
You are entirely correct that brake “feel” is very subjective. Hard to put an actual number on brake feel but it seems people prefer the bmw booster on a scale of 10:1. That’s what convinced me in the first place.
I prefer a linearly progressive pedal, newer non performance vehicles seem to be the opposite of this where the bite of the brakes seemingly comes from nowhere after the pedal doing nothing for a bit.
Right now the feel is that the initial 1/3 of travel does nothing and doesn’t have the linear feel I had before. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead

Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 17857 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:02 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
Christopher Schimke wrote: |
You know, there's one recurring theme in all of this, be it for or against, and that is people using the word "feel" to describe their braking system. Feel is such a subjective word. What feels good to me might feel like garbage to another.
|
you're right
but 9 out of 10 times the pedal is soft, almost to the floor and the braking sucks
The key here is a combination of feel/stopping power. But the many times I have screwed with this stuff the pedal feels like mush and it's 3/4" off the floor _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Schimke Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2005 Posts: 5527 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:47 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
You know, there's one recurring theme in all of this, be it for or against, and that is people using the word "feel" to describe their braking system. Feel is such a subjective word. What feels good to me might feel like garbage to another.
So, what does "feel" mean? How do you define "feels better"? Better than what? And what are you basing your feelings on?
Are you basing it on the fact that your last brake setup had a hard pedal and took more leg effort to make the van stop and your new brake system has a much softer pedal? And did you come to this conclusion because you are comparing it to the way your modern Honda brakes feel? Or, are you saying that your new brake kit and booster make the pedal feel too soft, dead, and/or hard to modulate?
What if I prefer a pedal feel that is a bit harder than a modern car, but you prefer a softer pedal feel, like that Honda? Which one is right? Does one produce shorter stopping distances compared to the other? Maybe, but not necessarily. Obviously, the answer is that...it depends.
It depends on the exact combination of brake setup, wheel/tire size, wheel/tire weight, the weight of the van, how the van is loaded, what booster is used, what pads the calipers (or drums) have, etc. There are many variables.
And you can have a brake setup that "feels" great to your foot and/or brain but does not create the shortest stopping distance. Conversely, you can have brakes that feel terrible but stop the vehicle incredibly well. My new full size Bronco is a perfect example of this. The pedal is super soft and feels over-boosted. There's very little "feel" to the pedal. Yet, that system does a great job of stopping that heavy beast.
Brakes are really complicated. Many different variables come into play when it comes to constructing a really good braking system. While I realize that not everyone has enough experience or interest to be able to describe their brakes any other way than to say they "feel" good or bad, it's really useless to use how they feel as the end all be all descriptor.
And don't get me wrong. I'm definitely not saying that when someone describes their new brake system as, "feels better" that somehow the achievable stopping distance isn't better than it was before, but without some empirical evidence, you are simply going by the "feel" of the brakes. Does that mean you actually have a better braking system? Maybe, but going by feeling alone is not necessarily proof of that. _________________ "Sometimes you have to build a box to think outside of." - Bruce (not Springsteen)
*Custom wheel hardware for Audi/VW, Porsche and Mercedes wheels - Urethane Suspension Bushings*
T3Technique.com or contact me at [email protected] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mitch5 Samba Member
Joined: October 17, 2019 Posts: 147 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:41 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
I have an ej22 frankenengine setup. The brakes i have only tested so far from moving the van a few feet forward and backward. I plan to atleast give it a shot on the street and see if i adjust to the feel.
I am starting to believe i may have a faulty out of the box clutch master which is holding me up from street driving. i can barely get the clutch to disengage. The last thing to check is for proper clearance and the arm is actually returning all the way. I have powerbled, bench bled and gravity bled but seemingly still have air
My clutch was previously fine before tearing into the system, i could see a small weep past the master so i decided to replace. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mathieux46 Samba Member
Joined: October 21, 2006 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:03 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
Similar to thatbaldwinlife, I have a Smallcar front kit ( Gilrling 60 ) and Burley disk in the back and a BMW booster.
The brakes are simply amazing, the feel is much better than with the stock booster.
Planning the same on my other ( 2 ) vans.
Highly recommanded, no drawback other than on the wallet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thatbaldwinlife Samba Member

Joined: August 01, 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Out exploring
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:52 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
We have the full Burley front and rear kits and the BMW booster. Brakes are amazing, so much better than stock. Pedal feels great, just soft enough at the start but builds pressure nicely for good feel and feedback to keep from locking up if not needed.
We had to go with the GW GPS speedo to fix the speedo cable kink with the BMW booster. Good upgrade.
nate _________________ 1987 Westy
Insta: @Thatbaldwinlife
Vanagon Adventure and DIY videos:
That Baldwin Life YouTube Channel |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 18768 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:41 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
mitch5 wrote: |
Upgrades are always better right? Since I already had the bmw parts, I decided to try the larger master while I had the dash out to rebuild my heater box.
I have g60 calipers up front and the gowesty disc kit in the rear. Previously I had a stock master and booster and the brakes felt great but could require a bit of force to really get the van to stop. Never had an issue with a soft pedal
After installing the booster and a new fte master the brakes are way softer than I would like. I found some other threads about this after discovering the pedal feel. The pedal is stiff when the booster is disconnected so I would say the brakes are bled.
Has anyone else switched back to the stock booster after using the bmw one? I also don’t like how the increased booster thickness jams my reservoir up against the cluster. |
What engine is in your van? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markswagen Samba Member
Joined: January 28, 2018 Posts: 1555 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:17 am Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
l've fitted more of those than l can remember, no one l have fitted them for, has every mentioned anything but happiness, all 4 of our own fleet, have them, l personally wouldn't ever go back to s stock booster.
my customers who are not sure {those that have stick shift vans} l let them drive burni around the block, that's usually all the thought needed.
as for the bouncing needle, move the speedo cable to a different grommet, a bit of warmth from a hair dryer will soften a rubber grommet enough so you should be able to push the end of the cable through it, if there's not an unused hole. _________________ markswagen {mobile mechanic} san diego area all early VW's cared for.
619 201 0310 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ZsZ Samba Member

Joined: December 11, 2010 Posts: 1735 Location: Budapest Hungary, Europe
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Has anyone not liked the BMW booster upgrade? |
|
|
I had stock brakes and BMW booster. I went back to stock booster, as the pedal feel was too light and I had to keep my leg "up in the air" doing light brakings.
I think you need to match the pedal spring to the booster.
And I hated the bouncing speedo - it kinked the cable so stilk jumps a bit. _________________ Zoltan
1.9 MTdi 2wd Multivan (ex Caravelle)
Van since 2006, engine since 2008 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|