| Author |
Message |
cof Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2005 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:26 am Post subject: 101.6mm cylinders in a type 1 case?? |
|
|
What would i take to put 101,6 cyls in a type 1 case????
I'm planning for a big cc engine for my bug and wonder about the possibilities to use a type 1 case..
Is there any type 1 heads made for 101,6 cyls???
Gonna have 86-90 stroke.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanknmorgan Samba Member

Joined: August 11, 2004 Posts: 113 Location: San Ramon, CA (East Bay)
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I dont think many people are going to take the time to answer this one unfotunately, so I will try to help out. I am fairly new to VW's myself, but here goes. One of the "veterans" will correct me if I am wrong. From what I understand the 94mm P&C sets, which yeilds a 1915 cc engine with stock 69mm stroke is the biggest you can possibly go on pistons. 94's are extremely close to the case studs when machined out. So close in fact that many people modify the studs to keep them from pulling out of the thin case material due to the overbore machining. So, to answer the question, no there is no way that I can see of getting anything larger than 94's in a type 1 case. If it could be done, it probably already would have been done. VW's have been around a while. On another note, I believe your stroke desires are unrealistic as well. It would require MAJOR clearancing if possible at all. I dont even think anyone makes a crankshaft with that much stroke. A 2276 (94mm with 82 stroke, I think) is about your maximum displacement from a type 1. If you want bigger, you have to take out a second mortgage and go with a type 4 based engine. Worth every penny, but it's a lot of stinkin pennies. Anyway, good luck to you and have fun learning. This site is great.
-Hank |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hobbes Samba Member

Joined: April 25, 2005 Posts: 325 Location: Springfield, MO
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, i believe there Is another way..... but it's pretty difficult.
I think you can bore past the stud holes, and drill new studs in a different spot, however i think you'd have to drill new holes in the head too...
Basically, i'm not sure how it's done, but i've talked to people who have done it... Maybe you can look it up, I don't know.
But it is possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tuna Samba Member

Joined: October 04, 2004 Posts: 475
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The other thing to remember is the distance from the centers of each piston to the other. If the bore is too big, the cylinders will overlap. If you offset bore the case, you'll have to have the connecting rod journals on the crankshaft moved to be centered in the cylinder opening.
This may not mean much, but in over 15 years in the VW hobby, I've never seen a stock case with 101.6mm pistons. The only time I've seen them used were in aftermarket "racing" cases, like the Scat case, or the Dee Engineering one, from Pauter or Autocraft.
You won't know until you start measuring the case.
Tuna _________________ The VDub Geek
Type 4: Secrets Revealed
1969 Bug - 2056cc Type 4 Cal-Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cof Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2005 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well what i know for myself is that you can put thick steel plates on the type 1 case sides with the correct holes and bolt pattern for like type 4 101,6 cyls, just wondering if there was an easier way, like a readily made type 1 case for that purpose, so everything is possible=)
For the crank, there is stroke up to 90mm even larger i think but plenty pesetas...
Autocraft heads seems to be a good combo with this too.....
Just wanted to know if anyone here had done a simple solution=)
Thanks a lot for the input guys, I appreciate it a lot!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cof Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2005 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, so a type 4 crank is longer than a type 1 with larger distance between the rods?
Thanks for the info=) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cof Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2005 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Tuna=)
I've been looking at the killer case and that one seem to be the cheapest case out there for 101,6mm.
so most probably i have to get the big leather up and do some shopping.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekimthemad Samba Member

Joined: April 03, 2002 Posts: 600 Location: ohio
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The studs would have to be moved out. You would be better off to go with a type 5 motor that already has a larger stud pattern. I am pretty sure you can fit up to a 103mm bore into one of those. Currently, there are not any streetable heads available that will work with a 4 inch bore. There are aftermarket heads available to run 101.6 but none of them have enough fins to cool well on the street. You never mentioned what you wanted this giant for.
Up to a 90mm crank can be put into a type 1 case but it is difficult to get it to clear the cam without going to an aftermarket dropped cam case. The cranks also tend to flex quite a bit due to the lack of overlap in the journals and end up beating up the case.
Mike
59 single, 66 bug, 69 bus, 73 super
Member of the Ddk _________________ Remember never argue with a moron. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with a lifetime's worth of experince. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekimthemad Samba Member

Joined: April 03, 2002 Posts: 600 Location: ohio
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanknmorgan Samba Member

Joined: August 11, 2004 Posts: 113 Location: San Ramon, CA (East Bay)
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It looks like it can be done, but not easily and not cheaply. I say if you are going to go through all that just go with a well built type 4 from Jake Raby or similar. You get lots of power and a reliable and long lasting engine. I think if you did all that work to a type 1 case you would probably end up spending just as much as a type 4 and have a lot weaker of a starting platform and certainly will not last as long. And with the technology and research going into type 4 engines lately, they are starting to get a decent aftermarket going from what I hear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbo_bob Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 293 Location: Victorville CA
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 5:36 pm Post subject: Re: 101.6mm cylinders in a type 1 case?? |
|
|
| cof wrote: |
What would i take to put 101,6 cyls in a type 1 case????
I'm planning for a big cc engine for my bug and wonder about the possibilities to use a type 1 case..
Is there any type 1 heads made for 101,6 cyls???
Gonna have 86-90 stroke.... |
Jack Sacchette has done this conversion to an Auto Lina aluminum type 1 case, 3 liters, 101.6 by 92 stroke ? Lots of welding and work to do this.
Your better off going with a type 4 engine to do this, or stay with the type 1 and use a 94 x 90 combo = 2498 cc |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tuna Samba Member

Joined: October 04, 2004 Posts: 475
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want the big bores for bragging rights, then the best way is the Type 4 engine. You can easily install up to 105mm in a stock Type 4 case (use the LN Engineering Nickies cylinders) and invest in a pair of aftermarket heads from aircooledtechnology.com . That will get you in the high two liter range. A 105x82 will get you 2840cc.
Tuna _________________ The VDub Geek
Type 4: Secrets Revealed
1969 Bug - 2056cc Type 4 Cal-Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
philip1 Samba Member
Joined: March 11, 2004 Posts: 334 Location: wales, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
just buy yourself an autocraft, pauter or scat killer case if you want big cc. go out to 3.5 litres near enough.
and some advice buy the - aircooled interchange manua, by keith seume. read that and get a better idea. 94 are biggest pistons, movin studs or woteva is a real watse of time and money. and thnk berg can fit an 88mm crank in a type 1 case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muffler Mike Samba Member

Joined: October 10, 2002 Posts: 1054 Location: Lawndale Ca.
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
96.5 is not uncommon in a race motor. Wall just gets real thin by the studs.
I have seen 98 with in the stock head stud pattern too, but can you say paper thin? a modified porshe cylinder.
the problem with moving head studs around on the t1 case is the oil passages around the oil cooler area. Nothing that can not be overcome, but just a LOT of work.
I have heard about an autolinea case coming with no stud holes, but have yet to here of it actually coming true yet.
with the big plate idea, that would work. just more work to do, thats all.
http://www.precisionalloy.com/pages/tf-1.html
maybe use this case and use the through bolts to hold the plates on and sandwitch the entire case _________________ Muffler Mike
http://MufflerMike.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nsracing Samba Member

Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9750 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:14 am Post subject: bragging rights? |
|
|
| tuna wrote: |
If you want the big bores for bragging rights, then the best way is the Type 4 engine. You can easily install up to 105mm in a stock Type 4 case (use the LN Engineering Nickies cylinders) and invest in a pair of aftermarket heads from aircooledtechnology.com . That will get you in the high two liter range. A 105x82 will get you 2840cc.
Tuna |
Type IV? Type IV?
An elephant is already huge to start with...not really impressive. It is supposed to be that big!!!!! .....and heavy....3 tons?
But a turkey weighing 600 lbs? ......Now you are talking.
A Type IV is big. Fine. But a Type I growing some muscles is quite a sight to see.
It is not suppose to happen. That is what makes it exciting.
I have the 101.6 pistons. I am planning to stick in a Type I. I am looking for the case candidate now. The H-case is what I have in mind...no inserts....not deep-studded. Just a performance case waiting to happen.
Waterboxer? You kidding me? The waterboxer will take 4.25 inch easy. Why go 101.6 only with that?
The Type I with 101mm will be something.
Good summer to everyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
badbugtwo Samba Member

Joined: December 31, 2004 Posts: 35 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 8:01 am Post subject: Re: bragging rights? |
|
|
| nsracing wrote: |
| ...Waterboxer? You kidding me? The waterboxer will take 4.25 inch easy. Why go 101.6 only with that?... |
Uh, no! The waterboxer will not do 4.25 easy. It has the same bore centers as a type 1. The larger head stud pattern and being made from aluminum are two of the biggest advantages of using this case in an air-cooled application. Regardless of whether it is used in the water cooled or air-cooled version, even if you relocate the head studs out further and go with the thickest possible cylinders, you will only end up with approximately a cylinder wall thickness of .065” when all is said and done! Now if you want to offset the crank and rods, like the Pauter big block does, and do extensive welding…. But that wouldn’t be practical, or easy!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbo_bob Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 293 Location: Victorville CA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:24 pm Post subject: Re: bragging rights? |
|
|
| badbugtwo wrote: |
Uh, no! The waterboxer will not do 4.25 easy. It has the same bore centers as a type 1. |
Looks like the case can take 90 mm stroke x 4.100 bore, see the new Hot VW's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nsracing Samba Member

Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9750 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 10:09 am Post subject: Re: bragging rights? |
|
|
| badbugtwo wrote: |
| nsracing wrote: |
| ...Waterboxer? You kidding me? The waterboxer will take 4.25 inch easy. Why go 101.6 only with that?... |
Uh, no! The waterboxer will not do 4.25 easy. It has the same bore centers as a type 1. The larger head stud pattern and being made from aluminum are two of the biggest advantages of using this case in an air-cooled application. Regardless of whether it is used in the water cooled or air-cooled version, even if you relocate the head studs out further and go with the thickest possible cylinders, you will only end up with approximately a cylinder wall thickness of .065” when all is said and done! Now if you want to offset the crank and rods, like the Pauter big block does, and do extensive welding…. But that wouldn’t be practical, or easy!
 |
I would leave the machining to the machinist.
Sometimes, we have to think about what we just said. Sure Type I bore centers....but the studs are out more. You can bore that case spigot till the cylinder walls touch if you want!
It is all machining challenge. How much work do you want to put out?
The waterboxer has lots of potential. Finding the top end/heads for it is where the pain is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
badbugtwo Samba Member

Joined: December 31, 2004 Posts: 35 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:19 am Post subject: Re: bragging rights? |
|
|
| nsracing wrote: |
I would leave the machining to the machinist.  |
I’ll admit that I am not a full time machinist and also not the most experienced either, but I have used milling machines and lathes before. Also being a good machinist doesn’t always mean that you’re a good engineer, and vise-versa. Most of my projects have either been done by some of the best machinist out there or at least supervised by them.
| nsracing wrote: |
Sometimes, we have to think about what we just said. Sure Type I bore centers....but the studs are out more. You can bore that case spigot till the cylinder walls touch if you want! |
So if you utilize the stock bore centers, what is the largest bore that you think you can run and what will the cylinder wall thickness be?
| nsracing wrote: |
It is all machining challenge. How much work do you want to put out? |
I’ll agree 100%! If I’d have use off the shelf “bolt-on” parts instead of a little ingenuity and a lot of work, my car would have never ran as fast as it has so far.
| nsracing wrote: |
The waterboxer has lots of potential. Finding the top end/heads for it is where the pain is. |
Again I agree 100% But for all out race, the 910 or 910 style head is the best!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbo_bob Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 293 Location: Victorville CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I see the future of larger CC engines. When is somebody going to make a head like the 044 with the type 1 and wasserboxer spigot centers, but with a moved outward stud pattern to accept 101.6 bore? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|