Author |
Message |
dbtcj07 Samba Member
Joined: July 08, 2009 Posts: 39 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:06 am Post subject: Single Port VS Dual Port |
|
|
so my main question is, what the difference between the two.
also how can you tell by looking at the block if its a single port or a dual port.
What are the positives and negatives of either one.
Also what the difference between a long block and a short block. i currently own a short block but was thinking of buying a long block engine and rebuilding the long block.
If i were to go this route would i have to buy a new crankshaft, or cylinder heads, or would i have to change anything at all.
What are the positives and negatives of either one.
ive been trying to do research on it online and through the samba but cant find it. i know i saw a topic similar to this a while back, while i was browsing but i just cant find it or anything similar to it.
thx for the help |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jgarcia86 Samba Member
Joined: October 22, 2009 Posts: 57 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't help you. But I did log on today to search specifically for this topic, so thanks and I hope we get some responses.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
codeMechanic Samba Member

Joined: April 13, 2007 Posts: 876 Location: Bellevue , NE
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
dual/single port refers to the intake ports on the heads, these vary a lot in cc size
long block means it has barrels and heads installed
short block doesn't
if you buy a long block all you would have to get for it is all the bolt-ons like fuel pump, carb , gernerator, fan, dist. etc etc. _________________ 65 standard micro bus, Velvet green
65 sedan, Bahama blue |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
corvette6698512 Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2006 Posts: 421 Location: olympia, WA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Found this picture in the gallery.
_________________ garage:
'67 euro bug
'65 riviera bus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GB2S Samba Member

Joined: October 27, 2003 Posts: 1008 Location: Omaha
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is your application? Stock or something bigger? If it's just a family cruiser, it really doesn't matter.
Geoff |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Culito 11010101

Joined: December 07, 2006 Posts: 5878 Location: Columbia Missourah
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Single ports do offer a tad more torque. _________________ © CJ Industries, Inc.
'64 standard w/2.0L type 4
'62 bug
johnnypan wrote: |
...dont pay no attention to Culito,he's a cornhole.. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sid Vicious Samba Member

Joined: February 03, 2008 Posts: 512 Location: Queen Creek, AZ
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Single ports are also WAYYYYY easier to work on. I don't have to do Yoga and pray to get spark plugs out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jgarcia86 Samba Member
Joined: October 22, 2009 Posts: 57 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Culito wrote: |
Single ports do offer a tad more torque. |
Doesn't single have more torque at lower speeds and dual more torque at higher speeds and higher top speed? or am I mistaken?
So if i'm building an engine that will mostly be used on highways to and from school, should I be looking at upgrading to dual port? or keep it single and just upgrade to 1600 from 1300? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eric&Barb Samba Member

Joined: September 19, 2004 Posts: 25986 Location: Olympia Wash Rinse & Repeat
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Really you need to figure out what you want and more importantly need first!!
A 1600 will not get the MPG that a 1300 can, but of course neither of those will have the drag race ability of a 2000! Then again the latter can certainly suck your wallet dry in both parts and MPG if you do not earn the big bucks.
Personally very happy with a 40 HP 1200 engine in the type 1s. _________________ In Stereo, Where Available! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
corvette6698512 Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2006 Posts: 421 Location: olympia, WA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Singleports are awesome in a daily driver. I have a unknown displacement singleport in my '67(case says its the original '66 1300 for my car) and it produced 44.6hp and 84ft/lbs on the dyno. Gets 35-38 mpg and just runs awesome. I don't think i have ever had a dual port run as good as my singleport. _________________ garage:
'67 euro bug
'65 riviera bus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bill may Samba Member

Joined: August 27, 2003 Posts: 14160 Location: san diego,ca
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VOLKSWAGNUT Fastest VW Belt Changer

Joined: October 14, 2007 Posts: 11159 Location: Flippin' a Belt........ .... Off-n-On ... NC USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good large single port heads, in my opinion, get very little credit. They are very reliable, crack way less often, and have decent street power potential. I try to use single port heads whenever I can, add an Engle 100 cam and it comes to life even with a stock carb. _________________ aka Ken {o\!/o}
Its your vehicle- stop askin' for approval-do what YOU like for cryin' out loud
Better to roll em' how you want and wear em' out-than lettin' em' rot out
Its about the going not the showing
Rebuilt to drive not decorate
WANTED: Local Eatin' Joints, Triple D for TheSamba contributions here http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=570510
Search "VOLKSWAGNUT" on YouTube since you cant watch a "certain" BELT change video round here
Usually and often edited |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bnam Samba Member
Joined: July 02, 2006 Posts: 3463 Location: El Dorado Hills CA/ Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
They can be distinguished from each other by the intake manifold. The SP has a on piece manifold while the DP manifold is made up of 3 parts that are joined together with rubber boots and clamps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shadd Samba Member
Joined: January 18, 2007 Posts: 883 Location: Lancaster, Ohio
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are many more facets to an aircooled VW engine than most people realize. The factory was constantly making upgrades, not large noticeable changes but small evolutionary ones. And they do have consequence. If you dissected the majority of existing VW engines you would see that they are Frankensteins. With mismatched parts from many different years. So the trick is to match the best parts for your application.
Follow the advice given above to first decide what you want out of the engine, what you need, and what you can afford. This will dictate which case to use. 1200, 1300, 1500, and 1600. 1200=40 horse; its a great reliable little motor for the vintage enthusiast who is not concerned with all out horsepower. In my opinion 1300, 1500 and some early 1600 cases should only used if they were the original engine to the car and you are keeping them close to stock. They fall short in one critical area, oiling. They were fitted with a single relief oiling system. After 1969 the 1600 cases got a dual relief oiling system. If you are building a 1600 dual port or looking to modify, this is where you will want to start. Essentially this is your "short block." which is an assembled case with pistons and cylinders attached. If you bolted on the heads and valve train it would be a "long block" The benefits of dual port heads are few on a stock 1600. 3-4 hp coupled with better gearing means you can cruise a little faster on the highway but the benefit really comes as room to grow. You can increase displacement and install a larger cam. You can successfully run a 1776 with an otherwise stock intake system and find quite a few more hp.
Basically if you find beauty in simplicity and are perfectly happy with the limitations then single port heads will be fine. If your more performance oriented and your planning to squeeze out every last h.p. then the dual port is the path for you. Sorry about the rant  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zundfolge1432  Samba Member
Joined: June 13, 2004 Posts: 12567
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking at the block tells you nothing about whats inside as was mentioned earlier parts from various years can be matched or mismatched to build an engine.... The only advantage of using dual port heads`is potential for performance upgrades as they will flow more air, but building a stock engine say a 1600 we use a late case say AE or AK or AB or AS anything preferably built after late 1973 with 8mm studs and dual relief ...Find a good pair of single port heads, use a stock dished cam w/ matching 26mm oil pump, keep the compression reasonable, use the doghouse cooler w/ matching tin and fan , be sure to locate and install all the sheetmetal including the thermostat and last but not least balance the lower end ( DO NOT SKIP THIS STEP AS IT WILL PAY FOR ITSELF IN SMOOTHNESS AND RELIABILITY) Using this combination of parts will make a reliable engine ....... To the extreme we built a 1915 single port using a stock carb and a stock single tip bus exhaust. As you can imagine it was choked down and a simple switch to single pack header and carb jetting worked wonders, low end torque was all there till about 3k RPM, the little carb acted as a governor, Best wishes
Jim- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matthew Samba Member

Joined: January 29, 2004 Posts: 1760 Location: Eastern Tennessee
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
corvette6698512 wrote: |
Singleports are awesome in a daily driver. I have a unknown displacement singleport in my '67(case says its the original '66 1300 for my car) and it produced 44.6hp and 84ft/lbs on the dyno. Gets 35-38 mpg and just runs awesome. I don't think i have ever had a dual port run as good as my singleport. |
Just curious here. What code is stamped in your case? If your car is indeed a 67 then how can a 66 1300 be original to the car?
I agree, singleports do make great drivers. _________________ 1965 Beetle sedan
Click to view image |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiderjames Samba Member
Joined: October 30, 2004 Posts: 358
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone has their opinions on what works best for them, usually based on experience. If I am building a high performance motor I go for a later dual relief case with doghouse setup, dual port heads etc... For a stock driver I prefer a single port with a single relief case non doghouse oil cooler for simplicity. I have experienced no discernable longevity issues between the small oil pumps and the larger ones with the dished camshaft.
Although I am running all 1600 single ports right now i really feel that a 40 hp is the easiest to work on when doing routine maintenence. everything is easy to reach and the manifold angle to the heads makes it easiest to reach when fooling with the manifold. They always seemed to have less manifold leaks. Later I plan on building a good vintage speed 40hp for my beetle (volksrod). _________________ "A cranky transporter's a mighty finicky piece of machinery to be gambling your life on, Sir" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rustyblue Samba Member
Joined: November 11, 2009 Posts: 35 Location: Waltham, MA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just posted a number of questions about my engine, and one of them was about the strange intake setup, with a single-port manifold adapted to the dual-port heads. There seems to be a lot of knowledge on this thread.
Please take a look, I'd appreciate the help:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=386252 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bajababy Samba Member
Joined: August 29, 2009 Posts: 21 Location: BLUE SPRINGS
|
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok ive got a stock 1600 single port from my 1968 standerd bug and i was wandering what all i could do so that i could get more horses out of it with uot spending to much money and not goting over board with it??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|