| Author |
Message |
doublecanister Samba Member

Joined: September 23, 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Richmond, Va
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:01 am Post subject: Things and Wheels |
|
|
Hey Folks,
I've asked this in an existing post in the wheel and rim's forum but I wanted to ask here in the THING only forum (since nobody said anything in the other one)
I've got a set of rims (American Racing Torq Thrust's on my
66 Mustang, and had thought of changing to the orginal rims
for the Stang and putting the Torq Thrust's on my 73' THING.
(which currently has 15' rims and I believe 205 70 R15in Tires
(not 100% as I'm not looking at it).
I suppose (If they'd fit) & I'd need the wide 5 to Ford wheel adaptors,
but do ya think theyd fit the THING?
The Torq Thrusts are 15inch by 7in Rims with 225 60 R15 BFG's.
I have a feeling I'd need smaller tires, but not sure if the
rims are too wide.
Ive never used wheel adaptors before, are they ok to use?
Heard stories of wheels coming off before but have no
idea if true or how safe/reliable wheel adaptors are.
Just throwing that out there, any suggestions?
I figured if I do this I'd at least use what I have vs buying new rims
for the THING.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions folks!
Tom _________________ ****************************************
2020 - Mustang Eco Boost [High Performance]
1973 - Thing
1966 - Mustang GT- Fastback
1951 - Ford F1 pickup Flathead V8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doublecanister Samba Member

Joined: September 23, 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Richmond, Va
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:23 am Post subject: wheels and tires |
|
|
well, it appears I may have answered 1 question per the
wheel and tire size info sticky,
if i'm understanding it correctly, 5in rims are max size a THING can run.
Still would like to know any feelings/suggestions on wheel adaptors
for wide 5s to ford car rims.
Thanks!
Should have done more searching before posting, sorry!  _________________ ****************************************
2020 - Mustang Eco Boost [High Performance]
1973 - Thing
1966 - Mustang GT- Fastback
1951 - Ford F1 pickup Flathead V8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ron Domeck Samba Member

Joined: August 05, 2007 Posts: 1466 Location: louisville Ky
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| First I have ran adapters for years with no problem. The set I like the best for the Ford pattern is the cast not the stamped steel. Remember that Porsche use bolt on spacers from the factory. As far as size with adapters you can go wider. You have seen my purple/flame car, I run 15x7 front and 15x9 rear. The only way to know is get an adapter and bolt the wheels on set the car on the ground and check for clearance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Spalding Samba Member

Joined: February 19, 2005 Posts: 2519 Location: . . . in denial.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:09 pm Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
To answer your question regarding wheel and tire combo with any confidence, the following questions need to be answered.
What is the offset/backspace of the wheels?
What is the thickness of the spacer?
Is your Thing raised/lowered?
Stock fenders?
Are you running disc brakes?
The wheel width relates to whether or not the inside of the tire rubs on the steering/suspension. The tire width affects rubbing on the fender and inner fender well. The offset relates to both. The spacers can mitigate one problem while exacerbating the other.
I always use my vehicle as a baseline for these tire fitment questions. I'm running 27x8.5R14s on stock wheels with stock ride height and brakes with no rubbing at full compression — barely.
By comparison, while my wheels are 27x8.5, yours are 27x10. It's almost certain that your tires will rub. The question is will rubbing be the exception or the rule.
Ron, I'd be interested in the details of your car if you don't mind - same questions as above, and add info re: tire sizes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kubelmann Samba Member

Joined: April 13, 2003 Posts: 3268
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wide 5 to Ford is a very common wheel adapter. Also 4 x 130 to Ford is common. that means you could convert your fronts to disc brakes keep your rear drums use your ford wheels and be fine. The adapters give you extra width that would allow for wider wheels without rub. I run 944 rear arms with disc brakes and that give me extra width that also give the clearance for my rear Centerline wheels that were meant for 944/911 flat track cars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JThw8 Samba Member
Joined: September 17, 2003 Posts: 101 Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just bought a Thing with the ford adapters running 235/45/17s so depending on the offset of the wheels those would probably work.
I'll be removing them as soon as I can get some Porsche adapters so if you're looking for a set of Ford adapters I may have them soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doublecanister Samba Member

Joined: September 23, 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Richmond, Va
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 7:51 am Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
| Captain Spalding wrote: |
To answer your question regarding wheel and tire combo with any confidence, the following questions need to be answered.
What is the offset/backspace of the wheels?
What is the thickness of the spacer?
Is your Thing raised/lowered?
Stock fenders?
Are you running disc brakes?
The wheel width relates to whether or not the inside of the tire rubs on the steering/suspension. The tire width affects rubbing on the fender and inner fender well. The offset relates to both. The spacers can mitigate one problem while exacerbating the other.
I always use my vehicle as a baseline for these tire fitment questions. I'm running 27x8.5R14s on stock wheels with stock ride height and brakes with no rubbing at full compression — barely.
By comparison, while my wheels are 27x8.5, yours are 27x10. It's almost certain that your tires will rub. The question is will rubbing be the exception or the rule.
Ron, I'd be interested in the details of your car if you don't mind - same questions as above, and add info re: tire sizes. |
Hey Captain & Ron & Kmann & JTHW8(Thanks for responding)
here's what details I can offer.
What is the offset/backspace of the wheels?
Measured apx 3.5 inch backspace **note, I could not find a long enough flat ruler to go across the wheel, after a few min of searching and trying stuff to work, I came up with 3.5 inch, worst case they could be 3 3/4in backspace but I believe I'm correct at 3.5inch my best Eyeball guess.
What is the thickness of the spacer? ---------No spacers at this time
Is your Thing raised/lowered? ------
stock suspension --back ground to fender clearance 27 3/4 inchs-
---------------------- front 27 1/2 inches.
Stock fenders? --------------------------YES
Are you running disc brakes?---------- No, stock drums.
May upgrade to disc, still mulling that one.
Thing's tires are 205x70r15's confirmed (tire hight from ground 25 1/4in
Mustangs Tourq Thrusts 15x7 w/ 225 60R 15's tire hight is 24 1/2in tall.
Thanks again yall for helping, Owning a VW THING has somehow
re-sparked my passion to wrench with the Mustang again, (since the THING is in great shape), i've been mulling a new carb, ignition and going back to stock steel styled 66' wheels and dual red line tires and getting a new console to finish this 21yr Mustang project once and for all.
And, since i'd have a set of nice rims, it'd be sweet if they fit the THING with just a bolt on wheel adaptor!! Plus I know it'd ride smoother too.
Thanks again.
T _________________ ****************************************
2020 - Mustang Eco Boost [High Performance]
1973 - Thing
1966 - Mustang GT- Fastback
1951 - Ford F1 pickup Flathead V8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Spalding Samba Member

Joined: February 19, 2005 Posts: 2519 Location: . . . in denial.
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 8:52 am Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
Well duh. When I gave you figures before it was based on 255/60r15. I miss-typed into the calculator. Apologies. Your 225s are nominally 8.8 inches wide. Not 10 inches as I had said.
So, stock wheel backspace is 4.375. Torq wheels are 3.5. They will move the wheel inboard 7/8". Let's assume the spacer is an inch thick, moving the wheel outboard by that amount, gets us to 1/8" outboard. Now subtract 3/16 to account for the slightly wider tires (3/16 is half of that extra width which is 3/8) for an insignificant net of a 1/16" move inboard. So far so good. You won't be rubbing on the inside.
Your 225s are about 3/8" wider and 1.3" shorter than my barely-fitting 27x.8.5's. Your tires will sit 5/16" (1/8" for the backspace/spacer combination, and another 3/16 for the tires) outboard compared to mine. I believe this will get the outboard edge of your tire very close to the lip of the fender. Since your tires are shorter, but I can't say with absolute certainty that they'll never rub in any circumstance.
Last edited by Captain Spalding on Mon May 03, 2010 12:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doublecanister Samba Member

Joined: September 23, 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Richmond, Va
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:12 am Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
| Captain Spalding wrote: |
Well duh. When I gave you figures before it was based on 255/60r15. I miss-typed into the calculator. Apologies. Your 225s are nominally 8.8 inches wide. Not 10 inches as I had said.
So, stock wheel backspace is 4.375. Torq wheels are 3.5. They will move the wheel inboard 7/8". Let's assume the spacer is an inch thick, moving the wheel outboard by that amount, gets us to 1/8" outboard. Now subtract 3/16 to account for the slightly wider tires (3/16 is half of that extra width which is 3/ for an insignificant net of a 1/16" move inboard. So far so good. You won't be rubbing on the inside.
Your 225s are about 3/8" wider and 1.3" shorter than my barely-fitting 27x.8.5's. Your tires will sit 5/16" (1/8" for the backspace/spacer combination, and another 3/16 for the tires) outboard compared to mine. I believe this will get the outboard edge of your tire very close to the lip of the fender. Since your tires are shorter, but I can't say with absolute certainty that they'll never rub in any circumstance. |
Hey Captain, wow, thats quite a bit of 'hi level ciphering' math there.
you got me with the 3/ measurement!!
But, (I think)I see what you mean,
sounds like the wheels will work, tire size may be close,
plan b; if I used those rims with a smaller tire size I'd be good If they rub with what I got.
Besides buying used, any suggestions on where to locate a set of wheel adaptors? Sometimes when I look for parts, being new to Vw's if it's not labled THING specific it's a crapshoot for me weather I'm buying somthing that will work. This may not be the case for wheel adaptors but curious just the same.
Thank you again for your assistance.
T _________________ ****************************************
2020 - Mustang Eco Boost [High Performance]
1973 - Thing
1966 - Mustang GT- Fastback
1951 - Ford F1 pickup Flathead V8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Spalding Samba Member

Joined: February 19, 2005 Posts: 2519 Location: . . . in denial.
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:06 pm Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
| doublecanister wrote: |
you got me with the 3/ measurement!! |
Sorry. It's a smilie thing. An 8 followed by ) reads as . Should say 3/8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doublecanister Samba Member

Joined: September 23, 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Richmond, Va
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:43 am Post subject: measurements |
|
|
hey Captain,
I figured as when I typed it It got me too, I was just messin with ya.
did you know of a reliable source for these wheel adaptors?
(at least in your opinion?)
jus' curious. I'll look around a bit as well.
Thanks and take care!
T _________________ ****************************************
2020 - Mustang Eco Boost [High Performance]
1973 - Thing
1966 - Mustang GT- Fastback
1951 - Ford F1 pickup Flathead V8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Spalding Samba Member

Joined: February 19, 2005 Posts: 2519 Location: . . . in denial.
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:41 pm Post subject: Re: measurements |
|
|
| doublecanister wrote: |
| did you know of a reliable source for these wheel adaptors? |
Sorry, I don't. But if no one else chimes in here, you might try in the off-road forum. Bet someone there will know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kubelmann Samba Member

Joined: April 13, 2003 Posts: 3268
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CB performance has a nice selection of wheel adapters. They also have a minimum order policy. The good news is that the wheel adapters cost more ($33-$40) than their minimum ($20)
Check them out at:
http://www.cbperformance.com/catalog.asp?ProductID=694 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrodsurplus Samba Member

Joined: July 02, 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know you're hot on the torq-thrust wheels, but a 7" wheel with barely any offset AND an adaptor that pushes the offset to negative on a car that was engineered to run a highly positive offset wheel is sort of asking a lot. It's hell on bearings and ball joints, not to mention you'll probably have rub issues.
instead, why not just have a set of wheels made? The test wheels on the back of mine are 15x6 and the fronts (which I ended up settling upon) measure 15x5 (in other words i have the 5s all the way around now).
The stock offset of the stock 5-inch wheel is 4 3/8. The 6-inchers have 4 1/2-inch backspace, which is 1/4" shy of exact offset as stock (i was hesitant to go the full 4 3/4 for fear of the wheels rubbing the front arms but my fears were unfounded--4 3/4" would've worked perfectly). The 5s have a 4" backspace, which is about 3/8" less offset as stock.
Even with the less-than-exact offset, 215/75-15 tires won't rub even with the car at stock height. For that matter they wouldn't rub when I fully compressed the front suspension and cycled the front wheels full lock. I got the wheels made for $75 a whack and powdered (not shown) for $28 each. Can't beat them prices... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrodsurplus Samba Member

Joined: July 02, 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:30 pm Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
| Captain Spalding wrote: |
| So, stock wheel backspace is 4.375. Torq wheels are 3.5. They will move the wheel inboard 7/8". |
Cap't, are you sure? The Torq-Thrust wheels have less backspace than the Thing wheels. Reducing the wheel offset will push the wheel centerline out. If these were both 5" wheels then the wheel centerlines would move out by 7/8" each side, which would increase the track width by 1 3/4.
If I read correctly, the TT wheels in question are 7" wide, not 5". If'n that's the case, the wheel centerline would move out 1.75" per side, which would increase track width by a whopping 3.75". We haven't even added adapters to the equation either.
Am I missing something here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oasis Samba Member
Joined: December 12, 2002 Posts: 2193
|
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 5:14 pm Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
| Captain Spalding wrote: |
| doublecanister wrote: |
you got me with the 3/ measurement!! |
Sorry. It's a smilie thing. An 8 followed by ) reads as . Should say 3/8. |
I think is the common denominator for all 181 owners.
 _________________ Now: 2003 New Beetle Turbo S / 1990 Single Cab Transporter / 2014 Tiguan R-Line 4motion / 2013 Tiguan S / 2002 Golf GLS TDI
Past: 1974 Thing Acapulco / 2009 Eos Komfort / 1997 Jetta GT / 2002 Cabrio GLX / 2002 Passat GLS / 1971 Super Beetle / 1993 EuroVan MV Westfalia / 1981 Pickup LX / 1985 Vanagon / 1986 Jetta GLI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Spalding Samba Member

Joined: February 19, 2005 Posts: 2519 Location: . . . in denial.
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:38 am Post subject: Re: wheels and tires |
|
|
| hotrodsurplus wrote: |
Cap't, are you sure? The Torq-Thrust wheels have less backspace than the Thing wheels. Reducing the wheel offset will push the wheel centerline out. If these were both 5" wheels then the wheel centerlines would move out by 7/8" each side, which would increase the track width by 1 3/4.
If I read correctly, the TT wheels in question are 7" wide, not 5". If'n that's the case, the wheel centerline would move out 1.75" per side, which would increase track width by a whopping 3.75". We haven't even added adapters to the equation either.
Am I missing something here? |
Nope. Evidently I'm the one missing something. I wish I had some chemical vice to blame this brain lapse on. I zigged when I should have zagged. You are totally correct. I better get myself one of these. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|