Author |
Message |
dsomoroff Samba Member
Joined: June 14, 2006 Posts: 24 Location: CONNECTICUT
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:40 am Post subject: Handling improvements |
|
|
Looking for any modifications beyond what I've listed below that will help improve handling on my 1974 bay camper. I've replaced EVERYTHING, you name it, it's been done including front and rear oversized sway bars and adjustable Koni's all round. Steering box, damper, ball joints, all front end parts new and of good quality. I have no play or shakes and it tracks straight until light winds or speeds get up above 60 mph. Taking this thing on long trips is far from relaxing and easy, no coffee in one hand and the other on the wheel. It takes constant effort to stay in my lane and on track. I find the tires pull on any road grooves and if trucks pass me watch out! Alignment is on, just double checked, I'm suspecting tires which seem to have a very soft side wall might be the biggest problem?
I'm running brand new Hankooks from the Bus Depot on brand new stock rims. Any thoughts would help. I'm open to new rims and lower profile tires if it makes a big difference or any mods that will do the job. I've dropped crazy money into this machine already and I'm too far in to turn back now.
Thanks,
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aeromech Samba Member

Joined: January 24, 2006 Posts: 17610 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
You've got the best shocks, the best tires, and new steering components including HD sway bars. If you're not happy with the way it drives I don't think you ever will be. Honestly, I can't think of one more thing you could do to make it handle better. I guess you could experiment with some aerodynamic surfaces such as an air dam or possibly an air foil for the roof to keep the bus on the ground at high speed. _________________ Lead Mechanic: San Diego Air and Space Museum
Licensed Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic
Licensed Pilot (Single engine Land)
Boeing 727,737-200-300-400,757,767
Airbus A319,320,321
DC9/MD80
BAe146
Fokker F28/F100
VW type 1 1962,63,65,69,72
VW Type 2 1971 (3 ea.) 1978, 1969
VW Jetta
VW Passat
Capable of leaping tall buildings in a single bound |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
airkooledchris Samba Member

Joined: January 25, 2005 Posts: 2720
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
if that wasn't enough, there's very little left you can do - but there is one more thing that will add a minimal amount of stability in cross winds - lowering it.
get drop spindles for the front and horse shoe plates for the rear, from wagenswest.com.
if that doesn't get you what you are looking for handling-wise, your gonna have to man up and deal with it, or sell it and buy a Honda - because it's an old big heavy van and it shouldn't be expected to handle much differently than you'd expect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ghiastein Samba Member

Joined: July 01, 2008 Posts: 132 Location: Kalamazoo, MI
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of the best and most cheapest improvement that I did to help with handling on my 1970 Westy Bus was to adjust the rear ride height. The rear was sagging a bit and I believe that it was causing the front to lift at highway speeds. I adjusted the rear to sit level with the front. So after I climb in the bus the front drops a bit causing the rear to be higher than the front. At first I was not trying to improve handling just to fix the saggy rear. Remember to also replace the rubber bushings when adjusting the torsion bars. _________________ 1969 Karmann Ghia Lowered w/B6 engine 1600cc sp
1970 Westy Bus 1600cc sp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
78Kombi Samba Member

Joined: October 05, 2006 Posts: 1043 Location: Western Mass
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
guy I got a hightop. I dont drive on the high ways here. theres nothing you can do when most of the traffic is doing 85 and you are doing 60. it will always feel like you are getting rear ended and blown all around.
take the back roads, it is way nicer. drink your coffee and chill. you'll get there. _________________ 78 hightop 2.0 FI
Wildthings wrote: |
no engine that I know of will run off of hype.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ToolBox Samba Member

Joined: January 27, 2004 Posts: 3439 Location: Detroit, where they don't jack parts off my ride in the parking lot of the 7-11
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
ghiastein wrote: |
One of the best and most cheapest improvement that I did to help with handling on my 1970 Westy Bus was to adjust the rear ride height. The rear was sagging a bit and I believe that it was causing the front to lift at highway speeds. I adjusted the rear to sit level with the front. So after I climb in the bus the front drops a bit causing the rear to be higher than the front. At first I was not trying to improve handling just to fix the saggy rear. Remember to also replace the rubber bushings when adjusting the torsion bars. |
First thing I thought too.
The caster will be off if the rear is low. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
busdaddy Samba Member

Joined: February 12, 2004 Posts: 52664 Location: Surrey B.C. Canada, but thinking of Ukraine
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did you have sandbags or bodies in the front seats when you had the alignment done? Toe in changes with load and can make it drive like you describe.
What pressure are you running in the tires? _________________ Rust NEVER sleeps and stock never goes out of style.
Please don't PM technical questions, ask your problem in public so everyone can play along. If you think it's too stupid post it here
Stop dead photo links! Post your photos to The Samba Gallery!
Слава Україні! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52239
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have found that minor tweeting of the toe in can make a big difference in how a van handles. I just use a tape measure to check the toe in between the tread front and back on the front tires and then make adjustments in 1/32 increments, usually towards the "toe out" side of the middle of the spec.
Make sure your wheel bearing as tight as well. IIRC the spec is something like .000 - .006 inches of end play. With it towards the tighter end of the spec you will have very little noticeable rock when you shake the wheel.
Did you do the rear torsion tube bushings?
What tire pressures are you running? These things are pretty light up front and don't need close to the maximum pressures written on the sides of the tires. They may go all over the road if you are even a few psi about what the book recommends.
Not a vehicle that is ever conducive to driving with one hand, but unless there are pretty strong winds they shouldn't take a whole lot of effort to maintain your lane. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Esher127 Samba Member

Joined: August 26, 2010 Posts: 607 Location: Staunton, VA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wildthings wrote: |
What tire pressures are you running? These things are pretty light up front and don't need close to the maximum pressures written on the sides of the tires. They may go all over the road if you are even a few psi about what the book recommends.
|
One good thing to try with tire pressure... get some chalk and draw some fat lines across all four tires, across the tread. Get in and drive straight for a few feet and get out and inspect the chalk lines. If only the middle is gone, they have too much air. If the outsides are gone but the middle remains, they have too little. If the entire line is gone, they're good.
It's a good way to find out what your tire pressure should be when you're running an non-stock tire size/load rating/compound whatever, and the manual may not be accurate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dsomoroff Samba Member
Joined: June 14, 2006 Posts: 24 Location: CONNECTICUT
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:32 am Post subject: Many thanks! |
|
|
Thank you all for your comments and suggestions.
I'm going to try them out. I do notice quite a drop in the rear of the bus and will attempt to level out and have the toe-in rechecked. I had increased the tire pressure to about 38 to tighten them up, it did help a little, I'm going to try to bring this down in the front since it is so much lighter then the rear and see if this helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fillmore77 Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2009 Posts: 280 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ratwell has made a lot of tests using various components, his site has a page with a lot of info. I remember he had found that the rear sway bar was detrimental to good handling in some situations. You might want to try the truck without it.
Handling is achieved by a balance between the front and rear handling, too much or too little in front or in back throws the whole result off.
Try describing what part of the handling you find problematic, i.e. does the front want to turn away form the wind, or into it, or is the rear all over the place, etc...
Your description of how the tires want to fall into the grooves is a good exemple. Tire manufacturers came up with the radial tire to combat this effect, but at high loads and wide sidewalls, (like our 185r14's) radials feel like driving through pudding, which is why we need the reinforced sidewalls.
I use Continental Vanco 2 tires that were specifically designed for small utility vans, they were in fact OEM on Eurovans in europe. They are 6 plies, meet the weight/load requirements, but have a softer sidewall then full blown 8 plies. I don't have any issues with groove tracking, and the curve handling I find is wonderfull. I am running cheap cofap shocks on all corners, but have a HD sway bar in front with Urethane busshings. I only fight the steering wheel on high crosswinds. The Vancos set me back only $460 canadian $ delivered for 4 tires from tiretrends.com out of Vancouver. _________________ You can have it quickly, you can have it good, you can have it cheap...Pick two...
1977 Bay Westy, stock 2.0l FI, Hailing from Quebec, Canada. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randy in Maine Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2003 Posts: 34890 Location: The Beach
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also like the rear bus butt sag diagnosis.
I don't run a rear stabilizer bar myself, but is yours adjustable? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kmmcdonald Samba Member

Joined: October 11, 2009 Posts: 218 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The best handling improvement I have noticed on our 1978 Westfalia was the addition of Nokian Hakka C Van tires. In fact, this is the only thing that I ever recall, in 32 years, that caused a noticeable improvement in handling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fillmore77 Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2009 Posts: 280 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My bus scared my wife so much when I first bought it she told me sha wasn't riding in it until I do something to improve the wallowing-hippo-on- ice-skates feeling...
I changed tires (Vanco 2's are also C rated), front 7/8" sway bar, AND replaced the worn out steering swing lever. All at once, so I can't really tell you what made the biggest difference.
But I've gotten no complaints since...  _________________ You can have it quickly, you can have it good, you can have it cheap...Pick two...
1977 Bay Westy, stock 2.0l FI, Hailing from Quebec, Canada. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Desertbusman Samba Member

Joined: June 03, 2005 Posts: 14655 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I vote for toe adjustment and tire pressure. The Hankooks are as good as they get. If your new ball joints are still stiff you will be overcorrecting any movement and it really agravates the problem. If that is the issue once they loosen up it will be totally different and you'll be happy with the way it handles. _________________ 71 Superbug
71 Westy
Last edited by Desertbusman on Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:00 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morymob Samba Member
Joined: November 09, 2007 Posts: 4683 Location: east-tn
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had a '70 bus for awhile and i agree, it's a handful in a gusty side wind. It is basically just a heavier sized bug suspension and is prone to a lot of wobble with the top heavy body sitting on top. Tire helped the most,but as earlier stated u have to live with this quirky handling. Experiment with tire pres, very important, the rear needs more than the front. An example: i have the same tires on my WBX (i know,next gen)but tire press sensitive to it also, 40 psi in front, 45-50 in rear and makes very stable. If u want easy test get behind a 18 wheeler an go by the pitching around, that press calmed mine down to nil, just a suggestion, luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TomWesty Samba Member
Joined: November 23, 2007 Posts: 3502 Location: Wyoming,USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I live in one of the windiest parts of the US. More air pressure in your tires is my vote. Also, maybe a little ballast in the bus too.I run the Nexen 820's with full pressure. Steers easily and much less wind wag. _________________ If you haven't bled on them, you haven't worked on them.
Visit: www.tomcoryell.com and check out my music! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent  Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 42359 Location: at the beach
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
there are two or three major things going on that cause this.
The rear of the bus has sagged. Putting it back to spec will help - DON"T lower the front to match the back. Put the rear back to spec.
The steering worm is out of adjustment or worn in the steering gear. If you have less than 5/8" movement in the wheel before the tires begin to move it is Ok. If there is more then the box is worn or something else is. We found that the meyle drag link we bought new had more slop in it than the used one. We found an italian brand OC and it had zero and that made a big difference. Make sure the rubber puck in the steering is good too.
Make sure the wheel bearings are near the tighter side of the specs and not at the loose end. Triple check toe and camber.
You can drink coffee and drive a bus when it is tuned but you won't do it when trucks are passing you by or there is a quartering wind, _________________ "Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it." - George Carlin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
82-T/A Samba Member
Joined: March 23, 2004 Posts: 183 Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
78Kombi wrote: |
guy I got a hightop. I dont drive on the high ways here. theres nothing you can do when most of the traffic is doing 85 and you are doing 60. it will always feel like you are getting rear ended and blown all around.
take the back roads, it is way nicer. drink your coffee and chill. you'll get there. |
Hahah!!! That's pretty funny.
I know the feeling. I live in Fort Lauderdale and I've seen a couple of Busses in Miami (they're probably on here) that haul ass on the highway. Dead serious, I occasionally see a faded red VW Bus of a similar year to mine, cruising around at about 75mph on the highway. The best I can figure is that the guy probably has a Porsche 914 5-Speed in it...
My Bus still has the 4-Speed, and while it would be nice to get the 5-Speed... I'm in no real rush for that. I really only drive my VW to the beach, and that's about it. But yeah, I don't take highways.
When I first got my VW Bus... I knew nothing about it, and even LESS about carburetors. It would take me three miles of driving (practically) for it to build up to speed at even a modest 35-40 miles an hour. I had heard people saying these busses were ridiculously slow... but I figured, could it really be THAT slow??? Turns out, the guy who lived next to my girlfriend (now wife) told me that sometimes when the fuel lines are old, it can't get any power.
I had an electric pump mounted just in front of the carb. It was gravity fed to the pump, and then the pump only pushed it maybe a foot of distance to the carb. As it turned out, when I grabbed the fuel line to check it, it crumbled in my hand... completely!!! I couldn't believe it.
The fuel line was so pourus from old age, that the fuel pump was sucking in as much air as it was fuel... the engine was starving for fuel.
I replaced everything from the tank to the fuel pump with steel lines that I bent myself. (used a rubber coupler on the tank to the fuel line). Immediately after that, the Bus ran MUCH, MUCH faster... hah. _________________ Todd,
(Fun cars)
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX-P74
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
josh Samba Member

Joined: July 13, 2003 Posts: 1773 Location: laid back in the tall grass
|
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
82-T/A wrote: |
78Kombi wrote: |
guy I got a hightop. I dont drive on the high ways here. theres nothing you can do when most of the traffic is doing 85 and you are doing 60. it will always feel like you are getting rear ended and blown all around.
take the back roads, it is way nicer. drink your coffee and chill. you'll get there. |
Hahah!!! That's pretty funny.
I know the feeling. I live in Fort Lauderdale and I've seen a couple of Busses in Miami (they're probably on here) that haul ass on the highway. Dead serious, I occasionally see a faded red VW Bus of a similar year to mine, cruising around at about 75mph on the highway. The best I can figure is that the guy probably has a Porsche 914 5-Speed in it...
. |
More likely just stock and everything is in good shape and proper tune.
Any of the type4 powered buses should be able to cruise at 75mph.
The bus owners manuals can be found in the technical section of TheSamba.
The owners manual for 1973 states that the maximum and cruising speed is 78mph. _________________
modok wrote: |
...If If stoner A takes a hit and then stoner B goes right away(not waiting two seconds), he's trying to suck on it while it's still got a vaccum, doesen't get much of a hit at all! Cause it hasn't filled back up all the way yet.
Stoner A is cylinders #2/4 B is #1/3 The plugged bowl is the throttle, the bong is the manifold |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|