Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
Vanagon engine in Baja?
Page: 1, 2  Next
Forum Index -> HBB Off-Road Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
its gunna b bad
Samba Member


Joined: November 22, 2010
Posts: 85
Location: WA state
its gunna b bad is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:11 pm    Post subject: Vanagon engine in Baja? Reply with quote

Alright, I havent heard anything on putting a vanagon engine into a baja. I hear tons about a bus transaxle into one and it makes sense because of strength and gearing, but why not use the more powerful engine that is already mated to it? So lets hear some of the pros and cons of this and just discuss some hardships one would come across doing this type of conversion. Air cooled or water cooled, carburetted or fuel injected. Another pro I can think of is that if you get a LP front end car then you could have IRS after the swap. For clarification it would be the type 2 vanagon.
The chain is cut, GO!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
surewriting
Samba Member


Joined: September 17, 2009
Posts: 138
Location: Buford, Ga
surewriting is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those motors are a huge pain in the ass to work on, and possible fitment issues might limit it (although since its a baja I guess you could just cut any sheet metal that was in the way), along with mounting up a radiator.

It doesnt seem like a very powerful upgrade to be honest. Id steer clear of it, as there are plenty of other, cheaper, easier to work on water-cooled motors out there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
its gunna b bad
Samba Member


Joined: November 22, 2010
Posts: 85
Location: WA state
its gunna b bad is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It doesnt seem like a very powerful upgrade to be honest
Well idk a 47bhp 1600 to a 70bhp 2.0l (both aircooled) seems to be a pretty good jump and you get fuel injection with it too. Even more would be the 1.9 and 2.1 watercooled ranging from 55-112bhp. I did an average of all 1.9 and 2.1 models and got 82bhp. So if I stay away from 2 certain 1.9's (55 and 59bhp) then that leaves the next lowest at 76bhp. So I would have to say I disagree about it not being a big power upgrade. A 50% power increase seems ample enough for me. Thats probably(just guessing) but a 1600 with a couple grand into it just to get it to around 76bhp.
Quote:
Those motors are a huge pain in the ass to work on

How so?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
TrikeKid
Samba Member


Joined: October 12, 2008
Posts: 153
Location: Roy, WA
TrikeKid is offline 

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those are a type 4 engine. Do some searching about type-4 swaps and you'll find more info. Cooling is the biggest thing, I know the only aftermarket fan shroud to swap into a bug is around $700, don't know what the stock stuff looks like or if it could be f'd with enough to work in a baja since I haven't played with a T4.
_________________
'74 Baja - The Snowagen
'88 Suzuki Samurai - The endless project

That'll buff out... with a sawzall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
dixon_cass
Samba Member


Joined: December 14, 2010
Posts: 930
Location: Axtell Kansas
dixon_cass is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

them motors are ugly anyway Laughing i dont know from experience but i haver also heard they are a pain in the but to work on. why not just got full on modern and put a ecotec motor in it or somthing like that. you would never be able to beat the reliability and you get 147hp right out of the box. it only weighs 60 pounds more than a vw motor to.
_________________
My build thread:

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5224965#5224965

IRS, Kingpin, 2 seat, hot rod pinto powered sand rail.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=882925383&ref=ts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
its gunna b bad
Samba Member


Joined: November 22, 2010
Posts: 85
Location: WA state
its gunna b bad is offline 

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had this plan to kill multiple birds with 1 stone.
So far its just the shroud that is stumping me..Im thinking between the type 4 shroud and the type 1 shroud I will be able to make one. If not then it will be a big costly mistake.
Anybody want to tell me if this seems like a good idea to buy? Hes not very descriptive...
http://kpr.craigslist.org/pts/2266966450.html
He told me he has 3 good blocks, 9 carbs, 7 dizzys. And just said I should get out there and take a look because theres too much stuff to list so im thinking I should take the drive. Im really regretting getting rid of all my SBC stuff, just sold a tranny/tran case today, still have 1 more tranny left then pretty much all my big chevy parts are gone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
Mal evolent
Samba Member


Joined: March 31, 2009
Posts: 2923
Location: San Antonio, Nuevo Mexico
Mal evolent is offline 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"vanagon engine" is an undefined state; there were three:

aircooled type 4
wasserboxer
diesel

the aircooled engine block weighs 44 pounds more, the engine hanging off the transaxle thing no longer works. you have to brace the rear of the engine to the roll cage, adding even more weight. the cooling air intake is at crankshaft height, which will be a problem in sand and dust and mud and leaves and...

the watercooled engine has all of the above problems except the air intake, weighs even more and has head gasket issues. the Yugo of VWs

the diesel is dynamically challenged.

if you are going to be a bear, be a grizzly. swap in a Ford four or an ecotech.
_________________
73 Beetle Baja, Ghia front brakes, Type 3 rear brakes, 2220 ( 94 X 80 ), Weber Progressive, Bosch SVDA, '97 Mustang seats

Baja Bugs for Volkswagen Virgins: Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
veeweeman
Samba Member


Joined: December 20, 2009
Posts: 940
Location: New Port Richey, FL
veeweeman is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Vanagon water boxer engines would only last about 35-60k miles before blowing a head gasket...I have read a lot about owners complaining how their van sits in the repair shop more then their own garage...if it were me and I had the money I would install a modern TDI turbo diesel...the Golf, producing 236 foot-pounds of torque at 1,750 rpm and 140 horsepower. Fuel consumption is 30 mpg city and 41 mpg highway...now how can you argue with those numbers?

I will also point out that I personally have seen these motors safely hit 300hp with a bigger turbo and a new chip putting almost 600 foot pounds of torque to the wheels...and you can also get free fuel by making it a Vegi-Baja

VeeWee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
volks kidS
Samba Member


Joined: August 22, 2008
Posts: 61
Location: Lower Mainland, BC,Canada
volks kidS is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

my baja has a 1.9Lwater boxer in it no issues with it, soon going to stick a 2.1 Lin it for fun, it takes the car anywhere we want to go and is reliable, we even hooked up a heater core so we can have heat from it.
great moters imo.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

i dont have any photos of the motor right now but this is in quite a few feet of water.( no its not touching bottom)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
euromog
Samba Member


Joined: September 19, 2008
Posts: 267

euromog is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 5:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Total mis information! My Syncro has over 200K on it and the head gaskets were replaced at 90K. Big problems have been people not changing the coolant every two years and using the wrong coolant. Duh! Type 1 engines need a valve job every 45K miles! All engines have their quirks but the WBX is a far better engine than most give credit for. With mods and a turbo it can make over 300HP and not over heat. In stock form and in a Vanagon Westy it is underpowered but in a Baja it would work great. I am thinking about putting one in my Thing. Just by putting dual webers and a equal length header you can add 20HP to a stock WBX.




veeweeman wrote:
The Vanagon water boxer engines would only last about 35-60k miles before blowing a head gasket...I have read a lot about owners complaining how their van sits in the repair shop more then their own garage...if it were me and I had the money I would install a modern TDI turbo diesel...the Golf, producing 236 foot-pounds of torque at 1,750 rpm and 140 horsepower. Fuel consumption is 30 mpg city and 41 mpg highway...now how can you argue with those numbers?

I will also point out that I personally have seen these motors safely hit 300hp with a bigger turbo and a new chip putting almost 600 foot pounds of torque to the wheels...and you can also get free fuel by making it a Vegi-Baja

VeeWee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
drmiller100
Samba Member


Joined: April 04, 2010
Posts: 384
Location: Boise Idaho
drmiller100 is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vanagon guys all put subaru engines in their vans.

what does that tell u.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
volks kidS
Samba Member


Joined: August 22, 2008
Posts: 61
Location: Lower Mainland, BC,Canada
volks kidS is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drmiller100 wrote:
vanagon guys all put subaru engines in their vans.

what does that tell u.

it tells me there is probably alot of vanagon engine bajas out there
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
XLR8
Samba Member


Joined: October 09, 2010
Posts: 437
Location: ulverstone, Tasmania, AUS
XLR8 is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

volks kidS wrote:
drmiller100 wrote:
vanagon guys all put subaru engines in their vans.

what does that tell u.

it tells me there is probably alot of vanagon engine bajas out there


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

on a serious note ibe seen 3 people put vanagon engines in baja's on youtube.

i like the aspect of the aircooled 2L model with it's hydraulic lifters etc but i hate the aspect of how it is cooled. that rear mounted fan is gonna drink water and eat dust if given the chance while upright cooling is...well...more upright and out of the dust cloud and crap.
_________________
"But that parts not user serviceable!"

"Mate, everything's user serviceable."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
its gunna b bad
Samba Member


Joined: November 22, 2010
Posts: 85
Location: WA state
its gunna b bad is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats why you switch it to upright cooling..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
joescoolcustoms
Samba Member


Joined: August 08, 2006
Posts: 9054
Location: West By God Virginia
joescoolcustoms is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5195949&highlight=#5195949

It is a consideration of value, not total cost. The type IV engine is soo much better if you drive your VW more than a 1/4 mile at a time. They are no harder to work on than any other VW AC engine. The upright conversions are the better choice for the type IV in a beetle. The exhaust needs to be a true 4 into 1 header and not the 2-2-1 exhaust. The cheap exhaust really hurts the type IV engine.

If all the decissions are based on a budget issue, stay type I, even if you install a bus IRS gear box.
_________________
Bad News Racing 2018 NORRA 1000 3rd in Class
Best Day Ever Racing 2022 NORRA 1000 2nd in Class and first All Female team to complete the race

Everyone is gifted. Some just do not open the package.

Looks like it was painted with a live chicken,polished with a brick and buffed with a pine cone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
chuckput
Samba Member


Joined: June 16, 2010
Posts: 5
Location: El Centro, CA
chuckput is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have decided to go the Type 4 engine route for my Baja Bug project because I got a very good deal on a Porsche 914 engine (still a VW Type 4). I will be converting to an upright cooling system (either DTM or a FAT Porsche style). I already have a 091 bus transaxle. My question is this: The engine did not come with a flywheel. What flywheel should I use? One from a 914 or one from a bus? The transmission already has a Hi-Torque starter which is a stand alone starter (no bushing shaft to the bell housing).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
Jim.Fernish
Samba Member


Joined: July 30, 2007
Posts: 17

Jim.Fernish is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would suggest the type 4 flywheel as clutch parts and fitting it to the 091 trans will be much easier. The following is link to my engine.

http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=122048&p=906039#p906039
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
shred625
Samba Member


Joined: October 10, 2007
Posts: 1328
Location: Huntington Beach Ca
shred625 is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are great motors especially if you are going to go big and really good looking but will take a little coin.


http://www.fatperformance.com/type4.htm
_________________
“It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.”
~ Jack Handey
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Classifieds Feedback
jsturtlebuggy
Samba Member


Joined: August 24, 2005
Posts: 4594
Location: Fair Oaks/Orangevale, CA
jsturtlebuggy is offline 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Type IV engine are a great engine even in stock sizes.
Problem with a air cooled Vanagon engine is breather tower is case in and more difficult to convert to upright.
I have ran type IV engine in different buggies and a Baja since the middle 1970s and with the stock fan on crankshaft setup with no problems. From the factory they make a screen for the fan intake that keeps crap out. And since it has crank seals at both ends nothing gets into crankcase.
Finding and exhaust system now is not cheap. I still have my FourTuned off road exhaust on the engine.
They are not cheap to build. GOOD cylinder heads are not cheap.
I switch to a Subaru because to me it made more sense to me in the long run for the power I wanted.
_________________
Joseph
Fair Oaks/Orangevale, CA
Elrod Motorsports
Motion Tire Motorsports
Having fun with Dune Buggies since 1970
Into Volkswagens since 1960
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
72Pstroke
Samba Member


Joined: April 04, 2011
Posts: 191
Location: North Idaho
72Pstroke is offline 

PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:50 am    Post subject: new member chiming in... Reply with quote

I've been lurking for a while and was actually going to post this same question this morning.
I grew up driving bajas all through high school and beyond. Over the years, I tried lots of different engine combos in my cars. Started with a 1641, needed more power, went to a 1968cc. It ran great, had lots of power, but long term durability was an issue. Broke 1 crank in two, rebuilt it, ran for a year or so and split the case at number 3.
I finally went to a stock 110hp Corvair. No more durability issues, lots of power.
I tell you all that to say this: Here are the things I am looking at for my current baja engine swap.
Durabilityand longevity- Stock stuff rules.
Water cooled- That way I can add some real heat and defrost to the car. Winters are pretty long, and I want to drive this thing year around.
Trouble free- Have you ever tried to keep a Weber from icing up on the back of a baja?
I am thinking about the 2.1 Wasserboxer. No expensive adapter to buy, plenty of power for me, no ground clearance issues, doesn't hang out the back of the car a long ways, stock, and fuel injected.
I realize the wassserboxer may have some head gasket issues, but so do the Subies.
Comments or arguements?
Tim
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> HBB Off-Road All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2024, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.