Author |
Message |
calvinater Samba Member

Joined: September 06, 2014 Posts: 3563 Location: 802 The Pointless Forrest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 11:56 am Post subject: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
Which is better? 0 deck w/ copper head gasket
Or .040 deck with no gasket ? Does keeping the combustion out of the cylinders help to keep the engine cooler? Thanks _________________ "Albatross"! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nsracing Samba Member

Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9737 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 12:02 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
The 0.040 copper is more work and more cost. First, you have to machine the gasket so it will not overhang and get hit by the piston. You also have to machine the head so the gasket is just right in there.
The other option is simpler. You just machine the cylinder or case to achieve the 0.040 deck =DONE! And you saved the cost of the copper.
So..pass it around. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pruneman99 Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2012 Posts: 5013 Location: Oceanside
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:03 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
With a nice tight deck, you burn won't happen in the cylinder, Quench is a good thing. With a big deck, all is lost. Personally I don't use the the gaskets. I've never had a need. Maybe an all out race engine might be different, but I don't like adding stuff that I don't need. There are a few that swear by the gaskets, some who think they are the devil. It's all personal preference. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:15 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
the deck height and the gasket have nothing to do with one another, other than the actual deck height is increased by the thickness of the gasket.
There is so much misinformation about "zero deck" engines it's sickening. There's no such thing, at least one that will live more than 30minutes that is.
Deck height is NOT the distance from the top of the piston to the top of the cylinder, at TDC.
Deck height IS the distance from the top of the piston to the deck of the head, at TDC.
Sometimes they are the same, but often they are not. Like when you use a stepped head (Ugh), or use a head gasket. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net
Last edited by [email protected] on Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23950 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:16 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
most gaskets are sized bigger than the bore so no trimming required unless your trying to put a small gasket in a big bore, yes use the gaskets, no more work than not using them when building the motor. but the soft empi gaskets should be re torqued after a few heat cycle's( atleast the bottom row on head studs, Ive never had the top ones loosen/lessen) the cb head gaskets are not soft(aka hard) they normally do not require retorquing.but it wont hurt nutten if you do as long as you dont over torque than thats on you. I will not build a motor with out head gaskets unless it;s a rotary engine or...the head don't come off the cylinder. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DeathBySnuSnu Samba Member

Joined: August 25, 2012 Posts: 1238 Location: MS
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 5:20 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
I also like the soft copper gaskets.
My engine is nekkid and you can physically see the leaks when at cold start. The soft copper seals it up.
It could possibly be the sub standard (by my standards) of the machine work at that time.
But as far as your question.
It don't matter much if any as long as the assembled deck is right and you trust the machine shop work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ach60  Samba Member
Joined: May 14, 2001 Posts: 4137 Location: Santa Maria
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 6:53 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
the deck height and the gasket have nothing to do with one another, other than the actual deck height is increased by the thickness of the gasket.
There is so much misinformation about "zero deck" engines it's sickening. There's no such thing, at least one that will live more than 30minutes that is.
Deck height is NOT the distance from the top of the piston to the top of the cylinder, at TDC.
Deck height IS the distance from the top of the piston to the deck of the head, at TDC.
Sometimes they are the same, but often they are not. Like when you use a stepped head (Ugh), or use a head gasket. |
If a V8 guy tells you he is building a Zero Deck Engine, what he is saying is
the Piston at TDC is even with the Deck (The cylinder Head Mounting surface)
These guys can use different thickness head gaskets to make minor adjustments to compression ratio.
These guys, like us, like .040 to .070 distance between the top of the piston, and the head
But if you want to see some weird ass shit take a look at a Chevy 348-409 series engines. _________________ Good Luck
Al |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nsracing Samba Member

Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9737 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:45 am Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
I am about to build an 'above-deck' engine. I am .0505" above the cylinder.
I already have a set of ledged heads. My plan is to machine some of the ledge to give me around 0.035" clearance.
My question is - would the cylinders be cooler since I have moved the heat area higher in the bore??
Anybody's thoughts on this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:22 am Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
yeah but this isn't a V8 forum.
One advantage of the head gaskets is in long stroke engines (84/86mm) you can run a .060" head gasket, and run the piston up into the gasket .020", which gives the piston more cylinder at BDC to support the piston. Effectively making the cylinder longer, without buying custom (expensive) cylinders which require special machine work. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fivelugshortaxle Samba Member

Joined: May 13, 2011 Posts: 4263 Location: Aumsville, Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:10 am Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
That's how my 2276 worked out. Piston was .015 out of the cylinder....I used .060 copper for a deck of .045. Worked out nicely. And no, I didn't have to machinee the copper gasket. And personally I like the idea of a little so.ething soft between cyli der ad head for a nice, leak proof seal. _________________ Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7822 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:08 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
Erhm, a zero deck solution - can - be a good solution in some combo´s. But not necessarily with copper shims. Copper shims work well now and here, and is an easy fix if extra tolerance is needed for stroke or rod change. BUT, EVERY SINGLE engine that I have torn down which had done some miles and had copper gaskets were leaking BAAD! Never never use them on engines that sees a lot of miles. Race engines, fine, since they rarely see many miles before inspection. If you want to take advantage of the small benefit with zero deck and have the deck height tolerance in the cylinderheads, you should machine the step in the head. THEN you have a chance of making a proper seal between cylinder and head. This is the only way the engine will keep stay sealed for a long time.
T |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23104 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:52 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
Dang....seems like he type 4 people figured this out a while back.
For engines going long miles...lap cylinders into the heads with XXX valve grinding compound for perfect interface. Make sure your cylinder bores have the slight inside chamfer. Then right before installing heads apply a very thin layer of something like Indian head sealant, gas-ga-cinch or copper coat...basically a cylinder head "shellac"...not an RTV
Very thin transparent smear of sealant.
The sealant does no sealing between the mating surfaces. It forms a ring of carbon shortly after first start up that seals in the chamfer/bevel as it burns. The excess just burns away.
This runs 100k miles easy. The factory had a bulletin out ages ago about deleting the factory head gaskets on type 4. This is not saying head gaskets are bad...just that the stock type 4 head gaskets were a bad design.
https://www.ratwell.com/mirror/www.dolphinsci.com/techbull.html
Ray |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yamaducci Samba Member

Joined: March 30, 2010 Posts: 2373 Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:24 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
Deck height is NOT the distance from the top of the piston to the top of the cylinder, at TDC.
Deck height IS the distance from the top of the piston to the deck of the head, at TDC.
|
So here is where I am going to disagree; Sorry John.
Take the example of a Deck Height Measuring Tool. It sits on top of the cylinder and measures down to the piston.
Now take a Combustion Chamber CC Kit and drop the disk into the head. Where does it sit? What volume is it measuring? Add the Copper Ring and now what volume is it measuring? I don't know anyone who puts the copper ring on top of the cylinder to either build the engine or measure cylinder volume. It is always dropped into the opening of the head. Which effectively is contributing to Chamber Volume.
Since the "Deck" in your example is the flat surface of the head in the quench area; what happens when using a Hemi head? There is no deck reference at all.
To the OP. What is better depends on your application. Normally aspirated high mileage engine should go metal to metal and keep the deck to the top of the cylinder as small as possible. Keep the combustion in the chamber reduces the risk of cracked or warped cylinders. I n a racing or Turbo application you should try to eliminate deck height and run the copper shim/gasket. For example I am running zero deck to the cylinder with a .060" copper shim on top. _________________ -John Cox
My 2498 Turbo Re-Build Thread: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5578697#5578697
3rd Brake Light Safety Stars- I still have a couple with blue light left. Email me if interested.
Last edited by yamaducci on Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FreeBug Samba Member
Joined: March 12, 2012 Posts: 4277 Location: deepest, darkest Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:27 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
When the factory rebuilds put in head "shims" on the type 1, they were steel. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vwracerdave Samba Member

Joined: November 11, 2004 Posts: 15599 Location: Deep in the 405
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
calvinater wrote: |
Which is better? 0 deck w/ copper head gasket
Or .040 deck with no gasket ? |
I personally do not use those copper head shims. They are not a gasket and they do not seal anything. I always shim under the barrel. _________________ 2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nsracing Samba Member

Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9737 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:52 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
I define the deck heigth as the top of piston to the closest part of the head.
The closest part of the head in relation to the top of piston happens to be the flat portion of the head which happens to sit on top of the cylinders. I am only talking about flat piston tops.
So... we measure deck heights from top of piston to top of cylinder. The head is going to sit on top of they cylinders. I will submit that the top of piston to top of cylinder is the DECK HEIGHT.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fivelugshortaxle Samba Member

Joined: May 13, 2011 Posts: 4263 Location: Aumsville, Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:09 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
vwracerdave wrote: |
calvinater wrote: |
Which is better? 0 deck w/ copper head gasket
Or .040 deck with no gasket ? |
I personally do not use those copper head shims. They are not a gasket and they do not seal anything. I always shim under the barrel. |
And how does soft copper not seal? And yet aluminum against aluminum does? _________________ Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dsrtfox Samba Member

Joined: August 25, 2009 Posts: 443 Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:35 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
I think you mean cast iron against aluminum unless you have Nickie's... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fivelugshortaxle Samba Member

Joined: May 13, 2011 Posts: 4263 Location: Aumsville, Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:23 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
dsrtfox wrote: |
I think you mean cast iron against aluminum unless you have Nickie's... |
Yes. Casf iron against aluminum. _________________ Good things come to those who wait.
2332 with lots of goodies....
Rotating assembly balanced by Brothers VW
4340 84mm crank
AA 94mm p&c' s
Total seal 2nd ring, rest are Grants
5.5 h beams
Magnum straight cuts
Steve Long XR310 on a 106
CB 1.4 rockers
CB Magnaspark 2 distributor
NGK D7ea plugs
A1 lowdown 1 3/4 with single muffler
Dellorto 48's with 40 venturies
Kennedy Stage 2 with Daiken disc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23104 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:30 pm Post subject: Re: .040 deck height vs .040 copper head gasket |
|
|
fivelugshortaxle wrote: |
vwracerdave wrote: |
calvinater wrote: |
Which is better? 0 deck w/ copper head gasket
Or .040 deck with no gasket ? |
I personally do not use those copper head shims. They are not a gasket and they do not seal anything. I always shim under the barrel. |
And how does soft copper not seal? And yet aluminum against aluminum does? |
It doesn't......which is exactly why it failed on type 4 engines (aluminum double wall head gaskets)...and the factory sent out a tech bulletin to delete them.
Both copper and aluminum ARE malleable so they crush down to seal....for some period of time. The problem long term....like for a 100k street engine....is that neither is a spring material and both "work harden" with both heat cycling and pounding.
When either begins to leak....if you dont catch....it eventually produces a burn through that. Cuts the cylinders area like a torch. Of course copper is much better at resisting this for a lpt longer.
The issue is that both aluminum and copper are neither spring materials or elastomer sealing materials.
The "lapped" cylinder to head joint seals far better than either aluminum or copper gaskets because:
A. You are lapping the cylinder to fit the head and checking with machinist dye to get a "0" gap, glass smooth fit.....nearly 100% gas tight. But the gas tight seal at a micro level seal....is the carbon ring in the cylinder opening chamfer.
By the way the type 4 head to exhaust header gaskets have the same long,term issue. They are made of copper about .080" thick. They seal for typically about 30-40k miles....maybe a little more. When you get them out they are hard as a rock and have to be annealed cherry rex to give them any sealing ability at all. Ray |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|