Author |
Message |
billyisme Samba Member

Joined: November 28, 2001 Posts: 360 Location: Ventura, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:10 am Post subject: Opinions wanted on 15" Bias-Ply Tires for a Bus... |
|
|
Please don't hurt me for posting ANOTHER tire thread...
I'm in need of 15" tires for my stock-height 1960 panel. I am leaning toward a set of 4-ply tires because I think they are very cool and original looking. I have searched the forums here for feedback on their driving characteristics and tread life, but have not found many opinions one way or the other from people who have actually used them on a bus. Technically the 640-15 tires are closer to stock size, but I am interested in blackwall BF Goodrich 670-15 tires simply because of the increased load rating over the 640-15 tires, and the actual size difference shouldn't be noticeable from stock.
Here's a link to the tires I'm looking at right now (the photo shows a whitewall tire, but the specs listed are all for blackwall tires):
http://www.coker.com/store/customer/product.php?productid=17645&cat=&page=1
Here's the 640-15 tire specs:
http://www.coker.com/store/customer/product.php?productid=17421&cat=&page=1
So... who uses them or has used these or similar tires and what is/was your opinion of them? My bus is "just" my hobby so I won't be pounding the tires on the freeway every day--mostly weekend driving and the occasional long trip to a show. I also live in SoCal, so snow is not a concern, and rain is infrequent.
Thanks for your time.
Billy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bryan S. Samba Member
Joined: August 22, 2003 Posts: 547 Location: Visalia California
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you aren't going to be driving it alot on the highway, I'd get them they look nice, and it's a hobby car. Now on the other note it's gonna ride like shit when you do drive it to that vw show,and going to want to wander alot more than radial tires. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DanM Samba Member

Joined: June 07, 2002 Posts: 1376 Location: Falls Church, VA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i drive my '60 on Firestone 6.40x15's everyday. I drive in every kind of traffic and weather imaginable and have no complaints. (ok, sliding backwards down a hill in 2" of snow kind of sucked but that was my fault) bottom line for me is that these are the tires that our buses were built for. just make sure you slow your ass down on those highway exits!!!
your bus will handle, look, and feel exactly as it should on the right tires. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billyisme Samba Member

Joined: November 28, 2001 Posts: 360 Location: Ventura, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so-23 wrote: |
i drive my '60 on Firestone 6.40x15's everyday. I drive in every kind of traffic and weather imaginable and have no complaints. (ok, sliding backwards down a hill in 2" of snow kind of sucked but that was my fault) bottom line for me is that these are the tires that our buses were built for. just make sure you slow your ass down on those highway exits!!!
your bus will handle, look, and feel exactly as it should on the right tires. |
Very cool--Thanks for the reply! Where do you live? How is the "drift" on a grooved-cement freeway road survace?
The <1,200 lb load rating of the 6.40 tire doesn't worry you? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hazetguy Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2001 Posts: 10801 Location: the past
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
but I am interested in blackwall BF Goodrich 670-15 tires simply because of the increased load rating over the 640-15 tires, and the actual size difference shouldn't be noticeable from stock.
|
you obviously haven't seen Rachel's truck. the 670's are HUGE in comparison to 640's. makes her truck look taller for sure, and makes the speedo turn slower.
for a stock look, then go for it. for daily driving-the price you're gonna pay for bias ply's from coker, you could buy a real nice set of michelins. i have also heard (from people who have actually used thm on a daily basis), that they do not last very long--like 30K-40K, and that's not long for me. i have more than that on my michelins, and they look barely used.
i've driven busses with bias ply tires, and i can't wait to drive my busses with radials after that. make sure all your steering components are in tip-top shape, otherwise the "drift" will be exaggerated by the poor steering qualities.
i'll take radials any day.
and the load rating is per tire. 1200lbs is no problem for a bus. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edgy Samba Member

Joined: January 22, 2003 Posts: 424 Location: Bel Air, Maryland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Being old enough to have purchased 670x15s new for my first car...I'd go with radial tires. Every car manufacturer in the world has switched to radials. I suspect it isn't because bias ply were so good. The are hard, wander, and the treadware is probably faster than you realize. In the early 60's every gas station carried the tires you are considering. The reason they all carried them was they were replaced so often.
If you want a show car, go stock, if you want a hobby, go good. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gatorwyatt Samba Member
Joined: April 24, 2002 Posts: 1888 Location: Clearwater Fl.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:04 pm Post subject: firestones |
|
|
i drive just about every weekend on my 6.40x15 set and have no drift also no load complaints.coker is just about the easiest place to score them.hazet guy is correct about having a tight suspension,adjust all of your links pins,grease and should make sure your center link is also tight.hobby or not they drive great when your bus is all stock,besides it was the way the bus came.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
splitpile Samba's Worst Speller

Joined: May 03, 2000 Posts: 5928 Location: back to living where hell meets the suface
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have 670/15 Nankings on my container van, drove it to Cali and back with out a problem. I thought they felt good, rode fine and handled great in the winds we fought along I 10. Cost less the 60 dollars each mounted and balanced, I wish I could get a few more for my other 15 inch wheeled buses/ I have not found a decent radial in 15 inch to this day that is proper for a bus. _________________ Stocking distributor of "The Funky Green Panels"
www.BUSTORATION.com metal and more for your bus
"no more hacking my sig line" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hazetguy Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2001 Posts: 10801 Location: the past
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I have not found a decent radial in 15 inch to this day that is proper for a bus.
|
michelin ltx 205/75/15. same height as original 640/15 (i did alot of research before finding ones that would fit that were the same height). my speedo is very accurate,and they have a good weight load.
i don't care about original looks, i need roadworthiness (as you know). about 50k miles on them, and still about 3/4 tread left. they are quiet and handle great.
and they are a little wide, but i don't have a later rear end in my bus, so i do not have the tire-to-fenderwell clearance problems that so many complain about when they put bigger tires on and early bus with a later rear end in it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Brase Samba Member
Joined: March 28, 2004 Posts: 4570 Location: Cedar Falls, Iowa
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
splitpile wrote: |
I have not found a decent radial in 15 inch to this day that is proper for a bus. |
Splitpile:
Way back in about 1982 when I got my first type 2, (a 1976 red and white bus), and found out what "reinforced" tires were, I noticed that Michelin had available 175r 15's in reinforced construction. I kinda suspected that these were produced to retro fit 15" wheeled type 2's. I have no idea what ELSE they could have been made to fit. I suppose these have gone AWOL in the intervening years?
Or are they available from vintage suppliers?
Al Brase
69 double cab |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
campingbox  Samba Member

Joined: November 14, 2000 Posts: 10252 Location: Petaluma, CA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I noticed a weird feeling the first time I drove on biased ply tires....it was a different feel than radials.
After a few days of driving the bus the weird feeling went away...never noticed it since. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lind Samba Member

Joined: November 06, 2000 Posts: 10225 Location: idaho
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
bias ply tires aren't quite as bad as some make them out to be, but they still are not nearly as good as radials. radials just handle much better in rutted roads and on corners. my attitude is that if you are going to drive the bus alot, get radials. if it is a show type car that you are very interested in preserving its originality, get bias ply tires. I have buses with bias ply tires and radials. the bias ply tires don't make it too far from home. _________________ .
Wanted:
Idaho VW license plate frames or other dealership items.
VWoA literature and early dealership or distributor literature/pictures/information
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NorCalWeekender Samba Member

Joined: April 13, 2000 Posts: 6541 Location: East Bay, CA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This just occurred to me...when did they make the switch from bias to radials? I mean, would my 67 have originally had bias-plys? Just curious.
-Taylor _________________ 9th Owner of a 1971 Tintop Westy
"Eventually, we sold to a guy for $500 who towed it away to live in it in his parents' driveway. We didn't think it would ever avoid the junk heap on that day." -The 3rd Owner, 1995 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dstefun Samba Member

Joined: February 20, 2002 Posts: 3338 Location: Sacratomato
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NorCalRiviera wrote: |
This just occurred to me...when did they make the switch from bias to radials? I mean, would my 67 have originally had bias-plys? Just curious.
-Taylor |
Radials had been popular in Europe for many years by 67 so it probably came with radials - Michelin, Conti, & Pirelli all made them. US made cars and trucks didn't go to radials until the early 70's. Only Lind knows for sure! _________________ ~~~~~~~~
Radio Questions R Us - what'cha need to know?
"Out! Out! You demons of stupidity!"
Remember - You are required to get older but you are not required to grow up!
62 SC & 66 Bus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Waah Samba Member

Joined: February 10, 2004 Posts: 21 Location: Los Angeles
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dstefun Samba Member

Joined: February 20, 2002 Posts: 3338 Location: Sacratomato
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Those P195's are 1.0" smaller in diameter than a P205 which is close to stock, that's almost 4% smaller.
Here are some Coker P205/75's 2 3/8" wide whites
http://www.coker.com/store/customer/product.php?productid=18332&cat=&page=1
http://www.coker.com/store/customer/product.php?productid=17660&cat=&page=1
From type2.com ....
Quote: |
Bentley says that the 3/4 ton (small nut) models came with a 6.40-15 tire, having a diameter of 27.16", +/- .24".
This makes the nearest European radial tire size a 185R15, and the nearest P-Metric size a 205/75-15.
Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/Mile Difference
185/75-15 5.5in 13.0in 25.9in 81.4in 778 -4.5%
185/82-15 6.0in 13.5in 26.9in 84.6in 748 -0.6%
195/75-15 5.8in 13.3in 26.5in 83.3in 761 -2.2%
195/80-15 6.1in 13.6in 27.3in 85.7in 739 +0.7%
205/75-15 6.1in 13.6in 27.1in 85.2in 744 0.0%
|
_________________ ~~~~~~~~
Radio Questions R Us - what'cha need to know?
"Out! Out! You demons of stupidity!"
Remember - You are required to get older but you are not required to grow up!
62 SC & 66 Bus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Waah Samba Member

Joined: February 10, 2004 Posts: 21 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info dstefun. That table is very helpful.
I've been looking at the 205's too, but are they too wide for a OG rim? Here are the measurements from Coker.
Overall Diameter: 27.10
Cross Section: 8.00
Tread Width: 5.80
Load Capacity: 1598 @ 35 psi
The Goodrich 640-15 bias plys ( http://www.coker.com/store/customer/product.php?productid=17755&cat=&page=1 ) measure:
Overall Diameter: 26.88
Cross Section: 6.25
Tread Width: 4.20
Load Capacity: 1190 @ 32 psi |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scotts 63 23 Samba Member

Joined: March 09, 2002 Posts: 1280 Location: Somewhere in my mind... The Real er Laguna Beach :)
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
dstefun said:
Quote: |
I've been looking at the 205's too, but are they too wide for a OG rim? Here are the measurements from Coker. |
dstefun,
I put a set of 205/75R15 Coker Wide Whites on my '63 two days ago and they fit and look great. Took it out on the freeway yesterday and the ride is excellent.
I now have an extra set of Goodyear 205/75R15's with about 85-90% of their tread still on them with the small whitewall. They're great tires. Anyone interested?
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
splitpile Samba's Worst Speller

Joined: May 03, 2000 Posts: 5928 Location: back to living where hell meets the suface
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roaming westy just bought 5 of the cokers for his 23 window, I'm sure he'll pipe in when he gets them in and mounted _________________ Stocking distributor of "The Funky Green Panels"
www.BUSTORATION.com metal and more for your bus
"no more hacking my sig line" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
splitpile Samba's Worst Speller

Joined: May 03, 2000 Posts: 5928 Location: back to living where hell meets the suface
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
On my 1960 SC I have Coopers, 195/75/15 lt tire. They are rated at I think 1480 and have 2 ply sidewalls. In a never ending quest for a true LT 15 inch, I have found that there really are NONE made. If you look at the true construction and learn to read the codes on them you will find that there really isn't a radial 15 inch tire for a bus. The smallest size I have been able to find is a 215/15 truck radial, but to big for a bus _________________ Stocking distributor of "The Funky Green Panels"
www.BUSTORATION.com metal and more for your bus
"no more hacking my sig line" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|