Author |
Message |
skelly Samba Member
Joined: May 13, 2018 Posts: 45 Location: Upper peninsula, MI
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 4:46 pm Post subject: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
Hey guys. This will be my first post and my first westy (if all goes well). I'm looking at a 1985 westy weekender that has a 3 speed automatic transmission and a GoWesty 2.2L rebuild (40K on it). The owner now drives it as his daily driver and it seems to run great. Since most are standards, I'm curious what you all think about buying an automatic trans vs standard. This is our Honeymoon vehicle so my Fiance will be happy its an automatic (or will she?) and I am fine either way. I just want to check with the Samba community before I buy it, in case there's something I don't know about the automatics that I should. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarkWard Samba Member
Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 17157 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 5:02 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
I would not be put off by an automatic. This automatic was used for years in many vw and Audi vehicles. They can be very reliable and a pleasure that drive. _________________ ☮️ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimf909 Samba Member
Joined: April 03, 2014 Posts: 7482 Location: WA/ID
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 5:10 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
Use the google search in the upper right to search for Vanagon auto and you’ll find several threads where auto owners go on and on about how much they love their auto transmissions.
I never would have considered one but after reading so many positive comments I now wonder what I’m missing.
While you’re at it, go to the Vanagon FAQs here to read about PPis and what to look for (if you haven’t already). Regardless, the transmission type is well down on the list of things to worry about.
Feel free to ask other questions about the van you’re looking at.
Enjoy. _________________ - Jim
Abscate wrote: |
Do not get killed, do not kill others.
|
Current: 1990 Westy Camper - Bostig RG4, 2wd, manual trans w/Peloquin, NAHT high-top, 280 ah LFP battery, 160 watts solar, Flash Silver, seam rust, bondo, etc., etc.
Past: 1985 Westy Camper - 1.9 wbx, 2wd, manual trans, Merian Brown, (sold after 17 years to Northwesty who converted it to a Syncro). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
?Waldo? Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2006 Posts: 9752 Location: Where?
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 5:25 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
I've owned several vanagons. Most were manuals. The last two have been automatics. The automatic with the stock 1.9 WBX is quite gutless. With a more powerful engine (in your case a 2.2 GW engine) it is a real joy to drive. I think that any other vanagons that I purchase will be automatics. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mellow Yellow 74 Samba Member
Joined: October 14, 2014 Posts: 1615 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:11 am Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
?Waldo? wrote: |
The automatic with the stock 1.9 WBX is quite gutless |
I have a stock 1.9 with an auto and it is fine, it is only gutless when you hit a decent hill _________________ 1962 Karmann Ghia
1974 Deluxe Microbus
1985 Caravelle (Vanagon) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric_Taylor Samba Member
Joined: January 21, 2011 Posts: 291 Location: Bend, Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 6:56 am Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
I have a 91 Westy with a stock 2.1 motor and an automatic. I don't know that I would have sought one out, but this was just the right van so i've got it. I'm very happy with it. It's easy to drive, smooth, and I don't find it kills power, you just have to know how to drive it. These vans are slow regardless of what trans you have. I think the auto combined with the GW 2.2 sounds like a nice setup and I'd go for it if you like the van. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gizmoman Samba Member
Joined: September 10, 2011 Posts: 1554 Location: Nevada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:02 am Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
My wife can drive the stick but would defiantly prefer an auto. I think about it as well when I'm in stop and go traffic.
If I were to buy another, it would probably be an auto _________________ 82 Vanagon Westy - AAZ 1.9 TD, HE200 Holset, WAIC, 27.75 dia tires, Electric power steering, 5-speed AAP w/.078 5th
Oversize spare carrier - stock location (no longer for sale). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmayna Samba Member
Joined: August 18, 2014 Posts: 1148 Location: SF Bay area, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:13 am Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
Before we bought our '90, we rented westy's 2-3 times a year. They were always with a stick. Then the wife laid the law down and said "If you want me to drive one of these vans up & down the very hilly Van Ness ave in San Francisco, it's got to have an automatic. So the last one we rented was yes, with an automatic. OMG!
We never looked back. She loves driving our rig (when I let her ) Now I can steer with one hand and wave to the hippie chicks...er drink my coffee, with the other hand.
Go auto!! _________________ '90 Westy / automatic.
If I'm not working on the camper or my '50 Chebbie truck, I'm either fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chachi Samba Member
Joined: November 18, 2003 Posts: 858 Location: the weeds
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:48 am Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
i have a thread around here where i asked the same question and having had the auto for a few years, i love it. our van is a cruiser, never would be fast anyway so auto is better for long drives. also...CRUISE CONTROL. after driving 500+ miles yesterday i am convinced CC is the best thing that ever happened to cars. get up to 65, punch the button, kick your sandals off and think about nice things while you drive. _________________ '74 transporter panel
'91 vanagon carat NAHT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
?Waldo? Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2006 Posts: 9752 Location: Where?
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:49 am Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
One other item that hasn't been mentioned is that the automatics take a big hit in fuel economy. If you look in the fuel economy thread you will see that they get ~25% worse fuel economy than similar vans with manual transmissions.
Mellow Yellow 74 wrote: |
?Waldo? wrote: |
The automatic with the stock 1.9 WBX is quite gutless |
I have a stock 1.9 with an auto and it is fine, it is only gutless when you hit a decent hill |
I'm very familiar with how they perform. I think it's great that you are satisfied with the performance of your van but I think that perspective is not how most would feel about the 1.9WBX and automatic trans combo. Regardless, the OP states that the van they are looking at has a 2.2 GoWesty engine installed which is a decent bump up from a 1.9WBX. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vanagon Nut Samba Member
Joined: February 08, 2008 Posts: 10379 Location: Sunshine Coast B.C.
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:36 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
Since i live in a small town, were it me, when the time came, id be curious if overall, id stand a better chance of getting an automatic transaxle rebuilt locally VS a manual. But then maybe the auto tranny tech is so old, itd be a "wash" in terms of finding a tech to rebuild either.
From my POV, [edit: with buying a rebuilt tranny, having it shipped then installed, ]its potential warranty issues that would be the real PITA.
Neil. _________________ 1981 Westy DIY 15º ABA
1988 West DIY 50º ABA
VE7TBN |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mellow Yellow 74 Samba Member
Joined: October 14, 2014 Posts: 1615 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:11 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
?Waldo? wrote: |
One other item that hasn't been mentioned is that the automatics take a big hit in fuel economy. If you look in the fuel economy thread you will see that they get ~25% worse fuel economy than similar vans with manual transmissions.
Mellow Yellow 74 wrote: |
?Waldo? wrote: |
The automatic with the stock 1.9 WBX is quite gutless |
I have a stock 1.9 with an auto and it is fine, it is only gutless when you hit a decent hill |
I'm very familiar with how they perform. I think it's great that you are satisfied with the performance of your van but I think that perspective is not how most would feel about the 1.9WBX and automatic trans combo. Regardless, the OP states that the van they are looking at has a 2.2 GoWesty engine installed which is a decent bump up from a 1.9WBX. |
Condescending - "having or showing an attitude of patronizing superiority" _________________ 1962 Karmann Ghia
1974 Deluxe Microbus
1985 Caravelle (Vanagon) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
?Waldo? Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2006 Posts: 9752 Location: Where?
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:33 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
I can't comprehend where you get off. There was nothing at all in my post that was remotely condescending or patronizing. Your post suggested that what I had said previously was incorrect. I disagreed in a kind and respectful manner. I happen to own an '85 Automatic Adventurewagen that had a fine running 1.9 WBX up until a couple weeks ago when i started pulling it for a TDI swap because it was seriously gutless. I think there are very few who would find it an adequately powered vehicle. I have no idea why you would turn that into a personal attack on me. Completely bizarre.
I guess anything can be taken the wrong way if you try hard enough.
"You look nice today."
"Shut up you asshole, you're saying I usually look bad." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oceanair Samba Member
Joined: June 09, 2013 Posts: 720 Location: Victoria, BC
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:51 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
Quote: |
25% worse fuel economy than similar vans with manual transmissions. |
This is not true. Our 1.9 Auto gets about 18-20 mpg. That would mean that others in the manual are getting 23-25mpg -- that ain't the case.
So, since I have one and run it -- I never looked for an auto van, but the right one came up and we have been very pleased for quite a while. Loads of shifting needed in these underpowered beasts.
I have a 1.9 Auto and have many miles driven in a manual Auto and they are both about the same in the hills. Up any hill of real size that is. They could both use more power -- to say that the auto is gutless is to say the manual is not or is a major advantage, that is not my experience at all. But you need to know how to drive them and sometimes it's best to select a lower gear up a big hill in the auto. _________________ 84 Vanagon Pop Top Conversion from Tin Top, 1970 Ghia - all sweet rides! Love em!
Previous: Green 72 Tin Top, White 72 Westy, Blue 64 Beetle, Yellow 71 Squareback, 2014 Jetta TDI Wagon - wish I could have them all back! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeitgeist 13 Samba Member
Joined: March 05, 2009 Posts: 12115 Location: Port Manteau
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
I was just driving a '90 MV with a RJE 2.3L/auto combo today and it's just a joy to behold. This is especially true when compared to the manual in my van. As soon as I can afford it, I'm converting mine from manual to auto. _________________ Casey--
'89 Bluestar ALH w/12mm Waldo pump, PP764 and GT2052
'01 Weekender --> full camper
y u rune klassik? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
?Waldo? Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2006 Posts: 9752 Location: Where?
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:14 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
oceanair wrote: |
Quote: |
25% worse fuel economy than similar vans with manual transmissions. |
This is not true. Our 1.9 Auto gets about 18-20 mpg. That would mean that others in the manual are getting 23-25mpg -- that ain't the case. |
That's a bit of a mis-quote when you delete the ~.
I might be overstating the difference. I haven't ever done the transmission swap from one to the other in order to establish a true apples to apples comparison.
I recall a graph of the fuel economy of a bunch of different vans stating what engine and what transmission. I did some searching but did not come up with it. Does anyone have a link? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
?Waldo? Samba Member
Joined: February 22, 2006 Posts: 9752 Location: Where?
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:20 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
To be clear, I am not trying to dissuade anyone from the vanagon automatics. At this point I prefer them. I am just attempting to present as objectively as I can what I have seen as upsides/downsides based on owning quite a few manual and automatic vanagons that were both tin tops and full campers and having worked on quite a few others. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elizer Samba Member
Joined: May 02, 2016 Posts: 1471 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:43 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
I have seen so much more positive towards the automatic than negative. If there were ever an automatic option for the syncro I would automatically jump the manual ship with zeitgeist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gizmoman Samba Member
Joined: September 10, 2011 Posts: 1554 Location: Nevada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:37 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
?Waldo? wrote: |
I did some searching but did not come up with it. Does anyone have a link? |
A quick search netted this. . .
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=577788
After just getting into it it's clear that the auto does reduce mileage considerably. Many of these vehicles have been so modified though, it gets pretty muddy.
The OP in the linked post above starts out by saying he's running "13 mpg city, 18-ish highway".
While I'm sure that doesn't represent all AT Vanagons, I think I'll stick with my stick. _________________ 82 Vanagon Westy - AAZ 1.9 TD, HE200 Holset, WAIC, 27.75 dia tires, Electric power steering, 5-speed AAP w/.078 5th
Oversize spare carrier - stock location (no longer for sale). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mellow Yellow 74 Samba Member
Joined: October 14, 2014 Posts: 1615 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:54 pm Post subject: Re: 85 westy weekender automatic vs standard trans? |
|
|
oceanair wrote: |
This is not true. Our 1.9 Auto gets about 18-20 mpg. That would mean that others in the manual are getting 23-25mpg -- that ain't the case. |
Agree, I get similar mileage. I think Waldo thinks that because his 1.9 auto was worn out and was gutless and gave poor mileage that they all must be, which ain't necessarily the case. _________________ 1962 Karmann Ghia
1974 Deluxe Microbus
1985 Caravelle (Vanagon) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|