| Author |
Message |
panicman Samba Member

Joined: December 18, 2011 Posts: 2673 Location: Canby, OR
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 6:41 pm Post subject: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
Been gone a long time, and if I knew this before, I have forgotten.
I have a 1960 beetle, and a PO had a 40hp engine installed. A different front transmission mount was welded in.
I have a 36hp that I would like to put back in. Is this transmission mount going to screw that up? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
67rustavenger Samba Member

Joined: February 24, 2015 Posts: 11600 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:08 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| panicman wrote: |
Been gone a long time, and if I knew this before, I have forgotten.
I have a 1960 beetle, and a PO had a 40hp engine installed. A different front transmission mount was welded in.
I have a 36hp that I would like to put back in. Is this transmission mount going to screw that up? |
No. The trans mount added was to get a later tunnel trans into the early beetle.
I did notice that you were out of touch for a while. Nice to see you posting again.
I wish I had an answer to your tire/drop spindle question. But I have never had a link pin car. _________________ I have learned over the years.
Cheap parts are gonna disappoint you.
Buy Once, Cry Once!
There's never enough time to do it right the first time. But there's always enough time to do it thrice.
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo!
2003 Astrovan? GFYS again, Xevin!
Don't let your bad ideas remain, ideas! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:16 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
It depends on what you mean by "screw that up." You would need to restore the original front mount and locate a 1960 splitcase transaxle if you want that part to be correct. However, the 36 horse engine will work fine behind a 40 horse transaxle, the slightly lower gearing actually helps a bit. I ran a 40 horse transaxle behind a 36 horse in an oval window Bug for a number of years. _________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
panicman Samba Member

Joined: December 18, 2011 Posts: 2673 Location: Canby, OR
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:26 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
Thanks guys- long time!!
That's the strange part. The transmission is an old split case.
When I did all my resto work, it looks like the bug was in at least 2 bad accidents. I think the driver side was flattened, and the front apron was crushed, and replaced. It makes me think the impact knocked the rear axle around, requiring a new one welded in. Here's what it looks like.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:37 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
Interesting... It looks like that shot if from below, looking up. It appears that a stock 1959 and older front mount was welded in place of the 2 studs sticking out of the rear torsion housing (the stock 1960 only mount). It appears that you still have the correct 1960 transaxle, but more shots of the nosecone would be needed to be sure. I'm guessing the only thing to you need to know is that you now need to use a 1959 and older front mount at replacement time.
This is a '60 splitcase transaxle in my garage. The shift rod comes out of the box higher than older splitcase transaxles as 1960 was the first year VW mounted the VW drivetrain at a slight angle, to lower the axles and improve handling.
_________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
panicman Samba Member

Joined: December 18, 2011 Posts: 2673 Location: Canby, OR
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:53 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
Thank you so much!
I am itching to throw the 36hp in, and if it checks out solid, throw a dual carb kit in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:11 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
Last cool touch for an original '60 Bug, see if you can find a factory red 36 horse dipstick. Since the engine is mounted at a slight angle in '60 and newer Bugs (and level in older Bugs) the '60 only 36 horse dipstick has slightly different fill and add level lines, and VW painted them red to identify them. If you don't have red dipstick the level difference isn't enough to worry about. _________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekrossi Samba Member
Joined: March 16, 2008 Posts: 195 Location: outside Jonesborough, TN
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 3:27 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
On this subject, I have a 1960 with what must be a later model trans in it. Is this a swapped front mount?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:23 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
The background is rather dark in that photo, but it looks like a later front mount. The original 1960 front mount is 2 studs sticking out of the torsion housing facing back. _________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
splitjunkie Samba Member

Joined: April 04, 2006 Posts: 4227
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:52 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
It actually looks like the welded the '60 front mount to the torsion tube a bit lower so they could put an earlier transmission in.
I had a '60 that had a 40 horse and a tunnel trans installed and they had done exactly this. It was not a good setup. It was done poorly and nothing lined up well. Also you would have to cut it out if the rubber mount went bad since it is bonded to the metal part of the mount, which is welded to the torsion tube.
I ended up cutting the mount off and welding on a '61 - '72 mounting bracket so I could use the proper mounts and have everything line up correctly.
https://www.wolfsburgwest.com/cart/DetailsList.cfm?ID=111701173c
In order to put a '59 and earlier trans front mount in there correctly, I think a front mounting bracket would need to be fabricated as I don't think the '61 - '72 mounting bracket would work, but I could be wrong. _________________ Chris
You know, a lot of these scratches will buff right out... Jerry Seinfeld |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekrossi Samba Member
Joined: March 16, 2008 Posts: 195 Location: outside Jonesborough, TN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:35 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| splitjunkie Are you referring to the picture I sent in? My trans is a later all synchro model, though I don't know the year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
splitjunkie Samba Member

Joined: April 04, 2006 Posts: 4227
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 9:03 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| ekrossi wrote: |
| splitjunkie Are you referring to the picture I sent in? My trans is a later all synchro model, though I don't know the year. |
No. Panicman's. Yours look like it was done how I described how I redid mine. That is the best way to do it for sure. _________________ Chris
You know, a lot of these scratches will buff right out... Jerry Seinfeld |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 9:10 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| splitjunkie wrote: |
It actually looks like the welded the '60 front mount to the torsion tube a bit lower so they could put an earlier transmission in.
I had a '60 that had a 40 horse and a tunnel trans installed and they had done exactly this. It was not a good setup. It was done poorly and nothing lined up well. Also you would have to cut it out if the rubber mount went bad since it is bonded to the metal part of the mount, which is welded to the torsion tube.
I ended up cutting the mount off and welding on a '61 - '72 mounting bracket so I could use the proper mounts and have everything line up correctly.
https://www.wolfsburgwest.com/cart/DetailsList.cfm?ID=111701173c
In order to put a '59 and earlier trans front mount in there correctly, I think a front mounting bracket would need to be fabricated as I don't think the '61 - '72 mounting bracket would work, but I could be wrong. |
Oh, you're right! Referring to Panicman's '60 I see the torsion housing centered mount standing away from the torsion housing and thought '59 down style, but I don't see a pair of fasteners attaching the rubber block section to the bracket welded to the frame. So most likely it is a '60 only mount welded in place.
I don't think it would be hard to reshape the front side of the '61-'72 replacement front mount to raise it up to be centered behind the torsion housing. Thickness would be the one number to figure out.
The '60 Bug is a special case. If you want to run a tunnel transaxle the best way is to weld in a later front mount. If you want to retain the splitcase transaxle you need a '60 only one that has the raised hockey stick position. '60 is the first year of the new lowered and slightly angled mounting of the engine and transaxle designed to reduce the rear wheel positive camber while keeping the rear of the engine at the same height as before. VW covers this as replacement frames also got the new revised frame and needed some modifications to be used on older cars. Roughly, the rear frame forks where lowered about 8mm and the shift rod on the transaxle raised about 24mm. _________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
Last edited by EVfun on Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekrossi Samba Member
Joined: March 16, 2008 Posts: 195 Location: outside Jonesborough, TN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:03 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| Thanks. Are the '62-67 trans mounts all the same, or are there differences? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 1:56 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
There is a change, a 1961-1965 front mount and a 1966-1971 (?? -1972) mount. The available replacement weld on frame mount for all years is the later one.
I haven’t tested this but I think all 3 mounts (1959 down, 1961-1965, and 1966-1971) have the same attachment pattern at both the transaxle and frame. It is the safety retainer lug on the front side that changed (from none to small to large going forward). The 1960 is its own 1 year only case. _________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekrossi Samba Member
Joined: March 16, 2008 Posts: 195 Location: outside Jonesborough, TN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:40 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| One other question. My car often jerks when in reverse, unless I'm really leaning on the throttle. I've been told it's a sign that the trans mounts need to be replaced. Is that possible? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:04 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
That can happen if the rear mounts are failing. When you go forward the engine wants to go down. When you back up the engine tries to lift. It’s not the only possible cause though. _________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekrossi Samba Member
Joined: March 16, 2008 Posts: 195 Location: outside Jonesborough, TN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| Thanks to everyone who answered my questions! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
panicman Samba Member

Joined: December 18, 2011 Posts: 2673 Location: Canby, OR
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 10:52 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
Thank you guys!
I never recorded the transmission serial #, so I'd have to crawl under and look for it.
I have to assume that the original trans was replaced, and they used an older split case, and that's why they needed to change the mount?
Thanks again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EVfun  Samba Member

Joined: April 01, 2012 Posts: 6379 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 11:23 am Post subject: Re: 1960 swapped engine mount question |
|
|
| panicman wrote: |
Thank you guys!
I never recorded the transmission serial #, so I'd have to crawl under and look for it.
I have to assume that the original trans was replaced, and they used an older split case, and that's why they needed to change the mount?
Thanks again! |
I don't think it's an older splitcase. The position of the shift rod exiting the transaxle changed for Bugs in 1960. On 1959 and older splitcase transaxles it's lower, down about the height of the pinion shaft. On the 1960 splitcase transaxle it exited quite a bit higher, closer to the level of the input shaft. Starting in 1960 the Bug frame was changed so the engine/ transaxle assembly was mounted lower and at a slight angle. The location on the frame where the nose cone enters was not changed.
They may have welded the 1960 only mount in place because the studs where broken. That could be from prior accident damage or could have simply been because the car was driven with the mount loose and it wiggled around and cut into the shanks of the studs.
On tunnel transaxles with a Bug nosecone it also exits high, closer to the input shaft level. On tunnel transaxles with a Bus nosecone it exits lower, about the height of the pinion shaft. Below is the Bug (left) and Bus (right) nose cones for tunnel transaxles. The Bus nose cone is commonly used to install tunnel transaxles in 1959 and older Bugs. The 1959 down splitcase transaxle also has the shift rod in that lower position while the 1960 splitcase transaxle has it in the higher position.
_________________
| Wildthings wrote: |
| As a general rule, cheap parts are the most expensive parts you can buy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|