Author |
Message |
KitS Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2024 Posts: 58 Location: NV
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 2:57 pm Post subject: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
OK, some time back I took my front end apart in the effort of replacing the ball joints. good thing too, a couple of them just fell apart after removal. At the same time, I replaced one upper torsion leaf pack.
Ok, got it back together, quite a bit of effort. Now the front end is so stiff I have yet to see it rebound running over pretty big bumps out in the desert. I'm running 8 psi in my tires.
There are Can Ams out there that can blast down the trails at 50mph and they just float over the bumps. I know I'll never get that kind of articulation from my rail, but what can be done to soften it up some, without lowering it?
I have read some guys talking about installing one thru rod on the lower beam and using coilover shocks, I have these shocks already (on the vehicle). Would a thru rod in both upper and lower beams and then coilovers work any better?
What is the current thing to do here without buying some custom front beam?
TIA
KitS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BFB Samba Member

Joined: November 03, 2014 Posts: 2755
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:03 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Im going to guess you dont have true coilovers but have the chrome spring assist shocks sold by empi? Take those off _________________ "how am i supposed to torque the rear wheel nut to 250 ft lbs??? " - clonebug
An interesting thing happens in forums where everyone starts parroting the same thing and "common knowledge" takes over.
Most experts aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KitS Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2024 Posts: 58 Location: NV
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
In all honesty, I don't think those shocks are doing much. I can actually see the spring bounce around when hitting bumps...never a compression. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Crogg Samba Member
Joined: September 30, 2023 Posts: 92 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:43 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Get rid of your coil style shocks. Thats why its so stiff. Worst shock ever for a balljoint beam. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1898 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:46 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
If they're the funky coil/shocks you can always remove the coils and run them without and see if it helps |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
avwa Samba Member

Joined: March 14, 2005 Posts: 232
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 6:35 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
"OK, some time back I took my front end apart in the effort of replacing the ball joints"
Sure you oriented them properly? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dirtkeeper Samba Member

Joined: February 19, 2008 Posts: 3255 Location: Left of everywhere
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 8:56 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Sounds like maybe the shocks are suspect. In my case The new ball joints I installed were very stiff for the first 100 miles or so. And seemed to be a common observation on new ball joint installs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KitS Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2024 Posts: 58 Location: NV
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 9:28 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Orientation of the ball joints was the first thing I double checked...tabs to grooves. Honestly, I don't think you could get it together if they were in wrong as the whole assembly is forced down to full extension forcing the ball joints to an edge.
Let me reiterate my observation of the springs on the shocks: I can actually see the springs bouncing around loosely when hitting bumps. Like they actually appear to be loose on their seats. Nontheless, I'll try just pulling them off the lower mount and see if the assembly can move. Perhaps the shocks are stuck in position?
I only have maybe 100 miles on these ball joints, and it is a very light weight front end, so maybe it'll just take more time to break in.
KitS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KitS Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2024 Posts: 58 Location: NV
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 12:42 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
OK, I pulled the shocks off and lo and behold, they are stuck. The front end will now articulate a little when I jump on it. The real test will be to see how it does over the rough stuff. Suggestions for a replacement set of shocks?
KitS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mikedrevguy Samba Member

Joined: October 15, 2008 Posts: 2287 Location: No. Idaho
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
KitS wrote: |
OK, I pulled the shocks off and lo and behold, they are stuck. The front end will now articulate a little when I jump on it. The real test will be to see how it does over the rough stuff. Suggestions for a replacement set of shocks?
KitS |
Good news (though not unexpected)
How much you wanna spend?
Could go with King, FOX, FOA- contact them with specs and they’ll set you up.
That is not inexpensive.
Could go with set of stock front shocks and proceed from there. _________________ 74 1303 (RevBug): plan for German Look
76 914 with 2260
79 VW Iltis
69 Bwajaja
"The wise speak because they have something to say; while the foolish speak because they have to say something." Plato
Illigitimi non-Carborundum!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KitS Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2024 Posts: 58 Location: NV
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:09 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Well, assuming I am still not happy with the ride. I'm thinking (only thinking so far) of pulling the lower torsion stack out (it is original equipment, so softer), putting in a thru rod, and shocking from there. If I need more tention than that will give, I'm figuring a set of shocks with helper springs might work (cheaper than coilovers too).
Waddya think about that idea?
KitS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KitS Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2024 Posts: 58 Location: NV
|
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:06 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
No response? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BFB Samba Member

Joined: November 03, 2014 Posts: 2755
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:06 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
This place is fairly dead these days. FB put a hurtin on all the forums and now your left with most of the main guys being old coots who do it the way they do it because thats how its been done and thats the way to keep on doing it, dont like to discuss change or repeat themselves. And so the new guys that show up dont stay.
But no, that idea isnt great because youll end up spending all eternity trying to get the front end lined out to where you want it. Those helper spring types arent adjustable so your just guessing and hoping itll work to your liking and youll end up spending more money than if you bit the bullet and bought coil overs.
Originally your front end was too stiff, now is it to soft or are you just kicking ideas around for shit n grins and the enjoyment of building something? _________________ "how am i supposed to torque the rear wheel nut to 250 ft lbs??? " - clonebug
An interesting thing happens in forums where everyone starts parroting the same thing and "common knowledge" takes over.
Most experts aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DesertSasquatchXploration Samba Member

Joined: April 16, 2021 Posts: 988
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:38 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Buy the cheapest Twin tube shocks you can find but not Monroe. Any replacement twin tubes will blow after a year if you really go out and use the rail some guys actually like them better after they blow out. Don't buy Mono tubes they are much stiffer.
Aftermarket coil over shocks on a ball joint will not make it a race front end look at the class 11 bugs the front end is super stiff they actually just bounce over the terrain its a back braking ride you don't have the travel nothings going to change that. Your looking at 30-40mph offroad on mild/medium trails and 5-10mph on rough trails. Beats the pants off jeeps they are 3mph tops mostly because they are making 600$ payments and usually drunk don't spill the beer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
QRP Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2008 Posts: 1898 Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:39 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
BFB wrote: |
This place is fairly dead these days. FB put a hurtin on all the forums and now your left with most of the main guys being old coots who do it the way they do it because thats how its been done and thats the way to keep on doing it, dont like to discuss change or repeat themselves. And so the new guys that show up dont stay.
But no, that idea isnt great because youll end up spending all eternity trying to get the front end lined out to where you want it. Those helper spring types arent adjustable so your just guessing and hoping itll work to your liking and youll end up spending more money than if you bit the bullet and bought coil overs.
Originally your front end was too stiff, now is it to soft or are you just kicking ideas around for shit n grins and the enjoyment of building something? |
You are right about activity on this page, it's dead AF most of the time.
It's part of the reason I keep my build going and part of the reason I slack on updates....LOL
I don't know if I should keep it going or just let it die on the vine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbeck Samba Member
Joined: January 14, 2014 Posts: 2571 Location: high ridge, mo
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:57 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Some of us like to build other stuff also. Like rockwell axled, alcohol swilling mid mount bigblock mega trucks.
_________________ My cut in half and rebuild thread
www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=647779 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wulfthang Samba Member
Joined: August 25, 2018 Posts: 876 Location: Tucson
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:51 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
I replaced the ball joints on my rail front end and put on the those springs assisted shocks too. It was so stiff I thought it was seized. I took the shocks off and it made no difference so I put them back on. It did finally loosen up and start acting like a suspension after a hundred miles or so. I kept the spring shocks on because they added an inch of ride height and I could tell no difference between them and a "good set". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DHale_510 Samba Member
Joined: August 27, 2010 Posts: 411 Location: Nampa Idaho
|
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:22 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
Have you considered preload as well as spring rate?
Stock front spring stuff has a rate of about 75#/" and a preload to compensate for the 500# or so static weight load of a beetle. A buggy will have about 150# static weight load so it will take more than a little force to get off the stops and start spring action. You may consider that too stiff because you are not going fast enough to hit that hard. Yet. Do your own arithmetic.
You could measure your preload with a yardstick and some weight. See how many pounds it takes to move the front down an inch from rest. I bet it is so much [I guess about 300#] it never moves at the speed and roughness you are fussing about, that means no real suspension and it has little to do with spring rate at all. If you reduce the spring rate and go off road you will be hitting the upper stops and it will again feel too stiff when it is too soft.
The streeters with their lowered beams loose the preload but also loose their load capacity and they too complain about stiffness from sitting on the other end of the travel.
FV class roadracers weigh like buggies and often remove the upper spring packs with a through rod replacements but they never need off road type travel nor landing from jumps. It does get tham off the preload stops and the suspension articulates well.
Remember that shocks are not springs, they are devices to slow the travel of the springs. Gas shocks have some spring action but it is not linear and at best cannot really be counted on as a spring. lots to ponder though....
Tire pressure is also a non linear spring effect and load on the tire is a big deal. Buggies basically have no load on the front tires so all the tire load data that is set for high load safety is mostly irrelevant.
Since you said you like to overthink things.......
Dennis |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
halfassleatherworks Samba Member

Joined: December 09, 2018 Posts: 808 Location: Reno NV
|
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:04 am Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
"FV class roadracers weigh like buggies and often remove the upper spring packs with a through rod replacements but they never need off road type travel nor landing from jumps. It does get tham off the preload stops and the suspension articulates well."
This will work for Link pin front end only, not the ball joint. as I have found out and now have to fix. If you take the top spring pack out you will put the hole weight of the front end on the bottom ball joints. " from slalombuggy I never though about it but on a ball joint front end you are right, all the weight would be borne by the lowers which are in tension. Mine have all been link pin." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan_Lockwood Samba Member
Joined: October 03, 2023 Posts: 448 Location: Clare MI
|
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:04 pm Post subject: Re: Front suspension type 1 sandrail |
|
|
DHale_510 wrote: |
Have you considered preload as well as spring rate?
Stock front spring stuff has a rate of about 75#/" and a preload to compensate for the 500# or so static weight load of a beetle. A buggy will have about 150# static weight load so it will take more than a little force to get off the stops and start spring action. You may consider that too stiff because you are not going fast enough to hit that hard. Yet. Do your own arithmetic.
You could measure your preload with a yardstick and some weight. See how many pounds it takes to move the front down an inch from rest. I bet it is so much [I guess about 300#] it never moves at the speed and roughness you are fussing about, that means no real suspension and it has little to do with spring rate at all. If you reduce the spring rate and go off road you will be hitting the upper stops and it will again feel too stiff when it is too soft.
The streeters with their lowered beams loose the preload but also loose their load capacity and they too complain about stiffness from sitting on the other end of the travel.
FV class roadracers weigh like buggies and often remove the upper spring packs with a through rod replacements but they never need off road type travel nor landing from jumps. It does get tham off the preload stops and the suspension articulates well.
Remember that shocks are not springs, they are devices to slow the travel of the springs. Gas shocks have some spring action but it is not linear and at best cannot really be counted on as a spring. lots to ponder though....
Tire pressure is also a non linear spring effect and load on the tire is a big deal. Buggies basically have no load on the front tires so all the tire load data that is set for high load safety is mostly irrelevant.
Since you said you like to overthink things.......
Dennis |
I'm going through this same thing as we type...
I had decided to remove the lower torsion pack and through bolt it and I added an adjuster to the top beam and set it the opposite of the norm. I have the lowest/stock setting and I can then ADD more preload to the upper torsion pack if needed.
BUT... I know that over time, the upper will take on a bit of droop and need a bit more preload, but at that point the pack is probably being overloaded and loosing spring rate. SO... I've been bouncing (pun intended) back and forth on what to do on the front end.
I took the two thin outside springs off and added stubs tacked in at the ends and center to keep the same size at the grub screws. I put that in on the top only and it was not enough to keep the front end up, but very close. Now I have removed all three narrow strips on both side of the second lower torsion pack and again, added stubs of the thin springs in the appropriate places. I have it in the bottom beam and that beam does NOT have an adjuster in it.
In my mind, which is usually somewhat empty, I'm thinking that my two indifferent torsion spring packs, lower being weaker, will act as a helper to the upper; kind of like helper springs on a pickup. Time will tell. I'm going to be putting front hubs on this afternoon and testing my theory.
Also, I had beat my brains out trying to figure out how to preload the trailing arm enough to get it up into the ball joint hole in the spindle. I saw guys using pipe wrenches and having them slip. They also caused nicks and scratches on the trailing arms. Why get them all pretty painted up and such to just scratch the chit out of them??? So, I made a tool from an old hydraulic jack handle, some 1/8" plate, 3/8" square rod and a little chunk of tubing cut down. The first thought was for the driver's side, which worked great with the 3/8" square rod and hooking the grub screw. But on the passenger's side, it was the opposite rotation. I made the plate to come over the top and the tubing cups the knob on the trailing arm. The only issue is that I have to pull the grub screw to get it into position to lever on and put it back in for the actual work to be done. But it works great, and the handle is long enough to twist the torsion packs into position.
Driver's side use:
Passenger's side use:
Thanks to all for indulging me with my ramblings on and on and on, etc.
Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|