Author |
Message |
Beatr67 Samba Member

Joined: January 15, 2007 Posts: 4 Location: Huntington Beach, California
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:15 pm Post subject: Replace or repair gas tank |
|
|
Last weekend my tank just started leaking. I drained it and got it out. Saw some new ones on line for about a hundred. VDub Parts Unlimited says not to buy those, I'd be better off repairing my old one. How? There is no obvious crack or hole. Has anybody out there done this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
obus  Samba Member

Joined: March 08, 2001 Posts: 11618 Location: just off Garden State Parkway Exit 81
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Campy Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2005 Posts: 4933 Location: Chico, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you leave your fuel tank at one of those radiator repair garages to be repaired, make sure that you tell the employee not to cut a hole in the bottom of the tank. It can be pressure tested, then soldered to fix the leak.
Here in Chico, at two garages, they cut a small hole in the tank. The owner at one of the garages did it to my bus tank even though I had told him that I just wanted it cleaned in the hot tank and I wasn't going to use the original one because I didn't want one in my bus that had to be soldered. When I went to pick it up, he was soldering on a penny over a hole he had cut in a lower corner. He said that he cut the hole in it to help him dry it out faster.
Now, I clean my fuel tanks, myself, with muriatic acid and water (sloshed around with nuts and bolts in the tank). I bought a gallon in the pool supply section at a Home Depot for about $8.00.
Por-15 has a sealer that will seal the inside of the tank. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Friedpotatoes Addicted4life

Joined: April 04, 2003 Posts: 1215 Location: Fresno California
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:15 am Post subject: how thin? |
|
|
my gas gauge no longer works... are the walls of the sending unit thin enough to bend easily ? It worked until I had gotten a gas cap (one found at the vw shop)that sealed so good that it sucked in my gas tank... the max it holds is 9.4 gallons. _________________ 56- Wolfsburg Single Cab
57- Oval Window Bug (Agave Green) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kaput Samba Member

Joined: December 12, 2002 Posts: 859 Location: Lakewood, CO
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I bought a new one at cip1 for around 75 bucks. Probably worth more than the time and money repairing the old 1. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Karl Samba Member

Joined: January 29, 2001 Posts: 6170 Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: Re: how thin? |
|
|
Friedpotatoes wrote: |
my gas gauge no longer works... are the walls of the sending unit thin enough to bend easily ? It worked until I had gotten a gas cap (one found at the vw shop)that sealed so good that it sucked in my gas tank... the max it holds is 9.4 gallons. |
New gas caps fit 68 and up with evaporative emissions. The new caps are NOT vented. 67 and back buses require a vented cap.
It really irks me that the cap manufacturers get away with flaggrant false advertising when they pawn off non-vented caps as correct for a 67 and older bus <grrrh>
I use a Mercedes cap on my 66 and 67 buses. I drill the tiniest vent hole in the top most part of the cap at the crossbar handle. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
der58SC Samba Member

Joined: September 15, 2006 Posts: 1359 Location: Oceanside, CA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a crack right where the fill tube connects to the tank. I fixed it with some JB Weld. Shit works great! Just be sure to clean the area well before applying the stuff or it will not work obviously. _________________ Like a midget at a urinal, I'm always on my toes
KCCO!!
Strictly Vintage 2s |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Namocsid Samba Member

Joined: September 24, 2005 Posts: 411 Location: Graham, NC
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
You might consider "upgrading" to a tank from a bay window bus instead of repairing/replacing the existing tank. You can probably find one at a local junkyard for not too much money. You'll end up with a tank that holds about 50% more gas.
No matter what you decide, you might want to take the time to clean and seal the inside of the tank with a product like POR15's fuel tank sealer since you've got the tank out. _________________ ITMC - Backyard chapter
Hold the pickles, it's 100% pure beef Namocsid! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saint76 Samba Member

Joined: February 18, 2004 Posts: 718 Location: Western United States
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it possible to use a bay tank in a 59 Double Cab??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Type2meister Samba Member

Joined: July 19, 2002 Posts: 341 Location: Campbell River, BC
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I followed Ratwell's detailed how-to here:
http://www.ratwell.com/technical/FuelTankRestoration.html
Before I did this though, I took it to a rad shop to be 'hot tanked'. They guy said he couldn't do it, it was too far gone. So I did it myself. I took the sending unit out and pressure-washed the inside, then shook out the loose crud (1" thick old tar-like dried gasoline I guess). I repeated this step many times. They I acid-washed the tank, then used Metal-Ready, then the POR-15 tank sealer. It turned out very nice. This tank was still about 1/4 full of stale, stinky red gasoline from 1980...very nasty stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dstefun Samba Member

Joined: February 20, 2002 Posts: 3338 Location: Sacratomato
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Saint76 wrote: |
Is it possible to use a bay tank in a 59 Double Cab??? |
I don't know if the tanks are the same or not, but this is how to do it. Thanks to Thom at vintagebus.com!
http://www.vintagebus.com/howto/tank.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iamdonquixote Samba Member

Joined: January 28, 2003 Posts: 2079 Location: M*ssholia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had my fuel tank rupture on my 64' after I used a repro non-vented cap Its impossible for anyone to do any work around here that doen't involve a brand new car and replace brake pads ...sigh.. so I bought a repro (Brazilian) tank from Wolfgang Int. I am happy with it. The filler neck angle is slightly higher than stock though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kelly Samba Member

Joined: November 25, 2003 Posts: 2437 Location: Olympia, WA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I bought a brazilian tank when I first got my bus and it doesn't fit right and never has. the filler neck doesn't sit higher for me rather it rubs on the overfill drain tube. I've lived with it but will eventually put my bay tank in. _________________ It's not how wide your hatch is, it's what you do with it.
Eriba Puck Sticky |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Friedpotatoes Addicted4life

Joined: April 04, 2003 Posts: 1215 Location: Fresno California
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:32 am Post subject: Re: how thin? |
|
|
Karl wrote: |
Friedpotatoes wrote: |
my gas gauge no longer works... are the walls of the sending unit thin enough to bend easily ? It worked until I had gotten a gas cap (one found at the vw shop)that sealed so good that it sucked in my gas tank... the max it holds is 9.4 gallons. |
New gas caps fit 68 and up with evaporative emissions. The new caps are NOT vented. 67 and back buses require a vented cap.
It really irks me that the cap manufacturers get away with flaggrant false advertising when they pawn off non-vented caps as correct for a 67 and older bus <grrrh>
I use a Mercedes cap on my 66 and 67 buses. I drill the tiniest vent hole in the top most part of the cap at the crossbar handle. |
The 68 ones they listed didnt fit. Neither the ones the book listed.... This cap said 95-01 vw misc.... or something really weird. it fit perfectly .... I did drill that hole then it worked fine... but I lost the cap so im back using my old one. Im just going to get a new tank or unit. _________________ 56- Wolfsburg Single Cab
57- Oval Window Bug (Agave Green) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Campy Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2005 Posts: 4933 Location: Chico, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Puttimg a hole in a gas cap is not a good thing to do. Anytime there is a hole in a fuel tank, it is a potential bomb. A vented cap is designed to let fuel vapor out at a certain pressure in the tank and to let air in to avoid a vacuum in the tank. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Karl Samba Member

Joined: January 29, 2001 Posts: 6170 Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Campy wrote: |
Puttimg a hole in a gas cap is not a good thing to do. Anytime there is a hole in a fuel tank, it is a potential bomb. A vented cap is designed to let fuel vapor out at a certain pressure in the tank and to let air in to avoid a vacuum in the tank. |
You are comparing a new style pressure/vented cap with an original vanted cap.
Here is an original 67 and older cap:
If you look around the edge, you will see the vent holes.
There is nothing magical about the old caps: no springs, no diaphragms inside. They are just vented to the atmosphere. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Campy Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2005 Posts: 4933 Location: Chico, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's still dumb to drill a hole in a gas cap where the vapor goes directly out. If enough gasoline vapor accumalates out of the fuel tank and reaches a source of ignition such as a pilot light, so long. It is the gasoline vapor that is dangerous. That is why they developed cannisters in a sealed system where the vapor condenses back to gasoline. Spend a few bucks and buy a good cap. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Karl Samba Member

Joined: January 29, 2001 Posts: 6170 Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
You don't get it.
The original cap vents to the atmosphere.
A 68 and up cap is a sealed cap. Evaporative emission systems were added to stop fumes from the cap from escaping to the astmosphere, by venting the tank thru a charcoal cannister.. But that was after 1967. 67 and back tanks have one filler neck and one fuel tap.
If you put a 68 and later cap on a 67 and older bus, you will collapse the gas tank. Air cannot replace the fuel you are removing.
Here is a prime example of what is out there being marketed as a 55-67 gas cap:
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=VWC%2D211%2D201%2D551
READ the text below it: If you are looking for a gas cap for your 73-74 VW Thing, you will need to measure the diameter of your gas tank opening. If it is 60mm, then you require our part number VWC-211-201-551.
THAT cap is NOT a vented cap. It does NOT belong on a 67 and older bus.
In Calif, to pass the smog check, the gas cap has to be tested to see if it leaks. Guess what? That 211 201 551 passes. It does not leak. That is great for a later vehicle. It is plain as day WRONG for an early bus.
I have a gas tank with collapsed-in sides. Maybe a picture of it will help? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Campy Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2005 Posts: 4933 Location: Chico, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
You don't get it. By "new" cap it wasn't meant to be a later model cap. By using the example of the cannister, it was meant to show that, at VW, they developed a better system for their later model cars, because they had to to meet new VOC standards. I thought that I explained it pretty clearly.
The "original" caps don't vent the fumes directlly to the atmosphere like you would have if you drilled a hole directly through it.
Try storing one of those five gallon gasoline containers without the tiny lid for the spout on it, full of gasoline, in your garage. My father did it, once, on a warm day and, luckily, there was no water heater in the garage and I didn't start my bus until the garage was aired out.
Opening up a fuel tank directly to the atmosphere is not a good thing to do; telling people to do it is completely irresponsible.
Thanks for letting people know that the later model gas caps won't work, anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Campy Samba Member
Joined: January 10, 2005 Posts: 4933 Location: Chico, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since I didn't explain it clearly enough two threads ago, I apologize. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|