Author |
Message |
Red Ryder Samba Member

Joined: June 26, 2021 Posts: 1154 Location: PNW — Washington
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2025 4:29 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
After moving from California to Washington last year, we were delighted to find our new state no longer required smog tests. (No state income tax either!). _________________ “Most everyone’s mad here. You may have noticed I am not quite all there myself.” — Cheshire Cat, Adventures of Alice in Wonderland
“Scarlett” — 1990 Vanagon Carat Wolfsburg Edition (Tornado Red)
“Nigel” — 1999 Jaguar XK8 convertible (Alpine Green Metallic) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate  Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 23624 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:18 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
Dailymoto wrote: |
Abscate wrote: |
MsTaboo wrote: |
I think if they're gonna still smog check (and I understand why in certain areas) they should require the vehicle to meet the numbers when it was made, regardless of what kind of engine it currently has.
Makes no sense at all to penalize a 1990 VW for having a 2003 engine if it's putting out the same (or better) emissions just because it's an engine conversion.That newer engine is most likely getting better milage and not dripping oil all over (or stuck on the side of the road broke down).
On the other hand it's crazy that you can have 1964 Mustang with a 800 hp engine with no emission equipment and be exempt from any smog check just because it's older. Or those off-road only vehicles doing the same thing; just because it's off-road doesn't mean it's not polluting! |
It’s antisensical as being able to re-engine an old car is the greenest thing on the planet. Getting another decade out of a large manufactured item is a huge reduction in footprint from a new car, either ICE or EV |
I used to think this was the case as well with EVs, but after reading from the EPA, Department of Energy, MIT, etc, the evidence consistently shows that the lifetime carbon emissions of an average EV is significantly less than an average ICE vehicle even when taking manufacturing into account.
I definitely agree about the old ice for new ice swap. Here in Cali, I would have loved a different newer motor than what’s offered out here.
The dream would be an EV conversion, but after crunching the weight, range, and charging speed capabilities, not sure if that’ll ever happen for our household. Maybe 10-15yr if ever? |
It’s not an ICE vs EV thing. Extending the life of anything large is good for the planet. I’ve got 4 1999s in my fleet which are now arguably approaching 3x the average lifecycle of an ICE and still get 25 mpg and pass smog. Pocketbook impact is nice, too.
CARB authority comes from an act of Congress , not the President, so the Executive cannot “ overturn “ this authority in a democracy. _________________ 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🍊 🍊 🍊 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kamzcab86 Samba Moderator

Joined: July 26, 2008 Posts: 8371 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 8:27 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 |
|
|
Abscate wrote: |
CARB authority comes from an act of Congress , not the President, so the Executive cannot “ overturn “ this authority in a democracy. |
"One of CARB's responsibilities is to define vehicle emissions standards. California is the only state permitted to issue emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act, subject to a waiver from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Other states may choose to follow CARB or the federal vehicle emission standards, but may not set their own." _________________ ~Kamz
1986 Cabriolet: www.Cabby-Info.com
1990 Vanagon Westfalia: Old Blue's Blog
2016 Golf GTI S
"Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance." - 孔子 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dailymoto Samba Member
Joined: August 06, 2020 Posts: 21 Location: So cal desert
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:53 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
Abscate wrote: |
Dailymoto wrote: |
Abscate wrote: |
MsTaboo wrote: |
I think if they're gonna still smog check (and I understand why in certain areas) they should require the vehicle to meet the numbers when it was made, regardless of what kind of engine it currently has.
Makes no sense at all to penalize a 1990 VW for having a 2003 engine if it's putting out the same (or better) emissions just because it's an engine conversion.That newer engine is most likely getting better milage and not dripping oil all over (or stuck on the side of the road broke down).
On the other hand it's crazy that you can have 1964 Mustang with a 800 hp engine with no emission equipment and be exempt from any smog check just because it's older. Or those off-road only vehicles doing the same thing; just because it's off-road doesn't mean it's not polluting! |
It’s antisensical as being able to re-engine an old car is the greenest thing on the planet. Getting another decade out of a large manufactured item is a huge reduction in footprint from a new car, either ICE or EV |
I used to think this was the case as well with EVs, but after reading from the EPA, Department of Energy, MIT, etc, the evidence consistently shows that the lifetime carbon emissions of an average EV is significantly less than an average ICE vehicle even when taking manufacturing into account.
I definitely agree about the old ice for new ice swap. Here in Cali, I would have loved a different newer motor than what’s offered out here.
The dream would be an EV conversion, but after crunching the weight, range, and charging speed capabilities, not sure if that’ll ever happen for our household. Maybe 10-15yr if ever? |
It’s not an ICE vs EV thing. Extending the life of anything large is good for the planet. I’ve got 4 1999s in my fleet which are now arguably approaching 3x the average lifecycle of an ICE and still get 25 mpg and pass smog. Pocketbook impact is nice, too.
CARB authority comes from an act of Congress , not the President, so the Executive cannot “ overturn “ this authority in a democracy. |
I just listed reputable sources backing up my statement, but you disagree and give an anecdote. Please read the data.
We can generally agree that extending the life of something is usually good for the environment, but if it can be replaced by something more efficient and less polluting, then over the life span of the new object, it will overcome its manufacturing carbon footprint and be better for the environment.
Here’s another example. I run two stroke Hodakas and Greeves motorcycles originally built for 12:1 and 20:1 oil ratios. Just because they’re already manufactured doesn’t mean that they will always be the more eco friendly choice than a new four stroke husqvarna. There comes a point that the Husky will, over its lifespan, have a smaller carbon footprint. It’s an indisputable fact. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate  Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 23624 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 2:12 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
You’re not reading my statement, or not comprehending it, because we aren’t in disagreement.
Extending the life of any large manufactured item is good for the environment.
How’s that ? _________________ 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🍊 🍊 🍊 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dailymoto Samba Member
Joined: August 06, 2020 Posts: 21 Location: So cal desert
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 6:58 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
Abscate wrote: |
You’re not reading my statement, or not comprehending it, because we aren’t in disagreement.
Extending the life of any large manufactured item is good for the environment.
How’s that ? |
I misunderstood it. I read it as you stating that replacing an ICE with an EV would not be better because the EV would require additional manufacturing of an new vehicle and thus not be able to catch up on reducing the carbon footprint. My bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
metahacker Samba Member

Joined: May 26, 2010 Posts: 883 Location: san.diego
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:23 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
looks like it passed the Senate Transportation Committee with 12-2 vote
April 21 it goes to the Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing
would be very cool if this passes |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zerotofifty Samba Member
Joined: December 27, 2003 Posts: 3523
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:57 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
metahacker wrote: |
looks like it passed the Senate Transportation Committee with 12-2 vote
April 21 it goes to the Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing
would be very cool if this passes |
The Appropriation Committee vote has been postponed to April 28, so as of today, we still have a week to give them out input
The committee contacts are on the pdf below...
https://sapro.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-02/2025-committee-member-staff-2-27-25.pdf
Give them a call, let you voice be heard. _________________ Sorry About That Chief.
Give Peace a Chance.
Words to live by. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
syncrodoka Samba Member

Joined: December 27, 2005 Posts: 12242 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2025 1:03 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
It has passed appropriation committee with amendments- historical plates and collector car insurance required. Collector insurance requires the vehicle to be garaged, historical vehicle plates limit use.
I recently got tags for my car with HV plates and the DMV had a hard time figuring out how to even enter it into the system. That plate system isn't well understood. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fxr Samba Member

Joined: December 07, 2014 Posts: 2613 Location: Bay area CA
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2025 9:55 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
syncrodoka wrote: |
It has passed appropriation committee with amendments- historical plates and collector car insurance required. Collector insurance requires the vehicle to be garaged, historical vehicle plates limit use.
I recently got tags for my car with HV plates and the DMV had a hard time figuring out how to even enter it into the system. That plate system isn't well understood. |
Requiring a Vanagon to be garaged is a bit OTT - assuming one could get the plates etc. _________________ Jim Crowther
1984 1.9l EJ22 Westy Wolfsburg Edition
Vespa GTS 300 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MarkWard Samba Member

Joined: February 09, 2005 Posts: 18590 Location: Retired South Florida
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2025 11:53 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
There is probably an assumption of wealth and that everyone that can afford a collectable/classic has a garage. I don't think they had vanagon daily drivers in mind. Its a step in the right direction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zerotofifty Samba Member
Joined: December 27, 2003 Posts: 3523
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2025 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
MarkWard wrote: |
There is probably an assumption of wealth and that everyone that can afford a collectable/classic has a garage. I don't think they had vanagon daily drivers in mind. Its a step in the right direction. |
The garage requirement is a huge problem. Many do not have a garage, and a garage or lack there of has nothing to do with the smog produced by a vehicle. The dam politicians are simply trying to fuck us over again. _________________ Sorry About That Chief.
Give Peace a Chance.
Words to live by. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Max Welton Samba Member
Joined: May 19, 2003 Posts: 10977 Location: Black Forest, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xflyer Samba Member
Joined: June 15, 2006 Posts: 304 Location: SOCAL
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2025 9:48 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
Unfortunately this became a political argument. I don't have a dog in that fight.
I'm in California and in the past I ran a repair shop. We got a newsletter from the Bureau of Auto Repair which administers the Smog Check Program here. With that info, and some following of the news, it was clear (even stated outright as few times) that one of the goals of the Smog Check was/is to 'get old polluting vehicles off the roads'. That was the idea of "Cash for Clunkers".
Not too surprising, the auto dealers were supportive of this.
Several times, in the last few decades, a bill was submitted in the California legislature to make it impossible to register a vehicle that was over 10 years old. Soon those bills were withdrawn, as it was pointed out that the "slaves" would be unable to get to work.
Also in California, just about any motor can be installed in a vehicle, however ALL the emission related equipment from the donor vehicle needs to be there and functioning. Plus there's a process to go through with a State "referee" which can be time consuming and costly. The notion is that the OE maker designed and tested the system to comply with the requirements. Someone that uses part of the system(s) cannot guarantee that once on the road the vehicle will stay "clean".
Yes there are certainly issues with newer vehicles that emit more than allowed, however that has little to do with 'ancient' VWs.
There's a little known history about the emissions testing in California and other states.
And as has been mentioned, parts of California got cleaner air over the decades, not so much because of reduced emissions from vehicles (which helps) but because of the closure of many industrial activities. In the SoCal area, if we go back to the 1950s, there were at least 4 steel plants, several cement companies, at least one tire maker, and other places that put "smog" into the air. Those are all gone (along with the jobs).
BTW, I'd like to have an EV if someone would put up the $30K difference to a gasoline vehicle. _________________ 1989 Campmobile, 1984 7 passenger beater Vanagon
Both with cool A/C |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52126
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2025 12:14 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
zerotofifty wrote: |
MarkWard wrote: |
There is probably an assumption of wealth and that everyone that can afford a collectable/classic has a garage. I don't think they had vanagon daily drivers in mind. Its a step in the right direction. |
The garage requirement is a huge problem. Many do not have a garage, and a garage or lack there of has nothing to do with the smog produced by a vehicle. The dam politicians are simply trying to fuck us over again. |
It is the insurance that requires the vehicle to be garaged and not the state, at least that is my understanding.
For what it's worth, my newest vehicle is over 35 years old at this point in time, so all I drive are collectors vehicles. However living in Oregon, my oldest driver a 1972 Dodge will not be considered an antique until 2044, seventy-two years after it was built, while my '91 vanagon will not be an antique until 2082 when my grand kids (if I actually had any) will be in their dotage assuming that the world still exists.
I can understand the garaging requirement as I worry about my old classics being stolen. I have a non driving '1928 Model AA that had a first class restoration about 20 years ago and gets a lot of oohs and aahs, that is presently more of a lawn ornament that I worry may not be there some morning, while I also own a 1972 Land Cruiser, that I now keep out of sight of the road because people would wade the creek to look at it when it sat in the back forty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zerotofifty Samba Member
Joined: December 27, 2003 Posts: 3523
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2025 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
The state should allow the smog test exemption without the need for collector insurance ( which requires a garage) nor with the need for collector plates. I want to be able to keep my original plates.
The insurance, garaging, plate have zero effect on smog. Dam the state to Hell _________________ Sorry About That Chief.
Give Peace a Chance.
Words to live by. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate  Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 23624 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 3:14 am Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
I wonder if this might create a new collector vehicle insurance product with looser restrictions on garaging? Premiums would be higher of course, but if the demand is there, insurance companies could respond _________________ 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🍊 🍊 🍊 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crz4vanagon Samba Member
Joined: August 27, 2019 Posts: 3 Location: SD
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 12:59 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
The collector restriction seems to have been removed as the bill is currently amended. So all cars, 35 years and older are included in smog test, biennially, and at transfer exemption.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB712
watching it unfold... _________________ ————-
90 Vanagon Carat
90 Vanagon Westfalia |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SoquelDude Samba Member

Joined: June 13, 2021 Posts: 270 Location: Soquel, CA
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 2:22 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
Looks like the bill is simplifying current CA law by making any car that's 35 years or older a classic car. That also means dropping the classic car insurance requirement. Great move!
"A collector motor vehicle, as defined in Section 259 of the Vehicle Code, if the motor vehicle meets all of the following criteria: that is at least 35 model years old." _________________ '90 Vanagon Westy GL, AT, EJ22E conversion (1993 2.2L Legacy Engine) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52126
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 4:08 pm Post subject: Re: California Smog Exemption Bill 712 ~ Leno's Law |
|
|
Maybe they could add a provision so one could fuel an classic car with ethanol free fuel for the same price as regular fuel. I know I used to be very proud of how my older vehicles ran, and when I voluntarily had them smogged they would do very well. Today with ethanol laced fuel the exhaust can be gagging and they can spit and sputter on a hot restart, and no way would I have them smogged. They also get about 20% worse gas mileage than they used to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|