Author |
Message |
firerod Samba Member
Joined: September 01, 2014 Posts: 48 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2025 11:54 am Post subject: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
I have a very low mile 1776sp with stock internals and stock single carburetor. If I changed this over to a dual port with dual Kads would there be a noticeable power increase to make it worthwhile? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
b-man Samba Member

Joined: May 20, 2008 Posts: 653 Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2025 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Night and day difference. _________________ 1956 Dove Blue Panel
1966 Velvet Green Single Cab
1957 L41 Black Oval Window Beetle |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oprn Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 14865 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:23 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Unless you already have the Kadrons, Webers are about the same money these days and are head and shoulders better. I would never go back. _________________ Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jsturtlebuggy Samba Member

Joined: August 24, 2005 Posts: 4608 Location: Fair Oaks/Orangevale, CA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:46 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Yes you feel a difference in performance from what you have.
Kadrons work well for your size engine.
A set of 40IDF dual throat carbs would work too and usually run smoother then then the Kadrons and have more power.
Depending what vehicle you have getting to spark plugs can be more difficult to with the 40IDF size carbs _________________ Joseph
Fair Oaks/Orangevale, CA
Elrod Motorsports
Motion Tire Motorsports
Having fun with Dune Buggies since 1970
Into Volkswagens since 1960 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rome Samba Member
Joined: June 02, 2004 Posts: 10591 Location: Pearl River, NY
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 7:50 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Quote: |
If I changed this over to a dual port with dual Kads |
Would you also convert the in-shroud oil cooler from the single-port design to the dual-port engine's offset cooler, and the doghouse fan shroud with its wider cooling fan with increased air volume? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DerrickfromNC1 Samba Member
Joined: October 24, 2008 Posts: 1408 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 8:25 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Rome wrote: |
Quote: |
If I changed this over to a dual port with dual Kads |
Would you also convert the in-shroud oil cooler from the single-port design to the dual-port engine's offset cooler, and the doghouse fan shroud with its wider cooling fan with increased air volume? |
Someone correct me if I’m wrong but unless you have a late model case the doghouse cooler is not a direct fit to the early non-doghouse cooler cases…..H cases and earlier without modification.
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=224440&highlight=doghouse
Go to the 58-67 Samba threads and do a search on doghouse. Plenty of examples and instructions on how to do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
firerod Samba Member
Joined: September 01, 2014 Posts: 48 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 3:03 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Thank you all for your replies. I already converted to a doghouse cooler when I had the engine built. I also already have the dual Kads. The reason we went with a single port is the worry of overheating the heads and cracking them in a convertible, top down in the summer. Now I am just thinking of more power. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dusty1 Samba Member
Joined: April 16, 2004 Posts: 2158
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 3:15 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
firerod wrote: |
The reason we went with a single port is the worry of overheating the heads and cracking them in a convertible, top down in the summer. Now I am just thinking of more power. |
Remove the engine lid entirely. Mount the license plate and light at the top of the engine compartment.
.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oprn Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 14865 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
firerod wrote: |
Thank you all for your replies. I already converted to a doghouse cooler when I had the engine built. I also already have the dual Kads. The reason we went with a single port is the worry of overheating the heads and cracking them in a convertible, top down in the summer. Now I am just thinking of more power. |
Power wise you will gain a noticeable bit on the top end of each gear change but loose some on the bottom. Net result is hardly worth the effort unless you already have all the parts or can get them cheap. _________________ Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oprn Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 14865 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 3:32 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
Dusty1 wrote: |
firerod wrote: |
The reason we went with a single port is the worry of overheating the heads and cracking them in a convertible, top down in the summer. Now I am just thinking of more power. |
Remove the engine lid entirely. Mount the license plate and light at the top of the engine compartment.
.
. |
Good fix I will grant you that but it turns a nice looking car into just another junker that looks like it either just left the wreckers or is on the way back... Just my opinion.
Missing doors, missing decklids, missing hoods, missing running boards, missing bumpers and hubcaps, there are rows and rows of them in the salvage yards if that is what you like. Take a lawn chair, your favorite beverage, sit down and enjoy!
Again, just my opinion, yours may differ. _________________ Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jsturtlebuggy Samba Member

Joined: August 24, 2005 Posts: 4608 Location: Fair Oaks/Orangevale, CA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 4:12 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
At one time there were single port manifolds made for the Kadrons.
Kaddie Shack shows all the ones they had are sold out.
Contact them and look in swap meets you might find a set.
If you stayed with single port heads and used the Kadrons you still notice a performance increase.
Last single port set I was involved with was in the 1970s and they were the steel ones. _________________ Joseph
Fair Oaks/Orangevale, CA
Elrod Motorsports
Motion Tire Motorsports
Having fun with Dune Buggies since 1970
Into Volkswagens since 1960 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
firerod Samba Member
Joined: September 01, 2014 Posts: 48 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:40 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
That is a thought, dual Kads on my single port. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oprn Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 14865 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:59 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
There is something inexpensive enough to be worth a try. Find an old single port manifold, cut off the lower bits, cut and roll the next up elbows upright, make some carb bases from flat plate and weld it all together. _________________ Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rome Samba Member
Joined: June 02, 2004 Posts: 10591 Location: Pearl River, NY
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2025 9:04 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
^SP Kadron manifolds have become hard to find; none are made new AFAIK (edit- see my next post). Used ones come up occasionally... oprn's idea of making a set is viable considering the "rarity". Instead of trying to straighten the strong bend of a segment from a stock SP intake manifold as the mostly straight piece going between the head base flange mount and the carb base, you can use the straight (horizontal) section of the stock manifold pipe starting from the left side of the carb downpipe. You thereby need 2 manifolds, but those should be cheap at swap meets especially if the preheat pipes are tested to be clogged (blow into either end). You're cutting the two end flanges off anyway as the bases for the Kad manifolds, so the rest of the factory manifold is "available" anyway.
Another choice for making the long manifold pipe section would be a pair of dual-port factory manifolds. The curved down-pipe from the carb flange should have a larger OD than the straight/level pipe from the SP manifold. And stock DP manifolds are also very cheap at swap meets.
The Kad SP manifold pipe widens as it goes up towards the carb attachment flange, to make room for the carb's 40 mm throttle plate to swing downwards at full throttle. You'd need to force the stock factory manifold section apart to a wider diameter using a cone-shaped "muffler reshaping tool" while the pipe is heated red-hot... And I don't know if the metai has enough "stretch" for this reshaping.
Instead of sectioning the manifold for the straight section, I've often thought about using a section of exhaust connecting adapter pipe from a FLAPS. You'd need a piece with an OD of 1.2" to fit the stock manifold pipe's bottom flange, then tapers out bigger for the Kad's carb larger bottom flange. IIRC the smallest adapter pipe I've seen at FLAPS are 1.5" OD on the small end... If you can find one with an OD of 1 1/4" at one end and going up to 1.5" at the other end, that would be nearly ideal for the project.
I have a steel SP Kad manifold in the basement which is for an upcoming engine. I just measured it:
-The pipe's OD at the bottom flange (at the head) is 1.25". The straight pipe comes up out of the flange straight out/perpendicular from the flange; it does not lean outward or tilt forwards. The longest dimension of the straight pipe to the underside of the carb flange is 5 3/4".
-The OD of the pipe just under the carb flange is 1.6".
-The carb flange is tilted approx. 17 degrees, which should be the same (but tilted the other way) as the outward tilt angle of the SP head's manifold flange. This angle would bring the carb flange to a horizontal/level angle for the carb.
For the Kad carb's attachment flange, a piece of steel of appox. 1/8" should be sufficient- such as traced out from a stock oil pump cover. Use a hole saw to cut the center large hole for the throttle valve. It would need to have an OD which is slightly smaller than the OD of the pipe (just under 1.6") but at least as large as the 40 mm throttle diameter. A 1.5" hole saw would work, then you'd need to slightly enlarge it using a curved metal file. AFTER you weld it to the pipe.
Last edited by Rome on Mon Aug 11, 2025 9:35 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rome Samba Member
Joined: June 02, 2004 Posts: 10591 Location: Pearl River, NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dusty1 Samba Member
Joined: April 16, 2004 Posts: 2158
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2025 9:54 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
oprn wrote: |
Dusty1 wrote: |
firerod wrote: |
The reason we went with a single port is the worry of overheating the heads and cracking them in a convertible, top down in the summer. Now I am just thinking of more power. |
Remove the engine lid entirely. Mount the license plate and light at the top of the engine compartment.
.
. |
Good fix I will grant you that but it turns a nice looking car into just another junker that looks like it either just left the wreckers or is on the way back... Just my opinion. |
It only sucks if you have an ugly engine.
10,000 Baja Bugs can't be wrong.
I don't have running boards on my Bugs. They packed full of slop and rusted my channels when I used to run them in the winter.
.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oprn Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 14865 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:33 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
!0,000 old fat guys in speedos and big ladies in bikinis might think they look hot too but that isn't necessarily the opinion of the general viewers...
Yes we have been conditioned to accept open engines on Bajas and Buggies but engines in and of themselves are not exactly beauty queens. We dress them up with expensive shinny bits to help make them presentable much like today's trend to cover fat rolling bellies and bulging pendulous bosoms with tattoos to deflect the attention... but deep down engines are still just ugly bits of functional metal all stuck together without form or flow. Not much artistic merit there.
Each to their own... _________________ Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dusty1 Samba Member
Joined: April 16, 2004 Posts: 2158
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:46 am Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
oprn wrote: |
!0,000 old fat guys in speedos and big ladies in bikinis might think they look hot too but that isn't necessarily the opinion of the general viewers... |
New topic for general chat.
.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oprn Samba Member

Joined: November 13, 2016 Posts: 14865 Location: Western Canada
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 12:17 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
I will pass on that one thank you very much!
 _________________ Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BFB Samba Member

Joined: November 03, 2014 Posts: 2747
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:23 pm Post subject: Re: 1776 single port to dual port |
|
|
oprn wrote: |
!0,000 old fat guys in speedos and big ladies in bikinis might think they look hot too but that isn't necessarily the opinion of the general viewers...
Yes we have been conditioned to accept open engines on Bajas and Buggies but engines in and of themselves are not exactly beauty queens. We dress them up with expensive shinny bits to help make them presentable much like today's trend to cover fat rolling bellies and bulging pendulous bosoms with tattoos to deflect the attention... but deep down engines are still just ugly bits of functional metal all stuck together without form or flow. Not much artistic merit there.
Each to their own... |
I completely disagree , i love seeing bare engines and mechanical stuff. Nothing much worse than the modern engine compartment with everything covered in plastic panels. _________________ "how am i supposed to torque the rear wheel nut to 250 ft lbs??? " - clonebug
An interesting thing happens in forums where everyone starts parroting the same thing and "common knowledge" takes over.
Most experts aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|