| Author |
Message |
TrollFromDownBelow Samba Member
Joined: January 04, 2005 Posts: 450 Location: VA Beach
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 10:50 am Post subject: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
I know the quality of the currently available TSII's are not the best. However, my bus has gone through three in the past 1000 miles or so. To provide some context, I've got about 5k miles on the rebuild (shameless plug for Rich Sedoris - did a great job). First TSII lasted about 4k miles. Replaced it on the way home from a weekend getaway with one that had been rattling around in my toolbox for the last 20 years. That one lasted about 400-500 miles, then it went bad. This last one was a brand new URO brand, replaced it about 100-150 miles ago, and coming home from some local camping today, the bus started bucking.
In each case, the bus started bucking pretty badly/noticeably, and in each case, replacing the TSII completely resolved the bucking problem. The first one was a new URO, and I chalked it up to poor quality for failing after only 4k miles. The second, I assumed, had been mechanically compromised after sitting in my toolbox for 20 years, getting banged around on the top shelf with no protection. However, the last one was brand-new and lasted only about 100 miles. The failure frequency seems to be going up.
I recently bought the TSII 'kit' from the Samba supplier, and will put that in next. However, would like to know if there's anything I should look for/diagnose that could cause the TSII to fail prematurely.
Regards, Mike _________________ 1976 Westy (aka Tripod)
2.0 liter FI solid lifters
212k miles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23455 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 11:11 am Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
It's the way they are made now as compared to how they used to make them.
It's a thermistor literally with a very short wire on each end, stuffed into a tight bore drilled into a 10mm bolt. It's packed in tight so the inner end wire stub is I hard contact with the metal of the bolt. The upper end goes through an insulating bushing usually packed in with an insulating adhesive and is crimped to the wire.
Originally they were soldered in the inner end...I think....with low temp solder.
What is happening with these newer ones is poor connection/crimping to the outer wire....so a reading of 0. Or, the insulation at the outer end sucks and the outer end makes contact with the metal bolt body....meaning....they have continuity but resistance is 0.
The third thing I am seeing/suspecting is that they are using cheap common thermistors that do not have a temp range much higher than the 450° or so you can get from heat soak and the thermistor dies.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent  Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 42933 Location: at the beach in Northern Wokistan
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:01 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
make sure the threads are clean. Run a thread chaser thru them, not a tap. I think they are 10mm x 1.0 . Use deoxit or something like that on the threads, or use some COPPER anti-seize. It may not be the TSII that is failing but rather the connection to ground thru the threads. _________________
Canned Water - the new California approved parts cleaner (except in a drought in which case rub it with sand).
George Carlin:
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it."
Skills@EuroCarsPlus:
"never time to do it right but always time to do it twice"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23455 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:32 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| SGKent wrote: |
| make sure the threads are clean. Run a thread chaser thru them, not a tap. I think they are 10mm x 1.0 . Use deoxit or something like that on the threads, or use some COPPER anti-seize. It may not be the TSII that is failing but rather the connection to ground thru the threads. |
Forsure! There is that issue as well.
But a very quick check also while doing that. Unscrew the TS-2.
Put your VOM on continuity (meaning the meter beeps when you touch the probes together). Put one probe on the threads of the TS-2 and the other on the wire connector.
If the meter beeps...all is good...so far. Move the wire around. If there is a break in the beeping....its a break in the wire or insulation.
If it passes this test....
Then put the meter on resistance. One probe on threads and one probe on the wire connector. Remember...it passed "continuity" meaning currentr flows through it. It has connectivity.
But...if it now reads "0" resistance....but has continuity...itr means that the output wire stub on the thermistor inside...has shorted to the body of the TS-2. Its going to show "0" resistance to the ECU which is as lean as it can go.
If during the first test it showed NO continuity and no resistance....and moving the wire around does nothing....it means that the top output wire of the thermistor has broken its connection to the wire pigtail down inside of the TS-2.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 36308 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 11:09 am Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
A potential alternate part below. I wonder if it has the same failure modes, or maybe it's a more robust design?
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10436939 _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TrollFromDownBelow Samba Member
Joined: January 04, 2005 Posts: 450 Location: VA Beach
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:00 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
I bought that exact part, it didn't work for me (think my post is over in a different forum). Bus started bucking under hard acceleration or at hwy speeds over 50 mph. Might work with some modification, but as it was delivered, didn't work. _________________ 1976 Westy (aka Tripod)
2.0 liter FI solid lifters
212k miles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 36308 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:11 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| TrollFromDownBelow wrote: |
I bought that exact part, it didn't work for me (think my post is over in a different forum). Bus started bucking under hard acceleration or at hwy speeds over 50 mph. Might work with some modification, but as it was delivered, didn't work. |
Good feedback.
But it makes me wonder if your problem is in wiring or other connectors, causing intermittent contact and high resistances or opens. _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hoppy Camper Samba Member

Joined: April 13, 2013 Posts: 415 Location: New Hampshire, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:13 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
I chased intermittent bucking for years. Replaced many things, TS2 being one of them. Turns out my TS2 would just be loose in the threads. It's not bucking anymore. _________________ 1979 Mexico Beige Westy auto
The Wilds of New Hampshire!
www.hoppycampernh.com
https://youtube.com/@hoppycamper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TrollFromDownBelow Samba Member
Joined: January 04, 2005 Posts: 450 Location: VA Beach
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:11 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| KTPhil wrote: |
Good feedback.
But it makes me wonder if your problem is in wiring or other connectors, causing intermittent contact and high resistance or opens. |
I would generally agree, and will check. However, every time it happened, and I replaced it with a new one, the problem was most definitely fixed, making me think it's a problem with the sensor, the lead connected to the sensor, or the electrical connection between the sensor and the head.
@Hoppy Camper...it's a possibility it's loosening up. However, these are brand new AMC heads which Len Hoffman reworked ... aka 'Blue print specials' so the threads are fresh/tight. But, I will use some copper anti-seize to see if that fixes anything. _________________ 1976 Westy (aka Tripod)
2.0 liter FI solid lifters
212k miles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23455 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| KTPhil wrote: |
| TrollFromDownBelow wrote: |
I bought that exact part, it didn't work for me (think my post is over in a different forum). Bus started bucking under hard acceleration or at hwy speeds over 50 mph. Might work with some modification, but as it was delivered, didn't work. |
Good feedback.
But it makes me wonder if your problem is in wiring or other connectors, causing intermittent contact and high resistances or opens. |
KTPhil....Yes...you are correct. Typically the TS-2....being lets say "incorrect in" reading...does NOT generally cause bucking...unless it is GROSSLY off in resistance and running you either horribly rich or lean.
The points I am about to describe do NOT constitute "grossly" rich or lean.
Lets understand, TS-2 is a fuel trim device (to use a modern term). It controls maybe 10% added or subtracted fuel mixture.
I think from memory, trollfromdownbelow had issues on the lower end because the Vespa unit does not drop below 200 ohms...if memory servces.
Most D and L-jet have TS-2 readings when fully warmed up...of about 70 ohms absolute lowest (which is too low and is one of the TS-2 faults) or around 125 ohms.
While being off 150-200 ohms at any end of the scale may either cause:
A. Difficult to start in cold weather if its 150-200 ohms too low because it may be SLIGHTLY too lean or....if its 150-200 ohms too high it could be slightly too rich but this is rarely an issue....or
B. Difficult to restart after a short shutdown when fully warmed up due to heat soak keeping resistance down around 70-100 ohms when it should ideally be back up around 250 ohms....meaning too lean.
But typically when its the TS-2 causing bucking...back to KTPils point....its a mechanical disconnect, Either as mentioned, the threads rattling around loose creating a poor ground....or...the problem of poor connection inside of the TS-2 ...heat exapansion issue etc....along with vibration.
A lot of people characterize bucking as the feeling of fuel being cut off an on....and I concur. The TS-2 does not have the ability to cut fuel off and on...unless it has a wire or ground problem. And...its actual resistance response is very slow.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 36308 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:40 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
And at the risk of derailing this thread, and more for others who may read this, not the OP here...
Often replacing a component SEEMS to fix a problem. Actually, the component itself may have been perfectly fine, but the act of unplugging and/or R&Ring it may have jostled something or made a connection (electrical or vacuum) better. So it would seem to confirm a bad component.
But then later the symptom recurs. And you have to ask... is it ANOTHER bad component, or just a return to the original external problem?
This issue plagued early FI repair, and gave it a bad reputation for having (expensive) parts fail, causing many mechanics to swear off even working on it, or replacing it with carbs. There is even the embarrassment of a shady mechanic who figured out the loose wire on the expensive FI component was the problem, but won't admit his overlooking the REAL cause to the customer. And he can't return the new part to his supplier, as most have a "no return on electrical/electronic parts" policy. So he blames VW for a bad design, and charges the customer for the unnecessary new part, and put the used but good part on his shelf (which he can charge a new customer/sucker for later - "win-win"!)
Again, I'm NOT saying that's the case here. I'm just warning others to be careful about damning the part, when the act of replacing it may have fixed the problem (even if temporarily). _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23455 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 2:02 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| KTPhil wrote: |
And at the risk of derailing this thread, and more for others who may read this, not the OP here...
Often replacing a component SEEMS to fix a problem. Actually, the component itself may have been perfectly fine, but the act of unplugging and/or R&Ring it may have jostled something or made a connection (electrical or vacuum) better. So it would seem to confirm a bad component.
But then later the symptom recurs. And you have to ask... is it ANOTHER bad component, or just a return to the original external problem?
This issue plagued early FI repair, and gave it a bad reputation for having (expensive) parts fail, causing many mechanics to swear off even working on it, or replacing it with carbs. There is even the embarrassment of a shady mechanic who figured out the loose wire on the expensive FI component was the problem, but won't admit his overlooking the REAL cause to the customer. And he can't return the new part to his supplier, as most have a "no return on electrical/electronic parts" policy. So he blames VW for a bad design, and charges the customer for the unnecessary new part, and put the used but good part on his shelf (which he can charge a new customer/sucker for later - "win-win"!)
Again, I'm NOT saying that's the case here. I'm just warning others to be careful about damning the part, when the act of replacing it may have fixed the problem (even if temporarily). |
^^^^^^^^....this!
How many years have I been ranting about this? About 90% of all fuel injection faults that are initially blamed on a component are actually a connectivity issue. With age....usually the harness or a ground situation.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TrollFromDownBelow Samba Member
Joined: January 04, 2005 Posts: 450 Location: VA Beach
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:06 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| KTPhil wrote: |
Often replacing a component SEEMS to fix a problem. Actually, the component itself may have been perfectly fine, but the act of unplugging and/or R&Ring it may have jostled something or made a connection (electrical or vacuum) better. So it would seem to confirm a bad component.
But then later the symptom recurs. And you have to ask... is it ANOTHER bad component, or just a return to the original external problem?......
|
Actually, I'm kinda leaning towards this direction in my case. Did the first one go bad after 5k miles? Probably. Did the one sitting in my toolbox for 20 years go bad after 300-400 miles? I was surprised that it even worked. Did the brand new one go bad after <100 miles? very possible considering the quality today. Each event, taken separately, is easy to rationalize as very probable or possible, but taking all the events together ... not as much.
Based on the symptoms, I have to think it's a loss of continuity, and the likely culprits are either a) it's losing ground by rattling loose, b) a compromised wire on the FI harness that connects to the TS II. The heads are brand new, and I can only get the sensor in about half way with my fingers before using a wrench/socket to get it all the way in. It also hasn't been loose when I've replaced any of the TS II's. However, can't rule it out...will use copper antiseize as someone suggested, and will also need to check continuity on the FI harness. _________________ 1976 Westy (aka Tripod)
2.0 liter FI solid lifters
212k miles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23455 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:22 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| TrollFromDownBelow wrote: |
| KTPhil wrote: |
Often replacing a component SEEMS to fix a problem. Actually, the component itself may have been perfectly fine, but the act of unplugging and/or R&Ring it may have jostled something or made a connection (electrical or vacuum) better. So it would seem to confirm a bad component.
But then later the symptom recurs. And you have to ask... is it ANOTHER bad component, or just a return to the original external problem?......
|
Actually, I'm kinda leaning towards this direction in my case. Did the first one go bad after 5k miles? Probably. Did the one sitting in my toolbox for 20 years go bad after 300-400 miles? I was surprised that it even worked. Did the brand new one go bad after <100 miles? very possible considering the quality today. Each event, taken separately, is easy to rationalize as very probable or possible, but taking all the events together ... not as much.
Based on the symptoms, I have to think it's a loss of continuity, and the likely culprits are either a) it's losing ground by rattling loose, b) a compromised wire on the FI harness that connects to the TS II. The heads are brand new, and I can only get the sensor in about half way with my fingers before using a wrench/socket to get it all the way in. It also hasn't been loose when I've replaced any of the TS II's. However, can't rule it out...will use copper antiseize as someone suggested, and will also need to check continuity on the FI harness. |
No. Please do not use copper anti-seize. Two problems,
1. You will notice that over a long time when you use copper anti-seize that it comes out black when you unscrew the fastener its on. This is oxidized copper. It is a NON-CONDUCTOR. It's also why the electronic industry is not allowed to use straight copper conductors without plating on either medium al device or aerospace applications that can kill people.
2. Part of the make up of most copper anti-seize formulas is silica...which is a dead on dielectric....meaning non conducting insulator.
You need a good thread fit and use one of the conductive lubricants when in doubt. I need to dig in my notes and will post some options later. Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KTPhil  Samba Member

Joined: April 06, 2006 Posts: 36308 Location: Conejo Valley, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:37 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
I've always use Permatex silver anti-seize on muffler nuts/bolts, spark plugs, and lately for temp sensors. Of course only the latter two care about conductivity. I've had it for 20 years. I think it's this stuff:
Anti-Seize Color: Silver
Operating Temp. Range: -60 Degrees to 1600 Degrees F
Water Resistant: Yes
Military Standard: MIL-Spec A-907
For Use On Materials: Aluminum, Brass, Iron, Stainless Steel
Conductive: Yes
Net Fill: 8 oz
Anti-Seize Base: Aluminum, Copper
Odorless: No
Primary Additive: Graphite
Conductivity: Conductive
Primary Additives: Graphite
So it does have some copper in it. _________________ Current Fleet:
- '71 Fastback
- '69 Westfalia
Retired:
- '67 Beetle
- '65 Beetle (x2)
- '65 Bus
- '71 Squareback |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23455 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 5:37 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| KTPhil wrote: |
I've always use Permatex silver anti-seize on muffler nuts/bolts, spark plugs, and lately for temp sensors. Of course only the latter two care about conductivity. I've had it for 20 years. I think it's this stuff:
Anti-Seize Color: Silver
Operating Temp. Range: -60 Degrees to 1600 Degrees F
Water Resistant: Yes
Military Standard: MIL-Spec A-907
For Use On Materials: Aluminum, Brass, Iron, Stainless Steel
Conductive: Yes
Net Fill: 8 oz
Anti-Seize Base: Aluminum, Copper
Odorless: No
Primary Additive: Graphite
Conductivity: Conductive
Primary Additives: Graphite
So it does have some copper in it. |
For best all around and high temp I have always liked the C5A copper. For long term conductivity...no. If you read the technical data sheet....C5A copper says its conductive and it is. It uses copper and graphite (and silica). The problem is that it has more copper than anything which is why its great for high temp, easily galled metals like stainless steel.
The problem I have found in many places is that over time and heat cycling (like sparkplugs for instance)...you will see the copper turn black.At this point the resistance gets very high.
That one you are showing is better for long term conductivity because its mostly aluminum and the graphite helps. It still has a little copper but it takes a lot longer for it to oxidize enough to care.
If I had to choose an anti-seize based around conductivity alone it would be a nickel anti-seize like this one
https://www.crcindustries.com/nickel-anti-seize-lubricating-compound/
The aluminum one you show though is just fine.
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SGKent  Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2007 Posts: 42933 Location: at the beach in Northern Wokistan
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:27 pm Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| raygreenwood wrote: |
| TrollFromDownBelow wrote: |
| KTPhil wrote: |
Often replacing a component SEEMS to fix a problem. Actually, the component itself may have been perfectly fine, but the act of unplugging and/or R&Ring it may have jostled something or made a connection (electrical or vacuum) better. So it would seem to confirm a bad component.
But then later the symptom recurs. And you have to ask... is it ANOTHER bad component, or just a return to the original external problem?......
|
Actually, I'm kinda leaning towards this direction in my case. Did the first one go bad after 5k miles? Probably. Did the one sitting in my toolbox for 20 years go bad after 300-400 miles? I was surprised that it even worked. Did the brand new one go bad after <100 miles? very possible considering the quality today. Each event, taken separately, is easy to rationalize as very probable or possible, but taking all the events together ... not as much.
Based on the symptoms, I have to think it's a loss of continuity, and the likely culprits are either a) it's losing ground by rattling loose, b) a compromised wire on the FI harness that connects to the TS II. The heads are brand new, and I can only get the sensor in about half way with my fingers before using a wrench/socket to get it all the way in. It also hasn't been loose when I've replaced any of the TS II's. However, can't rule it out...will use copper antiseize as someone suggested, and will also need to check continuity on the FI harness. |
No. Please do not use copper anti-seize. Two problems,
1. You will notice that over a long time when you use copper anti-seize that it comes out black when you unscrew the fastener its on. This is oxidized copper. It is a NON-CONDUCTOR. It's also why the electronic industry is not allowed to use straight copper conductors without plating on either medium al device or aerospace applications that can kill people.
2. Part of the make up of most copper anti-seize formulas is silica...which is a dead on dielectric....meaning non conducting insulator.
You need a good thread fit and use one of the conductive lubricants when in doubt. I need to dig in my notes and will post some options later. Ray |
Ray - I only suggested copper because that is what the antiseize specs suggest for any connection that is electrical in nature. I have been using the silver type for so many years that the can is almost 1/4 used up now  _________________
Canned Water - the new California approved parts cleaner (except in a drought in which case rub it with sand).
George Carlin:
"Most people don't know what they're doing, and a lot of them are really good at it."
Skills@EuroCarsPlus:
"never time to do it right but always time to do it twice"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bnanwel Samba Member
Joined: November 10, 2022 Posts: 393 Location: Ft Lauderdale
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 7:12 am Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
To add to the data, I have a URO TS2 in the original spot under the tin above cyl 3 and a Vespa sensor as an installed back up at a tapped tin screw in front of the intake manifold on cyl 3. I have switched back and forth between the two and feel no difference. I keep another spare in the glove compartment. For the record, I have only driven this set up about 500 miles. _________________ ‘72 Karmann Ghia Conv.
‘73 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘74 Karmann Ghia Coupe
‘70 Deluxe
‘72 Deluxe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xevin  Samba Member
Joined: January 08, 2014 Posts: 8986
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 8:13 am Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
Not sure how many miles on this aftermarket TS2 had on it when it broke off, the PO installed. I had no idea a broken TS2 would instantly stop the engine. Fortunately I had a spare Bosch NOS in my stash. New TS2 Has about 8000 miles on it. _________________ Keep on Busin'
| 67rustavenger wrote: |
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo! |
| Clatter wrote: |
Damn that Xevin...  |
| skills@eurocarsplus wrote: |
I respect Xevin and he's a turd |
| SGKent wrote: |
My God! Xevin and I 100% agree |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetfxr69 Samba Member
Joined: December 28, 2018 Posts: 1294 Location: White mtns nh
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 8:41 am Post subject: Re: What could cause a TS II to fail prematurely? |
|
|
| Xevin wrote: |
Not sure how many miles on this aftermarket TS2 had on it when it broke off, the PO installed. I had no idea a broken TS2 would instantly stop the engine. Fortunately I had a spare Bosch NOS in my stash. New TS2 Has about 8000 miles on it. |
Had this also happen to me last spring. Stopped me in my tracks. Unfortunately for me, it broke electrically but didn't separate ( the heat shrink held it in place), so while poking around for a reason, I missed it. Had I seen it broken, i could have just grounded the lead, and pressed on, albeit full rich. But at least I wouldn’t have had to get it towed home. First time in 30 years of ownership and operation that I've been fully broke down. Always been able to fix or limp off the road and fix later. _________________ You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer. Zappa
‘77 westy Seamus
‘76 tintop Crusher
‘77 westy The Judge
‘72 tintop bastard westy Hudson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|