Author |
Message |
74 Thing Samba Member

Joined: September 02, 2004 Posts: 7651
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 6:29 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Hey Jeff,
Do you think your beehive springs assist a lot in your cool oil temp compared to dual valve springs? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23947 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:04 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
try ceramic coating the chambers, piston tops,&ex part ex valve heads and intake valve face. then you can have rough so it keeps the fuel in suspension much better, add some timing, keep the heat where it belongs( in the chambers&out the exhaust) higher CR, leener carbs,cleaner burning, better mpg ,and make more power more eazely, more reliable. kep on spearmenting!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 4105 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 8:28 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Piston rings on the cylinder walls are the highest point of friction inside of an engine. Which one of you two are gonna put a mirror shine on your cylinder walls??
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 4105 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:02 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
I am just gonna leave this here.....
#stirringthepot
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:59 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
Piston rings on the cylinder walls are the highest point of friction inside of an engine. Which one of you two are gonna put a mirror shine on your cylinder walls??
Brian |
lol none of us gonna do that. But we can reduce friction in other areas that do make sense...  _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:06 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
I am just gonna leave this here.....
#stirringthepot
Brian |
That'll buff out
lol yes I would be happy to try it on some other heads. I would love to test 2 sets of heads side by side on one engine, Polished chambers VS rough finish. The AA heads are only $399 a set including shipping.
Hey if you need any polishing supplies, I would happily send you some  _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vwracerdave Samba Member

Joined: November 11, 2004 Posts: 15601 Location: Deep in the 405
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:05 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Why do you want to waste your time and money experimenting with polishing chambers when it has been proven by hundreds of engine builders of all types of engines that a rough finish produces more power. _________________ 2017 Street Comp Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble, OK
2010 Sportsman ET Champion - Mid-America Dragway - Arkansas City, KS
1997 Sportsman ET Champion - Thunder Valley Raceway Park - Noble ,OK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
vwracerdave wrote: |
Why do you want to waste your time and money experimenting with polishing chambers when it has been proven by hundreds of engine builders of all types of engines that a rough finish produces more power. |
Because I just made more power and torque then explainable.
My dyno pulls are modest, careful, and getting 162 ft lbs of torque/165hp with only .491 lift and the belt on is better then most. Not only that, after more tuning in the car, it performs much better then those numbers suggest.
I think 12's are possible with this combo on street tires. I don't know about those 100's of builders, but if I can get 12's out of a N/A VW engine with only .491 lift,IDF's, full weight street car Its worth the experiment. _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 4105 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:43 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Finish it up all polished nice and dyno it. See what you get for numbers. Then send me the heads and I will beat them up free of charge just like the ones in the picture! Then you will have a good A/B test. Hell...I will even pay the return shipping just to see the results!!
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
Finish it up all polished nice and dyno it. See what you get for numbers. Then send me the heads and I will beat them up free of charge just like the ones in the picture! Then you will have a good A/B test. Hell...I will even pay the return shipping just to see the results!!
Brian |
Thank you for the offer lol. But i have 2k into these heads, and cant take the gamble. They work so good, i dont want to risk it.
But on some low cost heads that i dont have a zillon hours into, I would be happy to give it a try.
Would you be willing to try the opposite of your belief also? _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 4105 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:43 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
You pay for the parts and build the thing, and I will build the heads for it. I am an AA dealer. I will give you parts at my cost + shipping.
You build it, dyno it, pull the heads, and send them to me. I will beat them up and send them back. Re-assemble, and dyno again. After that you do whatever you want with the engine. Sell it to someone on here?
We can both run the heads on each of our flow benches to see how far off the numbers are from each other as well.
Here is what I would like to build.
1915cc
My 37x33 heads AA500 castings 155+ cfm.
web 163 cam
9.3cr .040" dh.
1.3 rockers
40idfs on straight manifolds.
light flywheel
1.5" header
Easy to assemble, and show people what a good 37mm intake is capable of.
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 5:17 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
You pay for the parts and build the thing, and I will build the heads for it. I am an AA dealer. I will give you parts at my cost + shipping.
You build it, dyno it, pull the heads, and send them to me. I will beat them up and send them back. Re-assemble, and dyno again. After that you do whatever you want with the engine. Sell it to someone on here?
We can both run the heads on each of our flow benches to see how far off the numbers are from each other as well.
Here is what I would like to build.
1915cc
My 37x33 heads AA500 castings 155+ cfm.
web 163 cam
9.3cr .040" dh.
1.3 rockers
40idfs on straight manifolds.
light flywheel
1.5" header
Easy to assemble, and show people what a good 37mm intake is capable of.
Brian |
Actually I was asking if you yourself would try a mirror finish combustion chamber for the sake of experience. Keep your rough finish intake port, but try the opposite in the chamber. You came to the conclusion of promoting the rough finish without a dyno, I have faith that you could come up with a conclusion on the opposite chamber finish also without a dyno. Many guys have so much ego, they would manipulate data to their favor, but I know you would not.
I have one engine to finish now, and I will be spending some time enjoying this engine before I'm ready to build another. But......I am 100% open to trying the opposite theory, and would do it with 2 identical sets of heads just for fun down the road. _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 4105 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:49 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
I would love to try it myself for comparison if I had more time to experiment.
I am so backed up with suspension, heads and engines for customers I don't get to work on much else. That's why I was hoping to have you do the work.
I used to polish all of my chambers and exhaust ports up to 250gr. Certainly not mirrors like yours, but I did spend hours on them and made lots of dust. I did that for the first 5-10 engines. I got tired of that and started leaving them at 80gr cartridge roll finish, and they seemed to run better. I did this for a long time. Then I started researching rough finishes and went that way. Every engine I have done it on tunes easy, has super quick throttle reaponse, and seems to use less jetting. Even less on the accelerator pump shots. Not real scientific, but it's all I have based on quiet a few engines, and getting to test/tune most all of them in my own test car.
The 2332cc in my baywindow has super rough ports very similar to the picture I posted. The final jetting on it is 47.5 idles, 140 mains, 210 airs, and the pump rod nuts are less then 1/8" on the rod. 36mm vents in 44idfs. On our 2000mile road trip we got 22mpg at 70mph across Nebraska in a loaded baywindow. That was 12.0-13.5 across the board on the wideband and a NON-vac dist. Not sure what other people with similar setups are getting, but this is quite a bit less jet then I have used in previous large engines I built.
Just like everyone else here, I wish I had a dyno and more time to experiment and post the results. Then we would all be learning more.
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Floating VW Samba Member

Joined: April 28, 2015 Posts: 1624 Location: The South Zone
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 8:59 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
jpaull wrote: |
I hope Floatingvw doesn't mind, but for anyone that wants to see a fellow wacko quest for power/efficiency that is similar to mine and is successfully reaping the rewards. . . |
By all means, feel free to spread the madness!
mark tucker wrote: |
try ceramic coating the chambers, piston tops, & ex part ex valve heads and intake valve face. . . |
I was on the fence for a long time about this- mirror finish or ceramic coating, which is better, if any? And then I came across a research article written in 2012 for the Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the U. of Toronto, entitled The Influence of Thermal Barrier Coating Surface Roughness on Spark-Ignition Engine Performance and Emissions. An excerpt from the conclusion: “Engine testing of the rough baseline copper coating and the metal TBC demonstrated that piston crown finish played an important role in engine performance. Measurable improvements in engine output and fuel consumption as a result of polishing were attributed to reduced heat transfer from the combustion gases to the piston coating, which was seen to result in higher in-cylinder temperature and pressure. Trends in exhaust emissions (decreasing THC, increased NOx) and in-cylinder pressure data (higher Pmax and advanced ϴPmax) also supported the conclusion of reduced heat transfer as a result polishing. While the use of the metal TBC was seen to provide some benefits in engine performance as a result of its low thermal conductivity, it was seen that its effectiveness was very dependent on surface finish and coating thickness.”
So I got out my polishing kit and went to work!
jpaull wrote: |
Brian_e wrote: |
Piston rings on the cylinder walls are the highest point of friction inside of an engine. Which one of you two are gonna put a mirror shine on your cylinder walls??
Brian |
lol none of us gonna do that. But we can reduce friction in other areas that do make sense...  |
Me neither, but even though it would probably burn oil like an Arab dictator, I bet the friction would drop to almost nothing and the rings would last forever!
Hey Jeff, I double-dare you to put a mirror finish on the piston skirt as well as the crown just for giggles! And maybe throw in a set of low-tension compression rings. I know from personal experience that the Total-Seal 2nd compression ring is pretty low tension. You might get some ring flutter at high RPM with that, though.
jpaull wrote: |
vwracerdave wrote: |
Why do you want to waste your time and money experimenting with polishing chambers when it has been proven by hundreds of engine builders of all types of engines that a rough finish produces more power. |
Because I just made more power and torque then explainable. |
Also, are you talking about combustion chambers or intake ports and runners? It is known that a rough finish on the ports and runners produces more power (because it improves flow and fuel suspension), but I have never heard the same being said of the chambers themselves. In fact, the research article I mentioned above would seem to indicate the opposite to be true, as well as Jeff's and my own personal experience. It would seem to me that the best of both worlds would be to keep the surfaces rough where better flow is needed, and put a mirror finish on the surfaces where you want to reduce heat transfer. Perhaps more research is needed?
And here is one more research article for you to check out: It's an older article entitled Do Darker Objects Really Cool Faster, written for the Dept. of Physics at Trinity U. in San Antonio, Texas. An excerpt: "The experiment for which the commercial apparatus is designed is the cooling rate of the black versus the unpainted can, and the results of that experiment are shown in Fig. 2. We see that indeed the black can is a better radiator and cools considerably faster than the bare metal can."
Interestingly, they go on to mention that even though black surfaces radiate heat best at ALL wavelengths, any color paint (including white) will radiate heat better than bare metal. _________________ "It's time you started treating people as individuals, rather than mathematically predictable members of an aggregate set, regardless of how well that works."
Last edited by Floating VW on Wed Jul 17, 2019 9:24 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Floating VW Samba Member

Joined: April 28, 2015 Posts: 1624 Location: The South Zone
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 9:20 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
I used to polish all of my chambers and exhaust ports up to 250gr. Certainly not mirrors like yours, but I did spend hours on them and made lots of dust. I did that for the first 5-10 engines. I got tired of that and started leaving them at 80gr cartridge roll finish, and they seemed to run better. I did this for a long time. Then I started researching rough finishes and went that way. Every engine I have done it on tunes easy, has super quick throttle reaponse, and seems to use less jetting. Even less on the accelerator pump shots. Not real scientific, but it's all I have based on quiet a few engines, and getting to test/tune most all of them in my own test car.
The 2332cc in my baywindow has super rough ports very similar to the picture I posted. . .
Brian |
I have a theory that might explain that:
Perhaps stopping at 250 grit is not sufficiently smooth to get the benefit of a mirror finish, which is north of 3000-4000 grit, nor is it sufficiently rough to promote the rapid carbon build-up that an 80 grit surface would. Carbon is a fairly good thermal barrier, and a good, thick layer of it might give you similar results to a mirror-finished surface. It's just a theory.
My ports are super rough as well, and I have also noticed a sharp reduction in the size of jets my engine calls for, especially the accelerator pump.
Here's another wacko experiment for you try, Jeff!
_________________ "It's time you started treating people as individuals, rather than mathematically predictable members of an aggregate set, regardless of how well that works." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23947 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 9:28 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
horizontally gas porting and .030"rings will make more power.and seal better too. there are all kinds of stuff that can help power and reliability too. you could possiably take all the tension out of a set of rings and gass port it, but I dont know how that will work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:21 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
74 Thing wrote: |
Hey Jeff,
Do you think your beehive springs assist a lot in your cool oil temp compared to dual valve springs? |
Not sure, on how much because of the single spring beehive not rubbing on the outer like a dual, but having the ability to run 117lbs seat pressure, and 245lbs open at .491" lift is lowering friction and freeing up horsepower. Many will run 150lbs/350lbs on similar combos which is wasting horsepower in overcoming spring pressure. For no reason.
horsepower spent doing work that is not needed, is building heat, so yes it can help run cooler. _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3653 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:09 pm Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Brian_e wrote: |
I would love to try it myself for comparison if I had more time to experiment.
I am so backed up with suspension, heads and engines for customers I don't get to work on much else. That's why I was hoping to have you do the work.
I used to polish all of my chambers and exhaust ports up to 250gr. Certainly not mirrors like yours, but I did spend hours on them and made lots of dust. I did that for the first 5-10 engines. I got tired of that and started leaving them at 80gr cartridge roll finish, and they seemed to run better. I did this for a long time. Then I started researching rough finishes and went that way. Every engine I have done it on tunes easy, has super quick throttle reaponse, and seems to use less jetting. Even less on the accelerator pump shots. Not real scientific, but it's all I have based on quiet a few engines, and getting to test/tune most all of them in my own test car.
The 2332cc in my baywindow has super rough ports very similar to the picture I posted. The final jetting on it is 47.5 idles, 140 mains, 210 airs, and the pump rod nuts are less then 1/8" on the rod. 36mm vents in 44idfs. On our 2000mile road trip we got 22mpg at 70mph across Nebraska in a loaded baywindow. That was 12.0-13.5 across the board on the wideband and a NON-vac dist. Not sure what other people with similar setups are getting, but this is quite a bit less jet then I have used in previous large engines I built.
Just like everyone else here, I wish I had a dyno and more time to experiment and post the results. Then we would all be learning more.
Brian |
Hey don't be to proud of ending up with smaller jets in that big engine, especially with that rich of a A/F cause that means your making less power too lol. Even your accelerator pumps are doing less! You shouldn't admit that! For realz, if you can only burn that much gas, it means your combustion chamber is not getting hot enough. Its not helping that the inside of your chamber is acting like a big internal heat sink because its so rough.
Like FloatingVW said, to achieve what we are wanting, keeping more of the heat inside the chamber, we wanted the effect of a sealed off room and smoothing it to a mirror was the goal. Zero porosity and the least amount of surface area. In the chamber, heat makes power. Everywhere else we want to shed heat.
I will say that it makes total sense that rough gets better mixing of air/fuel. So the value of mixing vs the value of heat, that is the question.
At this point, by theory alone, I should have the most horrible mixing vw engine alive. It should be "horrible to tune" by most everyones standards. Not only the polished chambers, but the intake valves are polished top and bottom so fuel beads off like a freshly waxed car(not a good trait for mixing). The intake ports are completely smooth. Not mirror, but they are smooth. The only thing that does not have a smooth surface are the complete length of the inside of the intake manifolds.
However, that being said, with the complete internal pathways of the 48 idf's polished, intakes ports contoured for airspeed, intake valves polished, combustion chambers polished, I bet the airspeed is pretty damn fast, which in itself will help atomization. If we were neighbors I would wheel my dyno over to your shop for you to use, then I would be borrowing your air probe equipment to test airspeed.
These ancient air cooled vw's were behind there times even when they were produced. Its all just fun stuff to play with. Yes, only so many hours in the day, one man can only do so much.
If you get a dyno going, and play with some heads both ways, I bet you find the polished chamber heads on the identical engine tune properly with larger jets, and make more power, and the rough heat sink chamber heads tune properly with smaller jets and make less power. But just my guess.......
#Stirringitupmore _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7891 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:31 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
Ohhh, dimpelled intake surfaces. That´s another one of those cans of worms. The first time (that I know of) this was up was in the late 60íes when BMW was working with the 2002 Tii. The exersize was of course to gain power, but what they found, with the porting techiniques and knowledge they had the time, was that it did not improve hp., but it helped the engine to improve fuel mix and torque in the lower to mid rpms. As injectors and injector position became better the need for this costly surface treat became not nessessary to get the same end result. In recent years this has surfaced again. I think it was Edelweis tuning that brought it up again in an effort to stand out from the crowd in the BMW and motorcycle world, also claiming 5% improved flow over smooth surface ports. Some Honda tuners claim the same. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6v2wpk4mjo But do they make more power (?)
Now, in a carburetted engine some of it begins to make a little sense, because "we" have the issue of a fuel mix that is not especially good atomized in the lower rpms. If you want to take advantage of that you should keep the port rough in the low speed areas and smooth in the high speed areas. That requires a little knowledge about how the mix behaves in an intake port, but this is actually beneficial. In fact when I build my Std plus engines I leave the surfaces raw almost all over to get a better mix and power in the lower rpms.
Raw or smooth surfaces in the combustion chamber. I for one really don´t know. There can be pro´s and con´s to both. On a freshly built engine I can see that there may be differences. On an engine that has seen some miles I doubt you will be able to measure much of a difference due to carbon build up. I think it is more beneficial to both power, temperature and fuel consumption to get the combo right and to have a good chamber shape to get a good mix and a burn that does not require a lot of ignition timing. That reduces the need for fuel due to simple efficiency and reduced pumping losses.
Here is a couple of articles discussing why they left it out in Formula1 years back.
http://www.formula1-dictionary.net/dimpled_surface_finish.html
http://speed.academy/10-myths-of-cylinder-head-porting/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian_e  Samba Member

Joined: July 28, 2009 Posts: 4105 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
|
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2019 9:21 am Post subject: Re: Unusual Sweep the Floor 2234 Build (With Dyno Video) |
|
|
I didn't have any reason to think my 2332cc was down on power. I have seen what quite a few different engines will do on the long hill behind my house, and this one is one of the more impressive of the 15 or so big strokers and 15-20 smaller engines I have driven up the hill.
I feel if the engine can make more power while requiring less fuel, it is obviously more efficient.
I agree with Torben's comment on rough port texture helping low and midrange torque the most. I have been building my engines different for the last few years now. I focus on highest average torque across the board, and I don't even care what the peak HP number is. I have found engines that make a pile of torque before 4000rpm are usually quicker up the hill, more fun to drive around town, much more pleasant to drive on twisty mountain roads, etc. This is the area I am focused on, and the increased fuel mix far outweighs high RPM heat retention in my mind.
Remember everyone...torque pulls trailers, climbs mountains and wins races....HP sells cars to those who don't know any better.
Here is a really good article from a very very experienced engine builder who has been building engines longer then most here have been alive. Myself included. The port texture stuff is down toward the bottom, but the whole thing is a good read. He has done real life A-B-A dyno testing more then once on this topic.
https://hotrodenginetech.com/pipemax-creator-larry-meaux-on-race-engine-head-porting/
Jeff, while your heads are off can you measure a few things for me? I would like to compare a few things on your heads with others I have bought or built myself, and run on different engines.
-Intake port centerline. I use a piece of solder with the valve installed. On the long side wall, go from the back of the valve to the intake flange. bend the solder so it conforms nicely to the port wall. Make a mark on the solder. Next do the same thing on the short side port wall. Flatten the solder back out and add the two marked lengths of solder together and divide by 2. This will be the "average" intake port centerline length. You can also do this with pinstripe tape.
-Intake port volume. I like to use washer fluid, and I have a small piece of plexi with a hole to cover the port flange. Just like measuring chambers.
-Intake flow from .250"-.550" @ 28" with the intake on and a radius at the top of the manifold.
Brian _________________ So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok
Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com
Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|