| Author |
Message |
vwhelmot Samba Member
Joined: May 04, 2006 Posts: 643 Location: united kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:42 am Post subject: Re: Type 877 Kommanduerwagen |
|
|
| Stunning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Magion Samba Member

Joined: February 15, 2016 Posts: 236 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D-train Samba Member

Joined: January 08, 2007 Posts: 1484
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:51 pm Post subject: Re: Type 877 Kommanduerwagen |
|
|
Digging up an old thread but any progress on the 20yr build?
And who's goin to reproduce these?? Love to have something like this in Australia.. _________________ shiny paint doesnt make it worth any more |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kapt. Q Samba Member
Joined: May 28, 2011 Posts: 256 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice picture, it's the Porsche museum in Gmund, this is displayed next to a complete one, this one is a total waste of parts in my opinion, finish it! Then use it!
It appears to be a different casting than my 166, it's missing the VW logo and the strengthening web ilooks different to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anmilsurp Samba Member
Joined: May 12, 2010 Posts: 77 Location: Tukwila Washington
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rich's 50 Samba Member
Joined: February 18, 2004 Posts: 10794 Location: San Diego, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Crazy ^^^^^^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kapt. Q Samba Member
Joined: May 28, 2011 Posts: 256 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a picture of the 166 frame
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kapt. Q Samba Member
Joined: May 28, 2011 Posts: 256 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, the counter bores in the flange are for rubber inserts that are part of the sealing gasket that, I think, may actually allow tiny movement , I'm not sure on this, I suppose that might relieves stress, takes some impact forces out. If you look at the above photo you will see two little holes for locating pins in the mating flange.
As for the 'thats why they made so few', nonsense, they made over 15,000 166's, the most mass produced amphibious car to date! They produced a few hundred of the 87/7's, production being limited due to time and materials I think.
I don't think there was any revision in this casting since the 128/166's introduction so I doubt there was any weakness, my casting has a 41 part#, not the date of manufacture, but design date, It is an original not a reproduction, not sure you can get a reproduction of the main part the differential goes in, you can get one of the front cover that connects to the axle beams, the part you can see with the six bolt heads in.
Don't forget that the suspension absorbs many loads, forces (whatever) before they ever get transmitted to the diff casing, etc.
The casing is iron/steel? and about 17kg, that's with out the side covers, another fair few kilo's there too.
OUB, you are right this is a 166 casing, in what ways are the 87/7 casing different? I know the speedometer cable comes out at 90 degrees instead of 180 but was unaware of any other difference, it would be intresting to know. The differences in the transfer box are very apparent in your photo's and I was unaware of them. How did you get the information and parts to make your 87/7 replica?
Last edited by Kapt. Q on Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:45 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnshenry Samba Member

Joined: September 21, 2001 Posts: 9413 Location: Northwood, NH USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ninamashr wrote: |
I agree there is allot of shear force along that flange. Did you notice the counter bores around each bolt hole? Maybe the tunnel flange has projections around each bolt hole that fit into these counter bores -or- there is a small sleeve that fits around each bolt and it's installed between the 2 flanges?
|
Can't see any projections in the tunnel pic, but it is not that detailed. That would be very plausible and make for a very good design. _________________ John Henry
'57 Deluxe
'56 Single Cab |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ninamashr Samba Member

Joined: October 12, 2005 Posts: 1400 Location: City of Round Rock in the Great State of Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnshenry wrote: |
Great pics!
I find it even more curious that there doesn't seem to be anything to support the shear force along the face of the flange. Unless the bolt bore clearances are very tight, the diff would want to slip upward on the flange when the beam is loaded. I don't think I see any kind of lip on the tunnel flange to support this. |
I agree there is allot of shear force along that flange. Did you notice the counter bores around each bolt hole? Maybe the tunnel flange has projections around each bolt hole that fit into these counter bores -or- there is a small sleeve that fits around each bolt and it's installed between the 2 flanges?
_________________ 1957 Karmann Kabriolet "Franky"
1957 Allstate trailer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peter schepens Samba Member
Joined: April 17, 2003 Posts: 1032 Location: belgium Caesars camp
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the grey museum car you see a reinforcement on the underside of the floorpan. I think the setup is strong enough for the frontdiff. The house is bolted to the frame....On a normal beetle the head is welded on the tunnel. Not that big difference to me. The bolt holes are probably welded tubes trough the Napoleon hat on the frame.
Kapt , Is that a new cast front house? _________________ Zelensis, glassfibre body made in Belgium , disigned and built on a VW platform About 25 body's built.
Hebmuller info wanted for http://www.hebmueller-registry.com/home.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seb67 Samba Member

Joined: December 02, 2003 Posts: 1012 Location: New England
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnshenry wrote: |
Great pics!
I find it even more curious that there doesn't seem to be anything to support the shear force along the face of the flange. Unless the bolt bore clearances are very tight, the diff would want to slip upward on the flange when the beam is loaded. I don't think I see any kind of lip on the tunnel flange to support this. |
Perhaps thats why so few were made? The design didn't hold up?
I look at that radial bolt pattern where the whole assembly attaches to the frame head and think it should be pretty strong. unlike the rear of the car, the front has very little weight. How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootise pop? The world may never know.
too bad I don't have one so I can do a little testing. _________________ 1964 Type 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnshenry Samba Member

Joined: September 21, 2001 Posts: 9413 Location: Northwood, NH USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Great pics!
I find it even more curious that there doesn't seem to be anything to support the shear force along the face of the flange. Unless the bolt bore clearances are very tight, the diff would want to slip upward on the flange when the beam is loaded. I don't think I see any kind of lip on the tunnel flange to support this. _________________ John Henry
'57 Deluxe
'56 Single Cab |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eurodub Samba Member

Joined: August 05, 2007 Posts: 1321
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
what material was used to cast the front diff and frame head? is it cast iron? steel? aluminum alloy? an approximative weight in kg?
thanks _________________ 1960 1200 model 117 deluxe ragtop
1976 MK1 Golf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OUB Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2011 Posts: 5 Location: CZECH
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:03 am Post subject: Re: Front differential |
|
|
Because I don't know English plus use translator, so I think, that the symposium is about it whether is tunnel in front enough reinforced. I'm not sure, whether is that a rather reinforced but because these rolling stock be not doing in series so it is possible, that the in using come to some problems. It will catch sight of.
Photograph fore final drive housing are nice to, but this final drive housing is from type 166. Don't belong to on type 877. I I have on photographs this final drive housing, but this to the wagon will not come. Shall I original that the there belongs to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kapt. Q Samba Member
Joined: May 28, 2011 Posts: 256 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:08 am Post subject: Front differential |
|
|
Heres my diff casing in the raw, it's very strong and heavy, what you see here is two pieces and you can clearly see how it attatches to the front beams/torsion tubes.
I doubt its weak where it attatches to the body because as you can see there are many bolts that attatch it the body and that area is reinforced and it is also attatched to the body via the front beams. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnshenry Samba Member

Joined: September 21, 2001 Posts: 9413 Location: Northwood, NH USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KäferKrieger wrote: |
Okay, torque is a measurement so that equation wasn't trying to teach a physics lesson. And weight at ( a certain moment) in motion around an axis would have been a better way for me to put it in laymans.
But where is your axis ?  |
| Quote: |
| axial toque along the tunnel axis |
_________________ John Henry
'57 Deluxe
'56 Single Cab |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KäferKrieger Samba Member

Joined: June 20, 2010 Posts: 335 Location: Pacific Woodpile
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, torque is a measurement so that equation wasn't trying to teach a physics lesson. And weight at ( a certain moment) in motion around an axis would have been a better way for me to put it in laymans.
But where is your axis ?  _________________ I contend that we thinking people should,
"Round-up all religious humans and put them on one island together.
An island where they can permanently sort out their indifferences & insecurities once and for all." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnshenry Samba Member

Joined: September 21, 2001 Posts: 9413 Location: Northwood, NH USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KäferKrieger wrote: |
| johnshenry wrote: |
| I would just think that bolt up area would be under some pretty hard stress (and axial toque along the tunnel axis) as the thing was driven off road. |
I dunno John...
Weight+Motion=Torque and that car wasn't very heavy or fast.  |
Uh no, weight plus motion = inertia.
Torque is a force acting on an object causes that object to rotate. Such as the the car hitting a big rut with one of the front wheels (even at a moderate speed) and it wanting to twist and rip that bolted flange of the framehead. _________________ John Henry
'57 Deluxe
'56 Single Cab |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KäferKrieger Samba Member

Joined: June 20, 2010 Posts: 335 Location: Pacific Woodpile
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnshenry wrote: |
| I would just think that bolt up area would be under some pretty hard stress (and axial toque along the tunnel axis) as the thing was driven off road. |
I dunno John...
Weight+Motion=Torque and that car wasn't very heavy or fast.  _________________ I contend that we thinking people should,
"Round-up all religious humans and put them on one island together.
An island where they can permanently sort out their indifferences & insecurities once and for all." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|