| Author |
Message |
nsracing Samba Member

Joined: November 16, 2003 Posts: 9758 Location: NOVA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:14 am Post subject: Re: What goes into making a 1600 a 1776? |
|
|
the 1600cc to 1776cc = she just gotta get bigger jugs... 90.5mm sizes.
Now who does not appreciate bigger jugs? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thormr2 Samba Member
Joined: March 21, 2021 Posts: 1 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthWeber wrote: |
Henrip, I assume a central Italian 40 is a single Weber 40IDF. You'd be much better off with dual 40IDF's. Easier to tune and more potential power, drivability and fuel mileage. I strongly recommend dual carbs.
Sorry for the hyjack Cookrw.
Are you aware of the P/C's in the link below? These 88's are thick wall machine in making them much more reliable than 87's. The base of the cylinders are turned down so they fit the stock 85.5 case spigot. All you'll need is to have your heads opened up to fit the cylinders.
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=806472
I like your combo. 1760 (or 1800 w/88's), mildly ported stock valve heads, Weber 40IDF's, C35 cam, 1 3/8" exhaust will work if you don't do a lot of high speed driving.
Krusher has a similar 1800 (88 x 74), this is his dyno chart:
|
I want to make a engine wich is reliable but can do alot of high speed driving for a longer time too. right now i have a original 1600AS in my 69/70 beetle. and i was thinking about making it 1776 with fuel injection and turbo. But i need it to be reliable too because i dont have enough money if it blows up haha.
do u have any suggestions for a better setup, that still rips? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
now there is nothing wrong with an 1835 or 2180, if you are using the thick wall 92s those are awesome!! _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cusser Samba Member

Joined: October 02, 2006 Posts: 33543 Location: Hot Arizona
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mal evolent wrote: |
| discount the 1835 if you live in the southwest. thin cylinder walls, uneven heat dissipation, 115 degree days... |
Yeah, my current 1835DP has only lasted 26 years here in Phoenix. And I used to run dealer-added AC on it when that same engine was in my sedan. Maybe the parts quality was better in 1986? I saw the mechanic who built that engine just this morning. In my mirror.
My first 1835 I built in 1976 developed a case crack in some 100,000 miles later in 1986, due to the way they used to use for boring the cases back in 1976. But cylinders, pistons, and rings were OK. _________________ 1970 VW (owned since 1972) and 1971 VW Convertible (owned since 1976), second owner of each. The '71 now has the 1835 engine, swapped from the '70. Second owner of each. 1988 Mazda B2200 truck, 1998 Frontier, 2014 Yukon, 2004 Frontier King Cab. All manual transmission except for the Yukon. http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=335294 http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=335297 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clonebug Samba Member

Joined: January 29, 2005 Posts: 4130 Location: NW Washington
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just had the 1679cc engine built and will be boosting it to at least 12 lbs.
I'm using the 88 mm thick walls from acnet.
We'll see how it holds up.
I don't see a problem for street use.
It should be fun......  _________________
| richardcraineum wrote: |
| I'm so ignorant of efi I don't even know the difference between batch, sequential blah blah blah .. |
| cbeck wrote: |
| His user name in a previous life was dick head. |
My Megasquirt Fuel Injection Turbo Buggy Build
Water/Alcohol Injection
Audi TT intercooler
Upgraded to MS3Pro-Evo
EcuMaster PMU16
ECUMaster ADU5 Digital Dash
http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=127936 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected] Samba Member

Joined: August 03, 2002 Posts: 12785 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://vwparts.simple-helix.net/1800cc-vw-engine-no-machine-combo/
has some great tips and things to think about for what you are doing. _________________ It's just advice, do whatever you want with it!
Please do NOT send me Private Messages through the Samba PM System (I will not see them). Send me an e-mail to john at aircooled dot net
"Like" our Facebook page at
http://www.facebook.com/vwpartsaircoolednet
and get a 5% off code for use on one order for VW Parts ON OUR PARTS STORE WEBSITE, vwparts.aircooled.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mal evolent Samba Member

Joined: March 31, 2009 Posts: 2924 Location: San Antonio, Nuevo Mexico
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
discount the 1835 if you live in the southwest. thin cylinder walls, uneven heat dissipation, 115 degree days... _________________ 73 Beetle Baja, Ghia front brakes, Type 3 rear brakes, 2220 ( 94 X 80 ), Weber Progressive, Bosch SVDA, '97 Mustang seats
Baja Bugs for Volkswagen Virgins: Index |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andk5591 Samba Member

Joined: August 29, 2005 Posts: 16824 Location: State College, PA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Throwing this out there - it costs about the same to build a 1914. Getting a few extra cc's out of the deal isnt a bad thing. And keep in mind that you want to build an engine based on what you are going to use it for. Huge ports, high lift monster header and all are great for high RPMs, but for a street engine, you will rarely see 5000 RPMS. And you can get a LOT of low end grunt from a 1914.
And staying conservative will give you longer life as well. Modest cam or ratio rockers, ported stock or mild aftermarket heads will do a lot for you. Quality filter pump or full flow is a great idea as well. Also keep the header size small 1 3/8" ish. _________________ D-Dubya Manx clone 1914. Ex wifes car.
Rosie 65 bug - My mostly stock daily driver.
Woodie 69 VW woodie (Hot VWs 7/12).
"John's car" 64 VW woodie - The first ever
Maxine 61 Cal-look bug - Ex-wifes car.
66 bug project - Real patina & Suby conversion
There's more, but not keeping them... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bertha64 Samba Member
Joined: May 09, 2010 Posts: 32 Location: tampa florida
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gt1953 wrote: |
Stroker crank...not much more in cost over a counter weighted ballanced 69mm crank. 74mm or 76 mm. You will get more torque. You can then use 85.5 pistons and very little head work.
A 76mm crank with 85.5 pistons is a 1745cc. I actually have that in one of my cars it the Hot VW mileage engine. |
Would this motor be faster than 1776 stock crank and can you use stock rods? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23945 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| if it's a 76-84 crank I would use 5.5 rods, well I would use them on 74 also.but I do have the 5.4 uni's in my 2028 with 78.8 mm crank, but had to trim the cylinders shorter.longer rods & shims are alot easyer unless you can do it your self. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
66 Shorty Samba Member

Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 917 Location: Rhode Island
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Henrip wrote: |
Actually I was thinking in build a 74mm with 87 piston, stock valves only port work, C35 cam and a central Italian 40 for my daily drive...
Has anyone tried this setup before? |
Sounds like the 1760 motor I'm gettin ready to build!
I have the 87mm pistons, C35 cam, looking into getting the stroker crank & some rods... I was going to go with Uni-Tech rods, but, they are STILL out of stock! I have a set of dual carbs for it. (I just don't remember what size he said they were ) I'm using stock heads/valves, (unless I hit the lotery & get new heads ) & I'm going to use solid shafts with stock rockers. I'm hoping to get away with stock pushrods, but, I don't think I can... Not sure, I AM using Scat single Hi-Rev springs...
Still undecided on what rods & length to go with, 5.500, 5.400, 5.394, 5.354, etc...
Mine's going in a Buggy, so, I'm thinking it should move it pretty well! _________________ ~X-Man~
'60's Spatz Buggy body on '74 Chassis (Budget Build)
'69 Bug (Baja-to-be partial daily)
'10 Silverado (My daily) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henrip Samba Member

Joined: April 04, 2011 Posts: 42 Location: Mcbo/Venezuela
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthWeber wrote: |
Henrip, I assume a central Italian 40 is a single Weber 40IDF. You'd be much better off with dual 40IDF's. Easier to tune and more potential power, drivability and fuel mileage. I strongly recommend dual carbs.
Are you aware of the P/C's in the link below? These 88's are thick wall machine in making them much more reliable than 87's. The base of the cylinders are turned down so they fit the stock 85.5 case spigot. All you'll need is to have your heads opened up to fit the cylinders.
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=806472
I like your combo. 1760 (or 1800 w/88's), mildly ported stock valve heads, Weber 40IDF's, C35 cam, 1 3/8" exhaust will work if you don't do a lot of high speed driving. |
Thanks for your response and help... I will try to go with duals.
I was worry about the thickness of the cylinder piston in this 88s set.
Thanks again for the link. _________________ Bug 1959 (Sold)
Bug 1961 (Sold)
T2A Pickup 1970 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cookrw Samba Member

Joined: June 09, 2009 Posts: 873 Location: Augusta, KY
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also, if I am getting the head worked on, what else should I do? From what I understand, airflow through the head is what limits my max rpm, so just to be safe, should I keep it stock? What benefits happen if I do other things to the head? _________________ '71 Super 'Vert
'84 Vanagon GL (w/ Sunroof!)
'96 Jeep Cherokee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cookrw Samba Member

Joined: June 09, 2009 Posts: 873 Location: Augusta, KY
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This looks very interesting. I have an email in with some questions about these. Has anyone used this before?
| DarthWeber wrote: |
Are you aware of the P/C's in the link below? These 88's are thick wall machine in making them much more reliable than 87's. The base of the cylinders are turned down so they fit the stock 85.5 case spigot. All you'll need is to have your heads opened up to fit the cylinders.
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=806472
|
_________________ '71 Super 'Vert
'84 Vanagon GL (w/ Sunroof!)
'96 Jeep Cherokee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DarthWeber Samba Member

Joined: November 24, 2007 Posts: 7542 Location: Whittier,CA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Henrip, I assume a central Italian 40 is a single Weber 40IDF. You'd be much better off with dual 40IDF's. Easier to tune and more potential power, drivability and fuel mileage. I strongly recommend dual carbs.
Sorry for the hyjack Cookrw.
Are you aware of the P/C's in the link below? These 88's are thick wall machine in making them much more reliable than 87's. The base of the cylinders are turned down so they fit the stock 85.5 case spigot. All you'll need is to have your heads opened up to fit the cylinders.
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=806472
I like your combo. 1760 (or 1800 w/88's), mildly ported stock valve heads, Weber 40IDF's, C35 cam, 1 3/8" exhaust will work if you don't do a lot of high speed driving.
Krusher has a similar 1800 (88 x 74), this is his dyno chart:
_________________
| Mitey62 wrote: |
| Swapped the Compufire for a Bosch blue and some points I had sitting around, started 1st crank. Took her out for a drive, pulls harder, more RPM, and runs smoother. I think I'll be sticking with points from now on. |
| RockCrusher wrote: |
JB weld the case halves....that'll keep the fretting to a minimum.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henrip Samba Member

Joined: April 04, 2011 Posts: 42 Location: Mcbo/Venezuela
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually I was thinking in build a 74mm with 87 piston, stock valves only port work, C35 cam and a central Italian 40 for my daily drive...
Has anyone tried this setup before? _________________ Bug 1959 (Sold)
Bug 1961 (Sold)
T2A Pickup 1970 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gt1953 Samba Member

Joined: May 08, 2002 Posts: 13960 Location: White Mountains Arizona
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stroker crank...not much more in cost over a counter weighted ballanced 69mm crank. 74mm or 76 mm. You will get more torque. You can then use 85.5 pistons and very little head work.
A 76mm crank with 85.5 pistons is a 1745cc. I actually have that in one of my cars it the Hot VW mileage engine. _________________ Volkswagen: We tune what we drive.
Numbers Matching VW's are getting harder to find. Source out the most Stock vehicle and keep that way. You will be glad you did.
72 type 1
72 Squareback
({59 Euro bug, 62, 63, 67, 68, 69, 73 type ones 68 & 69 type two, 68 Ghia all sold}) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cookrw Samba Member

Joined: June 09, 2009 Posts: 873 Location: Augusta, KY
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthWeber wrote: |
Don't discount the 1835. With the thick wall 92's available from AA I believe they would be just as reliable as 90.5's.
Also, don't forget about a small stroker crank like a 74mm. That would give you 1968cc (or 1904cc with 90.5 P/C's) and would be a very reliable foundation to base your engine on.
As I mentioned before, the addition of carbs/heads/exhaust and cam will determine how mild or wild you choose to go. |
I haven't discounted the 1835, I am just wary of going with that large of a motor. For just normal highway driving and puttering around, but with more torque, and the ability to actually go highway speed, which size would be the longest lasting?
I haven't really ever heard of the stroker crank much, so off to do some research! _________________ '71 Super 'Vert
'84 Vanagon GL (w/ Sunroof!)
'96 Jeep Cherokee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DarthWeber Samba Member

Joined: November 24, 2007 Posts: 7542 Location: Whittier,CA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't discount the 1835. With the thick wall 92's available from AA I believe they would be just as reliable as 90.5's.
Also, don't forget about a small stroker crank like a 74mm. That would give you 1968cc (or 1904cc with 90.5 P/C's) and would be a very reliable foundation to base your engine on.
As I mentioned before, the addition of carbs/heads/exhaust and cam will determine how mild or wild you choose to go. _________________
| Mitey62 wrote: |
| Swapped the Compufire for a Bosch blue and some points I had sitting around, started 1st crank. Took her out for a drive, pulls harder, more RPM, and runs smoother. I think I'll be sticking with points from now on. |
| RockCrusher wrote: |
JB weld the case halves....that'll keep the fretting to a minimum.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cookrw Samba Member

Joined: June 09, 2009 Posts: 873 Location: Augusta, KY
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At this point, I am doing a hypothetical build to start saving up for. I would like to get a long-life engine with more power than a 1600, and a 1776 looks like it is the most reliable. So, budget is not a problem right now. _________________ '71 Super 'Vert
'84 Vanagon GL (w/ Sunroof!)
'96 Jeep Cherokee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|