Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info
Page: 1, 2  Next
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1181
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2025 8:21 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Yeah I used neither an extra injector nor IAC valve. All cold starts were handled with about 25-30 degrees of idle timing and extra fuel mapped to the output of the CLT sensor Mario sells. It would have been better with an IAC but the simplicity of my EFI setup was insane. It was such a clean install after I loomed the wires to all the components.
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Max Welton
Samba Member


Joined: May 19, 2003
Posts: 11046
Location: Black Forest, CO
Max Welton is offline 

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2025 6:47 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

No need for a separate injector for cold start. Megasquirt has some built-in parameters that deal with cold start and enrichment that are all indexed to coolant temp (CLT). Mario has a nifty device that bolts to the head to provide CLT for this purpose.

https://thedubshop.com/modified-coolant-temp-sensor-package/

Max
_________________
1967 Type-3 Fastback
Under the Knife https://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=151582
Home Stretch https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=767836
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
andk5591
Samba Member


Joined: August 29, 2005
Posts: 16802
Location: State College, PA
andk5591 is offline 

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2025 6:33 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Max Welton wrote:
andk5591 wrote:
esde wrote:
I've built an MS2 unit and love it. If I wanted a turn key unit for daily driving, I'd get a Dubshop basic system with a micro squirt controller.


Tell me more. This looks completely different from the Sniper. Injectors at the end castings. Just emailed them for more info.

It seems the OP is on board and I'll be interested in how this turns out for him. That said, I'll offer my perspective as someone who has successfully done this.

I approached this with a type-3 car and a collection of stock type-3 FI parts ... minus the computer. The car was my all season daily for ~6 years operating in a range of altitudes and temperatures (Colorado). I started in almost complete ignorance of how megasquirt (and digital FI systems in general) work but eventually wound up with a reliable system that performed well.

https://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=132864&start=15

I found the process to be time-consuming but not particularly hard taken one step at a time. I am amazed at what VW was able to do back in the day before computers, both for design and implementation. The car eventually returned to the earth (rusted away) but the running gear lives on in a much better car. And it runs very well for a 1776 breathing through the straw that is the type-3 intake hardware.

https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=802152

To get here has been a time-consuming process. If I was doing this for someone else (a customer) this would be unacceptable. If someone had laid a worked-out solution (hardware and tune) in front of me at the start and someone was footing the bill ... it would be mostly a matter of assembly.

Using Mario should provide exactly this jump-start. The vast flexibility of megasquirt is its great advantage ... and biggest challenge.

Max


Yeah MaX, I am on board. I like the dub shop system since the injectors are where they should be. Have reached out to him, but have not heard back. The one thing I don't know is if he has a cold start injector or something that deals with that. As far as the controller goes, self learning would be preferred. I do have access to a chassis dyno, and plan to use it for this particular instance, BUT want to find a system that I can use in the future as well. Once again, I am a shop. Spending a ton of time fiddling is not practical, and this particular customer is about 3 hours away, so popping by to tweak later is not an option.
_________________
D-Dubya Manx clone 1914. Ex wifes car.
Rosie 65 bug - My mostly stock daily driver.
Woodie 69 VW woodie (Hot VWs 7/12).
"John's car" 64 VW woodie - The first ever
Maxine 61 Cal-look bug - Ex-wifes car.
66 bug project - Real patina & Suby conversion
There's more, but not keeping them...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Gallery Classifieds Feedback
raygreenwood
Samba Member


Joined: November 24, 2008
Posts: 23149
Location: Oklahoma City
raygreenwood is offline 

PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 12:52 pm    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

oprn wrote:
Funny thing to me is reading these comments about the difficulty in getting EFI to run properly on a stock 1600 under different altitudes and temperatures etc. and VW did it flawlessly 56 years ago. Makes me wonder about the serious lag in development in the aftermarket industry...


Well....um...yes....no...kinda Wink

So you say 56 years ago putting that at 1969....so you mean Bosch D-jetronic? ...which was actually released in 1967...but close enough Very Happy

But, while some text's and people like Dr.-Djet over in other forums suggest that some D-jet ECU's had the altitude compensation function in the MPS (manifold pressure sensor) or in the ECU of some of the Mercedes with D-jet....that did not come along until a few years later and actually was not very accurate or effective.

Having been inside of every type of D-jet MPS there is...there is nothing in there that can "sense" the decrease of atmospheric pressure outside of what it is already doing to sense changes in barometric pressure inside of the manifold and change your injection pulsewidth.

More accurately....the later models of MPS had a beryllium copper diaphragm plate that reacted with changes in external barometric pressure......but that function....when barometric pressure drops....is actually an ENRICHMENT function.

More precisely that copper plate flexes for a fraction of a second to increase RATE at which the internal barometric chambers allow your ECU to enrich the engine).

It has no capability to DECREASE your pulsewidth and lean out the engine at higher altitudes which is what is required.

The other item on the very first models of D-jet with the simplified MPS wit hsingle adjusting screw had a hollow adjusting screw driving against the aneroid chambers inside of the MPS. This allowed the external chamber to have outside atmospheric pressure reference and the inner chamber was strictly operating in vacuum.
This was their first attempt at having some sort of altitude adjustment....but it simply was not sensitive enough to work and these still suffered from running rich at high altitudes.

Having that altitude compensation function incorporated into the later Mercedes ECU's....was accomplished by one of two things:

1. more of a function of when the MPS is reading enrich, when the throttle position and rpm is not dictating enrichment. Its an electro-mechanical "guess" and would be horribly inaccurate.

2. Having an extra barometric chamber widget wired into the ECU that increases/decreases the resistance by drivin ga variable resistor and most probably operates across both the intake air temp sensor (TS-1) and cylinder head temp sensor (TS-2).....both of which were notoriously only really good for setting the conditional "trend" of the engine tune (background fuel mixture baseline) and worthless for second to second adjustment of pulsewidth. It would work. Not be greatly accurate for teh sake of maintaining horsepower...but would generally work.

On that last comment...it brings us around to where Bosch DID make a concentrated effort to correct fuel mixture at high altitude. That would be with L-jet in 1974.

This is from the Clymer Porsche 914 manual in the L-jet section:

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


I have worked on L-jet on hundreds of L-jet injected VW 411/412, Porsche 914 a few Ferrari, numerous Japanese cars and more than a few VW bus. At one point in time I picked up a factory service tech certification for D and L jet......and never in my life have I seen one of these compensators ...either in a parts bin or installed on an engine.

But, from looking at what little I can see of the shape and the three pin output, it is obviously a barometric chamber driving (probably) a rheostat that changes the output resistance with the change in barometric pressure...and adds and subtracts resistance from both injection channels in the ECU....shortening pulsewidth.

I have no idea how well it worked but can tell you that unless your injection was perfectly tuned in the first place....its just additive and not exact unless you have one of the later models of L-jet that have a downstream 02 sensor for correction.

So yeah....having a MAP sensor circuit in modern aftermarket injection is a damn good thing!

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Max Welton
Samba Member


Joined: May 19, 2003
Posts: 11046
Location: Black Forest, CO
Max Welton is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2025 7:51 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

andk5591 wrote:
esde wrote:
I've built an MS2 unit and love it. If I wanted a turn key unit for daily driving, I'd get a Dubshop basic system with a micro squirt controller.


Tell me more. This looks completely different from the Sniper. Injectors at the end castings. Just emailed them for more info.

It seems the OP is on board and I'll be interested in how this turns out for him. That said, I'll offer my perspective as someone who has successfully done this.

I approached this with a type-3 car and a collection of stock type-3 FI parts ... minus the computer. The car was my all season daily for ~6 years operating in a range of altitudes and temperatures (Colorado). I started in almost complete ignorance of how megasquirt (and digital FI systems in general) work but eventually wound up with a reliable system that performed well.

https://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=132864&start=15

I found the process to be time-consuming but not particularly hard taken one step at a time. I am amazed at what VW was able to do back in the day before computers, both for design and implementation. The car eventually returned to the earth (rusted away) but the running gear lives on in a much better car. And it runs very well for a 1776 breathing through the straw that is the type-3 intake hardware.

https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=802152

To get here has been a time-consuming process. If I was doing this for someone else (a customer) this would be unacceptable. If someone had laid a worked-out solution (hardware and tune) in front of me at the start and someone was footing the bill ... it would be mostly a matter of assembly.

Using Mario should provide exactly this jump-start. The vast flexibility of megasquirt is its great advantage ... and biggest challenge.

Max
_________________
1967 Type-3 Fastback
Under the Knife https://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=151582
Home Stretch https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=767836
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Brian_e Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: July 28, 2009
Posts: 4006
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
Brian_e is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2025 6:18 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Vw had electrical, mechanical, and automotive engineers, with millions of dollars to spend, and unlimited resources.

Now days it’s just someone with a summit racing catalog thinking they can slap a v8 system onto a vw and all the physics, thermodynamics, and heat transfer issues issues will just disappear.

VW also put the fuel injectors at the ends of the manifold where they should be.

Brian
_________________
So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok

Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com

Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Facebook Instagram YouTube Gallery Classifieds Feedback
oprn
Samba Member


Joined: November 13, 2016
Posts: 14802
Location: Western Canada
oprn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2025 5:45 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Funny thing to me is reading these comments about the difficulty in getting EFI to run properly on a stock 1600 under different altitudes and temperatures etc. and VW did it flawlessly 56 years ago. Makes me wonder about the serious lag in development in the aftermarket industry...
_________________
Our cars get old, we get old but driving an old VW never gets old!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 27676
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 8:32 pm    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

That's a great idea.
Mario should be able to give you some realistic expectations about what this or that system can and can't do, at a professional level.
And set you up with something that fits your goals.

instead of all us goons who just tried everything for free.
And tell you the same thing anyway
You'll believe it a lot better when you are paying for the advice Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Max Welton
Samba Member


Joined: May 19, 2003
Posts: 11046
Location: Black Forest, CO
Max Welton is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 7:09 pm    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Max Welton wrote:
What would I do? Reach out to Mario at the dub shop.

https://thedubshop.com/

Max


esde wrote:
I've built an MS2 unit and love it. If I wanted a turn key unit for daily driving, I'd get a Dubshop basic system with a micro squirt controller.


Before you let thesamba talk you into a blown stroker Rolling Eyes contact Mario. This is absolutely what he does for a living.

Max
_________________
1967 Type-3 Fastback
Under the Knife https://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=151582
Home Stretch https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=767836
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1181
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

I don't know how meaningful this data point is, but that perfectly serviceable engine tuned like a Japanese economy car is under my garage stairs, and I have $400 worth of EMPI carbs stacked on the engine in my car now. Laughing

Without going EFI with ITBs, you do hit a wall around 100hp with most of the popular intake parts, and really if you go center fueling and don't have port injection, you sorta lose the other benefit. In summary, I don't think I'd go Sniper or similar unless it was also gonna have a fat turbo. Very Happy So in keeping with Samba tradition, I'd suggest you get a 82mm crank, trade for B pistons, and do the sniper but get a turbo exhaust and boost it. (lol perfect Segway from him being curious about EFI options on a mild 69x94.)
_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Alstrup
Samba Member


Joined: July 12, 2007
Posts: 7843
Location: Videbaek Denmark
Alstrup is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 12:32 pm    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

The converted Mex system is an entirely different ball game as the injectors are placed just above the cylinder heads, as they should be. for milder engines it can be a nice set up. There is till the same performance limit. Not quite sure where it is, but somewhere around 100 hp. However, there is still the price tag. With the converted Mex system there is also a real option of improving fuel efficiency. i have never messed much with them, but I knnow people who has, and they have been able to reach very impressive overall figures. but, once again, it is not something you do in an evenings time.

Now, IMHO the 34 Solex, - and its modified sisters (37 & 39) are vastly underrated and misunderstood carbs. I will agree that on a 1600 displacement they - can - be a bit of a challenge to get to run right if you are not strict with your build. But on say a 1776 or a 1914, coupled with a better center section, the picture changes complestely. If you maintain a decent manifoild heat as well as proper pre heat to the aircleaner (Not necessary if you live in Ca or Texas or similar) and and make a couple of small changes to the carburettor it can run flawless, also during cold start and warm up.
_________________
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
boxer74
Samba Member


Joined: July 03, 2011
Posts: 862
Location: Ontario, Canada
boxer74 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 11:29 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

So if a sniper setup costs $2000 and I could get the same performance out of a $500 carb setup, but keep my clothes smelling fresh and keep my wife happy (provided I don't tell her about the $1500 cost for her happiness), then I'm good with that! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
_________________
74 Super
84 Westy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Brian_e Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: July 28, 2009
Posts: 4006
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
Brian_e is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 11:10 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Yes, it is all 100% preference.

For my road trip vehicle, I want it to be dead reliable, super easy to trouble shoot, and even easier to fix on the side of the road if need be. I carried spare parts for every piece of the EFI system, but trouble shooting it is much more difficult, and far more involved.

My wife was getting good at adjusting fuel and timing maps from the passenger seat while I told her numbers. She was over it by the time we got to our destination.

I also did the 2nd MAP sensor, but the software wouldn't altitude adjust no matter what I tried. If I had someone who was a MSquirt expert go through the whole thing and rework it all, it would most likely be way better, but I didn't have access to anyone like that.

By the end of our trip, I had different fuel maps saved for different altitudes. I would stop and load the next one to keep the bus running good. With carbs, you barely notice any altitude change. They just work plenty good all the time.

I think most people get it tuned and think its amazing at their local altitude, but never leave that altitude. I did the same thing. I had it running awesome here in town. Near perfect tune. As soon as I left town and started changing elevations is when the tuning issues started.

It is neat to be able to adjust so many parameters so easily, and be able to see the results right away.

Brian
_________________
So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok

Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com

Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Facebook Instagram YouTube Gallery Classifieds Feedback
boxer74
Samba Member


Joined: July 03, 2011
Posts: 862
Location: Ontario, Canada
boxer74 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 10:45 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

My Vanagon has Mansispeed's EFI kit, which uses Microsquirt and includes a second MAP sensor for barometric pressure compensation. It was a well thought out system that has required none of the tinkering that Brian_E outlined above. That said, it was designed for the stock Vanagon 2.1 MV engine which is what I'm basically using.

Dub Shop builds EFI kits for Type 1 engines and as we all know no Type 1 engine is the same unless bone stock. Therefore Mario can't give you a nicely dialed in VE table. Therefore it requires some user effort afterwards.

Kinda cool to play with VE Analyze Live in Tuner Studio though.

I think EFI vs. carb is just a personal choice. People that sink all their money into EFI aren't always doing it for performance gains. Some are techie types (myself included) that like making adjustments with the laptop and seeing the engine respond different rather than dialing in a carburetor.

The number times my wife complained about the gas smell all over my clothes and in the garage while I was dialing in some dual webers years ago had me glad I've gone down the EFI path. Hard to put a price on keeping your better half happy.

The Red-E sniper kit appeals to me and others because it has been loaded with the necessary software adjustments to work out of the box for most people.

If you're not after high performance, but like high tech upgrades to your ACVW, I think it's a nice upgrade. It's not cheap, but I don't regret buying it. It requires WAY less effort to get running nicely than a kit from the Dub Shop. If you're willing to put in the effort, the results from a port injection setup from the Dub Shop are likely much better.

But having said all that, I'm enjoying driving my bug this spring with the sniper. On to the next project...
_________________
74 Super
84 Westy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Brian_e Premium Member
Samba Member


Joined: July 28, 2009
Posts: 4006
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
Brian_e is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 9:36 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

The main difference between the stock VW EFI setup and Jim's Honda like setup Vs. the sniper stuff is the injectors in the end castings, and this is 100% what makes the difference in drive-ability.

Not sure if you have ever tried to drive a VW with a stock center mount in cold or even cool weather with little or no manifold heat, or a heat riser, but they suck. They run super rich, they make crappy power, and they tend to flood themselves after shutdown. Google latent heat of vaporization.

Same exact problems occur with ANY system that adds fuel 1.5 feet away at the entrance rather than right at the end of the manifold. With the center mount EFI, the computer will just keep running in circles trying to add more fuel to keep it alive, but then pull fuel out because its running so rich.

If you want it to drive like a civic, copy exactly what Jim did. He knows his stuff. I would warn you, it will take lots of tinkering on your end after the install to get it dialed in. Then when you leave town and change elevation, you will need to get out the laptop, and start tinkering again. After a few 1000 miles and lots of elevation change testing you will hopefully have it pretty close to dialed, but don't be thinking it will drive like a civic on the first trip around the block.

I am not trying to be a total downer, but after my VERY expensive EFI install, and a 3500 mile cross country road trip with it, I would have rather had a pair of dirty, half worn out kadron's on my 2332 for that trip. I too thought it would be all unicorns, fluffy clouds, perfect drive-ability, and fantastic MPG, but it was none of those things for me. It was more like get the laptop out at every stop, read data logs, make changes, hope it works..... Maybe I had too high of hopes.

I ditched all of it, and went back to China 44IDF's. Now I am back to worry free driving, super simple trouble shooting, better throttle response, and equal or better MPG. All for about $3500 less.

Brian
_________________
So more or less the lazier and stupider you want to be, the nicer quality parts you need to buy.
-Modok

Narrowed beams, Drop adjustable spring plates, Bus disk brake and IRS kits.
www.type-emotorsports.com

Type E Engine Parts and Supplies
https://type-emotorsports.com/collections/engine-parts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Facebook Instagram YouTube Gallery Classifieds Feedback
andk5591
Samba Member


Joined: August 29, 2005
Posts: 16802
Location: State College, PA
andk5591 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 6:19 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

esde wrote:
I've built an MS2 unit and love it. If I wanted a turn key unit for daily driving, I'd get a Dubshop basic system with a micro squirt controller.


Tell me more. This looks completely different from the Sniper. Injectors at the end castings. Just emailed them for more info.
_________________
D-Dubya Manx clone 1914. Ex wifes car.
Rosie 65 bug - My mostly stock daily driver.
Woodie 69 VW woodie (Hot VWs 7/12).
"John's car" 64 VW woodie - The first ever
Maxine 61 Cal-look bug - Ex-wifes car.
66 bug project - Real patina & Suby conversion
There's more, but not keeping them...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jimmyhoffa
Samba Member


Joined: February 16, 2014
Posts: 1181
Location: St. Louis
jimmyhoffa is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 6:09 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

andk5591 wrote:
I understand what you are saying. My question to you is this. Have you ever driven a properly running FI VW? I have, and they are really nice. In this particular instance, the customer wants FI for that reason. That being said, all of my personal classic VWs have carbs... singles and duals. But to be perfectly honest, I want to build this for my own curiosity.


I did the same thing for the same reason, and I can back up your expectation that it is, in fact, insane. I had a 1915 with the Mexican beetle port-injected individual runner single throttle body setup. It was mild in behavior, but almost unbelievable as a daily. It felt way more like a mid 2000s Honda Civic than any ACVW of any configuration I have ever driven. I still have the engine under my staircase. It was not fast, but it was impossibly smooth. It'll get budget boosted one day here soon - I need to find a header. Fair warning, I'd think that a huge amount of the smoothness came from the combination of single throttle body and individual port injection.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
1974 Chenowth 2RL #1244 Street Legal
My other car isn't ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
esde
Samba Member


Joined: October 20, 2007
Posts: 6339
Location: central rust belt
esde is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 4:49 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

I've built an MS2 unit and love it. If I wanted a turn key unit for daily driving, I'd get a Dubshop basic system with a micro squirt controller.
_________________
modok wrote:
Bent cranks are silent but gather no moss. I mean, ah, something like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
andk5591
Samba Member


Joined: August 29, 2005
Posts: 16802
Location: State College, PA
andk5591 is offline 

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 4:29 am    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Alstrup wrote:
I know I´m about to hijack this threead, but I do find that it should be a part of this discussion.
So, let me ask this: What makes a $ 2000 "electric carb" fuel injection an interesting alternative to a modified 34 & 37 mm Solex which will do the same for what, 500 bucks and an afternoon of tuning?


I understand what you are saying. My question to you is this. Have you ever driven a properly running FI VW? I have, and they are really nice. In this particular instance, the customer wants FI for that reason. That being said, all of my personal classic VWs have carbs... singles and duals. But to be perfectly honest, I want to build this for my own curiosity.
_________________
D-Dubya Manx clone 1914. Ex wifes car.
Rosie 65 bug - My mostly stock daily driver.
Woodie 69 VW woodie (Hot VWs 7/12).
"John's car" 64 VW woodie - The first ever
Maxine 61 Cal-look bug - Ex-wifes car.
66 bug project - Real patina & Suby conversion
There's more, but not keeping them...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Gallery Classifieds Feedback
BFB
Samba Member


Joined: November 03, 2014
Posts: 2687

BFB is offline 

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2025 5:42 pm    Post subject: Re: building a 1914, fuel injected daily driver. need info Reply with quote

Alstrup wrote:
I know I´m about to hijack this threead, but I do find that it should be a part of this discussion.
So, let me ask this: What makes a $ 2000 "electric carb" fuel injection an interesting alternative to a modified 34 & 37 mm Solex which will do the same for what, 500 bucks and an afternoon of tuning?


Only 2 benefits i could see is if a person has never worked on a carb or if your running steep angles offroad.
Ive been surprised how many people nowadays have never driven a carbureted vehicle muchless worked on a carb. I mean i get why but just still surprised me for some reason
_________________
"how am i supposed to torque the rear wheel nut to 250 ft lbs??? " - clonebug
An interesting thing happens in forums where everyone starts parroting the same thing and "common knowledge" takes over.
Most experts aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2025, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.