Author |
Message |
TheRustyRabbit Samba Member
Joined: December 26, 2008 Posts: 25 Location: Moncure,NC
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 4:20 pm Post subject: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
I'm still contemplating what direction I want to go with my 1972 bus. The 1.7L maybe savable, but I've been looking at everything from type one conversions to Subaru swaps.
One thing that confuses me is why no one has offered a simple carb swap for the EJ22 or EJ25. It would seem to be an easy way to cram that modern engine in without the need for an ecm. Is it due to the ignition system? I can't recall if they are both run by the same ECM on that car. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
adventurebob Samba Member
Joined: August 06, 2020 Posts: 107 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 5:49 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
The ECM runs everything. Donโt fear the ECM, thereโs plenty of laptop timers for it. Hang out on some subbie sites, lots you can do with it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
busdaddy Samba Member

Joined: February 12, 2004 Posts: 52575 Location: Surrey B.C. Canada, but thinking of Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 5:57 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
Indeed, carbs would be a major downgrade in performance and economy, not to mention all the other things that would have to be modified if you ditched the ECM. _________________ Rust NEVER sleeps and stock never goes out of style.
Please don't PM technical questions, ask your problem in public so everyone can play along. If you think it's too stupid post it here
Stop dead photo links! Post your photos to The Samba Gallery!
Слава Україні! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vacca_rabite Samba Member
Joined: July 04, 2021 Posts: 76 Location: PA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
The simple reason is that the engine was designed for fuel injection, and many of the benefits you get from a modern engine would be lost if you moved it to carbs.
For instance, you will never get the fuel mileage or clean burn or partial zero emissions running with carbs.
With the stock wire harness being easy to get and aftermarket EFI being so readily available (even for specific Subaru to Bus swaps) its kinda crazy to try an adapt carbs.
Zach _________________ 1972 T2 Bay Westy in restoration
1976 Porsche 914
196? Empi Sportster Dune Buggy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
notchboy Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2002 Posts: 22658 Location: Escondido CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:20 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
busdaddy wrote: |
Indeed, carbs would be a major downgrade in performance and economy, not to mention all the other things that would have to be modified if you ditched the ECM. |
Let alone trying to find someone that would be able to work on it. _________________
t3kg wrote: |
OK, this thread is over. You win. |
Jason "notchboy" Weigel
1964 1500 S
1964 T34 S Convertible
1977 Westfalia Camper pop-top |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate  Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 23604 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:47 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
When I asked my mechanic if he worked in carbs he said he has cut out bagels but still enjoys pizza.
Carbs are done in modern engines _________________ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ ๐ ๐ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
notchboy Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2002 Posts: 22658 Location: Escondido CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:07 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
Abscate wrote: |
When I asked my mechanic if he worked in carbs he said he has cut out bagels but still enjoys pizza.
Carbs are done in modern engines |
_________________
t3kg wrote: |
OK, this thread is over. You win. |
Jason "notchboy" Weigel
1964 1500 S
1964 T34 S Convertible
1977 Westfalia Camper pop-top |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead

Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 17774 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:12 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
TheRustyRabbit wrote: |
One thing that confuses me is why no one has offered a simple carb swap for the EJ22 or EJ25. It would seem to be an easy way to cram that modern engine in without the need for an ecm. Is it due to the ignition system? I can't recall if they are both run by the same ECM on that car. |
what's to be confused about? by and large carburetors are a pain in the ass.
it has been done. this guy liked the looks of the dual carbs i guess:
but the time spent in working the ignition, plus timing map, plus carb tuning, plus custom intakes is really a step backwards not only financially but time wise.
i couldn't imagine going thru all that work, just to have to try and make it run.
but i guess if you're afraid of ECU's and fuel injection i could see the appeal _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manfred58sc Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2009 Posts: 3462
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
Carburetors are done,done,done. You fight like hell to keep stock set ups running and starting. Ethanol eats the kits, boils dry in the heat, attracts moisture. And you never really know how much booze is in the stuff you buy. Independent state testing in Colorado found up to 28%. FI cares not and will happily mix about anything that gets past the fuel pump.
Interesting that the carb set up had no belt on it..who knows if it actually ran _________________ Fat chick owner/operator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Xevin  Samba Member
Joined: January 08, 2014 Posts: 8482
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
OEM Subaru carb. I think they stopped using those in the U.S. in 1990.
Link
Skills next Subaru conversion on my Rusty 72.  _________________ Keep on Busin'
67rustavenger wrote: |
GFY's Xevin and VW_Jimbo! |
Clatter wrote: |
Damn that Xevin...  |
skills@eurocarsplus wrote: |
I respect Xevin and he's a turd |
SGKent wrote: |
My God! Xevin and I 100% agree |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Abscate  Samba Member
Joined: October 05, 2014 Posts: 23604 Location: NYC/Upstate/ROW
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 2:25 am Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
There is a crying need for a new Bears video
โ I would like to put a Subaru engine into my VW vanโฆ.I mean, Busโฆ.โ _________________ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ ๐ ๐ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ceckert64 Samba Member

Joined: September 16, 2015 Posts: 2094 Location: Huntington, WV for now
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:16 am Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
skills@eurocarsplus wrote: |
TheRustyRabbit wrote: |
One thing that confuses me is why no one has offered a simple carb swap for the EJ22 or EJ25. It would seem to be an easy way to cram that modern engine in without the need for an ecm. Is it due to the ignition system? I can't recall if they are both run by the same ECM on that car. |
what's to be confused about? by and large carburetors are a pain in the ass.
it has been done. this guy liked the looks of the dual carbs i guess:
but the time spent in working the ignition, plus timing map, plus carb tuning, plus custom intakes is really a step backwards not only financially but time wise.
i couldn't imagine going thru all that work, just to have to try and make it run.
but i guess if you're afraid of ECU's and fuel injection i could see the appeal |
Iโm not sure that is even dual carbs. If you look at the bottom of the intakes there are ports for injectors. Maybe the carbs are being used for a throttle body? Also the engine is missing half the parts still as if it was carbs, I see a missing linkage on the right side and no fuel lines plumed up. So who even knows if this setup ever even was used or ran. _________________ 1964 sunroof Beetle Restoration "Herbie"
โJoannโ 1970 Elm Green Squareback
1972 Yellow Tin Top Westfalia -Sold
โFitzโ 1971 Westfalia Poptop EJ22 swap
โRomeโ 91 Syncro |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildthings Samba Member

Joined: March 13, 2005 Posts: 52101
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:09 am Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
My Suby swap in my '91 Vanagon has been running for 10 years at this point, the FI has preformed flawlessly from the get go. Why should I want to get back to wheels having wooden spokes and tires made from steel bands? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead

Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 17774 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:29 am Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
Ceckert64 wrote: |
Iโm not sure that is even dual carbs.. |
it is. he was mocking stuff up with a hacked up stock subaru manifold with the base flanges welded on
in the end there is a video somewhere of it running. the build was on STF as i recall
this is like putting a carbureted 350 in your M3 because you are afraid of FI. makes zero sense _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jtauxe  Samba Member

Joined: September 30, 2004 Posts: 5935 Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:32 am Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
Carburetors are nasty in terms of emissions, inefficient with fuel, and are a real PITA in the winter.
How about considering a conversion to electric? It is quite viable, and has a lot of positive aspects. The main negative is the matter of range, which kind of rules it out for campers, especially. _________________ John
"Travelling in a fried-out Kombi, on a hippie trail, head full of zombie..." - Colin Hay and Ron Strykert
http://vw.tauxe.net
1969 Transporter, 1971 Westfalia, 1976, 1977, 1976, 1977, 1971, 1973, 1977 Westfalias,
1979 Champagne Sunroof, 1974 Westfalia Automatic, 1979 Transporter, 1972 Sportsmobile, 1973 Transporter Wild Westerner, 1974 Westfalia parts bus, 1975 Mexican single cab *FOR SALE*, 1978 Irish 4-door double cab RHD
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
airschooled Air-Schooled

Joined: April 04, 2012 Posts: 13411 Location: West Coast, USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:57 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
EV conversions are extremely viable if you donโt drive more than 200 miles in one sitting/day. That number scares people, but letโs be honest: how many of you drive your buses that far every day anyway?
The cost factor (25k diy, 110k turnkey,) is still leaving those conversions to people with more money than spare time in their lives. Those folks arenโt going on cross-country drives. Let them be the coal mine canaries for the next few years.
Robbie _________________ One-on-one tech help for your vintage Volkswagen:
www.airschooled.com
https://www.patreon.com/airschooled |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nemobuscaptain Samba Member

Joined: March 07, 2002 Posts: 3874
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
notchboy Samba Member

Joined: April 27, 2002 Posts: 22658 Location: Escondido CA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 2:32 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
airschooled wrote: |
EV conversions are extremely viable if you donโt drive more than 200 miles in one sitting/day. That number scares people, but letโs be honest: how many of you drive your buses that far every day anyway?
The cost factor (25k diy, 110k turnkey,) is still leaving those conversions to people with more money than spare time in their lives. Those folks arenโt going on cross-country drives. Let them be the coal mine canaries for the next few years.
Robbie |
Let me get the $ in drive time out of my bus redo first before I ever think of that  _________________
t3kg wrote: |
OK, this thread is over. You win. |
Jason "notchboy" Weigel
1964 1500 S
1964 T34 S Convertible
1977 Westfalia Camper pop-top |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheRustyRabbit Samba Member
Joined: December 26, 2008 Posts: 25 Location: Moncure,NC
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 5:54 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
Interesting. I have no issue with F.I. at all. I started as a mechanic at the dawn of that era and for me Carbs are not something I really like working with.
That said It just seems to me that the hassle of rewiring a CAN harness to work with a Subaru engine is going to be a pain.
I'm on a tight budget but am blessed to live in an era with plenty of late 90's early 00's Subaru's to pick from. It' would be a project and a half so I just want to be sure its what I want to tackle.
Power and economy? Ya, I'm good with that, but as a life long mechanic, I yearn for simplicity as well.
The name "The Rusty Rabbit" relates to my life long love of 77-80 VW Rabbits with the best fuel injection ever made. The Basic non electric CIS system. Such a wonderful system and a thing that was done without the needs of huge piles of vac lines or dozens of electric do-dads. Pure perfection!
I'll keep everyone posted on the direction I go, but I feel like I'm leaning towards a Subaru swap if the type 4 that this old girl came with turns out to be too far gone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shonandb Samba Member

Joined: January 12, 2019 Posts: 1938 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:49 pm Post subject: Re: Subaru swap. Why not switch to carburation? |
|
|
TheRustyRabbit wrote: |
Interesting. I have no issue with F.I. at all. I started as a mechanic at the dawn of that era and for me Carbs are not something I really like working with.
That said It just seems to me that the hassle of rewiring a CAN harness to work with a Subaru engine is going to be a pain.
I'm on a tight budget but am blessed to live in an era with plenty of late 90's early 00's Subaru's to pick from. It' would be a project and a half so I just want to be sure its what I want to tackle.
Power and economy? Ya, I'm good with that, but as a life long mechanic, I yearn for simplicity as well.
The name "The Rusty Rabbit" relates to my life long love of 77-80 VW Rabbits with the best fuel injection ever made. The Basic non electric CIS system. Such a wonderful system and a thing that was done without the needs of huge piles of vac lines or dozens of electric do-dads. Pure perfection!
I'll keep everyone posted on the direction I go, but I feel like I'm leaning towards a Subaru swap if the type 4 that this old girl came with turns out to be too far gone. |
I had a similar decision back in late 2020 when I found out that my new to me 76 Westy had a 1.7L in it instead of a 2L and it needed a full rebuild so I went the Subaru route.
It took some time as I did the swap myself including the harness and the cost excluding the transaxle upgrade was about CAN$7,500 (US$6,000). I was looking at a minimum of US$3,500 to build an air cooled 2L but like others have said, was concerned about the quality of VW parts, so it was a fairly easy decision. My donor was a 2.5L SOHC from a low mileage Subaru Legacy so the mechanical and electrical was very straight forward.
Really happy with the results as I just get in a drive now but still have fun fixing/upgrading everything else. _________________ *******************************
76 Westy with a 2.5L Subaru SOHC + Vanagon (010) Automatic Transaxle
Build & Trip Thread: https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=758760
Previous 1973 Panel Bus:
Click to view image |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|