Author |
Message |
wildman1 Samba Member
Joined: December 30, 2003 Posts: 674
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
the FK-10 used to be considered a pretty big cam. Nowadays not so much.
Wildman, you absolutely can NOT go wrong with the 86c. My car runs DEEP in the 11s with IDFs with that grind. |
Thank you John. As I understand it, the 86c is right in the middle of the FK10 and FK46 in terms of character and valve train stress. Is this correct? I will drive the Bug often on nice days and it is secondary transport. We are blessed with long cold winters with salty roads, so a tear down/inspection/refresh is not a problem now and then. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vince1 Samba Member

Joined: December 14, 2003 Posts: 837 Location: Burgundy, France
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Taber Samba Member
Joined: October 17, 2006 Posts: 123
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:26 am Post subject: anyone running an FK-10 on the street |
|
|
Wildman all 3 cams, the fk-10, 86C, and the FK-46 are closse in there specks. I have not run all 3 in the same engine. I have run all 3 in simular engines and they are all very close. John is right about the 86C and Joel Mohr runs a lot of them and really likes it. The duration at 0.050 on the fk-46's that I have tested is not 268 but 271. I have found the fk-46 to be the smoothest of all 3. If I had to pick one of those 3 it would be the fk-46 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wildman1 Samba Member
Joined: December 30, 2003 Posts: 674
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Ken, I appreciate your shared experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23950 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks murzi thats nice to have.what engine was the dyno sheet from?how much head work?carbs,cr,cc rockers,valve size? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yamaducci Samba Member

Joined: March 30, 2010 Posts: 2373 Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have run the k8, then k10 and now about to run the 86C in my 2498cc Fuel injected turbo.
I can say after 500 miles and about 5- 1/4 mile runs that the lifter bores were shot and could not hold oil pressure when hot. I have since sleeved the lifter bores among many other mods and expect a fantastic return on power with the 86C.
I think since I have fuel injection it made up for the lack of low end with both cams; however, I think both cams felt similar. The K10's power band had moved up the scale and really woke up later than the K8.
On the highway, all out, the K10 would ramp up around 5000 seemingly with no ceiling.
It is a VERY different animal with the FI, CE Heads and Turbo though.
Down low with the FI, they were both "streetable", frequently running out of gear and needing a 5th.
Not sure if running carbs would make them not-so-streetable. _________________ -John Cox
My 2498 Turbo Re-Build Thread: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5578697#5578697
3rd Brake Light Safety Stars- I still have a couple with blue light left. Email me if interested. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23950 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I ran the k8 and it as very streatable&mild mannered. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bilboa Samba Member
Joined: July 23, 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ken and i built my 2442, clyde 44 x 37.5 heads, 9.1 , 271 @ .050 fk46 , profiled 48 ida's. Don't have dyno sheets in front of me, but on his dyno, 4800 elev , 181 hp, uncorrected. In my heavy street car, berg 5, love the fk46, tons of bottom end, pulls to rev limiter at 7300. On one of my baja motors 87x94 , 44 x 37.5 wedgeports, 7mm beehive springs, fk44. pulled 25 lbs at 2500 rpm, 150 hp @ 6k with only 36 vents in 44idf. with more tuning and better exh, WAY more left in it. Really like the fk 44 too. fk series cams rock. bill |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bilboa Samba Member
Joined: July 23, 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
meant to write that first motor mentioned with clyde 44 x 37.5 hds had a k10. Liked it put prefer the fk 46, but to be fair motor was also stroked from 84 to 88, besides cam change. Second motor, fk44, 87 x 94 motor should read 7mm valve stems, beehive springs. like that cam too. bill |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jeff68 Samba Member
Joined: November 02, 2007 Posts: 305 Location: Sarasota, Florida
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I run the K-10 in my 2110 (82X90.5). Has 42 X 37.5 CB 044 / Berg 870 CNC / hand ported heads, Berg 1.4 rockers, Dual 48 IDA's. Only 8:1 compression. Engine has nice street manners. Fine in traffic and on the freeway. Pulls hard from 3000 rpm to 7200. Stock geared transmission. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DarthWeber Samba Member

Joined: November 24, 2007 Posts: 7543 Location: Whittier,CA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff, are your heads semi-hemi cut? I'm guessing yes. Just wondering what you have your max timing set at with your combo? _________________
Mitey62 wrote: |
Swapped the Compufire for a Bosch blue and some points I had sitting around, started 1st crank. Took her out for a drive, pulls harder, more RPM, and runs smoother. I think I'll be sticking with points from now on. |
RockCrusher wrote: |
JB weld the case halves....that'll keep the fretting to a minimum.  |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23950 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
any body got the fk 46 card to add to the thread?any .100" or more lift figures for any of these cams?just wondering, wish I had loged all mine good when I did them,if you think my spellen is bad, you dont want to see my riten when ploting a cam.I think most of them got trashed.keeping a dedacted book would be too easy.Im about to go apeshit wanten to finish this hyd roller motor that hasent been hardly started.& now this 44&46 are looking good for a mild street motor, but too much time&$ in this roller cam as it is so it need to be going.(inreality not much $$ at all in it, but I want to use a new aluminum case so thats the $$$ part)all of this info has been good,and if we pay attn to it it can be very usefull.me coming from a 600+ci background ,it's totaly different for the vw stuff with low ratio rockers&Ir induction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Arndt Samba Member
Joined: August 01, 2005 Posts: 1797 Location: Boise, Idaho
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the V8 world they give duration at higher lift values on the cam cards. I wish we could get that information in one place for analysis. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nater Samba Member
Joined: June 19, 2006 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mark tucker wrote: |
any body got the fk 46 card to add to the thread?. |
These things flat rip!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23950 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steve Arndt wrote: |
In the V8 world they give duration at higher lift values on the cam cards. I wish we could get that information in one place for analysis. |
nope about the same @.050" is .050" just about any where.but at the valve with a 1.1 or 1.25 is a lot different than 1.6 or 1.8 or even the 2.2 ratio rockers I have. think of how much faster the 1.8 rocker engine sees the .050 figure and the amount of lift it has there..055 valve lift turns into about .090"valve lift at the same .050" cam degree. thats where raito rockers make the extra power, not so much the extra lift, but faster lift,yes the extra lift does add too.thus my hyd roller for my vw uses 1.7 ratio rockers.but is only about 250 @.050(248 desine duration) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bilboa Samba Member
Joined: July 23, 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mark, my fk46 lift was .630 with my berg 1.45's that measure 1.54 ?? ken has my cam card, gotta make sure on engle cams, some k10's measure 266 or 268, some fk 46s might differ from 271 . ? GREAT CAM... Might want to play with lobe centers in future as ken taber and doug berg just built a motor for johny johnson with fk46 with a 106 lobe center, GREAT results , ken , speak up ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark tucker Samba Member

Joined: April 08, 2009 Posts: 23950 Location: SHALIMAR ,FLORIDA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
both sets of my 1.4 checked out at about 1.53,and with a .420 lobe they were 1.56, checking without a calculator is a must in all motors. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7846 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I vote for the 86c too in that cam range. I have used them down to 1914´s and they run surprisingly strong. Of course the combo needs to be about perfect and not have too long gears, but still.
As Alan U stated, the CB 2289 is a much overlooked cam. It works really nice and has more midrange than the 87.
The 40 series I dont care about, apart from the fact that they make good power. They wear stuff out fast. (A few people seem to not have problems. I suspect they are suddenly in for a surprise)
The FK10 was never a popular cam. I´m not sure why. But I actually do think that a certain, now long gone, person had a lot to do with it due to the way he built and advocated street engines. It doesnt work well with 7,5-1 CR.
The FK8 is a "forgiving" cam. It works reasonably well with 8-1 CR and is hot at 10-1 + high octane. If the ports are small it pulls ok numbers, but early. If the ports are actually too large it still makes reasonably good numbers. Going to the FK10 all that disapears and the combo has to be more "correct" to make good power.
The figures/timing on the 40 series, (43-46) are actually rather good. And I do think that if they were ground on a slightly fatter lobe they would be killer cams. Until then I stay with the 86B/C and CB 2289
T |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
westy richardson Samba Member
Joined: September 22, 2010 Posts: 153 Location: Suffolk, England
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glenn wrote: |
jamestwo wrote: |
The FK-8 is the best cam for a TRUE hot rod daily driver. |
I love my 2180 with K8. |
I'm having a 2110 built for my 1970 bus as we speak, my engine builder is using an FK8, with 1.4:1 rockers and 40x37 valves. All this with weber 40 IDF's and a 1 5/8 merged exhaust should give a good driveable bus and plenty of grunt when needed  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ALB Samba Member
Joined: August 05, 2008 Posts: 3499 Location: beautiful suburban Wet Coast of Canada
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alstrup wrote: |
The figures/timing on the 40 series, (43-46) are actually rather good. And I do think that if they were ground on a slightly fatter lobe they would be killer cams. |
What do you mean by that last statement? Please explain... _________________ On a lifelong mission to prove (much to my wife's dismay) that Immaturity is Forever!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|