Author |
Message |
spencerfvee Samba Member
Joined: August 19, 2004 Posts: 3068
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you got me thinking. i think your right. if i would go to a 32mm venturi it would slow the intake velocity down . i think thats why i have to run a 155 main jet. i allso kept the intake ports on the head small to help velocity and i allso did not open the ports up to big . on the end castings and the intake manifold tubes are real close to stock size i allso have the CR at 9 1/2 to help velocity . your right a booster ventri would be great . but would take a lot of room up it would have to be made out of something real thin like brass shim stock . if one could use a booster venturi from a kadron carb . i know they have low heat welding rods that they sell at swap meets that i have used in the past to weld sheet alum. and i have used it on a intake end casting to weld a hole up . i think it can be used on carbs . some thing i will have to look into your why i like samba. people like you give great imput allso could you post your data on your flow simulations for the 34 pict carb i very much would like to se them spencerfvee
yellow73kubel wrote: |
The more creative part of me loves this stuff.. Great to hear some success stories. I'm very tempted to try it out this summer.
I spent a while last year doing flow simulations on 34 pict venturi designs in Autodesk if anyone is interested in the data. I found that it's a very delicate balance. The volume increase is significant in all cases, but the majority will slow down the intake velocity far more than desired. In short, a boost venturi is really handy once you punch out the stock venturi past a certain point (~28-30mm). Unfortunately, the "best" design would put it right where the choke butterfly is, so that needs a more elegant solution...
I didn't even know where to start with getting the proper amount of fuel in there, but it looks like most of you are way ahead on that. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yellow73kubel Samba Member

Joined: August 17, 2008 Posts: 789 Location: Columbia, SC
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
That brings up a good point, do any any of y'all have experimental data for these carburetors? Manifold vacuum off of a few different engines would help a lot. Tubing size, engine displacement, and compression ratio would all be handy. Obviously there's more to it, but lets start simple.
I found all of my simulations last night. When I have some free time this week, I'll get them done and post the results. I do need to work through my calculations again since I lost the original ones.
My calculations are based on the maximum vacuum at the manifold on my engine. Using a simplified version of the Bernoulli principle and a few assumptions, I came to the conclusion that a stock ~1600 creates enough suction for 105m/s air velocity at that point. The simulations work their way "up" from there, yielding the maximum velocity and flow rate at the fuel outlet.
The first useful test was that pulling the venturi out yields a 13% decrease in flow velocity (213m/s down to 183m/s) with a 41% increase in flow area (539mm^2 to 907mm^2). That's what Motor is seeing in his 1904. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spencerfvee Samba Member
Joined: August 19, 2004 Posts: 3068
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi i just posted pitchures of my motor and bug in the gallery under bug-super beetle if you want to see the motor thanks spencerfvee...........................
spencerfvee wrote: |
you got me thinking. i think your right. if i would go to a 32mm venturi it would slow the intake velocity down . i think thats why i have to run a 155 main jet. i allso kept the intake ports on the head small to help velocity and i allso did not open the ports up to big . on the end castings and the intake manifold tubes are real close to stock size i allso have the CR at 9 1/2 to help velocity . your right a booster ventri would be great . but would take a lot of room up it would have to be made out of something real thin like brass shim stock . if one could use a booster venturi from a kadron carb . i know they have low heat welding rods that they sell at swap meets that i have used in the past to weld sheet alum. and i have used it on a intake end casting to weld a hole up . i think it can be used on carbs . some thing i will have to look into your why i like samba. people like you give great imput allso could you post your data on your flow simulations for the 34 pict carb i very much would like to se them spencerfvee
yellow73kubel wrote: |
The more creative part of me loves this stuff.. Great to hear some success stories. I'm very tempted to try it out this summer.
I spent a while last year doing flow simulations on 34 pict venturi designs in Autodesk if anyone is interested in the data. I found that it's a very delicate balance. The volume increase is significant in all cases, but the majority will slow down the intake velocity far more than desired. In short, a boost venturi is really handy once you punch out the stock venturi past a certain point (~28-30mm). Unfortunately, the "best" design would put it right where the choke butterfly is, so that needs a more elegant solution...
I didn't even know where to start with getting the proper amount of fuel in there, but it looks like most of you are way ahead on that. |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NewTechnicIan Samba Member

Joined: May 28, 2013 Posts: 367 Location: Burlington, VT
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aryue Samba Member

Joined: January 16, 2006 Posts: 1027 Location: Austin, TX
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vwsb74 Samba Member
Joined: July 30, 2009 Posts: 1201 Location: socal
|
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or you can wrap a drillbit with sand paper. Drill it till it gets thin. Don't remove the Venturi . _________________ 74 super beetle
2011 ford explorer traded
2010 mazda 3 hatchback
2014 Honda odyssey
2180cc 48IDA clone
Xr310 cam =171hp@6k rpm sold so as the car😢 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NewTechnicIan Samba Member

Joined: May 28, 2013 Posts: 367 Location: Burlington, VT
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds good guys! I've been having such a lively debate with myself whether or not to go 1776 or just 1641 and the carb seems to be the biggest challenge. Everyone has an opinion one way or the other on that.
If I go 1776 I'll want to make my current carb work for a while and probably go to duals after a year or two of driving and enjoying. I'd prefer while I'm cracking the case to make room for power and then wait to bolt on the parts that will let all that power out a little later on.
Thanks! _________________ My 73 Standard build - It's painted! It drives under its own power! Time to get it wired and upholstered!
My 1679 Engine build. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
honeybeetle Samba Member
Joined: October 13, 2016 Posts: 12 Location: Bloomington
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I recently sent in a spare 34 PICT 3 I had laying around which Blackline reworked for me to the Super Stock spec. I am very pleased with the performance so far. They were super easy to work with as well.
Running an Engle W100 cam with stock valves, heads, and exhaust, so I've been reading this thread to see where to go next. Great stuff Samba! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul.H Samba Member

Joined: April 03, 2015 Posts: 617 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 4:31 am Post subject: Re: any one running a 34 pict carb with bigger venturis |
|
|
I put a stock carb on a 1600 dp with Scat C20 cam and it was pretty quick but it needed a lot more fuel at idle to make it work and pumped out a lot of fumes. Also an engine builder I used to supply parts to said anything more than an Engle 100 would't idle properly and would be unacceptable to the customers I actually supplied him cams milder than E100 before supply dried up.
How is the idle quality with these overbore carbs , larger displacement engines and aftermarket cam ?? . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheViking Samba Member
Joined: March 04, 2016 Posts: 278 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 5:07 am Post subject: Re: any one running a 34 pict carb with bigger venturis |
|
|
Just sayin
Link
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vespist Samba Member
Joined: December 02, 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Goteborg Sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pharos Samba Member

Joined: March 05, 2009 Posts: 323 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:46 pm Post subject: Re: any one running a 34 pict carb with bigger venturis |
|
|
Paul.H wrote: |
I put a stock carb on a 1600 dp with Scat C20 cam and it was pretty quick but it needed a lot more fuel at idle to make it work and pumped out a lot of fumes. Also an engine builder I used to supply parts to said anything more than an Engle 100 would't idle properly and would be unacceptable to the customers I actually supplied him cams milder than E100 before supply dried up.
How is the idle quality with these overbore carbs , larger displacement engines and aftermarket cam ?? . |
Hi,
Do you have procedures photo or video for bore steps?. One of the engines that I have is a stock 1600, will it make a noticeable change in power if I did it? _________________ http://www.facebook.com/groups/vwbug/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lingwendil Samba Member

Joined: February 25, 2009 Posts: 3999 Location: Antioch, California, a block from the hood
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alstrup Samba Member
Joined: July 12, 2007 Posts: 7851 Location: Videbaek Denmark
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:03 am Post subject: Re: any one running a 34 pict carb with bigger venturis |
|
|
Yes. This mod works very well with turbo (blow thgrough) and or running w.o. venturi. But you need some displacement "down under" to exploit it. A "simple" big big bore Solex can easily supply enough air for 120 hp. A stock 34 w.o. venturi can too, but the jetting is a challenge. also the ignition almost has to be programmable if you want a decent result. And you don´t have to buy the overprized units from BAS. There are other options.
As a comment to Paul´s old comment on cams. As I have stated many times elsewhere, if you want to use stock carb or modified stock carb induction the W cams are NOT what you want. The engines can be tuned to work fair, but the lower rpm range will always suffer. The milder Scat cams - soso. The pre 2002 C25 was quite good, the latter a little more troublesome. CB has a range of standard cams that work really well, so does Pauter and also Steve Long.
The more displacement the easier it is (naturally) to get some air speed into the manifold at idle, but on sub 2 liter engines I can make a stock carbed or modified carbed engine idle dead steady at approx 875 and still pull just around 100 hp at 4800 rpm. I have a 125ish hp 2165 in the bench right now that idles steady at 800 rpm. As the saying goes, and it really makes sense here: its ALL in the combo. _________________ https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=435993 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|