| Author |
Message |
turboblue Samba Member

Joined: October 09, 2003 Posts: 4216 Location: Central Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| If they had made a key-groove in the different parts that mate together the twisting problem would have been pretty much solved, or at least to a greater length... |
It's been done.
Suzuki GS 750 engine we tried in a 3/4 open wheel midget race car was a keyed roller bearing crank.
Sent it to Falicon crankshaft in Florida.
Did every trick in their book, we still yanked it out of index and cracked the TIG welds.
It did drive off the end of the crank rather than at a right angle like a motorcycle would.
Maybe that's why it didn't work..........  _________________ Gary
Turbo VW Sand Drag Buggy
"If you don't run into the Devil every once in awhile, you must be going in the same direction!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OGSquare Samba Member
Joined: March 18, 2008 Posts: 244 Location: N. Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Stuggi wrote: |
| miniman82 wrote: |
Let me make a suggestion (always been an idea of mine):
What if the roller crank were used only to reduce friction in a highly efficient engine? You know, not so much to achieve a high power engine, but a small engine capable of high MPG? |
I'm not quite certain that they would add much to the MPG, they don't reduce friction very much, but then again I'm not a very experienced builder so my opinion isn't worth much... ^^
|
Stupid Q, Stuggi. If rollers don't reduce friction much, what good are they?
I get to ask stupid Q's, TB. I have a T3 and it isn't a race car.  _________________ Early 71 Stock Squareback
Early 65 Stock Doublecab
63 Stock Beetle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
junior55 Samba Member
Joined: October 01, 2006 Posts: 941
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I saw a segmented "bolt together" & "SPLINED" coupled full-circle-roller crank somewhere around on the web and it still had a list of problems that made it impractical in real life conditions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EZGZ Samba Member
Joined: October 10, 2005 Posts: 923 Location: Loveland, Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a SPG flywheel that was made for the roller crank.
It is aluminum and weighs about 7lbs. It has the steel starter ring and a steel peace for the clutch to ride against.
When I tried it on my standard crank 1776 it worked ok. Reved faster due to the weight savings but had a unusual sound when starting. would kind of ring like a bell.......
Anyway, I guess the lighter weight flywheel was to offset the heavy crank.
I always heard that they ran nice a smooth and helped low end power. Guess they weren't ment for sustained high RPM though.
Cool idea. Has worked great on the Harley Davidson V-twins for many decades. _________________ 64 custom Ghia, 66 Bug, Sandrail, Barrien tub |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turboblue Samba Member

Joined: October 09, 2003 Posts: 4216 Location: Central Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OGSquare wrote: |
| Stuggi wrote: |
| miniman82 wrote: |
Let me make a suggestion (always been an idea of mine):
What if the roller crank were used only to reduce friction in a highly efficient engine? You know, not so much to achieve a high power engine, but a small engine capable of high MPG? |
I'm not quite certain that they would add much to the MPG, they don't reduce friction very much, but then again I'm not a very experienced builder so my opinion isn't worth much... ^^
|
Stupid Q, Stuggi. If rollers don't reduce friction much, what good are they?
I get to ask stupid Q's, TB. I have a T3 and it isn't a race car.  |
I ain't mad at ya OG.......
They do reduce friction somewhat.
Instead of using HP to maintain oil pressure at 20-60 psi or whatever, they run at a much lower pressure and use volume for lubrication.
Yeah Harley has made that work for years but again they are at right angles to the drivetrain instead of direct drive trhough the clutch.
Seems to make a difference. _________________ Gary
Turbo VW Sand Drag Buggy
"If you don't run into the Devil every once in awhile, you must be going in the same direction!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stuggi Samba Member

Joined: October 16, 2007 Posts: 1208 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've read somewhere that they didn't reduce friction that much, and the roller cranks still use normal case bearings in VW applications, it's just the rod-bearings that are different, at least on the ones I've seen.
And it's like putting an unexploded WWII hand-grenade in your engine, if it gets jerked out of index it'll destroy your engine in a very effective fashion. _________________
1970 Beetle
1969 Panelvan
Orange VW Fest!
Pulled out of a Lake Fest! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sbnova Samba Member
Joined: January 27, 2005 Posts: 741 Location: Lakeland,FL
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Guess they weren't ment for sustained high RPM though.
|
Maybe not sustained like road racing or blasting down the freeway, but my neighbor has a roller crank in his VW dragster. It hasnt run in 20 years, but he said it turned 10,000 rpm regularly. His whole engine was probably quite innovative for its time. He also did all his own machine work. He's not known for story telling, so I believe him. _________________ Link to my build thread- Updated 6-6-07 http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=210613
check my sites to see my work;
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1564293 (bug)
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/448794 (Vette,Nova,Typhoon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ALB Samba Member
Joined: August 05, 2008 Posts: 3506 Location: beautiful suburban Wet Coast of Canada
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| They reduce friction considerably- enough to make a stock cammed motor with dual carbs run like the same plain crank motor with a 280 degree cam (see my previous post). Iirc the main bearings had to be modified so the big ends of the rods were lubed with a constant spray or mist of oil. Al |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jengel451 Samba Member

Joined: July 15, 2007 Posts: 479 Location: Greenacres, WA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sbnova wrote: |
| Quote: |
Guess they weren't ment for sustained high RPM though.
|
Maybe not sustained like road racing or blasting down the freeway, but my neighbor has a roller crank in his VW dragster. It hasnt run in 20 years, but he said it turned 10,000 rpm regularly. His whole engine was probably quite innovative for its time. He also did all his own machine work. He's not known for story telling, so I believe him. |
The same basic design is used today in 250cc Road Racing motorcycles running 14,000 RPM's pushing over 90hp. Average around 1500km before they need to be rebuilt though. _________________ 63 Dee "lux Interior" RIP Lux
09 R1 Track Weapon
66 Ducati 160 Monza Jr
64 Ducati Mountaineer
72 Z50a PitMonster
Last edited by Jengel451 on Thu Oct 16, 2008 5:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
special-k Samba Member
Joined: September 26, 2008 Posts: 178 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually roller bearing get away with a lot less oil supply. Thats why 2 strokes and modern 4 stroke dirt bikes use them. Kawasaki used them for years on H-1's and Z-1's and they were the bike to have for drag racing for more than 20 years. The only reason car/bike companies went to plain bearings was to save money initially. My .02 cents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perrib Samba Member
Joined: September 14, 2004 Posts: 3402 Location: Chandler, Az
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If your on a budget a roller crank is not for you. A roller engine is a blast to drive offroad. I got to use my friends Baja with 2180 roller engine. The engine had a lot of hard miles on it. He had run many off road stadium races with it. He did state it was very expensive to make them work. You would be better off using a plain bearing crank. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tncsparky Samba Member
Joined: November 29, 2008 Posts: 703 Location: santa rosa
|
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
look what i have
82mm empi roller that is pinned
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiftysevenvw Samba Member
Joined: May 03, 2008 Posts: 3 Location: Baldwin, N.Y.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:55 pm Post subject: Roller Crank |
|
|
| After looking at the pics. the rod side clearance looks awful excessive. Is that normal for a roller crank? The oil must gush out quite fast and how do you keep the oil pressure at an acceptable range? There is a lot of dirt on that crank and cleaning it, how can you be sure the dirt isn't accumulated in the rod bearing area? Just something to consider. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gears Samba Member

Joined: October 28, 2002 Posts: 4411 Location: Tamarack, Bend, Kailua
|
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There isn't any oil pressure to lose from the rod bearings. Oil is sprayed to the rod externally from notched main bearings (which is why the rod's large side clearance and windows are important design features).
Yes, oil cleanliness is critical with the SPG.
I've seen the earliest (non-pinned) 82mm stroker SPG last 20 years in a high performance street engine. They weren't intended for drag racing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Terry Cloyd Banned
Joined: March 23, 2004 Posts: 2218 Location: Valley Center "SO CAL"
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Too funny that the Inch Pincher drag raced with a roller crank. It had 88mm bore x 82mm stroke with SPG roller crank assembly and dual 48IDA Webers, EMPI 851 camshaft and 39mm x 35.5mm ported heads. All you need to do is to pin the cranks in 4 places to keep them from twisting out of index. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vanapplebomb Samba Member

Joined: November 03, 2010 Posts: 5573 Location: Holland, MI
|
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some of you guys might find this cool. Tatra uses roller bearings on their disk web crankshafts. They are bolted together subassemblies so they can put all the rollers on. The main bearings on their v8 and v12 diesel engines are massive! These diesels are built to the hilt, no cost object engines.
Notice the 7 large main bearings on the crank webs. This is the crankshaft used in Tatras v12 diesel engines.
This is what a v8 Tatra engine look like from the outside. It is just over 12 liters and is fully air cooled. What a beast!
This is one of the massive trucks that the engines are installed in.
_________________ 1800 Type 4 Berrien 295
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=487021 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vdubwizard Samba Member
Joined: May 14, 2008 Posts: 52 Location: Palomar Mountain, Calif
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 2:38 am Post subject: Roller Crank |
|
|
If anyone has any questions about the roller crank, as in a fix, repairs, or pinning, the newest found Roller Guru is "Gary, The Roller Crank Guru at 714-997-9785 " as of 2012 when I called him, he is in or near Anaheim, CA.
Plan on calling him myself soon for a couple roller cranks. Pinning, indexing, and rod pin bushing all is simple tasks for Gary, hope to send him a crank soon for a long term engine ( street, not drags). Don't drop the clutch! G _________________ Please use <vdubwizard> for all messages, Big foot does not work correctly? Long rod Engines slow the piston down at TDC and BDC to let more flow and less angle to the pistons which helps the engine to last longer, less wear, and move the power band up the scale a bit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quokka42 Samba Member

Joined: December 02, 2010 Posts: 3117 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roller bearings definitely have a friction advantage when pressurised oil to the bearing isn't available, but the factor that hasn't been brought up this time around is their behaviour under detonation - they can quickly become toast! _________________ There has only ever been one man who was perfect, and they nailed Him to a cross. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bashr52 Samba Member

Joined: July 16, 2006 Posts: 5669 Location: On an island in VA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Roller cranks are cool, but in a 1641? Why bother? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raygreenwood Samba Member
Joined: November 24, 2008 Posts: 23593 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uh....no....roller bearing, cranks have no friction reduction properties. There is many, many studies done all the way back to the advent of roller bearings being used in the first steam locomotives (Timkin project). In that individual case because journal box bearings had much higher rolling resistance.
Roller bearing cranks were found by aircraft companies, motorcyle manufacturers and a wide range of others...to have lower rolling resistance and less wear to the very expensive crank.
But because of more metal to metal contact, within the bearing itself....the roller bearing actually has more friction, heat and a shorter life.
For the most part, only low budget (and thats a relative term) auto crank mfgs and motorcycle engine mfgs whose cranks and engines are much lower rotating mass.....made pressed together roller cranks.
Most high end applications were either splined or pinned journals.
Friction and rolling resistance are joined at the hip but are NOT the same thing. The only use for roller cranks was reduction of rolling resistance making for a more free revving engine. This made for noticeable inefficiencies in engines when maintaining engine rpm at high speeds when right on the fringe of adding power or technically coasting.
This was the original efficiency use in steam locomotives. Once up to speed there was a definite reduction in coal usage in tons per 100 miles in sustaining, speed. Ray
Last edited by raygreenwood on Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|