Author |
Message |
TinCanFab Samba Member
Joined: April 04, 2006 Posts: 2743 Location: Waterford, California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:43 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
I've been reading dyno charts and looking at random info on the newer rx8 engines. I knew they consumed oil and fuel-some of the other things I've been reading are pretty surprising. Still, with your max hp coming in around 8500 RPM and max torque at 5500??? At below 3000 RPM the torque is weak like a 1600 ACVW. I don't see it as an improvement over the subie at all. No aircooled trans can handle this fast revving engine in a daily driver. You would need the matching trans as well. After all that hackage, I'd be kicking myself for not doing a small block v8 instead. If rotary swaps are so good, they be popular still. In the 80's, it seemed more popular than the Subaru. But the 80's Suburu engine was not sporty or a real upgrade. Now, the Subaru is a powerhouse without the quirkyness of the rotary.
There are a lot of things that can fail in a VW trans. Besides all the power it has to handle, it's obvious when you take one apart it's not meant to spin at 8500. Most of the common racing mods for a tranny are for better shifts and power handling. Even then, drag race cars are not doing their 8,000 RPM every day. Just look at the play in the input shaft. The ancient designed hubs,gears, bearings, type of gear oil, etc. The more you look, the more you notice it's a terrible match for highway miles with VW trans. It's a low geared miniature heavy duty truck gearbox. I don't think any of the common mods will save trans death while holding 5-6000 RPM long drives. I know it seems like a cool swap from a size perspective, but I think it's a bad idea. _________________ Check out my truck brought back from the dead... http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=420762&highlight=sprayed+blood
They're never really ever finished 58 rag build...
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=658092 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gprudenciop Samba Member

Joined: July 06, 2008 Posts: 606 Location: portland or
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:38 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
I was thinking of buying a subaru as a daily driver and researching a swap for a type 1 after finding out that my type IV case was not usable. After I read some guides on subaru engine rebuilding I changed my mind. Boxer engines biggest gain are that they are light and short from the flywheel to the crank pulley. An aluminum split engine case does not hold up well to abuse and in the subaru's case the best option is with a new engine replacement. Along with the adapter plate ,what to do for a transaxle ,the huge amount of wiring and boogering up the car with a radiator it is not practical in my own opinion. If the case held shape it would be a different story.
I was/am looking into a rx8 swap but every one wants top dollar for a engine that has to be a replaced warranty version because the originals were garbage and they themselves are swapped out because of negative aspects. This is looking to be non practical as well. Some my say stupid.  |
yup! using a subaru that warps cases and having to booger up your car with a radiator is a bad decision!! swaping in an rx8 is going to be so much easier not having to worry about size and a radiator. only thing better would be a 5.0 motor!!!  _________________ Never look down at anybody unless you are helping them up..
Loaning someone your strength instead of reminding them of their weakness = kindness.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the2ndcashboy Samba Member

Joined: March 19, 2007 Posts: 827 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:14 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
Dude, have you just ignored everything I posted? A non-turbo Forester (the car YOU picked remember) puts out 165hp AT THE WHEELS and runs 16.8 with an auto trans. A 5.0 Fox body puts out 210hp ALSO AT THE WHEELS and runs 16 flat with an auto. OF COURSE your 5.0 will beat a non-turbo Subaru, it's got FIFTY MORE HORSEPOWER. All cars sold since the early 70's have been rated in WHEEL HORSEPOWER. That includes SHITTY FORDS.
There, I put the important parts in caps so maybe you won't be able to gloss over it again. I really don't know why I'm bothering the though. I think I'm done here. _________________
SRP1 wrote: |
You see....... He talks in code and translation requires a priest, geologist, astronomer, biophysicist, and Indiana Jones. |
modok wrote: |
If anything comes out perfect it just means your measuring tools are substandard. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:52 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
I was thinking of buying a subaru as a daily driver and researching a swap for a type 1 after finding out that my type IV case was not usable. After I read some guides on subaru engine rebuilding I changed my mind. Boxer engines biggest gain are that they are light and short from the flywheel to the crank pulley. An aluminum split engine case does not hold up well to abuse and in the subaru's case the best option is with a new engine replacement. Along with the adapter plate ,what to do for a transaxle ,the huge amount of wiring and boogering up the car with a radiator it is not practical in my own opinion. If the case held shape it would be a different story.
I was/am looking into a rx8 swap but every one wants top dollar for a engine that has to be a replaced warranty version because the originals were garbage and they themselves are swapped out because of negative aspects. This is looking to be non practical as well. Some my say stupid.  _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dsrtfox Samba Member

Joined: August 25, 2009 Posts: 443 Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:27 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
An all wheel drive Impreza weighs about 3,400 lbs. If you put the same engine in a 2,000 pound Type 1 it will run circles around your Fox Mustang. All of that aside you guys are 2 different kinds of enthusiasts, there is no right answer. But I'll tell you this, the Subaru conversion is not a fad. More are being built all the time. Also remember Subaru advertises there engines with full smog controls. If you pull all that shit off of one and get a pro tune you'll have an easy 200 hp. It takes one hell of a ACVW to match that and it certainly won't go 150K with nothing more than oil changes.
One mans opinion  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:51 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
http://myquartermile.com/qtrmile.php?make=Subaru
It looks like here from the figures that any subaru under a 14 second quarter mile time is a turbo and all of those over are a non turbo. So I can head out in my pony car and beat a non turbo subaru if Ichose and risk the legal fees. Or, I can assume that when I see a non turbo subaru being beaten on by a kid who borrowed it from the parents and not getting out of it's own way that they are not that fast. _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:29 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
Quote: |
What's the point of comparing random other cars to the Subaru? |
My point is that other car's ,honda ,toyota etcetera with simular engines (multivalve comparative displacement) are going to have the same peak Hp output that is not accurate in my opinion ,or in other words the slow honda is as good as the subaru. My 5.0 comparison lies in the fact that almost all pony cars with a better exhuast and intake are going to vastly out perform a stock non turbo ,non 4 cam subaru and the pony car is putting out the same figure at the flywheel that subaru claims that they are putting out at the wheels. _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the2ndcashboy Samba Member

Joined: March 19, 2007 Posts: 827 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
I think the 4 cam subaru and the turbo versions have decent power but are too intrusive for a swap in a type 1. For the real world Hp increase of a dual cam 2.0- 2.2 subaru of 25 Hp compared to a stroked aircooled vw, I would put a type V in the car. Even 25 Hp is substantial but with the amount of work involved is too much in my opinion just to say you have a subaru in it. A bus is a different situation. |
Ah, but the trick is actually comparing a Subaru to a stroked aircooled VW. We know what the Subarus put out (whether you want to believe it or not, the info is out there and has been verified). The general run of ACVW's? Not so much. I think there's a tremendous amount of HP inflation going on, especially in the people who build their own motors. I estimate my motor puts out around 120hp (1915 w/DRLAs, W120 cam, and Tims Stage II's) and I know it would have been a HELL of a lot cheaper to just put in an EJ20, and probably less man-hours too. Plus I could easily plop a turbo on an EJ20 and dramatically boost the HP. Not to mention that hypothetical EJ20 would be much lower maintenance and longer-lived than my high-strung ACVW.
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
If you have a car with a broad/flat torque peak curve you don't miss the manual transmission because the faster shifts make up for the Hp loss and auto's can withstand more power at a fraction of the cost of a manual. Some auto's don't have a lot of mass to spin either.
Where does a non charged subaru land in a comparison to other sedans like an accord or an avenger in a acceleration test? |
I'm not going to sit here Googling 1/4 mile times for you all day just for you to keep moving the goalposts, especially when there's no point at all. How many Accord or Avenger motors have you seen in a VW? What's the point of comparing random other cars to the Subaru? If you want random numbers: the Firebird with a 3.8 V6 had 200hp and ran 4 tenths slower than the 5.0 Fox with only 10 more HP. Was that relevant in any way to VW's? _________________
SRP1 wrote: |
You see....... He talks in code and translation requires a priest, geologist, astronomer, biophysicist, and Indiana Jones. |
modok wrote: |
If anything comes out perfect it just means your measuring tools are substandard. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead

Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 17844 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:04 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
read post #9
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2308074
I have an identical(ish) build in my bus.
187 at all 4 wheels. n/a.
so, when you guys decide to pull your heads out of the sand, do some homework and realize you can do a "modest" (by Subaru guys definition) 200+ hp n/a build for a fraction of what it would cost to do aircooled....and it will survive forever, why would you f*ck with this old technology and piss poor parts?
every time I stick my head in this forum, there is always some catastrophe, be it a noob or a old timer. sorry, not fun to me anymore
SOHC's fit all vw platforms just fine. I think you need to trim bumper brackets? apron? in a bug (not a bug guy, so I don't know) _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 5:11 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
I think the 4 cam subaru and the turbo versions have decent power but are too intrusive for a swap in a type 1. For the real world Hp increase of a dual cam 2.0- 2.2 subaru of 25 Hp compared to a stroked aircooled vw, I would put a type V in the car. Even 25 Hp is substantial but with the amount of work involved is too much in my opinion just to say you have a subaru in it. A bus is a different situation.
Quote: |
but it had an auto trans. |
If you have a car with a broad/flat torque peak curve you don't miss the manual transmission because the faster shifts make up for the Hp loss and auto's can withstand more power at a fraction of the cost of a manual. Some auto's don't have a lot of mass to spin either.
Where does a non charged subaru land in a comparison to other sedans like an accord or an avenger in a acceleration test? _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the2ndcashboy Samba Member

Joined: March 19, 2007 Posts: 827 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:44 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
Autoparts suppliers historically do not stock a lot of parts for subaru's. I assumed this was because the market was bad for them because they did not break down. |
And VW's are better? Hell, my brother even had a New Beetle and getting parts for that thing was a nightmare. Everything was special order.
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
To reiterate my opinion on high peak Hp cars that can't do crap on the street; if the dyno numbers are true they don't include 10-30 oil ,accessories, (an alternator) etcetera or the engine is barely ever in its narrow peak Hp range. The only ricers I see not backing down to a race with a modified pony car are ones that are running over 15lb of boost. |
Oh so now it's "modified" pony cars? That's a real apples-to-apples comparison. And why are we even talking about 5.0's? Does anyone put them in VW's? I'm confused  _________________
SRP1 wrote: |
You see....... He talks in code and translation requires a priest, geologist, astronomer, biophysicist, and Indiana Jones. |
modok wrote: |
If anything comes out perfect it just means your measuring tools are substandard. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the2ndcashboy Samba Member

Joined: March 19, 2007 Posts: 827 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:30 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
You changed the comparison to turbos and the 4 cam subaru's don't filt well in a type 1.What's does a stock impreza get in the quarter without a charger, 16's? |
You didn't say which Forester now did you? I was attempting to make the closest comparison possible between the two vehicles. You just didn't know there was a Forester that could spank a 5.0 . Just FYI, the non-turbo Forester does the 1/4 in 16.8 @ 165hp, but it had an auto trans. The auto trans 5.0 (210hp) did around 16 in the 1/4. So your original comment about smaller lighter cars with more HP getting beat still doesn't make sense. When it comes to modern cars, horsepower is horsepower. They don't really play games with the numbers like they do with fuel economy. It is possible that a lower hp car can beat a higher hp car (for instance, the original model of that Forester XT ran high 13's with 10 less hp), but its usually because of weight, gear ratios, auto vs manual trans, etc. _________________
SRP1 wrote: |
You see....... He talks in code and translation requires a priest, geologist, astronomer, biophysicist, and Indiana Jones. |
modok wrote: |
If anything comes out perfect it just means your measuring tools are substandard. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:04 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
Autoparts suppliers historically do not stock a lot of parts for subaru's. I assumed this was because the market was bad for them because they did not break down.
To reiterate my opinion on high peak Hp cars that can't do crap on the street; if the dyno numbers are true they don't include 10-30 oil ,accessories, (an alternator) etcetera or the engine is barely ever in its narrow peak Hp range. The only ricers I see not backing down to a race with a modified pony car are ones that are running over 15lb of boost. _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead

Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 17844 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:00 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
PumaVW79 wrote: |
skills@eurocarsplus wrote: |
if you don't do a new shortblock like I did, you can do a swap for the 3-4k range...that will barely buy you a new 1600...sorry but if I need another engine I will do another swap. |
It's ok but I still choose the 1600. Performing an engine swap in order to gain more hp in an ACVW is like shooting fish in a barrel.
It would make more sense to swap whole cars. |
another narrow minded aircooled die hard...
so taking the 65 horse V8 out of a 34 ford coupe is a no go? I should look into a big block corvette instead...gotcha _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PumaVW79 Samba Member

Joined: January 31, 2012 Posts: 486 Location: WGS84: 22.9083° S, 43.1964° W
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:51 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
skills@eurocarsplus wrote: |
if you don't do a new shortblock like I did, you can do a swap for the 3-4k range...that will barely buy you a new 1600...sorry but if I need another engine I will do another swap. |
It's ok but I still choose the 1600. Performing an engine swap in order to gain more hp in an ACVW is like shooting fish in a barrel.
It would make more sense to swap whole cars. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dale M. Samba Member

Joined: April 12, 2006 Posts: 20807 Location: Just a tiny bit west of Yosemite Valley
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:33 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
Another advantage of the Subie is its a new modern engine, lets say 150HP(?) at wheels stock, and if you are on the road and have a engine problem you stand a better chance of getting parts for engine at local FLAPS the you highly modified VWAC engine....
Friend of mine built beautiful Porsche RSK kit car and originally put a 125hp at the wheel ACVW motor and the idea of getting parts while car was on road was a worry to him... He upgraded to Subie (not sure what version) but with the EFI and added horsepower it put more life into car as to speed (cruise) and acceleration, and made car a lot more fun to drive and engine is in stock form....
Dale _________________ “Fear The Government That Wants To Take Your Guns"
"Kellison Sand Piper Roadster" For Street & Show.
"Joe Pody Sandrover" Buggy with 2180 for Autocross (Sold)
============================================================
All suggestions and advice are purely my own opinion. You are free to ignore them if you wish ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skills@eurocarsplus Samba Peckerhead

Joined: January 01, 2007 Posts: 17844 Location: sticksville, ct.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:30 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
from wiki
The EJ engine was introduced in the 1989 Subaru Legacy to replace the EA engines. It was designed from scratch with five main crankshaft bearings and four valves per cylinder and can be either SOHC or DOHC and one timing belt. The fifth digit is the only way to tell without seeing the engine.
Subaru EJ20H twin turboEJ15: 1483.4 cc SOHC, 1990–2003 JDM Subaru Impreza
EJ16: 90 hp at 5,600 rpm used in the 1993–2006 Subaru Impreza
EJ18: 1820 cc SOHC 110 hp at 5,600 rpm used in the 1993–1996 Subaru Impreza and Euro and JDM Subaru Legacy
EJ20: 1994.3 cc, available in Europe and Japan naturally aspirated at 115–190 hp and with a Turbo 220–280 hp used on Most Models, (2002–2005 WRX in the United States)
EJ22: 2212 cc, 135–280 hp used in the 1989–2001 Subaru Impreza and Subaru Legacy
EJ25: 2457 cc, 165–320 hp found in Most Models 1995–Present
EJ30: Special limited engine. Four were built by Subaru, but only 3 remain in working condition. There is no readily available technical or power information on these engines.
Generally the EJ-series can be divided into two versions: the Phase I engines (1989–1998) and the Phase II engines (1999–2010). The Phase II engines featured new cylinder heads and crankshafts with the thrust bearing located at crank bearing #5 instead of #3. The designation also changed from Phase I to Phase II. All Phase I engines have an alphanumerical suffix behind the standard EJXX designation, all Phase II engines have a numerical suffix behind the EJXX designation. _________________
gprudenciop wrote: |
my reason for switching to subaru is my german car was turning chinese so i said fuck it and went japanese....... |
Jake Raby wrote: |
Thanks for the correction. I used to be a nice guy, then I ruined it by exposing myself to the public. |
Brian wrote: |
Also the fact that people are agreeing with Skills, it's a turn of events for samba history |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:21 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
You changed the comparison to turbos and the 4 cam subaru's don't filt well in a type 1.What's does a stock impreza get in the quarter without a charger, 16's? _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the2ndcashboy Samba Member

Joined: March 19, 2007 Posts: 827 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 5:04 am Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
theKbStockpiler wrote: |
So a Forester can beat a Fox body 5.0 in a quarter mile then? |
Yes, depending on which Forester of course. The 5.0's ran 14.7-15 in stock trim with ~210hp (the pre-85 5.0 was significantly worse/slower). The Subaru Forester with the 230hp EJ25 Turbo ran 14.3. I still don't see your point. _________________
SRP1 wrote: |
You see....... He talks in code and translation requires a priest, geologist, astronomer, biophysicist, and Indiana Jones. |
modok wrote: |
If anything comes out perfect it just means your measuring tools are substandard. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theKbStockpiler Samba Member

Joined: July 07, 2012 Posts: 2316 Location: Rust Belt
|
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 11:00 pm Post subject: Re: Mazda 3 engine swap? |
|
|
So a Forester can beat a Fox body 5.0 in a quarter mile then? _________________ My beetle is not competing with your beetle. I have the yellow beetle in my town. There is a red one, a green one ......
Use all safety devices including a mask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|