Hello! Log in or Register   |  Help  |  Donate  |  Premium Membership  |  Buy Shirts See all banner ads | Advertise on TheSamba.com  
TheSamba.com
 
CB merged header VS AA sidewinder
Page: 1, 2  Next
Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions Share: Facebook Twitter
Reply to topic
Print View
Quick sort: Show newest posts on top | Show oldest posts on top View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vugbug68
Samba Member


Joined: June 25, 2006
Posts: 2701
Location: sacramento
vugbug68 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:03 am    Post subject: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Looking to up my header size to 1-5/8" on my 2109

Cant decide between the CB with my Bugpack hideaway muffler
http://www.cbperformance.com/product-p/3658.htm

Or the AA system that comes with a muffler
http://aapistons.com/collections/sidewinders/products/aa-sidewinder-ex-system-1-5-8-w-muffler

I've heard the AA system is loud

My current set up is a Berg 1-1/2", I like the sound I just think 1-5/8" will perform better

Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
71 Super
66 Corvair
69 Baja Bug
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
bugguy1967
Samba Member


Joined: January 16, 2008
Posts: 4368
Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
bugguy1967 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:05 am    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

You have to tell us whether you're after performace or sound. For performance, the best way to know FOR SURE is to either dyno test or invest in a wideband. The wideband will let you know if the exhaust is more efficient or not for your particular engine combination. No one can actually tell you what exhaust works best unless they actually have or had the same combo as you and have tested.

Weld a bung onto your current system, tune it, pull the exhaust off and install your new system with an O2 sensor bung, test that one. If you need to richen up certain areas, it flows better. If your jetting is too rich, put your old one back on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jpaull
Samba Member


Joined: February 22, 2005
Posts: 3680
Location: Paradise, Ca
jpaull is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:16 am    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

The AA is "louder" cause it has a performance type muffler. Your running a quiet pack style muffler that is well....quiet..... Its not a performance muffler in any way.

If you like the Hide-A-Way style, I would spend $50 more then that AA setup you mentioned and get the same thing in Stainless from Carcraft:

http://carcraftstore.com/sidewinder158exhaustsystem.aspx

You will definitely notice a difference in power from what you have now. For $50 more, you get something that doesn't rust and turn to crap. Its so much nicer to work with. $350 for a complete stainless system is a great deal.
_________________
[email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg

Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 80459
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:42 am    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

[quote="jpaull"Your running a quiet pack style muffler that is well....quiet..... Its not a performance muffler in any way. [/quote]
That's a generalization that's not true for every quiet pack.

Gene Berg GB-933S 1-5/8" merged, GB-971A-2M dual muffler
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


This was on for less than a day. It was loud, obnoxious and had less bottom end than the dual QPs.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare

עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jpaull
Samba Member


Joined: February 22, 2005
Posts: 3680
Location: Paradise, Ca
jpaull is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 12:10 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.

Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.

Jeff


Glenn wrote:
[quote="jpaull"Your running a quiet pack style muffler that is well....quiet..... Its not a performance muffler in any way.

That's a generalization that's not true for every quiet pack.

Gene Berg GB-933S 1-5/8" merged, GB-971A-2M dual muffler
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.


This was on for less than a day. It was loud, obnoxious and had less bottom end than the dual QPs.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.
[/quote]
_________________
[email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg

Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 80459
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 12:55 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

jpaull wrote:
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.

Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.

Jeff

1776 dual 36 Dells, ported heads 40x35 single HD springs, all balanced with a single QP.

It ran great for 87,000 miles.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare

עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jpaull
Samba Member


Joined: February 22, 2005
Posts: 3680
Location: Paradise, Ca
jpaull is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:37 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Very cool Glenn. Always good to see people put some real miles on their Vw's. (You woulda had more power with your dual quiet packs or anything else then that single though) Very Happy



Glenn wrote:
jpaull wrote:
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.

Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.

Jeff

1776 dual 36 Dells, ported heads 40x35 single HD springs, all balanced with a single QP.

It ran great for 87,000 miles.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

_________________
[email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg

Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 80459
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:19 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

jpaull wrote:
Very cool Glenn. Always good to see people put some real miles on their Vw's. (You woulda had more power with your dual quiet packs or anything else then that single though) Very Happy



Glenn wrote:
jpaull wrote:
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.

Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.

Jeff

1776 dual 36 Dells, ported heads 40x35 single HD springs, all balanced with a single QP.

It ran great for 87,000 miles.
Image may have been reduced in size. Click image to view fullscreen.

I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power.
_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare

עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
jpaull
Samba Member


Joined: February 22, 2005
Posts: 3680
Location: Paradise, Ca
jpaull is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:42 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Once your exhaust gets to the muffler flange its met all the backpressure it needs providing your header is proper size. This is why someone can run a open stinger on a vw. Annoying as hell but they work.

I ran 5 exhausts an a 1600 stock but dual carbs and lowest restriction had the most power. The single quiet pack was the slowest. Experience is king, if you tried them all and more restriction works for you then great.






[/quote]
I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power.[/quote]
_________________
[email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg

Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Facebook Gallery Classifieds Feedback
74 Thing
Samba Member


Joined: September 02, 2004
Posts: 7677

74 Thing is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:19 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

If you want to use the same merged hideaway muffler then just get a Berg 1 5/8" since the flanges will match up. Al's headers make them so you can look for that.

If you are looking for something different and to make power look at a Mohr stepped header with muffler set up..
http://www.mohrprf.com/products/stepheader.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 80459
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 5:07 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

jpaull wrote:
Once your exhaust gets to the muffler flange its met all the backpressure it needs providing your header is proper size. This is why someone can run a open stinger on a vw. Annoying as hell but they work.

I ran 5 exhausts an a 1600 stock but dual carbs and lowest restriction had the most power. The single quiet pack was the slowest. Experience is king, if you tried them all and more restriction works for you then great.







I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power.[/quote][/quote]

So you're saying a header with a stinger gives enough back pressure for street use?

You've just lost the debate.
_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare

עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
bugguy1967
Samba Member


Joined: January 16, 2008
Posts: 4368
Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
bugguy1967 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:01 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Glenn wrote:
jpaull wrote:
Once your exhaust gets to the muffler flange its met all the backpressure it needs providing your header is proper size. This is why someone can run a open stinger on a vw. Annoying as hell but they work.

I ran 5 exhausts an a 1600 stock but dual carbs and lowest restriction had the most power. The single quiet pack was the slowest. Experience is king, if you tried them all and more restriction works for you then great.







I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power.
[/quote]

So you're saying a header with a stinger gives enough back pressure for street use?

You've just lost the debate.[/quote]

I have to say that I disagree with your statement. I once believed that, because that's what everyone said, just like almost everything in our hobby. The more reading I did (Four Stroke Performance Tuning, several David Vizard books, How To Build Horsepower, The Design And Tuning Of Competition Engines, several online write-ups and articles), the more I truly believe that engines need high gas velocity/low backpressure. What your preaching is a myth, unless you can find some current literature to back your belief.


Last edited by bugguy1967 on Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
bugguy1967
Samba Member


Joined: January 16, 2008
Posts: 4368
Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
bugguy1967 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:23 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

In one David Vizard book I read, he went so far as to say ZERO back pressure is ideal. The main goal for best performance is to scavenge so well in the engine's operating range that intake charge is pulled in before the exhaust valve fully closes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
AlteWagen
Troll


Joined: February 23, 2007
Posts: 8748
Location: PNW
AlteWagen is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:29 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Ah the back pressure myth again.

I agree with high velocity with as little back pressure as possible. A restrictive muffler can cause reversion and hurt performance. Its true that anything beyond the collector is just for sound reduction. If the header design, primary tube size/length is optimized for the engine a stinger will work both on the track and street. If a muffler offers little to no back pressure you will not loose power.

On the other hand if the header is too large for the power band a restrictive muffler will make it feel better but its just a bandaid for poor planning.
_________________
Grapes of Wrath $200 Engine Rebuild
Official Dual Carb Thread
Cylinder Head Quick Reference Sheet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 27754
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:14 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

I don't see the difference. old guys call it backpressure, and new guys call it high velocity. So what, i don't think there has been any progress.

Anyhow, your muffler sucks. The tube between the header and muffler is bigger than both, ans that's your main problem.
If you describe heads and cam of this engine I might be able to guess more
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vugbug68
Samba Member


Joined: June 25, 2006
Posts: 2701
Location: sacramento
vugbug68 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:21 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

Quote:
So you're saying a header with a stinger gives enough back pressure for street use?

You've just lost the debate.


Yeah I disagree as well, I couldn't tell any performance difference between a stinger and single quiet pack. We need a dyno chart to see the difference throughout the rpms, my bet is the muffler will perform better at low rpm, lower than where most of your driving is.
_________________
71 Super
66 Corvair
69 Baja Bug
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
vugbug68
Samba Member


Joined: June 25, 2006
Posts: 2701
Location: sacramento
vugbug68 is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:23 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

modok wrote:


Anyhow, your muffler sucks. The tube between the header and muffler is bigger than both, ans that's your main problem.
If you describe heads and cam of this engine I might be able to guess more


Cool I was thinking the same thing. Leaning toward the sidewinder anyways.
_________________
71 Super
66 Corvair
69 Baja Bug
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Glenn Premium Member
Mr. 010


Joined: December 25, 2001
Posts: 80459
Location: Sneaking up behind you
Glenn is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:50 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

bugguy1967 wrote:
I have to say that I disagree with your statement. I once believed that, because that's what everyone said, just like almost everything in our hobby. The more reading I did (Four Stroke Performance Tuning, several David Vizard books, How To Build Horsepower, The Design And Tuning Of Competition Engines, several online write-ups and articles), the more I truly believe that engines need high gas velocity/low backpressure. What your preaching is a myth, unless you can find some current literature to back your belief.

Are we talking race or street engines?

Because using a stinger on the street sucks below 3000rpm.
_________________
Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"

Member #1009

#BlueSquare

עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Gallery Classifieds Feedback
stan_tichomirov
Samba Member


Joined: May 24, 2005
Posts: 1719
Location: San Francisco, CA
stan_tichomirov is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:57 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

I don't know, I love running a stinger, but it's just too loud to run. I feel more power up top and hit the rev limiter easier, I don't really feel the loss at lower revs, at least not enough to miss. Can still putt around and climb hills. I'd run it more often but it's just too loud, and can be a hazard (I park on the street often).

Stan
_________________
Aircooled.net
Jansen Enterprise
My 1835cc build
My budget 2276 build
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
modok
Samba Member


Joined: October 30, 2009
Posts: 27754
Location: Colorado Springs
modok is offline 

PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:17 pm    Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder Reply with quote

I'm leaning towards I have no clue.
one way to guess at it: 35.5mm exhaust valve try sidewinder, 37.5mm then stay with classic design header (short tubes)

In either case, the mufflers can be improved. IMO, if you can live with the dragging, then the hideaway is a great layout, but, one size muffler does not fit all, so to get best performance you may need to go muffler hunting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Gallery Classifieds Feedback
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Performance/Engines/Transmissions All times are Mountain Standard Time/Pacific Daylight Savings Time
Page: 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

About | Help! | Advertise | Donate | Premium Membership | Privacy/Terms of Use | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1996-2025, Everett Barnes. All Rights Reserved.
Not affiliated with or sponsored by Volkswagen of America | Forum powered by phpBB
Links to eBay or other vendor sites may be affiliate links where the site receives compensation.