| Author |
Message |
vugbug68 Samba Member

Joined: June 25, 2006 Posts: 2701 Location: sacramento
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4368 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:05 am Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
You have to tell us whether you're after performace or sound. For performance, the best way to know FOR SURE is to either dyno test or invest in a wideband. The wideband will let you know if the exhaust is more efficient or not for your particular engine combination. No one can actually tell you what exhaust works best unless they actually have or had the same combo as you and have tested.
Weld a bung onto your current system, tune it, pull the exhaust off and install your new system with an O2 sensor bung, test that one. If you need to richen up certain areas, it flows better. If your jetting is too rich, put your old one back on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3680 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:16 am Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
The AA is "louder" cause it has a performance type muffler. Your running a quiet pack style muffler that is well....quiet..... Its not a performance muffler in any way.
If you like the Hide-A-Way style, I would spend $50 more then that AA setup you mentioned and get the same thing in Stainless from Carcraft:
http://carcraftstore.com/sidewinder158exhaustsystem.aspx
You will definitely notice a difference in power from what you have now. For $50 more, you get something that doesn't rust and turn to crap. Its so much nicer to work with. $350 for a complete stainless system is a great deal. _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenn  Mr. 010

Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 80459 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:42 am Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
[quote="jpaull"Your running a quiet pack style muffler that is well....quiet..... Its not a performance muffler in any way. [/quote]
That's a generalization that's not true for every quiet pack.
Gene Berg GB-933S 1-5/8" merged, GB-971A-2M dual muffler
This was on for less than a day. It was loud, obnoxious and had less bottom end than the dual QPs.
_________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3680 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 12:10 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.
Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.
Jeff
| Glenn wrote: |
| [quote="jpaull"Your running a quiet pack style muffler that is well....quiet..... Its not a performance muffler in any way. |
That's a generalization that's not true for every quiet pack.
Gene Berg GB-933S 1-5/8" merged, GB-971A-2M dual muffler
This was on for less than a day. It was loud, obnoxious and had less bottom end than the dual QPs.
[/quote] _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenn  Mr. 010

Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 80459 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 12:55 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| jpaull wrote: |
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.
Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.
Jeff
|
1776 dual 36 Dells, ported heads 40x35 single HD springs, all balanced with a single QP.
It ran great for 87,000 miles.
_________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3680 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:37 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
Very cool Glenn. Always good to see people put some real miles on their Vw's. (You woulda had more power with your dual quiet packs or anything else then that single though)
| Glenn wrote: |
| jpaull wrote: |
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.
Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.
Jeff
|
1776 dual 36 Dells, ported heads 40x35 single HD springs, all balanced with a single QP.
It ran great for 87,000 miles.
|
_________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenn  Mr. 010

Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 80459 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:19 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| jpaull wrote: |
Very cool Glenn. Always good to see people put some real miles on their Vw's. (You woulda had more power with your dual quiet packs or anything else then that single though)
| Glenn wrote: |
| jpaull wrote: |
Not a fair comparison that your making. You have TWO quiet packs. Once you give your exhaust that much space to flow its not much of a restriction.
Force all your exhaust through ONE quiet pack and my statement is true, its not a performance muffler.
Jeff
|
1776 dual 36 Dells, ported heads 40x35 single HD springs, all balanced with a single QP.
It ran great for 87,000 miles.
|
|
I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power. _________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpaull Samba Member

Joined: February 22, 2005 Posts: 3680 Location: Paradise, Ca
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:42 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
Once your exhaust gets to the muffler flange its met all the backpressure it needs providing your header is proper size. This is why someone can run a open stinger on a vw. Annoying as hell but they work.
I ran 5 exhausts an a 1600 stock but dual carbs and lowest restriction had the most power. The single quiet pack was the slowest. Experience is king, if you tried them all and more restriction works for you then great.
[/quote]
I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power.[/quote] _________________ [email protected] MPH 1/4 Mile & 8.1 @ 83.7MPH in 1/8 Mile with Mild Type 1 VW Mag Case 2234cc commuter engine in stock weight bug w/only .491 total lift(CB2292 Cam), 42x37 heads, 48idf's, Street tires, Belt on, Mufflers, Pump gas, video of the run here: https://youtu.be/M3SPqMOKAOg
Transmission by MCMScott:
Rhino case, Klinkenberg 4.12, Superdiff, 002 mainshaft with 091 first idler. Weddle 1.48 Third & 1.14 Fourth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
74 Thing Samba Member

Joined: September 02, 2004 Posts: 7677
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
If you want to use the same merged hideaway muffler then just get a Berg 1 5/8" since the flanges will match up. Al's headers make them so you can look for that.
If you are looking for something different and to make power look at a Mohr stepped header with muffler set up..
http://www.mohrprf.com/products/stepheader.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenn  Mr. 010

Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 80459 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 5:07 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| jpaull wrote: |
Once your exhaust gets to the muffler flange its met all the backpressure it needs providing your header is proper size. This is why someone can run a open stinger on a vw. Annoying as hell but they work.
I ran 5 exhausts an a 1600 stock but dual carbs and lowest restriction had the most power. The single quiet pack was the slowest. Experience is king, if you tried them all and more restriction works for you then great.
|
I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power.[/quote][/quote]
So you're saying a header with a stinger gives enough back pressure for street use?
You've just lost the debate. _________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4368 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| Glenn wrote: |
| jpaull wrote: |
Once your exhaust gets to the muffler flange its met all the backpressure it needs providing your header is proper size. This is why someone can run a open stinger on a vw. Annoying as hell but they work.
I ran 5 exhausts an a 1600 stock but dual carbs and lowest restriction had the most power. The single quiet pack was the slowest. Experience is king, if you tried them all and more restriction works for you then great.
|
I disagree. You need back pressure. Too much flow hurts power. |
[/quote]
So you're saying a header with a stinger gives enough back pressure for street use?
You've just lost the debate.[/quote]
I have to say that I disagree with your statement. I once believed that, because that's what everyone said, just like almost everything in our hobby. The more reading I did (Four Stroke Performance Tuning, several David Vizard books, How To Build Horsepower, The Design And Tuning Of Competition Engines, several online write-ups and articles), the more I truly believe that engines need high gas velocity/low backpressure. What your preaching is a myth, unless you can find some current literature to back your belief.
Last edited by bugguy1967 on Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugguy1967 Samba Member
Joined: January 16, 2008 Posts: 4368 Location: Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| In one David Vizard book I read, he went so far as to say ZERO back pressure is ideal. The main goal for best performance is to scavenge so well in the engine's operating range that intake charge is pulled in before the exhaust valve fully closes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlteWagen Troll

Joined: February 23, 2007 Posts: 8748 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:29 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
Ah the back pressure myth again.
I agree with high velocity with as little back pressure as possible. A restrictive muffler can cause reversion and hurt performance. Its true that anything beyond the collector is just for sound reduction. If the header design, primary tube size/length is optimized for the engine a stinger will work both on the track and street. If a muffler offers little to no back pressure you will not loose power.
On the other hand if the header is too large for the power band a restrictive muffler will make it feel better but its just a bandaid for poor planning. _________________ Grapes of Wrath $200 Engine Rebuild
Official Dual Carb Thread
Cylinder Head Quick Reference Sheet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
modok Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2009 Posts: 27754 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:14 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
I don't see the difference. old guys call it backpressure, and new guys call it high velocity. So what, i don't think there has been any progress.
Anyhow, your muffler sucks. The tube between the header and muffler is bigger than both, ans that's your main problem.
If you describe heads and cam of this engine I might be able to guess more |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vugbug68 Samba Member

Joined: June 25, 2006 Posts: 2701 Location: sacramento
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| Quote: |
So you're saying a header with a stinger gives enough back pressure for street use?
You've just lost the debate.
|
Yeah I disagree as well, I couldn't tell any performance difference between a stinger and single quiet pack. We need a dyno chart to see the difference throughout the rpms, my bet is the muffler will perform better at low rpm, lower than where most of your driving is. _________________ 71 Super
66 Corvair
69 Baja Bug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vugbug68 Samba Member

Joined: June 25, 2006 Posts: 2701 Location: sacramento
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:23 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| modok wrote: |
Anyhow, your muffler sucks. The tube between the header and muffler is bigger than both, ans that's your main problem.
If you describe heads and cam of this engine I might be able to guess more |
Cool I was thinking the same thing. Leaning toward the sidewinder anyways. _________________ 71 Super
66 Corvair
69 Baja Bug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenn  Mr. 010

Joined: December 25, 2001 Posts: 80459 Location: Sneaking up behind you
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:50 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
| bugguy1967 wrote: |
| I have to say that I disagree with your statement. I once believed that, because that's what everyone said, just like almost everything in our hobby. The more reading I did (Four Stroke Performance Tuning, several David Vizard books, How To Build Horsepower, The Design And Tuning Of Competition Engines, several online write-ups and articles), the more I truly believe that engines need high gas velocity/low backpressure. What your preaching is a myth, unless you can find some current literature to back your belief. |
Are we talking race or street engines?
Because using a stinger on the street sucks below 3000rpm. _________________ Glenn
74 Beetle Specs | 74 Beetle Restoration | 2180cc Engine
"You may not get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get"
Member #1009
#BlueSquare
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stan_tichomirov Samba Member

Joined: May 24, 2005 Posts: 1719 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
I don't know, I love running a stinger, but it's just too loud to run. I feel more power up top and hit the rev limiter easier, I don't really feel the loss at lower revs, at least not enough to miss. Can still putt around and climb hills. I'd run it more often but it's just too loud, and can be a hazard (I park on the street often).
Stan _________________ Aircooled.net
Jansen Enterprise
My 1835cc build
My budget 2276 build |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
modok Samba Member

Joined: October 30, 2009 Posts: 27754 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:17 pm Post subject: Re: CB merged header VS AA sidewinder |
|
|
I'm leaning towards I have no clue.
one way to guess at it: 35.5mm exhaust valve try sidewinder, 37.5mm then stay with classic design header (short tubes)
In either case, the mufflers can be improved. IMO, if you can live with the dragging, then the hideaway is a great layout, but, one size muffler does not fit all, so to get best performance you may need to go muffler hunting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|